Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 04/14/1987ME Minutes are not final until approved by the Planning Commission. PETALUMA PLANNING COMMISSION April 14, 1987 REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, 7 :30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL PETALUMA, CALIF. The Planning Commission encourages applicants or their representative to be available at the meeting to answer questions so that no agenda item need be deferred to a later date due to a lack of pertinent information. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Bennett, Davis, Head, Libarle, Parkerson, Read, Tarr COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: None. STAFF: Warren Salmons, Planning Director Pamela Tuft, Principal Planner Kurt Yeiter, Associate Planner APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of March 24, 1987 were approved with a change on page 12. PUBLIC. COMMENT (15 minutes maximum). The Planning Commission will hear public comments only on matters over which they have jurisdiction. There will be no Commission discussion. The Chairman will allot no more than five minutes to any individual. If more than three persons wish to speak, their time will be allotted so that the total amount of time allocated to this agenda item will be 15 minutes. Sissy Vogensen - 1755 Petaluma Blvd. N. - Questions regarding fences near Sycamore Heights project - was advised to discuss issue later on agenda during Sycamore Heights discussion. CORRESPONDENCE None. DIRECTOR'S REPORT 1. Conflict of Interest Forms. 2. Ely/Corona Specific Plan. 3. North Petaluma Redevelopment Area. 4. Legislative vs. quasi- judicial roles memo from City .Attorney. 5. Planning Commissioner's Handbook available through Planning Department. 11 COMMISSIONER's REPORT: Report from Councilman Davis regarding low moderate income housing proposal. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS: I. REDWOOD PLAZA, 5310 OLD REDWOOD HIGHWAY, AP No. 137- 010 -79 ,(File 1.514) . 1. Continued consideration of EIQ. 2. Continued consideration of conditional use permit for 13,000 sq.ft. 0 shopping center and 2,240 sq. ft. fast food restaurant with drive -thru lane. ® Continued from March 24, 1987. The public hearing was continued: SPEAKERS: Keith,. Jones - Pet Tire and .Brake - Requests delay for thorough traffic study; parking problems at center exist now; flooding problems; did not believe project should be separated from balance of shopping center; opposed to fast food restaurant at this site; wants different type of development. Dino 1VArgenzio - Keegan and Coppin Company - Shopping center buildings are separate from rest of center; development would provide more parking; fast .food restaurant would not generate much traffic, no problem with ingress and egress from site. Pat Patteson - InterCity Properties (shopping center owner) - traffic problems near Petaluma Tire and Brake are bad. John 'Tarlos - Project Designer - Aware of parking problems; commuter parking at center is problem; pad will probably be for Taco Bell fast food restaurant but tenancy is not certain. Dennis Patterso - P etaluma Tire and Brake - McDowell and Redwood Hwy. traffic is congested now, center would be too segregated. Chuck Hildebrand - 10 Oak Lane - Parking problems, flooding problems will not be worsened by this project; traffic problems should be improved by project planned across Old Redwood Highway. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Parkerson and seconded by Commissioner Davis to continue this item to the Planning Commission meeting of May 12 for redesign of the project by the applicant with the fast food pad moved toward the center of the overall shopping center site. Commissioner Bennett - Aye Commissioner Davis - Aye 201 .r, 2 202 Commissioner Head - No (Believes any redesign to be a SPARC function) Commissioner Libarle - Abstain (absent from 24 March meeting) Commissioner Parkerson - Aye Commissioner Read - Aye Commissioner Tarr - Aye II. LARRY A. JONAS, AARON ACRES ANNEXATION 1003 and 1030 WESTERN AVENUE, AP NO's 019 - 110 -34 and 36 (File No. 3.366). 1. Continued consideration of EIQ . 2. ' Continued consideration of prezoning to R -1 6-,500 (AP No. 019 - 110 -36) R -1 10,000 and R -1 20,000 (AP No. 019- 110 -34) . Continued from March 10, 1987. This item was removed from the agenda to an unspecified later meeting renotice of public hearing will be undertaken when rescheduled. . III. LAKEVILLE STREET, CITY OF PETALUMA, 11 ENGLISH STREET, AP NO.'s 007- 171 -18 AND PORTION OF ADJACENT PARCEL, (File 3.368) . 1. Continued consideration of EIQ . 2. Continued consideration of rezoning from M -L, FP -C (Light Industrial, Floodplain Combining) to C -H, FP -C (Highway Commercial, Floodplain Combining) . Continued from March 24, 1987. The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: None. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Read to recommend a finding for a Negative Declaration based on the following findings: Commissioner Bennett - Aye Commissioner Davis - Aye Commissioner Head - Aye Commissioner Libarle - Aye Commissioner Parkerson - Aye Commissioner Read - Aye Commissioner Tarr - Aye Findings 1. The proposed rezoning does not have the potential to cause any adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. 3 2. The proposed rezoning does not have the potential to achieve short -term, to the disadvantage of long -term, environmental goals. 3. The project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment. 4. An EIR was prepared and adopted for the - General Plan /EDP land use designations. A motion was made by Commissioner Read and seconded by Commissioner Libarl`e to recommend to the Council approval of the rezonings based on the 00 following findings: qq Commissioner Bennett - Aye 0 Commissioner Davis - Aye ® Commissioner Head - Aye Commissioner Libarle - Aye Commissioner Parkerson - Aye Commissioner Read - Aye Commissioner Tarr - Aye Findings 1. That the proposed rezoning will make the zoning consistent with the `General Plan. 2. That local policy calls for consistency between zoning and General Plan land use designations. 3. That public necessity, convenience, and general welfare permit the ,adoption of the proposed amendment. PUBLIC HEARINGS IV. ADAMS LANE, AP NO. 019- 193 -38 through 44 (File 3.369). 1. Consideration of EIQ. 2. Consideration of prezoning to R -1, 10,000 for seven parcels. The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: None. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Parkerson to recommend to the City Council that a Negative Declaration be approved based on the following findings: Commissioner Bennett Aye Commissioner Davis - Aye Commissioner Head - Aye Commissioner Libarle - Aye a -1:, 4 2 ®4 Commissioner Parkerson - Aye Commissioner Read - Aye Commissioner Tarr - Aye Findings 1. The proposed project is consistent with the applicable provisions of the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The prezoning leading to a annexation is consistent with applicable State Law (Government Code 35012) and Sonoma County LAFCO. 3. An Initial Study has been prepared and has determined that no adverse impacts are anticipated by this prezoning and annexation. 4. The project will not trigger growth - inducing impacts as the parcels are fully developed. " A motion was made by Commissioner Read and seconded by Commissioner Bennett to recommend prezoning of the seven Adams Lane parcels to R -1, 10,000 square feet based on the following findings: Commissioner Bennett - Aye Commissioner, Davis - Aye Commissioner Head - Aye Commissioner Libarle - Aye Commissioner Parkerson - Aye Commissioner Read - Aye Commissioner Tarr - Aye Findings 1. The prezoning is in the best interest of the City of Petaluma. 2. The prezoning shall not constitute an expansion of the existing Sphere of Influence or water service boundary line. 3. That the proposed prezoning is in general conformity with the Petaluma General Plan. 4. That the public necessity, convenience and general welfare require or clearly permit the adoption of the proposed prezoning. V. SYCAMORE HEIGHTS, LEONARD JAY DEVELOPMENT, TERMINUS OF SYCAMORE LANE, AP No. 048- 141 -46 (Files 3.348A, 6.673A) . 1. Consideration of revisions to PUD and tentative map. The public hearing was opened. o 205 SPEAKERS: Sissy iVo ensen - 1755 Pe_ taluma Blvd. North L. Jay has not built fences around projects - fences were removed and have not been replaced; brush, weeds,; debris are thrown onto this property from neighboring projects - wants fences built. Leonard Jay - Project Developer - Described fencing - is willing to fence northern portion of Sycamore Heights. 00 Ed Love - Applicant Representative - Concerns regarding: trees, parking Iq on site, CC &R's, drainage, of - street parking, water pressure, emergency exit, parking, density, designation of executive housing. O ® The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Parker'son to approve a mitigated negative declaration based on the findings, conditions, and biotic studies approved by the Council for the previous proposal and per the following findings: Commissioner Bennett - Aye Commissioner Davis - Aye Commissioner Head - Aye Commissioner Libarle: - Aye Commissioner Parkerson - Aye k Commissioner Read Aye r Commissioner Tarr - Aye Findings for Negative Declaration 1. The project as conditionally approved does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of major periods of California history or pre- history. 2. Removal of significant vegetation shall only be done in conjunction with a systematic replanting as reviewed and approved by the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee and Planning Director. 3. The project as conditionally approved does not have the potential to achieve short term to the disadvantages of long term environmental goals. 4. The project as conditionally approved does not have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. 5. The project as conditionally approved does not have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. 0 � m A motion was made by Commissioner Davis and seconded by Commissioner Read to recommend approval of the revised Planned Unit District development plan for a single - family residential subdivision based on the following findings and conditions: Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner Bennett - Aye Davis - Aye Head - Aye Libarle - Aye Parkerson - Aye Read - Aye Tarr - Aye PUD Findings 1. The development plan results in a more desirable use of land and a better physical environment than would be possible under any single zoning district or combination of zoning district. 2. The development plan as proposed has a suitable relationship to Petaluma Boulevard North which is adequate to carry any additional traffic generated by this development. 3. The development plan presents a unified and organized arrangement of buildings and service facilities which are appropriate in relation to adjacent properties and adequate landscaping or screening, as conditionally approved, to insure compatibility. 4. The natural and scenic qualities of the site are protected . as conditionally approved with adequate public and private spaces designated on the plan. The development of the project site as conditionally approved will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in the best interests of the City and will be in keeping with the general intent and spirit of the Zoning Regulation of the City of Petaluma, the Petaluma General Plan and with applicable environmental design plans adopted by the City. 5. The project provides a unique residential living experience including single- family homes on private lots with adequate outdoor yard areas, storage areas, minimal impacts to City government, and retention of natural oak trees. PUD Conditions: 1. Building architecture, exterior materials, colors, landscaping, irrigation design and materials shall be subject to approval of SPARC. All trees slated to be kept by SPARC shall not be removed without prior written approval from the Director of Community Development and Planning. 2. Fire hydrant placement is subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshal. 1 7 3 . The development plan shall be modified to incorporate the following a. Garage conversions are prohibited. b. No recreational vehicles, boat trailers or disabled vehicles are permitted in private open parking areas or on- street pull -out parking areas. c. Home occupations are permitted subject to Petaluma Zoning Ordinance and provisions of the CC &R's. 0 d. All landscaping and irrigation systems in public right -of -way Iq areas shall be maintained by an assessment district and shall be O designed and maintained to standards acceptable to the City of ® Petaluma. e. The following structural setbacks for future additions (i.e. after initial construction) to the main structure or to accessory structures shall be adopted: 1. Front yard setbacks a minimum of 20 feet from sidewalk or curb. 2. Side and Rear yards shall conform to R -1 6500 zone requirements. 3. Detached accessory structures setbacks must conform to the City standards. �4. Non - conforming structure_ s : the average setback must meet the standards for conforming structures. 4. 'The Director of Community Development and Planning has authority to :,modify building setbacks and locations from those shown on the ;approved plan during sitting /construction activities in an effort to retain as many trees as possible. All such changes shall be reflected in a revised development plan, a copy and sepia original of which shall be provided to the City within thirty (30) days of such modification. 5. The CC &R's shall be amended to reflect Conditions 3 and 4, and the City Engineer's letter, attached. 6. Maintenance responsibilities of common areas, if any, fences, and the retained oak trees must be specified in the amended CC &R's to staff satisfaction. - 7. Side and rear yards shall be enclosed within a six foot solid wood fence constructed on property lines except on street side yards where zoning ordinance setbacks prevail. Access to rear yards shall be provided through a gate. 8. All conditions of approval for the tentative map shall be incorporated, where appropriate, into the PUD development plan. 207 J, L W 6 14 1 9. The tree retention plan., replacement plan, site plan, grading plan, and proposed landscape prepared by the City's independent landscape designer /arborist shall be followed insomuch as feasible as determined by the Planning Director. An . independent consultant shall attend on behalf of the City all activities involving tree removal, grading, structural siting and construction in an effort to retain and protect all remaining significant trees. 10. Ten (10) additional parking spaces shall be added along the street, subject to staff approval. 11. The CC &R's shall be revised to clearly state the restricted parking situation in this subdivision, and to state the penalty for parking violations. 12. Streets shall be adequately posted to reflect parking restrictions to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. r 13. ire - project- errsrty- slialP -b�- limitecl- fio-- 4:9-- clwe}1in- �rritsfaere. A temporary fence shall be installed during construction along the northern property line to Protect adjacent property and= discoura e trespassers. The fence shall be replaced by permanent solid -foot fencing prior to occupancy of the units abutting this property line. 14. Entry /identification signs, if any, are subject to SPARC approval. A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Parkerson to recommend to the Council that the tentative subdivision map for Sycamore Heights (revised) be approved subject to the following findings and conditions: Commissioner Bennett - No (Felt density was satisfactory at 45 units) Commissioner Davis - No (Felt density was satisfactory at 45 units) Commissioner Head - Aye Commissioner Libarle - No (Felt density was satisfactory at 45 units) Commissioner Parkerson - Aye Commissioner Read - Aye Commissioner Tarr - Aye Tentative Map Findings 1. The proposed subdivision, together with provisions for its design and improvement is consistent with the General Plan. 2. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in said General Plan. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. 4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development, as conditioned herein. 5. The design of the subdivision, the units and the proposed improvements therefore, will not cause substantial environmental 0 damage and no substantial or avoidable injury will occur to fish or wildlife or their habitat. 6. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not cause serious public health problems as conditionally approved. 7. The project site terrain, vegetation, and secluded location create special circumstances and conditions for which approval of a public street of narrower width than previously adopted standards is desirable. Granting of this modification for this project will not be detrimental to the public welfare or safety, or injurious to other property in the territory. Go q q 8. Use of a 28 -foot wide street with parking pull -outs was recommended ® by the Planning Commission to mitigate the effects of grading, paving ® and removal of significant vegetation associated with standard public streets. Use of a public street, rather than private, mitigates concerns expressed by the Commission with regards to maintenance, police patrol, and parking enforcement. Tentative Map Conditions 1. The tentative map shall be revised to reflect structural setbacks adopted as part of the PUD development plan. All changes required by this and other conditions of approval shall be made to the tentative map, two copies and one sepia print of which shall be provided to the Department of Community Development prior to approval of the project final subdivision map. 2. The tentative map is subject to review by SPARC. All SPARC and Planning Commission conditions of approval for the PUD plan which affect the tentative map shall also be incorporated in the tentative map prior to tentative map submittal. 3. The tentative map shall be revised to conform to the conditions of the City Engineer contained in the letter dated April 9, 1987 as follows: A. The developer shall comply with the amended Petaluma Municipal Code Sections 20.36.030 and 17.30.040 which require the developer to pay storm drainage impact fees (as calculated in Chapter 17.30) on construction in all sections of the City of Petaluma. B . Prior to final map approval, the developer is required to obtain the sanitary sewer easement for that portion of the sewer main located on the Cypress Hill Memorial Park property. If this , easement cannot be obtained, the sewer serving that area will have to be redesigned. C. Provisions to handle the off -site storm runoff from the properties adjacent to the north and west subdivision boundary are required. Lot -to -lot and across property line drainage is not 209 10 210 allowed. The drainage as proposed will cause off -site drainage problems. D. The legend and the grading play symbols shall be coordinated. Specifically, the symbol for tree removal. It appears there are existing trees to remain within the proposed street system. E. Signing and striping shall conform to the City of Petaluma standards and comply with the recommendations outlined in the traffic report by DKS Associates, December 9, 1984, as required by the City Engineer. Recommendations (from DKS Traffic Consultant Study) "The proposed Sycamore Heights development combined with existing traffic and other development along Sycamore Lane would add to the cumulative traffic along the adjacent street system.' The Sycamore /North Petaluma Boulevard would ultimately meet the minimum warrants for signalization. The following items should be considered in the vicinity of Sycamore Lane. i. Replace the stop sign controlling Sycamore Lane at North Petaluma Boulevard since it has poor nighttime reflectivity. ii. Strip a 150 foot length of centerline on Sycamore Lane approaching North Petaluma Boulevard. iii. Extend the Red curb along the southerly curb of Sycamore Lane so that No Parking Zone extends approximately 100 feet west of North Petaluma Boulevard. This will facilitate drivers making right turns from Sycamore Lane when eastbound left turning drivers are waiting for a gap in traffic. iv. Consider delineating a second eastbound lane on Sycamore Lane to separate right turn from left turn and through movements entering North Petaluma Boulevard. V. Improve the delineation of the cemetery entrance roadway and gate at the westerly end of Sycamore Lane to make it clear what is expected of approaching westbound drivers. The final development plans should show what is planned for this transitional area between Sycamore Lane and the Cemetery. Whir- slirnrl- incirtzde -- how-- �merg�rrc�r-- rrehi�l�s would- - gaiir- access -ace eaa= road- connectizrg te- tire- -projec- etil-- de- -sa�c -- �'- iirstairce, - -if- the- �-emetery gate- rovisio rs-must- -be- nmcte -to isslxc keqs -te- fire -�trrc��elice- t}ep- �rtments. vi. Show the location of sidewalks to be constructed as part of the project - on the final plan. This would include the 11 211 sidewalk along the Sycamore Lane frontage as well as internal sidewalks and connecting pathways. ® vii. Show the location of street lights on the final plans, this would include one at the intersection of Sycamore Lane and the project access road. viii. Contribute toward the ultimate construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Sycamore Lane/Shasta/N. Petaluma Boulevard. The projects "fair share" could be based on proportions of daily or peak hour volumes. DKS estimates Go that the project would be responsible for about one -third of the traffic along Sycamore Lane." 0 F. The need for a traffic signal at the intersection of Sycamore ® Lane /Shasta Avenue /Petaluma Boulevard North, as specified in Item viii. of the traffic study, shall be evaluated with this development. Current traffic signal counts shall be taken and analyzed with the projected traffic count from Sycamore Heights. If the intersection warrants a traffic signal, it shall be required with this development. G. The existing subdrain shall be connected to an approved closed conduit system. H. The cul -de -sac shall not be designed with a 100 year relief swale over private property. I. On- street parking ,fex-cept-irr- parkirrg-b?7s) shall be subject to City staf approval nat be- allowed. Appropriate no parking signs and/or painted red curbs shall be visible throughout the subdivision street system. J. In accordance with the Petaluma Municipal Code Section 20.32.340 "Utility Easements Within Subdivision - Modification." All public utility easements shall be ten feet in width unless the modification is approved by both the City Engineer and the public utility concerned. K- . - - - twc- try,-- *+*.�±- +r s�c�ve- �izv-atioa sixty- feet - may -requ ire --a- -water -press tire - system -irrstaii�d - for -eack snit- to mairrtairr-- agnate -h-o r pre-. sl — r-- T+re- -pmmp-4m --eacir4ot must- motb attar+ reel- ter -anq- pipe --d rectfy -z -tv �h -water main-- or- -s�ervirc- -pipe: --- Stxe �mrr�rin- g '- or- - ef- �ressere shall -4Y%-_- clone -- from -­a--.mmp ,- -cistern -or- storage - tan* - which -nrr r -be served -- bar, -- but- nct �irect�y-- eonsrectcd- �rit}r -the -- water - system disc. ibution - -iTe -; - -tir�.t -is•- there-- nrnstt- be- -air - air --g'ap between -tlrc -pump -acrd- -tire- water - -meter: -- Fire-- Gity- -W+1i - Trot- warn; maintaiir- or- azcept- q-espvnsrb +AT --im— Eire- - privates - pressure- -system on- eae}r- lc�t- -ovcr- eentonr- sixty - feet--- �ing}e- arnia��er�ri�esslrali be- -providerl- at- -ttrese- loc�ativns--- ��ter- servree- zaica}atiens --mast be- strbcnrtte�-arittr- dirra�� nap -to- verify - service-- pressare- 12 212 Kb. The ten foot private sanitary sewer system easement shall 'all include that portion of the sewer main located on Lot 41. LM. The 'final improvement plans shall show the design of Sycamore Lane as it relates to the cemetery property. Specifically the need for an emergency turn - around at the entrance gate. 4. The project sponsor shall be required to pay low and moderate income housing in -lieu fees of an amount to be determined according to the schedule established by City Council Resolution Number 84 -199 N.C.S. , or make alternative arrangements to meet the low and moderate income housing provision requirements of the housing element, subject to approval of the City and prior to approval of the final map. 5. School facilities and Park /Recreation Land Improvement fees shall be paid in accordance with existing City ordinances and applicable resolutions. 6. Fire hydrant placement is subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshal. 7. This subdivision shall conform to the SCWA Design Criteria. 8. If buried archaeological materials are discovered during project implementation, work shall halt in the area of the d(s) until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the situation. 9. Tentative Map to be revised to reflect PUD approval conditions. 10. Approximately ten (10) additional parking spaces shall be added along the street, subject to staff approval. 11. A drainage study shall be conducted per the direction of the City Engineer. Recommendations from this study to mitigate adverse drainage conditions, both existing and created by this development shall be incorporated into the project improvements. This drainage study is subject to review by the City Council prior to final map approval. 12. A soils engineer versed in the drainage constraints of the project site shall be present on -site during construction and grading,. Should changes to the drainage plan be recommended by the soils engineer due to information gathered on -site, the drainage plan shall be changed-per the recommendations provided the City Engineer concurs. 13. Storm drainage impact fees shall be paid as required by Municipal Code Chapter 17.30 as amended by Council policy. 14. Separate sign permits are needed for any project identification signs. Said signs are subject to SPARC approval. No off -site signs are permitted. 13 15. All properties are subject to Major Capital Facilities Fees if adopted by the City Council prior to final map approval, payable at time of final map or pursuant to adopted regulations. 16. Public access shall be assured on all sidewalks even if they meander outside the public right -of -way in order to preserve trees, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 17. All property owners shall participate in assessment district(s), mitigative fees or other funding mechanisms which may be formed or required by the City for design, review, formation, construction 00 and /or maintenance of major flood mitigation and traffic circulation N1 project (i.e. Rainier Avenue) that affect or are affected by this project site. This project's ultimate "fair share" responsibility toward ® these improvements shall be determined by the City Council. 18. All landscaping located in a public right -of -way not normally associated I ith private front yard maintenance shall be maintained through an assessment district or other staff approved funding mechanism that distributes funding responsibilities of all properties within this project. 19. Three . units shall be removed along the eastern property line (i.e. bordering Acorn Terrace Subdivision ) and one unit shall be removed from the west side of White Oak Drive between the project entrance and White Oak Way resulting land to be redistributed among other lots in area. PLANNING MATTERS VI. YARDBIRDS CENTER, 2000 LAKEVILLE HIGHWAY, AP No. 005 - 050 -22 (File No. 5.100) . 1. Consideration of appeal of administrative decision on height of freestanding sign. Due to lack of time, this :item was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of April 28, 1987. VII. DISCUSSION OF PROPOSED CURRENT AND ADVANCE PLANNING DIVISION BUDGETS. This item continued to date uncertain. VIII. RULES OF ORDER (Continued Item) . 1. Consideration of proposed amendments to Rules and Regulations for the Transaction of Business Continued from March 24, 1987. This item continued to date uncertain. 213 -: 14