The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes 02/08/1983Page 1 of 6 150 MINUTES Petaluma Planning Commission February 8, 1983 Regular Meeting 7:30 P.M. City Council Chambers Petaluma, California PRESENT: Commissioner Bond *, Hilligoss, Lavin, Popp, Shearer, an,d. Tencer *arrived at 7:52 p.m. ABSENT: Commissioner' Head STAFF: Gregory C. Freitas, Community Development and "Planning Director Warren Salmons, Principal Planner Cynthia Beeken, Associate Planner APPROVAL OF .MINUTES The minutes of January 25, 1983 were approved as sub- mitted. Commissioner Tencer corrected the minutes of January 18; 1983 to reflect that the public hearings on Items 12 and 18 were still' open. CORRESPONDENCE Mr. Freitas "advised that letters had been-received relating to the GP/EDP Amendments, and were distributed to the commissioners. DIRECTOR'S REPORT There is "support for locating a Santa Rosa Junior College in our area by the City Council. I. Diamondhead, ;Inc., 718 Petaluma Blvd. South - PUD Development Plan Amendment (Tape 40 - 54) Item 3.249 Revised To consider a request from Diamondhead, Inc., to amend the PUD Development Plan for the 53 unit.senior citizens condominium project known as Diamondhead, located at 718 Petaluma Blvd. South (AP# 08- 281 -52 and .55). Amend- ment is limited to reassignment of several parking spaces. The public hearing was opened and closed. Motion introduced by Comm. Popp, seconded by Comm. Hilligoss, to recommend to the City Council approval of •the proposed PUD Development Plan; Amendment for Diamondhead based on recommended conditions and "standard findings: AYES: 5 NOES :...O ABSENT: 2 (Bond, Head) PETALU', A PLANNING COMMISSION MINU Page 2 of 6 FEBRUARY 8, 1 983 151 LI. Negri- Murphy, Park Place III Subdivision — PUD Development Plan Amendment (Tape 55' �i= 82) �t Item 3.300 Revised - to consider .an application from Negri- Murphy Co. to modify the housing models previously approved on Lots 93 and 97 of Park Place III Subdi- vision, from two stories to one story, located on Rainier Ave. near Maria Dr. i The publiF hearing was opened and closed. Motion introduced by Comm. Hilligoss, seconded by .Comm. Popp, to permit single story models proposed by the applicant to be developed on Lots 93 and 97 in Park Place II4 AYES: 5 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 2 (Bond, Head) pp III. John Balshaw, 1680 Kearny Court Use Permit for Accessory - Dwelling (Tape 8Z{- 258) �I Item 1.380 - To consider an application by John Balshaw for a use permit at 1680 Kearny Court for the purpose of constructing an accessory dwelling. The publi'. hearing was opened: Speaker}: John Balshaw, applicant, 1680 Kearny Court The public hearing was closed. Motion introduced by Comm. Lavin, seconded by Comm. Popp, to approve a use permit for 1680 Kearny-Court for an accessory dwelling 'based on recommended findings and conditions, with Condition #2 changed to read: "The exterior materials and color; scheme used on the proposed enclosed porch shall match the materials and colors of the accessory dwelling," and, Condition #3 changed to reads "Appli- cant shall provide parking per requirements of the Zoning Ordinance." 'r AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 (Head) IV. The Great Petaluma Mill, ,6 Petaluma Blvd. North — Entry Modification (Tape 259' - 312' Item 1.3.2. To consider an application from The Great Petaluma Mill to modify the southern wall of the historic landmark for the . purpose of rede "signing the B Street building entry at #6 Petaluma Blvd. North. The public hearing was opened:: Speaker.: Dan Waldman, project manager and co- owner, 618 Grand Ave., Oakland The publ hear: ngA'.was closed. Motion introduced by Comm. Tencer, seconded by Comm. Lavin, to approve the proposed! improvements to The Great Petaluma Mill at #6 Petaluma Blvd. No. Page 3 of 6 152 PLANNI NG COMMISSION AGENDA FEBRUARY 8, 1983 The Great Petaluma Mill - continued based on recommended conditions. AYES: 6 NOES: 0 ABSENT: l (Head) V. General Plan/Environmental Design. Plan - Land Use Ma and Text Amendments CONTINUED FROM 1 1.8 83 (Tape: SIDE II 313 to Side I 406) Chairman Shearer requested staff to present a review of Item 4 -- adopt or relocate urban separator as per the Petaluma West Specific. Plans (Tape:. Side II 368 to 236). The public hearing was opened: Speakers: Matt Hudson, 205 Keller St., Petaluma,. representing Baldwin Ward, Carol Fullerton, and William Bullard Baldwin Ward, 286 ".Sunnyslope Road Carol Fullerton, 250 Sunnyslope .Road Bill Bullard, 556 Sunnyslope Road Steve Buckley, 620 E. Washington St. Al Cattal'ini, 433 Clearview Place Robert Hayden, representing Bill Brody, 300 Montgomery St., Suite 723, San Francisco The public hearing was closed. For the area along Sunnyslope Road, it was the consensus of the commissioners to move the urban separator to the inside..of the rear property line, with 2 units/ acre (Suburban Low Density) to remain in the lower portion of the area below the 160' contour; and ".above that point to' show 1 unit /acre (Low' Density Residential). Staff was directed to prepare said revision for recommendation to City Council Chairman Shearer requested staff to present a review of Item 5 — redesignate industrial area south of Corona and east of the N.W.P.R.R. line to planned residential (Tape: Side Il 368 to Side 1 194). The public hearing was opened: Speakers: Robert Hayden, ' attorney representing Bill Brody, 300 Montgomery St., Suite 723, San Francisco, 94104 . Steve Buckley, 620 E. Washington St. The public hearing! was closed.' It was the consensus of the commission to .direct staff to prepare additional alter- natives for commission review at its continued meeting. ,Chairman. Shearer requested staff to present. .a -review of Item `14 : east side urban separator and along Corona Road (Tape 194 - 291 Side 1 r The public 'hearing was opened: Page 4 of 6 PLANNINiG COMMISSION AGENDA FEBRUARY 8, 198 5 tl V. GP/EDPi LAND USE MAP AND TEXT AMENDMENTS - continued i Item 11 Speakers: Matt Hudson Steve Buckley Henry Chiosi, 498 Corona Road f;. Mrs. Henry Chiosi, 4.98 Corona Road Joe Matelli, 470 Corona Road Gary Collins, 436 Corona Road John Laverne, 428 Corona Road Edith Cole, 496 Corona Road 'i�c hearing The publ g was closed. It was the consensus of the commission to recommend putting this area under Study (16s proposed in the revised staff report of - February 3, 1983. Chairman Shearer directed staff. to review Items 12 & 18 . Comm. Tencer expressed concern about excess density .transfers city wide with Transfer Density Rights. The public hearing was closed. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 1,2:35 a.m. (2/9/83) to a special continued meeting on Friday, February 11, 1983, at 8:30 a.m. 1 � i . Page 5 of 6 154 DIAMONDHEAD, INCORPORATED - 718 PETALUMA BOULEVARD SOUTH— PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT ITEM 3.249 REVISED CONDITIONS: 1. A sepia. of the revised development plan showing the revised parking will be provided to the Planning Department within 30 days. 2. Appropriate amendments will be made to building construction plans on file with the city to reflect any changes in interior design. Exterior designs shall remain unchanged. 3. All previously approved conditions of approval shall remain in force. JOHN BALSHAW, 1680 K'EARNY 'COURT -- ACCESSORY DWELLING -- USE PERMIT ITEM 1.380 FINDINGS: 1. The proposed structure will conform to the requirements of this ordinance and the City's General Plan /EDP. 2. The proposed structure will not .constitute a nuisance or be detrimental to the public welfare of the community. CONDITIONS: 1. The. minimum side yard setback along the western lot line shall be at least equal to that of the existing dwelling. 2. The exterior materials and color scheme used on the proposed enclosed porch shall match the materials and colors of the accessory dwelling. 3. The applicant shall provide parking per - ,requirements.of tfie Zoning Ordinance. fib. 4 Page 6 of 6 it MI THE GREAT PETALUMA MILL - #6 PETAL.UMA BLVD. NORTH - MODIFICATION ITEM 13:2 CONDITIONS 1. The two existing openings in the rock wall of the subject building that contain the door's' shall not be expanded in size. 2. The existing steel door covers which were originally used to protect the door openingsifin the subject building wall shall not be removed. i, 3. All existing building color and material patterns shall be maintained. 4. TheCapplicant shall comply with all applicable building and fire code requirements. ATTEST: 1� Gregory C. F eita Communiyty Development and Planning Director I,