HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 01/25/1983146 i
M I N U T.E S
Petaluma Planning Commission
Regular Meeting
City Council Chambers
PRESENT: Comm. Bond, Head, Tencer, and Popp
ABSENT: Comm. Hilligoss, Lavin, and Shearer
Page 1 of 4
January 25, 1983
Petaluma
California
STAFF: Gregory:C. Freitas, Community Development and Planning Director
Warren Salmons, Principal Planner
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minute's of January 11, 1983 were approved as
submitted
I. AL TARCA AND HENRY,NOYES, 824- PETALUMA BOULEVARD SOUTH - VARI'ANCE
Tape 6 - 141).
Item 2.311 - To consider a variance request by Al Tarca and Henry Noyes to
permit construction ,of a 13 , fo.ot - 6 inch wide.driveway to.serve a proposed
parking lot in the rear of 'the building located at 824 Petaluma Blvd. South
(formerly Red Carpet Realty).
The public hearing was opened.
Speakers: Dick Lieb, #1 Bodega Ave:, Petaluma, representing owners
Marion Moore 884 Petaluma Blvd. South
The public hearing was closed.
Motion introduced by Comm. Head, seconded by Comm. Popp, to approve a
variance - fora reduced driveway width for 13' 6" as shown on the submitted
plan after the- f:irs:t 20' from the front property line;'and that the driveway
width be expanded in the sou.therl'y.direct.;on to measure 16 in width between
the front property line and a point not less than 20' back from the front
property line, based on recommended-findings.
AYES: 4 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 3 (Hilligoss, Lavin, & Shearer)
Comm. Bond noted that he wanted feedback from the City Engineer regarding
draining at-this property.
II. NOVAK DEVELOPMENT CO., CASA DEL ORO II, SARTORI-& CASA GRANDE - EXTENSION
OF TENTATIVE MAP
Tape 141 - 152
Item.6.470 - To, consider a request by the Novak Development Co. to extend the
I -
:
•Id':C
Page 2 of 4
PETALUMA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY 25, 1983
147
II_ Novak Development Co. - continued
the time limit for filing the final map and improvement plans for Casa Del
Oro'II, 47 proposed single family lots at Sartori and Casa Grande.
Motion' introduced by Comm. Bond,, seconded by Comm. Popp, to grant a six
month extension forthe Casa Del Oro Unit II Tentative Map to run through
8/2/;83.
A Y 'LS: 4 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 3 (Hilligoss, Lavin, & Shearer)
i
III. 1983.`PLANNING COMMISSION CALENDAR
Motilon introduced by Comm. Popp, seconded by Comm. Head, to adopt the
proposed 1983 Planning with the deletion of December 27, 1983.
AYES: 4 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 3 (Hilligoss, Lavin, & Shearer)
PLANNING MATTERS
1. League of California Cities - Names of commissioners.were drawn to determine
who would attend the' League of California Cities
Conference on March 2 4. An inquiry was made
to see if all. members could go to the meeting.
2. Clarification of Condition - All Points Towing, #1 C Street - Use Permit
Upon questioning by the Director, it was" the
consensus of the Commission that the words
"tow truck ":should be deleted from Condition
#4, minutes dated.11/23/82.
ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned at p.m. to the next regularly
scheduled meeting of February 8, 1983.
1�8
Meeting dates
January 11
January 25
February 8
February 23*
March 8
March 22
April 12
April 26
May 10
May 24
June 14
June 28
Page 3 of 4
1983 PLANNING COMMISSION CALENDAR
July 1
July 26
August 9
August 23
September' 13
September 27
October 11
October 25
fl
November 8
November 22
December 13
P4t4ff )6) ?7 No meeting
January 10, 1984
January 24, 1984
*Moved to Wednesday due to holiday and City Council meeting conflict
1
Page 4 of 4
PETALUMA PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES JANUARY,25, 1983 149
i
ALlTARCA AND HENRY NOYES, 824 PETALUMA BLVD. SOUTH - VARIANCE
i
ITEM 2.311
FINDINGS
I. !There are peculiar and unusual conditions inherent in the property
in question sufficient to cause a hardship, and that such conditions -are
not common to all or most of the properties in the immediate area.
r
2. hardship peculiar to the property and not created by any act of
the owner exists due to existing building location.
3. !Such a variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of
substantial - property rights possessed by other properties in the same
zoning district and in the vicinity, and that a variance will not constitute
a special privilege of the recipient not enjoyed by his neighbors.
4. iThe authorizing of such variance shall -not be of substantial detriment
to adjacent property, and will not materially impair the purposes of the
Zoning Ordinance or the public interest.
ATTEST:
Greg ry F ita
Community De elopment
and P1'anning Director*