Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 11/25/1986115 • 1 PETALUMA PLANNING COMMISSION November 25, 1986 REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, 7 :30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL PETALUMA, CALIF. The Planning Commission encourages applicants or their representative to be available at the meeting to answer questions so that no agenda item need be deferred to a later date due to a lack of pertinent information. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG , PnT.T. CAT.T. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Davis, Hilligoss, Parkerson, Read, Tarr COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Head, Libarle STAFF' :, Warren Salmons, Planning Director Pamela Tuft, Principal Planner Kurt Yeiter, Associate Planner APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of November 11, 1986 were approved as amended on pages 2, 5 and 21. CORRESPONDENCE Redwood Business Park Petaluma High School Boosters regarding Cameo Coffee and U.P. request. DIRECTOR'S REPORT Corona /Ely Specific Plan informal meeting with property owners, progress to date. Zoning Ordinance and RDCS revisions. Rainier overcrossing. COMMISSIONER'S REPORT None. 1 116 I. YOUNG AMERICA HOMES, PARK PLACE IV, UNIT 3: BETWEEN ELY BLVD. AND MARIA DRIVE, AP NO's 136 - 111 -06, 07, 11 and 12 (File 6.813, 6.593, 6.422). 1. Consideration of one -year extension for tentative map on Unit 3 - consisting of 36 single - family homes. Motion made by Commissioner Read seconded by Commissioner Parkerson to approve extension of Tentative Map to December 3, 1987, with findings and conditions made by the City Council for this project on December 3, 1984 remaining in effect. AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 2 (Head, Libarle) CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING II. BOULEVARD BOWL, MCCOY ENTERPRISES, 1100 PETALUMA BLVD. SOUTH, AP NO. 008 - 471 -81 (File 1.458A) . 1. Consideration of EIQ. No action necessary as project was denied. 2. Consideration of Use Permit to allow increase in number of video games (Continued from November 11, 1986) . The public hearing was opened. Speakers: Mr. Glasspoole, attorney representing the applicant, stated that Chief DeWitt rescinded his comments contained in the staff report; asked for continuance to allow Chief DeWitt's attendance; explained intent of original use permit expansion. Some of the machines will be. in areas available to adults only while other machines would be available to all ages. Ms. Collard (co -owner of Boulevard. Bowl) - explained locations of machines. Mrs. Majors, 18 Cochran Way - noise (nighttime parking lot) is a major problem. The public hearing was closed. General discussion ensued. Motion made by Commissioner Davis seconded by Commissioner Read to deny the use permit " without prejudice and further stipulate that no use permit for an expanded arcade be approved until after the one -year review by the Commission. AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 2 (Head, Libarle) 9 117 PUBLIC` HEARINGS III. ARCTURUS MARINE ASSOC., 1360 INDUSTRIAL AVENUE, AP NO's 150- 020 -09 (File 1.515). 1. Consideration of EIQ. 2. Consideration of Use Permit to allow light machining shop. The public hearing was opened. Speakers: None 0 T The public hearing was closed. ® Motion made by Commissioner Parkerson seconded by Commissioner Hilligoss ® to direct staff to prepare a Mitigated Declaration based on the following finding's.: AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 2 (Head, Libarle) a. Dupe to the developed nature of the existing site, the project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or' restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or. prehistory. b. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals. C. Because the proposal does not include additional phased development, th'e project as conditionally approved does not have impacts which are individually limited., but cumulatively considerable. d. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. e. The project site mitigates possible adverse noise effects by its great distance from any noise sensitive receptors such as housing; tenant improvements will include noise control as required. Motion made by Commissioner Parkerson seconded by Commissioner Davis to grant the use permit for a prototype machine shop and test facility for hydraulically- driven bow thrusters at 1360 Industrial Avenue based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions of approval: AYES: .5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 2 (Head, Libarle) v 3 118 Findings 1. The proposed use, subject to the conditions of approval, conforms to the intent and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan / EDP. 2. This project will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community due to the mitigation measures incorporated in the conditions of approval. Project Specific Conditions 1. The following requirements of the Fire Marshal shall be met: 1. Provide fire extinguishers 2A rated ABC dry chemical type in office and in warehouse. 2. No extension cords. All equipment and appliances to be direct plug in. 3. Provide metal or flame retardant plastic waste cans. 4. Permit required from Fire Marshal's Office for sprinkler system alteration prior to work being started. Two sets of plans are required. 5. Post address at or near main entry door - minimum two inch letters 6. Keep storage eighteen (18) inches under sprinkler heads in warehouse area. 2. Tenant improvements including sound control shall conform to Uniform Building Code and shall result in sound reduction so as to meet Zoning Ordinance Performance Standards. Applicable Standard Conditions 3. This use permit may be recalled to the Planning Commission for review at any time due to complaints regarding traffic congestion, noise generation or other operating characteristics. At such time the Commission may repeal the use permit or add modified conditions of approval. 4. * No signs may be erected on 'the site without issuance of a sign permit. Signs must conform to Rancho Arroyo Business Park Sign Program. 5. There shall be no open storage of equipment, materials, trash, litter or packaging. 6. All existing and future outdoor mechanical equipment of Arcturus Marine shall be fully visually screened subject to approval of the Community Development and Planning Department. E . IM 7. Exterior modifications to the building are subject to SPARC review pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 26 -401 et al. IV. CAMEO COFFEE, 1120 INDUSTRIAL AVENUE, AP NO's 150 - 020 -09 (File 1.513). 1. Consideration of EIQ. Go 2. Consideration for Use Permit to permit coffee roasting and packaging I' facility . O ® The public hearing was opened. c Correspondence from Petaluma High School Bingo Boosters in support of request was introduced. Speakers: Joan Gest, 900 Lohrman Lane, supporting request, read letter from Cinnabar Arts Corporation. Michael Gest, applicant - Petaluma oriented company, five high school students plus five full time employees. Read letter from John E. Ferrick, Job Corp, Petaluma High School, regarding training of high school students. Discussed scrubbing and odor minimization process. Jane Doherty, read letter from Barry Nichol, owner of Petaluma Arbor Restaurant in support of use permit. Gary Snyderhound, Arrovo Partners, owners of the development, - complimented staff report on completeness, their development provides incubator units, area to provide underground filter system. The public hearing was closed. General discussion ensued. Concensus to continue the consideration until December 9, 1986 to allow time for submission of additional information by applicant and formulation of recommended conditions of approval. 5 120- V. G &W MANAGEMENT, INC., REDWOOD BUSINESS PARK II, NORTHWEST CORNER OF 101 HIGHWAY AND REDWOOD HIGHWAY, AP NO's 047 - 211 -12, 20 and 22 and 007 - 421 -07 and 08, (Files 3.354, 6.793, 8.102, 11.857). 1. Consideration of Draft EIR. 2. Consideration for prezone, rezone, annexation and subdivision of 74.4 acres, including approximately 35.4 acres which are north of Willow Creek Park and outside incorporated City limits. The public hearing was opened. Speakers: Rich Lemos, 806 Denman - drainage major problem, site is a floodway, wants denial of whole project. Bob Carpenter, 518 Orchard Lane, Penngrove - argued against continuance; read letter of August 22, 1986 to City staff. Harriett Boysen, Penngrove Water Advisory Committee - detention pond capabilities. George Miles, Penngrove Water Advisory Committee - impact of tidal action on draining capability. Gary Oates, ESA, authors of the EIR - answered question regarding Caltrans' comments on EIR. General discussion ensued. The public hearing was not closed. Concensus of Commission to continue consideration and action on EIR, zoning and tentative map for this project as requested by applicant until January 13, 1987. VI. DUFFEL FINANCIAL COMPANY, MUIRWOOD GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB, ELY AND FRATES ROAD, AP NO's 17- 050 -07 and 08 (File 3.363). 1. Consideration of rezoning 105 acres to PCD to accommodate a portion of a proposed 18 hole golf course, clubhouse and up to 558 residential units. The public hearing was opened. Speakers: Joe Duffel, developer - explained that this will be a Robert Trent Jones golf course, investment for golf course demands a minimum number of units. Cost of improvements suggested by staff will deem project economically infeasible. 121 Mike Nistler, 1112 East Sunnyslope Road, representing Petaluma Golf and Country Club. Eve Braum, 308 Cherry Court, supports need for new golf course. Commission concensus to continue item until December 9, 1986 to allow submission of written comments by applicant. 91 ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 10:40 p.m. O ATTEST: Warren Salmons, Community Development and Planning Director 1 I 7