Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 02/09/19822 NOT OFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED BY THE PETALUMA PLANNING COMMISSION M I N U T E S PETALUMA PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 1982 REGULAR MEETING PETALUMA CITY'. CHAMBERS CALIFORNIA PRESENT: Comm. Head, Lavin, Popp, Shearer, Tencer, and Waite ABSENT: Comm. Harberson STAFF: Warren Salmons, Principal Planner Les Ruh, Assistant City Engineer MINUTES Minutes of January 26, 1982 were approved as submitted. DIRECTOR'S REPOR Let-ter received regarding Petaluma Gardens and will distributed during staff's report. Agenda revised to include item. #2 for Madison Manor;. public hearing to consider :a modification to the previously approved tentative subdivision,map. Upon. request by Mr;. Robert Hirsch, Chairman Lavin d rected.staff to present Petaluma Gardens first if there was no objection from anyone in the audience. PETALUMA GARDENS, WASHINGTON.AND ELY - UNIT.DEVELOPMEN,T PLAN REVISION (Tape 12 328) . Item 3.176 - To consider an application from Robert Hirsch for a revision to the approved Development Plan for Pe.taluma'Gardens, a P.U.D. located near the intersection of Washington and Ely (reduction of proposed units from 101 to 57 elderly rental units). The public hearing was opened: Speakers: Robert Hirsch, applicant, 15`233 Ventura:Blvd., Sherman Oaks Ernest Vivas, 17451 E. Madison, Petaluma Mr. Vivas pointed out to the Commission that a settlement_- iad been involved with this project, and,should be considered with the condition's. The public I was closed. Motion. introduced by - Comm. Waite,, seconded by -Comm. Tencer; to recommend the City Council approve the revised PUD Development Plan based upon recommended findings -an,d conditions, with the following changes: Condition .#6 changed to read, "13 onsite parking spaces," and Condition #17 the word "ri!quest" changed to read, "obtain." AYES: 6 ABSENT: 1 (Harberson) It was'the consensus of the Commission to recommend the City Council consider incorporation of the settlement as a condition after coiisultation with the City 3` : PETALUMA PLANNING CM.U.S'SION 1ESrUARY y, 1982 MINUTES PAGE: -2 PETALUM1 GARDENS continued Attorney . , E . Item 5:366 To consider three; subdivision ;ordi anc'e' m oaaf catiori� to permit the proposed layout of Madison Manor..; to`consder a modification to th'e previously approved tentative subdivision map prepared -far Madison - Manor. The public =hearing was.opened Speaker:. Paul :Hilleshe m, R. 0. Box 1041,, Nova> o, CA 94947 I. The public hearing was closed. I T Motion: introduced by COT 1m. ;Head, secon'd'ed by Comm. Popp; to recommend ,the Ci pP n_anc -e modifications ao per Council a rove three subdivision 'or the proposed, layout°, of Madison Manor.' a) to permit a lot to be created, with a 59 foot width -,.. where; a 65 foot minimum wid 'i's required, b) t o permit a lot (Phas'e -2) be created with.les than'the required L00 foot depth: e) to permit, the creation of. a 'flag lot AYES: k 6 ABS . ENT: '1 (Haxberson) Motion'introduced ' by Comm pp• P'opp,' seconded by Comm. Head; to ,recommend the City u Concil a, rove the revised tentative subdivision .map, for Madison Manor Unit II based on recommended find ggs and cob & t ons-: AYES: 6 ABSENT:, 1, (Harberson;) ; ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at: 9 P M. S- y ss6' t•ino, Secretary P 1 ann ing/D ep.ar, tmen -;t 'N Petaluma - Gardens Revision to Approved DeveIopMeO-t-' Plan 1 06 P�. U, D. `REZONING RE COMMENDED CONDITIONS (3,176) 1. All buildings on the subject site (Parcel A) shall hd - setback at least forty' (46) feet., from,, 4djoini ng single-family re.sid,enti,al, •lot lines and at least- twenty(20) feet from the future Washington Creek, Channel tigl -wa,Y. 2. The developer . - per must meet the requirements of the, City VlAter ,Department for providing water for dbmestic, landscaping and fire protection pur poses. All , mechani pal equipment, - either on the roofs or adjacent•to or near, 'the buildings shall be fully screened. The screening shall be approved, by SPARC prior- to issuance of building permits. 4. the - aPplipant, must submit a, detailed irri plan and -landscaping plan which is, prepared 'by 'a licensed landscape ar6h identifying the number, type,, location and size; of all plants and , ttees to be"u These plans must be approved' by SPARC prior to issuance of building',' t All trees be-a minimum - I , . permits. m of fifteen (715); gallons as per City standard's.. 'The landscaping at the corners of -intersections must- be, Qf a height ;no greater than three. and on,e"_h feet to provide adequate sight'distanc 5. The, developer shall rovide a six.-foot,high �fe p , ncoalonl the - C prop ertY 1-i n 0, -that will separate the housing developmenE frorf St; Jamie's.Gliafch property'and adjoining residences Fencing shall be required along Lthe'acces way of of Ely B lvd. lvd,. No where it does not abut Parcel B.., The proposed fencing plan must 'approved SPAR&; 6. pr d An additional 13 ory- site , park' Jng spaces sha 11, be provide.d,, designed .1. on t t to the approval of the Planning Department and slibwrk " -he-,developmen plam. This. number" of - additional spaces will :provide the' ' same rati I 0--as the nearby valley Orchards project at 64 spaces per , unit." Prior to installing any must obtain ' sign gns the applicant otA . ,b - permits. �8 The. developer shall make ohe..half stree,t"�; •td­E-i 34orth..'from the, western sid e p.f private access ' street to East (a) (1 1 5 Pet9luma Gardens - Revision to Approved Development Plan (Item 3.176) Washington Street to the sPocificationn of the My Ergineering Department. Improvements are to be shown on the deveMpment plan. I : 9. 1 Mur on-site fire hydrants shall be required per Fire Department spolificationn. 10.birn warning detectors must be instDIMR per Fire DepartmeNt !,V fire sprinkler systum shall he installed in the Petaluma Gardens,-, (elderly Otizeys apartment buildings) per Fire Department LO spoi i f ica Lions. Emorgency vehicular access shall he provided to the south side of Petaluma Gardens (elderly citizens apartment building), per Planning and < Lire; Department specifications, And be clearly shown on the development plan!.' 13. : "The access way to the senior citizen (Petaluma Gardens) portion of the i groject shall be designed; - includinq roid section, landscaping, ig irratinn, curbing, etc, to the approval of the Planning, Engineering and Are Departments, and shown on the development plan. 14. iThe developer must make improvements to Washington Creek from Ely BIVA North to the southern property line of the subject site. The improvem-un shall bi designed to Sonoma County Water Agency specifications. Dedication of channel right-of-way to Sonoma County Water Agency shall also be required. improvements shall be shown on the development plan. 15. We fencing along the Washington Creek Channel shall he designed and Installed subject to . the review and approval by SPAFC and the Sonoma Count! Water Agency. 16. RevippQ site layout plans and architectural elevations (showing all. of the h"Llildings and materials and co3ory to be used) must be suhmitted for SPARC appxoval prior to issuanca of building permits. 1 The use of Petaluma Gardens (elderly citizens housing complex) is restricted to hoosing for the elderly. The ownprs of the project must obtafp an amendment to the P.'U:D. zoning clasHfication prior to any chonle in occupancy. 18. direct pedeptrian path or walkway must he provided from the elderly ritizels complex Q the .Ely RIMSOM and East Washington Strept KLAsection in the Sonama County Water Agency righ0of-way or across the church property. The path shall be shown on the Aevelopment plan. 19. jA drainage easement must be provided over the Putaluma Gardens I property Mr the adjoining Parcel B. I ( b ) - - 6 Petaluma_ Gardens - Revision to AU _ove d Development i'l (Item 3.176) 20. Two turn - around areas along the driveway must prnvided; one at the dog -leg of the driveway and one at the pr::perty a.ne which will separate Area A (Petaluma Gardens) from Area r >. 21. A joint use and maintenance agreement for an access drive the two properties will be required at such time, as the vacant (Parcel B) parcel is developed. 22. Development of the 3± acre parcel (Parcel B on attached man) which formerly was designated for 44 addi:tiontil units may proceed only after a , 'PUD rezoning and all appropriate planning r.nd environmental review is accomplished. (c) MADISON MANOR I ITEM 6.366 - ORDINAN'CE MODIFICATIONS AND MODIFICATION TO I TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FIiNDINGS A ND CONDITI 1. hn order to receive a housing allotment exempt -on for the project, not more than fifteen (15) housing units may be constructed in any one (1) construction year. 2. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of.the City Engineer outlined in the attached correspondence. �• 3. The project shall be subject to site plan and architectural review in accordance with Section 26 -400 of the Zoning Ordinance prior to Final L Map approval'. proval'. 4. Any required relocation of the P.G. & E.'overhead 12 Kv primary and 60 Kvj'transmission pole line along Madison Street shall. be done at the developer's expense. 5. Grading and drainage design shall be subject to approval by the Sonoma County Water Agency. 6. The right side property line of Lot 12 shall.be increased in length to measure ninety -five (95) feet. 7. Six (6) foot high decorative view obscuring wood fencing shall be provided on all lots to enclose yard areas behind the building front walls in accordance with the setback requirements specified in the Zoning'Ordinance. wherever fencing already exists, the Community Development Department shall determine which measure should be taken. 8. The CC & R's (Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions) pret;red for the prpject shall be subject to approval by the City Attorney prior. to Final Subdivision Map approval. 9. Parcels shall be correctly numbered. All front yard setback lines shall'.be shown on plans. Gross density figures shown on the "Plan metric Calculations" chart shall be corrected. The Coma,-nunity Development Director's signature block shall be provided on plans. I 1. the sidewalk along Madison Street should be extended from the development to the bridge over Washington Creek. 2. T�o minimize trenching in an existing street,.and to eliminate difficult connections to an existing large diameter 'sewer main, the sewerlhateraTs for Lots 2 and 3 should connected to the existinq manhol Also, Lets 4,and 7 should be connected to the new main, and ` Lot 6 �5houl.d be connected to one of the existing manholes. j 3. The lot grading should be revised so that Lots G, 7 and 8 of Unit II, 8 l and .9 of Unit LI, 9 of Unit II and 1 of Unlit I, 1 and 2 of Unit I, 2 and 3 of Unit I, 5 and 6 of Unit, ,I, and 6 and 7 of Unit I water can drain to the proposed street. .(d) r�.