HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 12/09/1986122
PETALUMA PLANNING COMMISSION December 9, 1986
REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, 7 :30 p.m.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL PETALUMA, CALIF.
The Planning Commission encourages applicants or their representative to be
available at the meeting to answer questions so that no agenda _item need be
deferred to a later date due to a lack of pertinent information.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
W)T.T. (.AT.T.
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Davis, Head, Libarle, Parkerson, Read, Tarr
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Hilligoss
STAFF: Warren Salmons, Planning Director
Pamela Tuft, Principal Planner
Kurt Yeiter, Associate Planner
APPROVAL OF MINUTES The minutes of November 12, .1986 will be
brought back at the next meeting with page order corrected.
CORRESPONDENCE Letter regarding Muirwood distributed.
DIRECTOR'S REPORT Report of City Council recent discussions
regarding fill and floor elevations in flood plain.
COMMISSIONER_ 'S REPORT Commissioner Libarle would like to see more
direction from City Council regarding controversial projects. Commissioner
Read is in favor of joint study sessions with City Council.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
I. CAMEO COFFEE, 1120 INDUSTRIAL AVENUE, AP NO. 150 - 020 -09 (File
No. 1.513)
1
1. Continued consideration of EIQ.
2. Continued consideration of Use Permit to permit coffee roasting
and packaging facility.
(Public hearing previously closed at November 25 meeting, however the
applicant answered questions) .
1
A motion was made by Commissioner Parkerson and seconded by
Commissioner Davis to direct staff to prepare a mitigated negative
declaration per the following findings:
AYES:.'4 NOES: 1 (Read) ABSENT: 1 (Hilligoss) ABSTAIN: 1 (Head)
Findings.
a. Due to the developed nature of the existing site, the project does not
have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a
co fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number
0 or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history
® on prehistory.
b. The project, as conditionally approved to limit the duration of the use
p ermit does not have the potential to achieve short -term, to the
disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals.
C. Because the proposal does not include additional phased development,
the project as conditionally approved does not have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.
d. The project, as conditionally approved to limit the duration of the use
permit and eliminate significant odors extensive filtering
techniques, and because of the great distance between the building
and nearby residences, does not have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or
indirectly.
A motion was made by Commissioner Parkerson and seconded by
Commissioner Libarle to grant the use permit subject to the findings and
conditions listed in the staff report as amended.
AYES: 4 NOES: 1 (Read) ABSENT: 1 (Hilligoss) ABSTAIN: 1 (Head)
Findings
1. The proposed use, subject to the conditions of approval, conforms to
the intent or requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, the General Plan
and the EDP.
2. This project will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the
public welfare of the community due to the mitigation measures
incorporated in the conditions of approval, including; limited duration
of initial use permit and extensive filtering of effluent.
Conditions
1. This use permit shall be valid for six months commencing at reviewed
bvtY - 1 3 - lanniTrg- Ebmmissirrr -sip -months- -af ter initiation (occupancy)
of the business in Petaluma. This use permit may also be recalled at
123
2
124
any time by the Commission for review upon receipt of complaints
regarding this operation or upon observation of any objectionable
attributes or effluents outside the enclosed space occupied by this
business. Extension or modification of this use permit may be
considered by the Commission after six months at no cost to the
applicant
2. This use is subject to all performance standards and operating
regulations contained in the Petaluma Zoning Ordinance and Municipal
Code.
3. This business shall obtain necessary permits from Bay Area Air Quality
Management District prior to initiation of operations.
4. Prior to issuance of building permits., Envirotech (operators of the
City sewage treatment facility) shall review all wastewater discharge
plans. Envirotech's recommendations shall be incorporated into project
design by the applicant.
5. All exterior mechanical equipment, -including underground filters, and
any other external modifications to the building or grounds are subject
to architectural review pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article .26. All
exterior equipment shall be fully screened in a manner compatible with
the building's architecture.
6. This use permit is valid only for the operation including the following
critical equipment: smoke hood that
recirculates to filter, soapy water smoke scrubber, chamber that
separates chaff in an incombustible manner, and double external
underground filters. All these elements must be in. place prior to
initiation of operation.
7. On -site retail sales shall not exceed ten percent (10 %) of gross
business receipts. There shall be no advertising of this site for retail
or "drop -in' sales.
8. Signs are subject to staff review.
II. DUFFEL FINANCIAL COMPANY, MUIRWOOD GOLF AND COUNTRY
CLUB, ELY AND FRATES ROAD, AP No's 17- 050 -07 and 08 (File
3.363).
1. Continued consideration of rezoning 105 acres to PCD to accommodate a
portion of a proposed 18 hole golf course, clubhouse and up to 527
residential units.
The public hearing was opened.
SPEAKERS: Mr. Duffel - applicant; Duffel Corporation is proposing a
Robert Trent Jones golf course. Duffel Corporation agreed
with staff's recommended conditions.
Joe Milner - 813 Gilardi Drive - Representative of Petaluma Golf.
3
125
and Country Club, discussed recreational opportunities of
golf course.
A motion was made by Commissioner Read and seconded by Commissioner
Parkerson to recommend rezoning AP No's 17- 050 -07 and 08 to PCD
incorporating the conditions listed in the staff report dated 12/9/86 as
amended. It was also voted to direct staff to submit a letter City Council
encouraging semi - private use of the golf course.
AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Hilligoss) ABSTAIN: 1 (Head)
00 PCD FINDINGS
0 1. That the Muirwood Golf and Country Club project, as conditionally
approved, is in substantial harmony with the General Plan of the City
® of Petaluma, and can be coordinated with existing and planned
development of the surrounding areas.
2. That the interior streets., as conditionally approved and existing
streets to be improved concurrently with the project, are generally
suitable and adequate to serve the proposed uses and the anticipated
traffic which will be generated thereby.
3. That information submitted with the application establishes that:
a. Development of the PCD will be initiated within a reasonable time
by submittal of a Technical Rating Review application and
subsequently a Planned Unit Development application.
b.' Said PCD will constitute a residential development of sustained
desirability and stability; that it will be in harmony with the
character of the surrounding area.
4. That development of the 18 -hole golf course will be appropriate in
area, location and overall planning to the purpose intended; and that
such development will be in harmony with the character of the
surrounding areas.
5. That municipal water delivery and storage improvements serving this
project are intended to serve this site and existing incorporated areas
of southeast Petaluma only and that any future extensions from these
improvements to serve other areas would be an infringement of the
policies of the City with respect to urbanization in southeast Petaluma.
CONDITIONS
1. Total residential portion of the project shall not exceed 527 units.
Unit mix shall be determined upon PUD rezoning for residential portion
of the project.
2. Application to the County for a Conditional Use Permit for golf course
shall be undertaken prior to submission of specific residential
development plans for Technical Rating.
4
126
3. All improvements to the existing municipal water ser -, rice system deemed
necessary by the City Engineer to provide adequate domestic and fire
flow service shall be submitted in detail with residential PUD
application and completed concurrently with the required public
improvements prior to the issuance of development permits for
residential units. The Petroleum Avenue aqueduct connection as
described in Brown and Caldwell's Water Capacity Study Master Plan
may be a City - funded project repaid by area -wide Water Connection
Fees which would include this uroiect.
4. Prior to commencement of improvements, the proposed golf course shall
be subject to review through the PUD rezoning process. Golf course
improvements shall have commenced prior to the issuance of any
development permits for the residential portion of the project site.
5. Prior to the issuance of any development permits for the residential
portion of the proposed project, the residential portion shall be subject
to review through the PUD rezoning process.
6. The project improvement plans shall accommodate the Sonoma County
',later Agency Master Drainage Plan east -side bypass or developer shall
provide an alternative eastside bypass route outside the project area
acceptable to the City and .Sonoma County Water Agency _ and pay
in -lieu fees equivalent_ to the cost of the bypass as presently proposed
through this project Improvement of the bypass if across the project
site shall be completed concurrently with the golf course construction
to the satisfaction of City Engineer and Sonoma County Water Agency.
7. Open space /scenic easements shall be created over the entire golf
course development area, subject to approval of appropriate City staff.
8. Frates Road shall be improved along the project frontage, subject to
approval of appropriate agencies., concurrently with public
improvements accompanying any residential development on the project
site in order to accommodate a possible State Highway designation.
Improvements shall include, but not b_ e limited to left turn stacking
lanes and right turn acceleration and deceleration lanes as approved
by the City Engineer, County Engineer, and Calti &ns_ per these
agencies' jurisdications at time of approval and concurrently with
improvements accompanying any residential development on the project
site.
9. Casa Grande shall be improved concurrently with public improvements
accompanying any residential development on the project site as
follows 1) from the east end of the existing Casa del Oro subdivision
to the -Fity- -limits Ely Boulevard subject to approval through the PUD
review process improvement shall . include provision of landscape median
and one east bound. lane. 2) Median landscaping island shall be
provided from Ely Boulevard to a point equivalent
to
the
extension of
Garfield Drive to Casa
Grande Road, subject to approval
through the
PUD review process. Full frontage improvements east,
and
west bound
shall be provided for approximately
300 feet east
from
Ely
Boulevard,
3 transitioning to 40
foot curb -to -curb section
to
City
limits with
developer constructing
the southerly half of
the
street section
consisting
of
5
127
C
1'1.
i
C
necessary pavement, curb and gutter to City limits line on Casa
Grande Road.
10. Ely Boulevard shall be improved concurrently with public improvements
accompanying any residential development on the project site to
provide loop street access to units which front toward Ely Boulevard.
A substantial landscaped median strip an-d -a-pedestri=r/�- rants;
separating Ely Blvd. from the interior loop streets shall be provided
subject to approval through the PUD review process sha -1l - -+
irreorporated-
11. Interior road design shall provide landscaped medians at entry points
and intersections, landscaped cul -de -sac islands, street tree planting
strips adjacent to curb line plus appropriate pedestrian /bike pathways
subject to approval through the PUD review process.
12. Developer shall participate in a fair -share contribution for offsite
intersection signalization, in accordance with mitigation measures set
forth in the Final EIR and the results of application of the City's
traffic model, or as deemed necessary by the City Engineer.
13. No issuance of residential development permits will be permitted until
such time as the Lakeville Highway Assessment District formation is
completed anrP-- cerrstrtzetion-- was -- been--- cammerrced; subject to
determination by the City Engineer. ProTcct= shall- �e-�rrclnrtie�rr -said
£istrict. Project shall contribute a fair share contribution for
Lakeville Highway Assessment Distric
on traffic contribution formula impose
Permit, formula subject to approval o:
14. As: an element of the PUD submission
shall be prepared and submitted for
to design, materials, etc.
as 'Traffic Mitigation r ees bas
at time of issuance of Buildi
package, architectural guidelines
review and approval with respect
15. As! an element of the PUD submission package, development standards
shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval that address
building height .limitations, parking requirements, structural setbacks,
future additions, garage conversions, etc.
16. As an element of the PUD submission package, development standards
shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval that provide
design standards for entry gateways, peripheral and internal street
frontages, landscaping for individual residences and multi- family
complexes, screening, rear yards of residences facing fairways and
enhanced treatment for City gateway area (Frates Road) .
17. Pedestrian /bike access and pathways shall be provided along the
perimeter of the development and through the gulf - cotxrse - groznrds
residential portion. of the project site as deemed appropriate through
the PUD review process.
18. The project shall comply with all applicable flood mitigation
requirements adopted by the City Council as contained in Zoning
Ordinance • Article 16 and Municipal Code, Chapter 17.30 "Storm
6
um
Drainage Impact Fee". All improvements and grading shall comply with
the Sonoma County Water Agency's Design Criteria.
19. Developer shall explore the possibility of utilizing wastewater irrigation
application for the golf course areas subject to review and approval of
City Engineer and appropriate agencies.
20. Golf course clubhouse uses shall be subject to review through the PUD
rezoning process.
21. Adobe Creek shall be maintained in a natural state. Enhancement of
natural vegetation and channel improvements shall be subject to review
through the PUD rezoning review process.
22. Appropriate mechanisms shall be developed for maintenance of all
landscaping within the public rights -of -way, common private areas and
golf course and shall be subject to review and approval through the
PUD rezoning review process.
23. The project shall be subject to review and approval of the Sonoma
County Airport Land Use Commission and shall comply with all
regulations pertaining to the airport land use policy.
24. The project developer shall be required to pay low and moderate
income housing in -lieu fees of an amount to be determined according to
the schedule established by City Council Resolution No. 84 -199
N.C.S. , or make alternative arrangements to meet the low and
moderate income housing provision requirements of the Housing Element
subject to approval of the City and prior to approval of the Final Map.
25. The developer shall be required to pay school facilities impact fees to
the Old 'Adobe School District subject to Section 17.28 of the Petaluma
Municipal Code and approved by the City Council.
26. Any signs erected to advertise the project shall meet the requirements
of the City sign ordinance and obtain a sign permit from the City
prior to installation.
27. The project shall respond and comply with all concerns and conditions
.of the City Engineer as set forth in the attached letter.
PLANNING MATTER
III. AUTORAMA, STONY POINT ROAD AND PETALUMA BOULEVARD
NORTH, AP NO. 007 - 422 -28.
1. Appeal of administrative decision denying an automobile lot in a
floodway.
SPEAKERS: Doug Clarke - applicant - answered questions from staff and
Commission - discussed project.
Norm Weiss - 6755 Pet. Hill Rd.- owner of project property -
spoke in favor of project.
7
129
Mrs. Weiss - 6755 Pet. Hill Rd. - owner of project property
- spoke in favor of project, gave history of property.
A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner
Libarle Ito deny the appeal.
AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Hilligoss)
PUBLIC' HEARINGS:
IV. SONOMA COUNTY TRANSIT, ROUTE CHANGE TO EAST "D" STREET
00 EXTENSION (File 9.197) .
Iq 1. Consideration of EIQ.
O 2. Consideration of certificate of convenience to change bus route and
® add two bus stops.
The public hearing was opened.
SPEAKERS: None.
The public hearing was closed.
A motion was made by Commissioner Davis and seconded by Commissioner
Read to direct staff to prepare and post a mitigated negative declaration
based on the findings in the staff report.
AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Hilligoss)
A motion was made by Commissioner Read and seconded by Commissioner
Parkerson to recommend to the City Council that the amendment to the
Sonoma, County Transit bus certificate be approved as shown on the
alternate route exhibit based on the following findings and conditions:
Findings
1. The proposed route change will conform to the intent of the applicable
goals and policies of the General Plan /EDP.
2. The proposed route change will not constitute a nuisance or be
detrimental to the public welfare of the community.
Condition
1. Existing Route 44 utilizing Petaluma Blvd. to Washington Street shall
be abandoned.
V. PARMATECH CORPORATION, 2221 PINEVIEW WAY, AP NO. 005 - 090 -45
( File 1.518) .
1. Consideration of EIQ.
2. Consideration of use permit for facility producing precision parts.
8
130
The public hearing was opened.
SPEAKERS: None.
The public hearing was closed.
A motion was. made by Commissioner Libarle
Parkerson to direct staff to
on the and seconded by Commissioner
following findings:
Prepare a mitigated negative declaration based
g
AYES: 6 NOES:
0 ABSENT 1 (Hilligoss)
Fin —cgs
a • Due to the developed nature
have the potential of the existing site the Project does not environment,
substantial) to degrade the
y reduce the habitat of a fish quality of the.
or wildlife population to drop or wildlife s
eliminate a plant or P below self- sustainin Pecies, cause fish
the animal community, g levels, threaten to of important examples of major Y' reduce the number or restrict
or endangered plant or an
9
c.
M
e.
period of California history or eliminate
y or prehistory.
The project as
achieve conditionally approved does
short term to the disadvantage not have the
goals, g of long otential to
g term environmental
Because the project does
beyond expansion of d oes ech include additional
percent of the into the r Phase development
building the emain all approximately forty
have impacts which P as conditional)
considerable, are individually limited a pp r oved does not
but cumulatively
The project as
effects conditionally approved does
which will cause substantial adverse
not have environmental
directly or indirectly because the effects
either on human beings
impacts anticipated environmental
from the Parmatech
review, approval and technology are
Air supervision b l minor and subject to
Quality Management District and Env rot ch. rJarshal
the Bay Area
The project site mitigates possible adverse
noise effects b
distance from any noise sensitive receptors
im provements will include noise control t required.
P such as housing.
Am t'
its great
Tenant
o on was made b
Davis to grant the Y Commissioner Head and
conditions: use permit subject to theeconded by Commissioner
following findings and
AYES: 6 NOES: p
ABSENT: 1 (HilIigoss)
Findings
1 • The proposed use
the intent and , subject to the conditions of a
Plan/EDP. requirements of the zonin approval conforms to
g ordinance and the General
I..
W
131
2. This project will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the
public welfare of the community due to the mitigation measures
incorporated in the conditions of approval.
Conditions
1. The requirements of the Fire Marshal shall be met.
2. Tenant improvements shall include sound control to Uniform Building
Code and shall result in sound reduction so as to meet zoning
co ordinance performance standards.
O , 3. Parmatech Technologies shall be subject to regular review and approval
® by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District with particular
attention to possible air pollution from the sintering process. Any
necessary steps shall be taken to reduce air pollution from the process
to acceptable levels.
4. Any additional mechanical equipment required -to be added to the
building for the Parmatech process including stacks shall be
architecturally screened subject to the approval of the Community
Development and Planning Department.
5. This use permit may be ' recalled to the Planning. Commission for review
at any time due to complaints regarding traffic congestion, parking
adequacy, noise generation or other operating characteristics. At
such time the Commission may repeal the use permit or add modified
conditions of approval.
6. Nol signs may be erected on the site without issuance of a sign permit.
7. There shall be no open storage of equipment, materials, trash, litter
or packaging.
8. Exterior modifications to the building are subject to SPARC review
pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 26 -401 et al.
VI. STEAM SPECIALTIES COMPANY, INCORPORATED, 3880 CYPRESS
DRIVE, AP NO. 005- 090 -62 (File 1.516) .
1. Consideration of EIQ.
2. Consideration of use permit for facility specializing in design,
fabrication and machining of special purpose industrial valves.
The public hearing was opened.
SPEAKERS: Bob Gianini - DES, 399 Bradford Street, Redwood City -
Project designer, answered questions and described project.
Bill Brockett - 150 W. Edith, Los Altos - Exec. VP of Steam
Specialties; expressed concerns regarding landscape
requirements.
George Mellinger - President of Steam Specialties - described
10
132
project, answered questions, expressed concerns regarding
landscaping requirements.
The public hearing was closed.
A motion was r_-made by Commissioner Davis and seconded by Commissioner
Parkerson to direct staff to prepare a mitigated negative declaration based
on the following findings:
AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Hilligoss)
Finding 9
a. The project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major
periods of California history or prehistory.
b. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to
achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental
goals.
C. Because the proposal does not include additional phased development,
the project as conditionally approved does not have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively considerable.
d. The project, as conditionally approved, does not have environmental
effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings
either directly or indirectly.
e. The project site mitigates possible adverse noise effects by its great
distance from any noise sensitive receptors such as housing; building
design will include noise control as required.
A motion was made by Commissioner Parkerson and seconded by
Commissioner Read to grant the use permit based on the findings and
subject to the conditions as follows:
AYES: 4 NOES: 2 (Head, Libarle ABSENT: 1 (Hilligoss)
because of Condition #3)
Findings
1. The proposed use, subject to the conditions of approval, conforms to
the intent and requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the General
Plan/EDP.
2. This project will not constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the
public welfare of the community due to the mitigation measures
incorporated in the conditions of approval.
11
133
6. Any structures in the flood plain section of the site shall be
constructed so that the floor height is at least 12" above the 100 -year
flood height.
7. This use permit may be recalled to the Planning Commission for review
at any time due to complaints regarding traffic congestion, noise
generation or other operating characteristics. At such time the
Commission may repeal the use permit or add modified conditions of
approval.
8. No signs may be erected on the site without issuance of a sign permit.
9. There shall be no open storage of equipment, materials, trash, litter,
pallets, packaging or containers.
10. All future outdoor mechanical equipment of Steam Specialties shall be
fully visually screened subject to approval of the Community
Development and Planning Department.
11. This property shall participate in any future benefit assessment
district for Lakeville Highway corridor improvements.
12. All landscaping must conform to the Master Plan for Oakmead Northbay
Industrial Park, subject to SPARC review and approval.
13. The project shall be subject to Storm Drainage Fees as required by
Municipal Code.
VII. RIVER CAFE, 222 WELLER STREET, AP NO. 007 - 142 -12 (File 13.4) .
1. Consideration of rezoning to overlay Historic designation.
12
Conditions
1.
Building design including sound control shall conform to Uniform
Building Code and shall result in sound reduction so as to meet Zoning
Ordinance Performance Standards.
2.
Plans shall reflect the existence on the property of trees, storm
drainage ditch, easements, and FPC zone boundary.
3.
The parking along the west property line shall be relocated to the east
an=mate- distance a minimum of 10' to assure that the trees along
co
this line will remain, subject to SPARC review and approval.
Adequate space for a screen of trees shall be provided along the south
®
property line.
®
4.
Should the use change, adequacy of one loading berth shall be
co
reconsidered.
5.
This project is subject to SPARC review with special emphasis on the
south elevation, pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 26 -401 et al.
6. Any structures in the flood plain section of the site shall be
constructed so that the floor height is at least 12" above the 100 -year
flood height.
7. This use permit may be recalled to the Planning Commission for review
at any time due to complaints regarding traffic congestion, noise
generation or other operating characteristics. At such time the
Commission may repeal the use permit or add modified conditions of
approval.
8. No signs may be erected on the site without issuance of a sign permit.
9. There shall be no open storage of equipment, materials, trash, litter,
pallets, packaging or containers.
10. All future outdoor mechanical equipment of Steam Specialties shall be
fully visually screened subject to approval of the Community
Development and Planning Department.
11. This property shall participate in any future benefit assessment
district for Lakeville Highway corridor improvements.
12. All landscaping must conform to the Master Plan for Oakmead Northbay
Industrial Park, subject to SPARC review and approval.
13. The project shall be subject to Storm Drainage Fees as required by
Municipal Code.
VII. RIVER CAFE, 222 WELLER STREET, AP NO. 007 - 142 -12 (File 13.4) .
1. Consideration of rezoning to overlay Historic designation.
12
134
The public hearing was opened.
SPEAKERS: None.
The public hearing was closed.
A motion was made by Commissioner Read and seconded by Commissioner
Libarle to recommend to- the City Council that the River Cafe building be
designated as a local historic landmark based on the following findings:
AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Hilligoss)
Findings
1. That the proposed designation is in general conformity with the
Petaluma General Plan and any applicable Environmental Design Plan.
2. That the public necessity, convenience and general welfare require or
clearly permit the adoption of the proposed designation.
VIII. REVIEW OF 1987 COMMISSION MEETING 'SCHEDULE.
The following meeting schedule was adopted by the Planning Commission:
PLANNING COMMISSION
1987 MEETING SCHEDULE
January 13
27
February 10
24
March 10
24
April 14
28
t.lay 12
26
June 9
23
July 14
28
August 11
25
13
1-35
September
9 (Wednesday)
22
October
13
27
November
10
24
December
8
I q IX. APPOINTMENT OF SPARC REPRESENTATIVE (to complete Mayor -Elect
® Hilligoss' appointment, effective January 8, 1987) .
Commissioner Read was unanimously appointed to serve as the SPARC
representative.
ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at 11 :20 PM.
1
LE I
14