Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06/23/1987271 c Iq PETALUMA PLANNING COMMISSION June 23, 1987 ® REGULAR MEETING Tuesday, 7:00 p.m. ® CITY, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL PETALUMA, CALIF. co The Planning Commission encourages applicants or their representative to be available at the meeting to answer questions so that no agenda item need be deferred to a later date due to a lack of pertinent information. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG ROLL CALL COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Bennett, Head, Libarle, Parkerson, Tarr COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Davis, Read STAFF:. Warren Salmons, Planning Director Pamela Tuft., Principal Planner John Morgan, Assistant Planner APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of June 9, 1987 were approved as printed. PUBLIC COMMENT (15 minutes maximum) . The Planning Commission will hear public comments only on matters over which they have jurisdiction. There will be no Commission 'discussion. The Chairman will allot no more than five minutes to any individual. If more than three persons wish to speak, their time will be allotted so that the total amount of time allocated to this agenda item will be 15 minutes. There were no speakers. CORRESPONDENCE None. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: Budget 1987 -88; Zoning Ordinance Update; Growth Management; Corona Ely Scoping Session in mid -July; General Plan Award - California Chapter, American Planning Association Award; California Planning Association State Workshop - August 19 -21. COMMISSIONER'S REPORT None. 1 2mm PUBLIC HEARINGS I. MCNEAR BUILDING, 23 PETALUMA BLVD., AP NO. 008 - 053 -07 (File 5.1092). 1. Design review of McNear Building (Cheers Restaurant) facade remodel (referral from Historic and Cultural Preservation Committee) . The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: None. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Parkerson and seconded by Commissioner Head to permit the alteration of a portion of the McNear Building at 23 Petaluma Blvd. North per submitted plans. COMMISSIONER BENNETT - AYE COMMISSIONER DAVIS - ABSENT COMMISSIONER HEAD - AYE COMMISSIONER LIB ARLE - AYE COMMISSIONER PARKERSON - AYE COMMISSIONER READ - ABSENT COMMISSIONER TARR -AYE II. ROBERT J. MCCLURE, 28 EIGHTH STREET, AP NO. 008 - 171 -43 (Files 2.357, 6.844). 1. Consideration of appeal of variance and Subdivision Ordinance Modification to permit a two -lot Parcel Map Subdivision. The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: Terry McClery - (neighbor) - approve project. Ernest Lichau 22 8th St. - approve project. Joanie Guy - 818 D Street - against project - does not want to lose rear yard privacy. Bob McClure - answered questions - asked for approval. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Libarle . and seconded by Commissioner Parkerson to deny the appeal ' of the administrative approval of a variance thereby granting a variance based on the findings as follows: COMMISSIONER BENNETT - AYE COMMISSIONER DAVIS ABSENT 2 273 COMMISSIONER HEAD - AYE COMMISSIONER LIBARLE - AYE COMMISSIONER PARKERSON - AYE COMMISSIONER READ - ABSENT COMMISSIONER TARR - AYE Findings 1. There are special circumstances or conditions peculiar to and affecting the property in that the lot is developed with a home of substantial value while a large vacant area exists to the rear of the lot; and that ;such conditions are not common to most of the properties in the co immediate area. O 2. That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of ® substantial property rights possessed by other properties in the 0 vicinity, and that a variance, if granted, would not constitute a +special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors. 3. 'That the authorizing of such variance shall not be of substantial , idetriment to adjacent property and will not materially impair the ,purposes of this Ordinance or the public interest. 4. 'Granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or safety, or injurious to other property in the neighborhood. A motion was made by Commissioner Parkerson and seconded by Commissioner Bennett to recommend to City Council denial of the protests and 'approval of the Subdivision Ordinance modification based on the findings listed in the staff report as follows: COMMISSIONER BENNETT - AYE COMMISSIONER DAVIS - ABSENT COMMISSIONER HEAD - AYE COMMISSIONER LIBARLE - AYE COMMISSIONER PARKERSON - AYE COMMISSIONER READ - ABSENT COMMISSIONER TARR - AYE Subdivision Ordinance Modifications 1. Special circumstances apply to this parcel as to depth and area. 2. Modification is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the petitioner in that the total area of the lot in question is approximately 24,400 sq. ft. (more than three times the minimum lot area for the zoning district) . 3. Granting of the modifications will not be detrimental to the public welfare or safety or injurious to other property in the territory in which said property is situated because that granting will be conditional upon review of the design of any house to be built on the property to insure protection of existing privacy and architectural compatibility with the neighborhood. 3 274 A motion was made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Head to recommend to the City Council approval of the parcel map based on the findings set forth for the granting of the variance and subdivision ordinance modification and subject to the following conditions: COMMISSIONER BENNETT - AYE COMMISSIONER DAVIS - ABSENT COMMISSIONER HEAD - AYE COMMISSIONER LIBARLE - AYE COMMISSIONER PARKERSON - AYE COMMISSIONER READ - ABSENT COMMISSIONER TARR - AYE Parcel Map Conditions 1. Any house to be built on the rear lot shall be subject to review by the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee. SPARC is particularly enjoined to insure that the design of the house is architecturally compatible with the neighborhood and that privacy of adjoining _properties is protected to the extent possible through the use of screening vegetation, fencing or and size and placement of windows or height and placement of buildings on the site as appropriate. 2. All requirements of the Fire Marshal with regard to access and /or sprinkler system shall be met. 3. All requirements of the City Engineer with regard ' to utilities, driveway/ sidewalk repair and storm water runoff system shall be met. 4. Payment of Storm Drainage Impact Fee shall be done prior to filing of Parcel Map. 5. Payment of Park and Recreation Improvement Fee shall be done prior to issuance of building permit. 6. School Facilities Fees to Petaluma School District shall be paid prior to issuance of building permit. III. FIVE CORNERS AUTOMOTIVE, 215 and 416 WASHINGTON STREET, AP NO's 6- 272 -12 and 6- 362 -1, (File 1.536). 1. Consideration of EIQ. 2. Consideration of Use Permit for expansion of Conditional Use. The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: David Law - Owner, Five Corners Automotive - answered questions, wants to use new location for bookeeping office only, wants to be able to tow a few cars to the new site each week. The public hearing was closed. 4 275 rs • A motion was made by Commissioner Parkerson and seconded by Commissioner Libarle to direct staff to prepare a mitigated negative declaration based on the findings in the staff report. COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER Findings BENNETT - AYE DAVIS - ABSENT HEAD - AYE LIBARLE - AYE PARKERSON - AYE READ - ABSENT TARR -AYE A. Because this site has long been developed, the project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, or eliminate important examples of periods of California history. B. The project as conditionally approved, does not have the potential to ,achieve short term to the disadvantage of long term environmental ;goals. C. :Because no additional development is anticipated as part of this ;project, the project does not have impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. 1 D. The project as conditionally approved, does not have environmental ;effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings :either directly or indirectly. E. 'Traffic impacts will be mitigated to an acceptable level through conditions of approval regarding employee parking and customer vehicles. Certain other uses permitted under this zoning, which could be established at this location without conditional use permit review have the potential for creating more adverse traffic impacts. A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Bennett to grant a conditional use permit based on the findings and subject to the conditions listed below: COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER BENNETT - AYE DAVIS - ABSENT HEAD - AYE LIBARLE - AYE PARKERSON - AYE READ - ABSENT TARR - AYE Findings 1. The proposed use, subject to the following conditions, will conform to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and policies of the General Plan. 5 Ylipw 2. The proposed use, constitute a nuisance community. Conditions subject to the following conditions, will not or be detrimental to the public welfare of the 1. In order to help discourage customers, all storage and repair work shall take place indoors with the bay door closed. Venting, air conditioning or other appropriate mechanisms shall be provided which will enable business operation with the bay door closed, subject to staff review and approval. 2. No major automotive repair, as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, shall be allowed on this site (i.e. no repair or refurbishing of any motor vehicle including the dismantling of an. engine by removal of the head or pistons; the removal of the transmission, rear end or major assembly of any motor vehicle) . Only minor automotive repair, as defined in the Zoning Ordinance, will be allowed (i.e. limited repair of any motor vehicle including the sales and installation of tires or _replacement of .fluids or _minor_ . automotive parts including -, - but not limited to, spark plugs, belts, batteries, mufflers, tires, upholstery, and wheels. Major automotive repair, painting, body and fender work are excluded."). 3. Vehicle pick -up and delivery by customers shall only occur at the 215 Washington site. 4. Any exterior changes are subject to staff review. Refurbishing of the front facade shall include multi -pane windows with trim, replacement of the man -door, and the addition of climbing vines in the cut -outs along the building front, subject to staff review and approval. 5. Building shall be painted, subject to staff approval. 6. This use permit may be recalled to the Planning Commission for review at any time due to complaints regarding traffic congestion, noise generation or other operating characteristics,. At such time, the Commission may repeal the use permit or add modified conditions of approval. 7. No signs may be erected on the site without issuance of a sign permit. 8. Building shall comply with all requirements of the Uniform Fire and Building Codes. Building shall have Fire Marshal inspection and building survey. All necessary permits shall be obtained, all improvements done and all fire and building inspections completed prior to occupancy. 4. Project shall be subject to review by the City's Industrial Waste Inspector and the City Engineer prior to occupancy. 10. Noise levels shall not exceed City Standards (i.e. Zoning Ordinance and General Plan) . Automotive repair activities shall be limited to 6 277 --,: weekdays only between the hours of 7AM to 7PM. Acoustical buffering - shall be installed along rear wall of building, subject to staff approval. 11. No towed vehicles shall be delivered to 416 Washington to avoid potential traffic friction on Washington Street. 12. This use permit is valid for 416 Washington only as this use is adjunct to "Five Corners Automotive" at 215 Washington. The use at 416 Washington cannot be conducted independent of the "Five Corners Automotive" use at 215 Washington. 00 13. If the following operating characteristics of 215 Washington continue, grounds may exist for recall of the use permit: ® a. Vehicles parked over the public zight oi wwy-7 sidewalk ® b. Outdoor storage of parts, equipment, etc. 14. ,Employees working at the facility at 416 Washington shall park at the 215 Washington facility. 15. If a compressor is to be used at the 416 Washington facility, it shall be indoors. 16. All customer related transactions shall take place at 215 Washington. This will require the office to remain at 215 Washington. No office use shall be allowed at 416 Washington which involves customer visits IV. ; ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT REGARDING MINIMUM LOT SIZE FOR RESIDENTIAL PUD'S UNDER THE HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL COMBINING DISTRICT. The !public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: Mr. Langworthy Associate of Mr. Klebe - answered questions. Fred Lucas - 463 Amber Way - Did not feel Ordinance should be amended. Marvin Klebe - Answered questions regarding project. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Libarle to deny the Zoning Ordinance Amendment. COMMISSIONER BENNETT - NO COMMISSIONER DAVIS - ABSENT COMMISSIONER HEAD - AYE COMMISSIONER LIBARLE - AYE COMMISSIONER PARKERSON - NO COMMISSIONER READ - ABSENT COMMISSIONER TARR - NO 7 2'78 A motion was made by Commissioner Parkerson and seconded by Commissioner Bennett to recommend to the City Council approval of the Zoning Ordinance Amendment as drafted. COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER BENNETT - YES DAVIS- ABSENT HEAD - NO LIBARLE - NO PARKERSON - YES READ - ABSENT TARR -YES ORDINANCE NO. N.C.S. Introduced By: Seconded By: AN - ORDINANCE amending Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. regarding minimum lot size for residential Planned Unit Developments in hillside sites. Amending Section 19.1 -200, be it ordained by the Council of the City of Petaluma as follows: Section 1 Article 19, Section 19.1 -200 Point A of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S. is hereby amended as follows: A. This Article and the provisions thereof shall be applicable to all lands in the City which are identified as R -1, R -C., RMG, RMH, PC and P -U -D which have a (5) percent or greater average slope, except for all portions of property identified as R -C, RMG, RMH, P -C, and P -U -D which have 5 -12 percent slopes and are designated for densities of ten (10) dwelling .units per acre on the City General Plan in which case twice the density otherwise permitted herein will be available. The uses permitted on and general provisions for each land subject to this article are those of the underlying land use district. The lot yield shall be as defined herein. In the case of Residential PUD's, minimum parcel size may be flexible so as to respond to site conditions and the proposed site plan, however lot yield shall remain as defined herein Whereas the Zoning Ordinance Modification contained herein reflects existing policies, contributes to tthe safe and orderly management of hillside residential subdivisions, and clarifies regulatory procedures, the, City Council hereby finds that the proposed amendment is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 as amended, pursuant to CEQA Section 15305 (minor alterations in land use limitations) . Actions by regulatory agencies for the protection of the environment and 15321 (enforcement actions by regulatory agencies) . F. 279 INTRODUCED and ordered posted /published this day of 1987. ADOPTED this day of 1987. V. KLEBE SUBDIVION ( "Bodega Vista ") , 13 LOTS NORTH OF BODEGA AVENUE, VICINITY OF N. WEBSTER STREET AND AMBER WAY, AP NO.'s 6- 221 -01, 03, 04 and 6- 480 -01, (File 6.856). 0 1. Consideration of EIQ. q ;T 2. Consideration of rezoning to PUD 0 3. Consideration of Tentative Map for 13 -lot subdivision. ® The public hearing was opened. m SPEAKERS: EmilMogel - 422 Petaluma Blvd. N. - _project engineer - Described project, answered questions regarding drainage., traffic. Cindy Hefner - 334 -3341 Bodega - Concerns that her property would be landlocked; does approve subdivision, drainage improvements. Harold Matzen - 470 Amber Way - drainage concerns. Marvin Klebe - Project Applicant - Answered questions. Malcolm Burnett - 522 Amber Way - drainage, traffic concerns. Fred" Lucas - 463 Amber Way - drainage concerns. Joe ';Milner - 813 Gilardi - concerns regarding road connection to Bodega, increased traffic. The 'public hearing was closed. This item was continued to the Planning Commission meeting of July 28, 1987. Commission directed staff to prepare more information regarding; 1) Ridegline protection, 2) lot reduction, 3) access to adjoining properties. VI. FASTOP FOODS, 1420 S. MCDOWELL, PART OF AP NO. 005 - 250 -43, (File 1.537) . 1. Consideration of EIQ. 2. Consideration of conditional use permit for operation of a convenience market. The: public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: Jean Kapolchok - applicant representative - 131 Stoney Circle, Santa Rosa - described project; no security, noise, litter problems. Cristine Peasley - Rancho Arroyo Subdivision - concerns regarding traffic. Mrs. Russell - 404 Casa Grande Circle - concerns regarding truck traffic, noise. Jim Cook - 812 Sartori - traffic concerns, exiting and entering off S. 9 McDowell; overabundance of liquor vendors in center; no more convenience markets needed in area. Mary Navalolli - 408 Casa Grande Circle - concerns regarding parking and traffic; kids hangout. Rich Leiphic - lives near existing deli - too many convenience markets. The public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Head and seconded by Commissioner Parkerson to deny the use permit based on the findings listed below: COMMISSIONER BENNETT - YES COMMISSIONER DAVIS - ABSENT COMMISSIONER HEAD - YES COMMISSIONER LIBARLE - YES COMMISSIONER PARKERSON - YES COMMISSIONER READ - ABSENT COMMISSIONER TARR - YES Findings 1. Due to environmental concerns expressed by the neighbors, including additional traffic congestion, security, noise, loitering, lights, litter, and lack of necessity for an additional convenience market, this proposal may constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. 2. Due to the potential of the proposed use relating to protection and preservation of the existing levels of peace and quiet for adjacent residential areas. 3. Due to the unacceptable level of activity to the surrounded uses which may result from the proposed use. 4. Due to the lack of necessity and provision of a public convenience by the establishment of the proposed use at this location. 5. Denial of this application is consistent with action taken by the Planning Commission on November 1985 and July 1983. VII. MEADOW PARK OFFICE DEVELOPMENT, AP NO. 137- 060 -33, (File 3.371). 1. Consideration of PUD amendment to allow approximately 80,000 sq.ft. of office /commercial space and associated site improvements at intersection of McDowell Blvd. North and future Trent Drive (North of Royal Oaks Mobile Home Park) . The public hearing was opened. SPEAKERS: David Young - owner, Royal Oaks Mobile Home Park - questions regarding 10 Vim=' drainage. Mike Gallagher - McBail Objection to Condition No. 9. Bob Anderson - Project Engineer - Answered questions regarding drainage. The! public hearing was closed. A motion was made by Commissioner Head to recommend approval of the proposed PUD Rezoning with added assurances regarding drainage design. This motion died for lack of a second. aN • so A motion was made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Libarle to recommend to the City Council approval of the proposed PUD Rezoning subject to the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER BENNETT - AYE DAVIS - ABSENT HEAD - NO LIBARLE - AYE PARKERSON - AYE READ - ABSENT TARR - AYE Findings for the PUD 1. The PUD is proposed on property which has a suitable relationship to McDowell Blvd. North and to the future Wood Sorrel Drive and these said throughfares will be adequate as conditionally improved to carry additional traffic generated by the development plan. 2. The plan for the proposed development represents a unified and organized arrangement of buildings and site improvements which are appropriate in relation to adjacent or nearby properties as conditionally approved and that adequate landscaping and /or screening will be included upon SPARC review to insure compatibility. 3. The nature and scenic qualities of the site are protected with adequate available public and private spaces including landscaped entryway to the office complex at Meadow Park along Trent Drive. 4. The development of the subject property in the manner proposed by the applicant and conditioned by the City will not be detrimental to the public welfare, will be in the best interest of the City and will be in keeping with the general intent and spirit of the Zoning Regulation of the City of Petaluma and with the Petaluma General Plan. Y Conditions for PUD: 1. This project shall be subject to review by the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee and all applicable conditions of SPARC approval shall become conditions of the Unit Development Plan herewith approved. In SPARC review, special attention should be paid to the landscaping on either side of and in the island in the middle of Trent Drive as an entryway to this office complex. Attention should also be paid to the architecture of these prominent and large buildings with a 11 r, focus on variety and, detail and quality materials. At should also be paid to provision of adequate landscaping throughout the site. 2. Three -foot wood fence proposed on top of two -and -a -half foot berm between the parking lots of the site and North McDowell Blvd. should be designed as a sound fence to staff approval. 3. The buildings shall be set back from the curb line at McDowell Blvd. a minimum of 45 feet. The objective is to provide an appropriate proportion to these large buildings. 4. The sidewalk along McDowell Blvd, shall be separate from the curb and meandering with adequate landscape buffering between it and McDowell Blvd. Improvements to McDowell Blvd. will include a bikeway to approval of the City Engineer. 5. This project shall participate in the North McDowell Blvd. Assessment District now being established. 6. Compact parking spaces shown clustered on the the site plan shall be distributed thoughout the parking areas to staff approval. 7. Development standards for this PUD shall include the following: a. Height limit of buildings shall be 40 feet. b. Lot coverage shall be 21 maximum as proposed. Any additions or modifications to the buildings once approved shall be subject to SPARC review. C. Permitted uses shall be all forms of office uses permitted in the Commercial/ Office district per Zoning Ordinance Article 10, except that in the case of medical offices, because of their higher parking requirement, if more than 20% of the office space is devoted to medical offices, future medical offices shall be a conditional use. d. Conditional uses at this site shall include some commercial or light industrial uses compatible with the predominent office character of this site and, surrounding office and residential uses. These include restaurant or deli to serve local office workers, bank branch, sales offices including real estate, medical laboratory and other uses which may be deemed by the Zoning Administrator compatible with this office complex. 8. In the event that either- building is built without the other, adequate parking area and driveways shall be completed. In the case of Building A, this will include all site development .up to and including the second driveway from Trent Drive. In the case of Building B, this will include all site development and landscaping from the northwest end of the site to the southeasternmost driveway along Wood Sorrel. In either case, full "street improvements to Trent Drive and to Wood Sorrel will be required. 9. Applicants shall participate in any future Assessment Districts or other funding mechanisms formed to improve area -wide flooding, traffic congestion or other sub- regional programs for which development of 12 283 this property is found to be a contributing factor. Major Capital Facilities Fees, if found to be different from said funding mechanism, shall also be applicable in an amount to be determined by the City Council payable pursuant to adopted regulation. 10. Public utility access and easement locations and widths shall be subject to approval by PG &E, Pacific Bell, Sonoma County Water Agency and all other applicable service and utility companies and the City Engineer ,and shall be shown as necessary on project plans. 11. ; Construction activity shall comply with applicable Zoning Ordinance and c Municipal Code performance standards (noise, dust, odor, etc.) . I q 12. In the event that archeological remains are encountered during ® grading, work shall be halted and a qualified archeologist shall be ® consulted for evaluation of the artifacts and to recommend future action. The local indian community shall be notified and consulted in the event any archeological remains are uncovered. 13. ; A sign program for the buildings shall be developed prior to SPARC review and subject to SPARC approval. 14. The applicant shall provide for perpetual maintenance of all landscape areas not contained on private property to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development and Parks and Recreation and subject to final approval by the City Council. Perpetual maintenance may be accommodated through annexation of some or all of these areas to the Maintenance Assessment District to be established for public areas in Meadow Park Subdivision. These areas include the entry treatment and landscape islands in Trent Drive. 15. The site drainage plan shall be approved by the City Engineer and shall conform to Sonoma County Water Agency design criteria. 16. All existing and proposed utilities as required by code shall be placed underground at this site. 17. Developer shall comply with all conditions of the City Engineer as follows: a. Improvements, including proposed sanitary sewer through the site and McDowell widening must be coordinated with adjacent residential development. b. If the office complex develops prior to the residential portion (Meadow Park) , the following shall be required: 1. Full I street improvement with overlay on south side as necessary for smooth line and grade and utility extensions are required for North McDowell Blvd. 2. Full street improvement with utility extensions to Wood Sorrel Drive fronting this property and its connection to McDowell Meadows through the Mulrath property per Reso. 86 -314 (Tentative Map Condition 7P) as follows: 13 284 7P. Phase 1 of this development shall construct Wood Sorrel Drive through the Muelrath property and connect to that portion of the roadway constructed with McDowell Meadows. Funds previously collected shall be utilized for this purpose per McDowell Meadows tentative map conditions, Resolution 84 -91, No. 9 as follows: The project sponsor (owners) shall be responsible for one -half the cost of the proposed frontage road across the Land of Muelrath (A. P. No. 137- 060 -54) . The owners shall either construct their portion of the road (approximately 105 feet to appropriate City standards) with the development of the first phase of the subdivision, or shall agree to deposit an amount of money to be determined by the City Engineer, prior to approval of the final map, that will be used to construct the road at the time the Friedman (A . P . No. 127 - 060 -33) property develops. 3. - Full street improvement with utility extension to Trent Drive from North McDowell Blvd. to Wood Sorrel Drive. 4. Reso. 86 -314 (Tentative Map Conditions 3, 7B, 7G, 7N, and 70) as follow, shall apply: 3. All existing and proposed utilities, as required by Code, shall be placed underground. 7B. This subdivision shall be contingent upon the storm drainage improvements to be constructed with the proposed parcel map for the Land of Charles. Stephens and Pine Creek Properties (A.P. No. 048 - 080 -06) and proposed South Point Industrial Park Subdivision. All said projects shall be approved and constructed concurrently. If this is not possible, it will be the responsibility of the Meadow Park developers to construct the drainage improvements as - required by Sonoma County Water Agency Master Drainage Plan and the city Engineer. 7G. Regarding North McDowell Boulevard and Warrick Drive (now called "Trent Drive ") , the developer shall build the signal, in conjunction with the developers of the proposed Pine Creek Properties Parcel Map/South Point Industrial Subdivision, the first party to develop being reimbursed half of cost upon development of other project. 7N. Signing and striping shall be in conformance with the City of Petaluma and Cal Trans standards. 70. A left turn pocket shall be provided on North McDowell Boulevard to serve Warrick Drive ( "Trent Drive ") . 14 �.n IS. The, applicant 'is notified that the project area site is in Waugh School Attendance Area and is therefore subject to School Facility Fees on a per square foot basis. 19. ; This project shall be subject .to payment of storm drainage impact fees ' as required by City Ordinance. 20. i .Fire hydrants shall be spaced as required by the City Fire Marshal. ,All other conditions of the Fire Marshal shall be met. i i PLANNING MATTER VIII;SECOND STREET HOMEOWNERS 1. Consider petition requesting Planning Commission initiation of Historic District. The i Commission directed staff to return with an architectural /historic survey of the neighborhood. l0 ADJOURNMENT 10:45 PM. I .. . f � r I, 15