HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 11/04/1975PE�TALUMA CITY PLATJPd -ING�' COMM�I�SSI,ON NOVEMBER 4 19'75
REGULAR•MEET -ING
, , .
CITY COUNCI •L''CHAMBERS'� C °ITY''HALL:`' °��' "'� PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA -
p' PLEDGE :ALLEGIANCE,, 'TO THE' FLAG
ROLL Comm. Bond -ligoss Horciza Popp
L CA L:, Co Head Hil
'Water s Wright
.
STAFF: Dennis Boehlje
Leo P. Rachal, Associate Planner
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
CORRESPONDENCE
CQRRESP� ., .
CONSENT CALENDAR:" Downey Tire'Comgany - 'Site design review consi-
°derat'ion forlaltera;tions to an existing building
located at '52,7 E. Washington Street.
PHILIP L. J.OERGER - E•IQ. 1) Public Hearing to &,te the Environmen-
;µ'`EVALUATION /PREZONING Z15 -75 tal,Impact Questiorinai'tel for the prezoning
of two parcels.
' 21) 'Public Hearing to ;consider the prezoning
request from County Agricultural to C -H,
Commercial District for two'parcels
located on the west side of Petaluma Blvd.
North adjacent to the City' l-mts.
PETALUMk CARE &;
GUIDANCE CENTER USE
PERMIT
SUBSEQUENT RENEWALS'
- i REVIEW'':
JOHN 0 ' N YOUNG'
VARIANCE V5 -75':
H & H PROPERTIES
EIQ EVALUATION '&
SITE DESIGN REVIEW.:
Public Hearing.to' whether,or not the
assumptions of issuance of Ulf -:66 and subsequent
renezaals,�, are ��lieing'�;compl
ed with in respect to
property known as the Petaluma Care & Gui
�.. y p.ital)
Center (formerly Kegkuk Convalescent Hos
located at 101, Monroe. S,,treet
Consideration of a variance request to allow the
construction of a one -car detached.carport.with
a r car at �� a dequa'te for. only'
o ne ivewa, widtih and length a
t 644 F Street.
EIQ� evaluation and site design, consideration for
a proposed. open storage yard trailers!, boats,
recreational vehicles etc. to be located at 421
Pa
yran,.Street in an.i"M -L District.
Petaluma City Plann'ing, Commission_ Agenda:,, November 4. 19.7-5
RON HARDY EI EU
Q ALUATION
.
EIQ� .Evaluation and' site. design review for du
1
& SITE. DESIGN REUIEW:,
pnlex to be• .constructed :on, the - same lot with; an
existing, one - family dwelling at 7G0:9a" G "` Street.
MCR. INCA.. - USE' PERMIT.
l:)! Publi'c-'Hearing- t,o• consider a Use P'ermi't
U12 - -75 & SITE DESIGN
application, fo•r a meat' die boning plant
REVIEW:;
to be, locatedi." adJA' ent .tb th'ei Royal Tallow
& Soap: rendering plant at 2 Lakeville
Highway:
2' }• " Site design review for a. ,proposed:.meat.
_ de- boning'., plant.:
"D" 'STREET PLAZA - EIR:.
Pub-11c .Hearing:. to. - cons de'r the .adequacy of the
Environmental Impact. :Repo•rt '.prepar:ed'. by Del
Davis & Associates for the proposed' ".D" Street
;Plaza, including, a,, 7 - = Eleven Market and addit- ion - -�
al space' for ' rl sto =res.,. to be.= 'loc'ated at
122. '.P,etaluma. B1vd!.'' South.,
ADjOU;RNMENT'
� � n
;M T N U 'T E..
4 4 A !
IIY i;
fl
P$TALUM " CIITY PLANNING COMMISSI',QN M NOUEMBEk 4, 1975
ULAR MEE
u ; A , , t, � 30, P l . , ,, 1 ''
YI, COUNCITING
" � L 'CHAMBERSk'
,
.i ' r. " �PETALUMA;' CAhI +FORNI_A P
''CITY, HALL , " !
PRESENT ,' 'CommBond`'''Hea`d ,Hilhgoss, ' Hor;ci'za,' Popp; Waters, 'Wri g
or �I u _� p
S�TAFF Dennis iBoehl e Plannin Direct',
n � ), L.., g
w
. I;
�I A•PPROUAL OF';MINUTES•
The minutes of Oct`oberl " ; fi`975 ,;fand Octobe x 21,. '1975,;; were ap.- I'� �,
proved Was submitted
I l
l rqt I,,,u s
C ORRES_PONDE, NCE
Mr�. Boehl�e the Commission that the 20 -da eriod allowed
e
� , r :,.
GIuluil; '. �I', ���
A nformed ,? o-lp
�, „ - , • _;
' I,' of n g , I
r
Wrecking�and6- "&'., try Customs' to comef.irit;o confo "rmance
D & D "� C Use j
ed He tat D &gD
conditio ns " of their P ermits had end
P I1Qn ti
a� 4 pad Pdv 1. Ili
Countr J com -fete �b movie
y C e- to te
u I
once a com
,hand ain_' with the
g p lied _
4 n
p
i
JN
conditions of Permit <. _
F his�.Use
i.A' + -. .,..-
ilp� y "1 1,I 4w R iil
IhJ ""y I +I-
, ill ,� •
u �I DOWNEY TIRE; CENTER
Ul,r.+
S tir r L
Mr:. Boelil e;lirPiefl' reyiewed the ro o °�> ,
y p p I s,edr, site' design; for convey_
SITE> DESIGN�i REVIEW
s on and remodeling of�,�the structure previous) usedb � ' eale
; - . -, , y i ' Y , '.
I, „III
,. m�
Uolkswa'gon art 52Zr� E ast�Washngtonr Street The r,ecomended changes
J tips
•'
Architectural & Site Design Review Committee, regarding,
e
�
N � �iA "'I,�N� H
.�... ' oJ �.
s igh ,4 ` .L
landsca n ,Iand�ahe fr e' g were bro ught to thee; °atteri ,pla '
J g
,
, I "
- ��
t .
ton of' the; ,Commission: Comma He�ad�s,;
"
gtatedfhe obje
�;- ?'�
.: ..
�: ,�.,.. . ore thecwallA
the aPR.licant to rn� the i landscaping ,be s con,i!
„..:
I.
,put,M IJT w
s,truc,ted he felts t it ,iao liardship`n. ande_
A ;brrief; discussion.,followed;�xand _Mr �Boehl�e assured r Comm. He&&
need•'ao construct "the, wall ° before 4 ttie land =°
s :caping_,'was,',put. in
" IG I'ii " " "' � w 'y "
NSW MP �� )' Tire'
�made �the
r 9N
_ Popp a motion to ~approve site design . for' Downey
Cop
Com an reomended b
'y,,with,..cond bons. ofn,:approval as y•..�,
e a i d e,
5 M,: ommi
r 4 •'
by,y,the Architectural and Site, rDesign.Review C it 66. , „.1 h,,
moaidn was secondedtby Comm Waters �,
-
a J ',� , 1 A r 4 ra r qll 4✓t„�, i , , • tt_W f�� u 1 „'
. a h ,�
" �I�I
L J
,AYES 7 Ot ABSENT” 0 s
- Jti
_a.•
y I
r,4 V w
'l` 't, i'_
I
p
HILIP`, L �J.OERGER
Bo e the ° �Commissi'o n,, tl a�t propert;_ owner
s rezphed
k EVALUAT, t
, fr
fh boundaries of dt�he r.o” er y� ro used ". be'�� mnst,°,.
eet l o_ ,the r r. , r". I , ,, P _P Y P P - .
g EIQ
' EREZON�ING Z'15 75�: _
1
be: .,not in aordoiiiclLied�twitlt�rorw
lip"
ruling had not b, n c p p toG �the of�
�':: P
y ,. • I p;
I u�ti�,�� , + °'��,
,i 1 7j �.� h I-d , h � ;�_ "I "L � ' wg I �
Oc-tober' 14;..1975, ; toths :aPPlcaton, Ntlerefore, �tle,
_ f
; .wit -
p fiearing 'would have t�o�, be,, reheld , Mr ;. Boe191� e' then briefly
0 9 ' VOW reviewed the, `re uest fo.r re el ] y 6 " a —, cres , f:ro' "
i , ^� q ,n . zoning Jof a L pprox l mat W y
A
u . ; .,- E fi P
a Count::y � ","Agricultural Dstr�`e'trtoa C H Hiaghway Commercial'"
strict at riser. of .the .intersection. o'f Hi h ' ,
Di loc ed on the ~north co l`,.,7f g y
u �6
n ,
16:1 with w Old; Redwood, Highway North. I.
.,
I a I � R!'Iti r I,. Pol _ � I . u'. I �•I. i
Nl
�
�'fl "d
Petaluma, City Planning Commission Minutes, Nbve`mbev X 19,75
The" p,ubaic .hearin. g 'relating, to the E I.Q n evaluatio was opened
No comments were, offered, , f y rom the audience' and tithe vubtL 'c liejkdn41 < .;
was clo d
Comm. Wright moved to .d tte; 'Planning; `Director, t4 prepar aid '
post a ,Negat'iVe Declaration'forr ' t proposed pr:ezoning•:. 'The motion
.p'.. was seconded_ by Comm., :H IligQss ' `
.r
AYES T ' ', " :'. -ABS °NOES' -t oo- ENT , 0 ,
'' - •';- . s
The p.ub'lic (hearing relating �to. the prezbning :was opened.,. , No com
ments were offered from the.audie_nce and the publicxhearng wash
Comm Wright moved to forwa _
h d
for the City Council „
r- a recommendat
' recommending appr.ovah of the C H prezoningi b�ect site:.
The motion was seconded[ b y 'Comm 'Waters
a .. AYES T NOES 0 'ABSENT` 0 u -`
a
PETALUMA CARE` &. Mr. B'oehl�e'`'brief`r reviewed the staff' 'report relatirigto 'the j
GUIDANCE CENTER USE_ f ; operation of -'' the `Petal'uma Carer and Guidance Center (f ;orriie -rly :then
PERMIT.: U11 -66 " Keokuk- =Convalescent. Hospital) , locate'dT at" 101 Monroe +'Street . He
SUBSEQUENT: RENEWALS advised, the -'that'; i.n -add tion - �to the -petiti on 'requesting,:'
- REVIEW ' 7 the Planning, Comm sE if ' to hold `a publlic r hearing for "the purpos -e of "
" r y, another geti.tion
r ;evoca "ton of the Use ,Permit for; 'this; facilwit
ha'd' been`,forwarded -to. the 'City Council asking. that Ais ; es 'of 'this .
type gnot�bet allowed in" res:dential'fare'as ,in the future Mr.
Bo _hl'j'&''also' referred `'to 'the legal 'op ni'on rof the City Attorney
which state 'that' any attempt by° nthe° City & ,Petaluma.''`to Prevent
" ca=re and treatment of psychiatric patients.;:at. the Petaluma. Ca and-
:Guidance Center would be a, violation' of t- e•'Welfa're.' , ;Ins ;titu -
„r t
bons :Code, Section ST20, `since 'the C "ty is bound by''rStatn. law to
permit psychiatric care thin facility in° add "i`tion to medical -.
The -Commission` wars' ;also advised that, this fac =ility 'had beef,
, care : ;
constr rcted, under %• he` `of. 116 :old' Zoning Ordinance,
therefore, 'the -new .Zoning Ordinance did :not-' apply. Mr. Boehlje
informed the r Comrimssion that, alathough they could 'not legally
revoke•. the.Use P;e'rmit; they could condition it with ;additional"
security mea'sures.. The City Attorney was'questoned', if a ;law•
existed'` -s ;t'a °tin that ;a psyclitatrc hospital- shoul no;t. be loca
g ted
next to' to school,;' or if the •code distinguished between psychiatric
patient's, o a border .].- ne`kmatur,e and (hose .who are actua.11y,'
g Y _ _
erous societ `. Mr?: Hudson r'e lied that no such rulings could
P
be found wi?thin` the confine'§ of `the, Welfare and Institution Code,
since •it ,s'a'tes 4`t hat 'if a "convalesceri_:t ho"'spital is °;permitted' in a
..
'z'one,-, - a distinction . `.'can not' be made' °betwee'n' +coriv'alescent hospitals
•' that provi�d.e car Ito- ,inedica�l pat'•ients' ^as opposed to those,
`provide care for• psychiatric patients ;r Since any convalescent-
hospital that hanalesl: psytehiatr;rc pat erns ghoul'd `be adequately"
equipped, Mt. Hudson guest oned the type of, security', this "`par -
ticiilar facility has . •
r:I p
t
IT
Eetaluma Ct Planniri ,Commission Mznutes.,., November, '4, 1975
t a, : I 1� a g j U�t t� p 4� ° ,, j �N' k,�.J iiR a�• } =I i°i!�}„>a f ,"h Ii'
W+ d
U
k Comm , Head T asked if there was any., as tb i 'the adequacy, , ;0
, r r *,� , a 5 q '3 . I ,,•, .� „a FM , .r Y r I "� ,'v„ t� •1 -_ f .�i
�securit me r f r Larr Hi i ..�,
rld ,
Police,yadva edettatrinhtheapasttthere ; h y : gg ns, Cderab
1 Pr 3 t � P , ..
_ aS been .cOnST le �: Mi
hie
+;wiith particular ., facility with regard,,. - primarily 11 to
rT
,7 . - 1, i . F ice. i t ,
walk sways Hestated that, S in 1'974 . k
t ere wer 34 c s of wal
M, "I' 71, Vo �„ „� sways, and ,thus ,far, in ,197,5'. there hadhbeen 17 Higgins
' j �9h'N , advised: that Ysome': of these walk -sways :wer " e ° sch'izophtenic"`peop -e
�T ,.� �,s�y , u .;
T4 rA� a :� u� . g ous to .,some but few ..,could. be c
;lass fieS n
'll:, 10"I" . „
some were -dangerous” e degree,, -
j. „ �,. y'• r 3� „. ,� ^„ ��E fI that caste or. a He informed the Commi.ssi.on that he.had met „ :,repea rl
redly with the sta g. y g�, n
attem t to yetfthemdtoana em he the f ty gg�ins '
3 0 1
� �1 r t p g s 4iY ,r'�.a old ritr0 t�le faGT 4 ,k: dal�a i .rl —
advised.,that °e adt six. weeks walk away' c
in th on
p ys ha ecreased
` j
siderably, and an duai from the Center s management today
p = had
°a n Ili , rur,,,,” p . 1, •� ' , ' m shad 3been Vto Increase r
• „� .additional mess -
y awa sl that 3
it to lk - would be.�kept,to a'minimum. He
secur
4 f that wa
stated. ; he felt t�;would' be difficult ,to (prevent all walk r sways hand':' p
P' 1 = 1. g, .,..tiT jV, nce . '�” n i e6dus6 of , 'y Y-11x f
r expressed his cor , 1 b; the psychoaic Efype ; of Lpat ents.`
e . a Chief Higgins was f
ol
a + in "vve an
S d the location of the facilit H
que "stidned' if,, other convalescent ,hospitals °had this, "same problem. r'
rk
..
He; replied that other convalescent hospitals did not Have walk
sways .or rufiawa ' s "to the , extent that the aSllb� Cl °llty, 'dld, h. p'Il t':
{ 4 y � r ec't fa
marily�'becatsethey` were rate differently, and had different
..
,r� Of atientlS.' .' 'l Ia q
„ IBS . 7 x:f
:. omm. Bond:: asked if Chief Hi ins had any- d
d C of ante- s u ggest-ions . f
r �N t y p es i S x b
.gg _.� _ y gg or
4 " y' f' !; additional .measur'es of" protection ,.Chi`ef Higg 'ns r,ep''lied l'that fiel IT l;
felt "a'fencesho be erected around "''rear ,of I �the site;',.and'`he h
r _
L i ,�. , �'�14.d"��•�r r y f A •vin '� i tl "�r. a�'1. i, 1 -}t` t ,:. . F 1 .d :. - •.
` „ the "Y thettfacil could be achievIngb ow meal' 4i
hit and »a et�ermin'in n _ y measures
° „''�` p1 � ;�+'' '� � i :. "' " "'�',C'omm" Po �iestoned `if` they State 'had °� an �'�regulation�s tha'�t Icould'�
tl , I' I� a W M h Cry j„�>",'yf II '� 1 •o"' a ,k vG$ . plp ,, q J , it ., y. �
be k enforced ' "' Chief' H ggin's ,replied that ^ there were -none' that 'he
was. awaref�•i ��3 T�9d° r; k
-
r b TI, , ch
' `" S hlatrlC teC�lnlcpltal workers wh'
aY�Y Mr;. Jeff Sackett employee o
py and at i�
represents ,a. „lar e number o£ c a union or
q r
'• -,r is •'i��, .. Ct ^.5'^ ,.t � - ,.i 3 N ,
, ' „ g , an
ere were, ma
i . dants,linformed the Commission t ire u at_ions
referred to Title 22, Division 5 Chapaer 3., of the State law „Mr.
r °,„ cad f`romT' °.T' t'le 22 ^ :`Beef -ons!' 72'047' and Z�2051 i ,.
a a ^Ip UI S
Vi tt
a'ckdt't' t1foriL r'a . i 4 1,,, Te�
have to be{ met for lic`ensin He, informed ° also conditions that
r t i�pp f. r• I. � toy- ,the,�deflnition.. :of� a :heal-gh r Ac and the Commission that if
I_ I. �"YJ`: , I ai - ..,. ., ..u- :. 1 , ,Z 5� M'; a u ...: � a ,i.. Yt! I t N..,
any one in the neghborhood,ihas any questions about !any oe� the
P
. tcular,patient Y or the ,;type of �pa�tients within the• .facih „y y'
have y g Y. F .
aton team �of t he 'Department' o Health Mrd E by. a nursing ,evalu,-
t
e ri ht to .re uest a'review conduc`-
t that wh Sackett' "also advised `
4 t r r" 4 en the fac ht` is ins ected the` t e o•f. e
care offred b
.:'
Z: y., = d; r 11 rr.�.ns P :�> � �. + T ,yP ry, .IUC if <,r :�. , „,,. I ty
C (1
that facility is gone ;over” by a u,tili.zation. review tom o'
a con
ph y8 r facilities ; in
of, "a s ic an a nurse ,and' admi�nlst'rators o f other-
� o a,. a � � ="U. � � '� Y I U - It
;.�.. _ .. ' �� �� P �' P' g_ if . , t, the;
,I ' ,H, y ' - �;•,,, + r, the I area and if;- a at'lent 'resents, a dan er to ',himse o w
.� - 4. .� u . , 1' J
3
communit or an other atents the center
y, y p t is ind a
;! ” „ e chars ed and he, ,show moved e
d that the patient needs; hav - g ldy�be is
•a � :
!F ', I i •I
I
•]
:
,
,
If
i t
uP 'k �`'•nNa �� ��� . II "� = n � P "� h'� . i .'I A'; 7�, Iflv � :.. I I. �� ,. .. �, ,, f. i :, „1; I� fin. h IL' r I� a � e � � :
•
• pt it � � :� I
0 III , °p'�l P'� ° I'• ,j..' ,G �h ' d, :. . '. ''„ ..1; II•, „ IV
"a' 4 "�
Lj ] �+i 41
vember 4, 1975
' P'etaluma Ct �Plannng Commission znutes; o
r i S 1 1
Mr, Sackett stated that he objected' to 'the 'patients being rimed as
f r
psychotic, since i th'ey ,were, in fact psychotic -,,- they' >wouI'd b in a e
, f -
m State- hospital and' not`.:in these' facil'i ies :�He. `further �st>ated that
the patients ; .were not animals`, but people, and had the .same •right
to demand protection' ft;om ,th`e Tne ghborhood as e nei'ghbor,ho:od' r
1 .de_ manded f. -,bfn them_ ` ,b
�, LL The public hearing. was .opened . ' Mr` Art Lafranch„ Attorney re-
presenting the Petaluma.Care a .
nd' +Guidance Center informed the:-
Commission that the acquisition of the fac
.: ility' by the 'pres'ent
:< 3
management was of very'shor,t du ration; < and' tie hoped flex Commiss on'
would take that factor -ifito. "consideration He - advised that. t was
t r NE the position. of the present management that i ther present
. and,
intended us.e �of the facihty�, as it now exists, as it has existed„
and wihl ex iri' the. is nof, . „in their opinion, .a 'viola,fion ”
that would justify any .suspension: "revo.cati ii Mr La-franchi
advis that' the' wi�shed� to - explain the nature o`'f roper
ations and their; future policies -'for the hospital- and they also
F �' wished to sit down with represe'nt'atives of the City. and/or �rep:te
s'entative's of the residents ' that area to, see °what tm hopds or.,-
pr,ocedures might ,be initiate "d to' alleviate the concerns' and, feats
of the audience;. y . j, „
Mr. Qyde Dahlinger, President. of Belcor, Inca advised the Commis
sign at 'Be opera ed 21; other facilities, five: of. which were
skilled nursing -f acilities similar to"'.that� bf Petaluma He 'ex
plained that; the facility was originally licensed to ';take 74 long
- .tt...
term mental patients and 25"convaleseent type patient's, and that
Iicens'e,, .which permitted the' housing; o.f mental patients within,` the
facility, .was still in existtence:- in its original form: Mr,.. 'Dahliii
per explained that the, : or,,i.g nal IIianagement had operated, for some
£ n x
period of , time and then, had.. gone into x',ecei:versh p, The - bankruptcy,
court then appointed a referee-. - 'op`erat`ed 'the, ,facility' for
approximately 9. months, until Belcor, ylnc,. 'went in under .`bankruptcy
sale.' He advised that "Belco 'r, Inc had been scheduled to. take over
i t the operation as, of, the f ir;s;t of� August , 1975 'but there had been
_ pr.ob'lems, therefore, they were presently operating - under . :d, manage
s' a • A a ' ( r
merit type contract, until all the legal, details 'of the• `sale could be
consumated. ;
Mr. Dal linger advised that upon takeover of'th.e facilities hi.s.
i. agency ;found anumber -'of things that, were inconsistent with their
, method of operation: He advised that `he saw a _lack, gf cori_trol_ of
patients and'' a lack of ,discipline of 'the staff , °and had taken
corrective measur -,qs by the placement of a riew, admznis;trator,' admzn
istrat ve staf "f, and program dir:ecto,r: Mr Dahl` nge - also advised
Y ° that atients wou ' j t a
p_ ld no' longer be ' given passes and" be allowed to
roam .the community, but must be accompanied by a responsible, party
>: 1' ee t
1 He, stated' that uniforms had ;recent y b. n utilized to distinguish
j t_ he patients, from the staff
Mr. Dahl inger 'explained that . the ,program "'o'f' the facility 'is to ; get
the patlenta back,, into the: community" as quickly as:'pdss ble. He>
y
I � ' 1 „,,' �Il�;fllr, ,I�, �r Ill ” + IG w ,, h I�' ' � ' I I I , u ` ', w ,' m•
r'
J ^I
r . y Planning Comriiissgn', �Nbvember 4, „ �� A
P eta l luma G' iI m x .. L 4 t 0 �I r 1 £•,
"l ull, - l,ti �+'�'ia'Ib d¢ "111, III ”" -A c',� ,,�'+''h �; S �M1 ,.
I
advised' t ... Yilh re'k;sc�reened by., then
!u n TM , P �l a ii
r S 1 rr _ Countand ents,,Are ,acceptfacild, a'
pr
�y + ed who have felony, records;
Y t offenders ",, or „o ous type ',_.'Mr `'DahlAnger, advised "'„ .
tl '
r Nl 1� It �, arse sex ."
t ttYPNe�f�m: tlR l h l'e ed c l'd b ndTled'' verbal
t t they o patien s ac'c pt ou a by
i- s,xr '.d .,M „�„t ,�}xr�n „t , :;and e � °4„ rl fit! -'.
control- and the center - w as intended to b e a_ maximum secure
o that hadl .'
-r,� L facilit 'r s ���ar {�3Dah] in erUntalked a'� ,:'bother dfac'ilities :.'
h
r u � „ .,,.» „ r . Y � g;,t � hry fr, NboUty
M�
b operated successfully E by his. He concluded by: saying;
,that he could,,not.,,say, there, rwouldnnever away, "since..
” h "d' not 'solve alF pr 'blems nmed'iate�ly; bu`t'" hey felt.
i'N ,.' .' r'ti. d i 1ur• q II �' '.� � , Ihh I ? 7 1 J ~ �
progress had,been -made.
thx�' G6uv ,. ".�'''� ," x , I '♦r£ "I {� �� 6 i � , , ten F,��,,, �F� ld','� 6It� �r l
�'� 4.Yhf .' m � It
Dr. �Charl Drectoi H of County the Sonoma Men al
Services ' i:n'formed the Comm sslori he d; ,id Tl ace• atients ;in this
^,I „ � 'f ill 7NM'.nlw".ur n p, N ,� ), 'r n��:.� ^M.va. ''°..,., �� ,o !` t r Y .q l P III', P.
dv ' f.
li l h,
� , p, n ai.sed thatino pa-tien't th a h omei; o wi r i'•story or
ae ptoclivity�to dangerous
'
y ' .� . • s .�� u w' m,l 'fi ".„ ! u ��f. �:, : _ r b r�,,a SC CEened� ". He"
,r;; ' , s,''r �r, . n ?planed there,,,lr since the f dcil ty
r r' �� N „ ,I , d :;r;:�� ,p” �Uhavior �ora'�sexual� ab� ormah ty
II "Iis� , I�r: �.,Ix� �
was+ not ^• intended..to handler that type of patient pr.� Nortron:.
advis that' it ways no tru e that all schizo hrenics. are ,d'an e .
„'L r _ rL._. P g sous,,
oo �� d s�nce „there were roba�bl , 3 000 or 4 7�000� people. whol cou�ld� be n +' j.-
A', P Y �k w„ , ry -
g , ' .ja r ; � g r. + Y ti 'advised, that- people
din nosed ras,. such hvin � in the communit He adv •
' i li d j'• " ° P "; w ' " 2 ;' nter- were ,those WhO were
,
I �� �Iaced in N the Pet'aluina� and Guidance f ,
"` :' it ;�noa: abler tot`ake ' care)'.of th`eir�! basic needs" without being in a
supervised, envrironment ,because of: ,an emotional ,d stur,bance. Dr
fi ,, Noorton
; rfur.t "� N, „ r Y N
a u- 4 n h
° herf stated y that ;if the y , „,
r) 'tR �
danger ,.existed ,toy the,- person ng away than to the community. - .
�,. ;'� ' '' , rt 5 x ' r i” .,. : JC r+' N 4, 4 A ,,, �, fY , I r nv _ 1, �. � ' " ' ' .a.
1„ f „ v v orl� N + 1 + h } t �m y
screenedybyathetCountyaofrSonoma�nsin. Tent had been
h ".
k ce felt t l
611- , w � ,, n S 7 ,t h t. had: of been.
the case (when Mrs: Berry managed the faci�ht Dr a plied,'
;. r
h {A ,• r "I s a c tl. r •,.i; Y NOY Oil re -
,. .that Mrs Berry, was part of ,the past prob since she
1
} 'f•, a ', ';I, wNNITIn bY
pass e theu n ystem x at� times " 4e: stated - is w"
h' pp I new many ement .,4 Dr''7 Nortonrr� further' advised that r
would not
� � .
fi j i a e at ents�are..screened whether the
r
r
all p , ,..y come from the: Santa Rosa`
P , r up t 1 plta, to ine,. if
�' a N , ` ,�, ;ti nt s akcres l determ
t fi faail a i�ty or fs,om the Na a State Hos x
6,w ,
theyw a re'a,dy;I a .g "radon) return to. the. community ss
Nr supervised facility
I,;,, I " liil � vG � • „� I. � "I'� d r , � r �.w „� !w� �,:.� i tn, n • ,” } a @i1
x, � +
I
a
•w J m V
, ,� 'Al .. R!
He advised that ,in the ,past., there had, 'been ,,patients placed. from.:
a —
oweve
, h,r•,,, he', now has an' agreement with the . new
r y. p'
pJ mana em`ent that aplon L a g s there are gtients from, other counties;
I a.g
k P
i . nit•, r Norton further
n their D,
he will. have the revile e of screens _ ,
adv+is "ed"ithat `Tthe ,Count - l ' provides the X_6nte'r;,wTth' a 1'fu11 -dine ,
I` schiatric i §ocial wo,rke and t Serviceof a staff ,S + c llatr :ist
P y P Y
g it rograms
„`i' Cle quate screening and, quay
in order to maintain a
_.
g i p p
x
l' a..,. i��, u� : ° ' :�ha'd notri ht: asked if any of resent atients in the facility
a 1 a rlPl N , ...: been t r . �Hr P P eS
. +I �.,I' IIII,,I;„ I' ��, ",,rl : : , .� t ` screened Dr r, Orton �,rephed that ah1 atien,ts r;r,
y�. � here, long enough to' .have ; been ti . .
ar y en tl p in y the a facilit i h�d been t that ;there were..,some
latoentsated into -the s stem He also advised
a'
admit,red f or r .needed fio be sent ,back to ,Na a' for more it not have,
h d mo
s a been re v frgm time to.,time whoa„shouldntensve;
p
N ( na a Y fl
4 l h
r 'a L a,� tpx � ! fi l l •, �,,a,� j j
r ',•-, " ' i it i. p' „•.. . v ' ♦,
,. "_ . r 'L'• h s ill x -I, 'N.' - ..,, .di �. ::, •II. . 'I .N - h V. ,,. 'x ,. . ,. ,. ., -
' • !. .
.L
•: • � ` . -`l 1D ur 'I �. 4w J Y 'KF} .j
Comm Bond questioned the extent of the scr eening Dr Norton.„
re ,hied t;ha,t °most of the atents'' are ,°
P d
Ladmitit from t
'Psychiatric,Facility in Sant :aRosa where they a,re thoroughly
- e
evaluated and_ treated- 'and`a - psychiatrist and full profess =ional:
stuff decide: `wher`e the person should" b.e placed
g.,. t
som a
a
eeisionismade t
r l
lessen ;supervised situation . Dr: Norton stated . that a, .few. pat ;en,ts.
also come from ,convalescent"'hosptals which arse, not equipped - to
deal with the patient, who is still Ambulatory but is a management
pro blem.. ' `He informed the Commission these' patients were also
screened by the 'sta'ff ,' .and ` p'laacement was ii's"' Il a team deciE;.,
Chairman 1 i a ested ;Mr Dahling t_o' briefly o tl'n'e the
' c
current eas
„ s
would °reo,ccur Mr Dab. nger replied` that the portion of the
fAtility that contained''the -bed capacity was kept •'behind locked _
'i B
Boars within the 'faci'lty, 'with windows that could riot . be opened
-�,
and exits that were connected to, "a fire alarm ,system -, He 'advised
that the side of the building with the 25 =bed capacity currently
• r
r r c
" he was contemplating n's•talfing ;Pocks , on these; doors' simihar to; the;
other .side, of t'he building, and "had`'already received .permis,s on
from the Fire Marshal Mr • Dahlin.ger stated a secondary factor' of
security is 'proper medication, sihce medication ,control an ;d chemo
�.
therapy` are 'a very important part of the program. He' advised that
k ` t
the program 'director was working very ^
:�.
^ closely w
,doc'tors' the' reforethare =
day-to-day cond , ef6ns and are afforded a much better oppo- rtuniE to:
ft p
better_.t t
,.
staff .member has i`een 'placed in _he lobby on a ,2'4 ,hour; basis.. As
to future violations, Mr. D'ahl�in'ge'r stated, he `would have to .d_e-
termine, what the breakdown in the present measures wa's I
'const
". t
threat to himself by walking' away from the: facility;; •he, would have:
to be transf;�erred for his own sa�fet . ',' Mr `.bahlin er'ifurth`er
advised', that' whenever' a walk away occurs,' -'the. - Police - Chief,,
'i. i ' � ' � � ,n I. rN; 'ui, r I" u � I rl I "i IW, :" � �. " � . 'I r v ' rl • �" ! " : "' .,.. • ^ r . y ` „�: � .
V ' 0I
UtY A °III �. i,J� I .: rl a.0, ' !1. ,I4 k 7. N ll e
Petal ' t Plannin' Comm •ss �I',.,
'lima Cll y ,; .. gr M � �,'" � 7 5 � " r " �I � � � "r ., ' I a ¢w � a A �1.� � r , 7"; •}1 s ,..,�. ; , ,
" I city"' ion�l nutes,� November 4
P
, N '
,
+u Hayenga ;spoke breflya' „regarding A.B X 284 1 an'd its effect �oi� local
• 6 1 ' �' 7 p r <
r II: g �. t ,� %� y at, a'Ithough they
G h. ,l „I , , r °. I�p r;l j hI,�I_� ° I� ;., ” „ arist. `I:Inc .. .even. "'a' ains',t the;' faci'1itYs: °hies „
overnment and theommunit state " t-fiat He sta
� � "� ha ., thing ,ag H" " d :about . a' �si over, Giliieti ��the ,had , L
d
L } P
arenas were Yl frustrate , in r�, .'ralthou h "th'e'' y � ;
P 'I 7a ,I ".� I�•�' control;: �µ Mr,. ,Hayenga stated that„ g People did; not have'
rt t ,. should be to of land for psych '-
k I a he felt that ever on
lil F 1 yl,+ �]� ^tea low'atric poses ,,next t.o,ra Ischool�;q since "this` was a public, hearing
i.. „ "i "i'. ry ,.I I U,r Ip r.R>rru m Nu4 r r , 9�n ,., �. , h,;; C 1, "U ,� v< • .1 _ :.F - �• v d,
:'I) " ' t � t '� :�� '" '. ',;.
rll II .� y r MrsF Judy, Barrett .info med� the Qo. nissiom,tha approximately' a..year,
4 a �y I k�w•.a s' w Ca
•' p " ago here s tt yeara oid�� daughterA,;hadj been, approached` by one`s of p tike
,,.
-,
P_
who as ked her,.to take, a- walk;.with `him, ',but had been
y r
,;immedia:telyapprehended 'Iby�. two men, from the° center "She also
telated that° while workin r in a nearb' p
� y u� r , �{ u 4, h'til�l 71 y r .'- r , "�' q �
g y sho ping' "center; 'she `ob"
,t. * ". h a'� ,Y
'' r P o the center b.
�� �mr�. t'lentsr ad, to be returned t
2 -� se_rved that+ sever a�� � � � g pp
;I }: ;Pr _.. fig . � bo a
" t ones entleman was,l a re -�
hended V by police of f icers - "di_ icr
k a
P ,.. the
._
���'�xa���dr" �L �ul school with ,his rants; : n doss t'heP streef f on
rom
w , downy'' Mrs Barrett informed the Commission
A 7 L u
I kI'r " ;v ti that4 'a .- r`egistered!'= nurse from Napar Yiad toldr her ,that a child moles-
+ P+ rter had; been: placed in `the f'acih,ty because: there was no other
11 !I, I k .l, y I w" place 'f'orA him nand the 'S M'" 1 �' rher ;to•�
do sa : She'' also, ' .11 d o ce
�. + ha f" r a'I s . F9�
advised' I that- 'she Shad had an k',inc dent ; 'her old'ei' ch ldren p had l had" an.
; , r d als�o�,been hurt by orie, of
�u these men Mrs Barrettr stated that a
riricident an Mrs. B � � I`^� h�" t h ' alTeshe e kriewho. � on
a ett, s ne ew a
as . , s f e
0 u " that' w owa.1cShe one '
1 e 4';;..0 a ^ 1w dlr been told thereeright' n i I ,` , ,�N,e. x, : �n hospl V man who hA in
II Nt l
curr' _, b'raifi- jdamage frgmjan �acc :d''ent 'and severely eaten. in ten t nurses;"
1" "'' i centertand I liad v walked awaysfroml He was, then' place this
pE .t + _ Je, ii
;nu �i� Mr
sr Barrett th rIGI� . g ors� id b cause of the.
that r�'liad. "�ha e "n` t 4t e
s ��k ' things,. stateP �' e -it yb werg, afra "
the patients „ would be onlyaseni -e eo needed
lerwhon y that
" lock =up been told . She'
nd tyre
had
one. em' lo: ee p P ' ,
arlso' §p &e of,
"'re ``ard n 4 l wtio was M - f fear :,
P� g g P Y „ �I pres`emt or
l li �:,
osing her, �:ob, who had had,,,an incident with .one of the patients, '
:. IPA P.�:iw., 'I Y P' )I� .� �:* Y
lrafilc k as '.. ,.. Y 1 ,t r i. Yp r ,. , n. '
wl earl ,
.fi eO le r " . _ e_ . ,- . _ 6
n 1975 Mrs Barrett stated she did- not feel this , t e of
• y ., _ p p ,could', bed controlled b voice �eommand:.and `she had not seen "
t _ s: at the facilit'
„ ' b� �MrPvl�� Y
any measurable tightening of the secur�.ty measure
ixddentl
� �
had'repor;ted t
,he „ inci dent° of „tier .
?dSlll gliter
.. ,toathelaauthorities�,iMrs o Ba "r.rrett ;re lied ,that she had''
I
P
- reported it,;to,the management, but, she was.;toid the oniy thingthey
; `d che os ck the: h a n a l t ke s ur e t all' of the patients
�wereaaccount'ed �f� ,� ,.. nd theyo ma made�aight'
or a had also of eft because 'her
u hter not ot- actuall een h Comm
. 1 Head stated that
da gr "on i W ,o •- Iti ,';�`, Y 7�urr armed' C ollLLal
I , • I � � b � g) this
con III( a �no.t onl exi,stecl ,
t
I ,.lpescent, home, but also. exisin � 4g. k n arya . of the, cony
the surroun i a
ted throw bout societl and was 'something'
P r '" C a' Imi.a "1 ...:'" . b 7 n. �.'. , a . H
.. , c�.ng e'
peo le ; would have live with �, .An ar umen;tive verbalexch ly
k '' y �aa_ 1 k'� ,. fglllowed betwe'en':Mrs' ,-JBa•rrett :and , Chair
- -and, mn ore za,
1. d h _ r, t' t . r rder
I
C a
mee i
o 0 4 7' "��at�G .
'I:�''� riti" °
T f
1�IN II
14 �
�e
Z ,
lil I r
r J
it
,
r
1�
I
Petaluma City : Planning Commission Minutes;,, November 4, r 19;75 - '_ Fr ':� *• "! _, ryYS
Mr 'Sackett again addressed ithef Commission, ?fireferring to pyast a .
1 F [ ♦ _ `
eg•isla;ture =that had closed down -`State`s hos`pritals an "d ther,,e�f -ore .made•
this type of facility necessary e - e »also us;tated that` if M'r ,
D •g
r r' ahlias er ,wants to' change as'much as" a doorknob in the facility, he
would ' go through 17� separate' agencies. `Mr Sackett scatted_'
' that most bf'L ,the ncidents` raised tonight took place "'under the
receivers shi _ which, was` coeducted much' a h "k_e =that of an absentee.
,. P
nd'1 "'d. He advised that : an �- inc'ompeaent registered riursel had ;run
' California 'epartmen`trof tgehavgainst Sher' with the
"
y g g
z
e her license
revoke'& 'Mr. I Sa'cketf 'spoket• of .'other - phy.chiatr,ic. centters next to
'•• i . , mo t '�_- J. ,. , ,: -' her towns
residential areas; schools; :and 'shopping center's in o •,
' z ooperation 'of 'the commun y In' those areas H'e ob
a ected ;t' h
e und'erl in h s;tera, found" ;in= the .nei hborhood and
expressed the desrability'of mee'tin'g'with•.Mrr: Dahlinger `Mrs
andmos 'erationeo'fa'dmin- iFstrator) and him "self,': regarding,;the" existence
i
tl • r a ft,
p the facility at this 'lot ion. : Mr., Sackett agreed'
that sex of fenders did' not belong ' in this' facility, .And . if the -
x •_
F "I nurse who liad' be %ri' .thus con•frorited' would' forward a letter, to Dr',
7 Norton `identifying, that `sex- °of•fend "er.. - he feat'that i,t'would behoove,
Be . Inc. ands Dr ;Norton totremove''that�bpafient to, the proper
' - facility, Mr.' Sackett °stated 'he,Afel`t ahe hysteria had been gen-
"` # erat'ed 'under ario'ther' adiniri 's ration';: aindt Belcox, Inc.i
should ;be given a° chance
�F . '
"4 tl•,
'{ Mr: Hank Scho'enlen addressed the' Commission, informing them he was„
x' the Dis,trict'•Administrator "fot " he Department of Health in char -,ge
licensing that.' fac.i Aty •and was available for; any, ^questions.
Mr. Dah'linger informed. the'Commission;he d'd not' agree "with Mr
' Sackett, that' the. community was' being 'Yiyster cal. n.;their.
�- since ,he, redllized`'they' were' concerned ,paren'tg• and were looking, at
Past even. o.
' Comm_ Bond asked. €Mr.• - Schoen`1
ein
" if hsa• office, was the licensing
i • ' `agent• ;for'' t ds°;;f acili`.t y; arid' how, `of't'en' ,, inve'st gations were :con=
a th'e licensin a i r : for the Pet'. Schoen�le n
vise that :they. °were.
` d'u - cted sunder, their policies:, Mr.
g g y aluma "Care .!and Guidance Center;, and_
- investigations. were po n dutIted minimally . once Yor ;twice° a year arid, .
also within- 10 days ',of any complaint He further. that ,the"
r ..
facility must meet the stan'd'ards. `of Medical. and' the L'`icensing
Program and inspections were made ,as ofate' as 'necessary to_ iri'sure
compl ° fiance with ,Ticeiis ng regu'lat Mr , Scho:enlein clarified
lh'at' -no' complaint's had `been "�r,'eceived since: "Mr. - Dahl" nger took over_ -.,
further advised that' three: weeks ago, avisit= had
4
been °made ,tolrasc'ert'aim, the status of the n'aine change and also to
' determine 't_fi`e status' :of the. =:25 bed, portion of the facile y. since.
ale Department' of Health''l ad only approved; that facility to 'h' e, 7
p
mental - ,&isordered s and the rest were to..be of g a .; general'.
. � Y P
atient
nursin t e. Mr Schoenle'n clarified that ra name Chan e requr`ed
a new 'application.'.
k . 'uf
w h f� or 4IF i. I J . •,; P I �'� I'
-
I
,
arming h Commissi "on Minutes -, , Novembet' 4, 1975 _
Pmn ! H Y -� S �,�'
Il etall1II13C1it P� I � I „ ��,u,' Iw f
,
P E r w..•
I 9
III l d Mr'':I yv, w - M, g O'f
r it Iw�P�� n , �-, , e.Y.1 f
"• 'P'P'° °I ` p "� h Petaluiriaeand °made com
P
; ; ,.31 beir ig r �r,egis,tered� here this I ;eY enin I . He, ; that his off =ice does_ : f
491, ,5 �I F3 N6 �;u. ,l e
al a P� .,a r w u ,.St I„, < compla a,41 ttersnar .eWinvestga to
aal+ k
t ,' V, 4 *�� J,��u�, I�, i� � db , res and , lto t a.t lea., 30
g.ted Comm.
t B r.- g' r choenlein when h r, {ga. ` Y s. .. 'i g
lu 3ond�laskedmMs� -Sono i:I6i t”, e, + +(� a ,enc shad last invest ated',, he
r p'lysicatl`facilites' Iof tlie�. cerite °r ' Mr' i Sch'oen'lein replied than t
had been about the latter part of, the summer,` approximately August,
,im I !r„" „ w' `fif y I, �; 1 k,i al. -F .� 1� * i y, Y ,•r +A i A � w � I
„and there had,4been, nW outstanding, ser' iious� ;noncompliances,hwith -,anyw
of, the regulations r
E
4 7 '111{ 14.FI 4 4'. .,Ei ,4�, a i
N l m•a ,r ,4r utk�ll,ly P I j',I ' v I,,} 3u t 'c 4 ' 1 ment;`o'f 'faci'lit randt�
Comm Bond, referred tq, the protective ..e e r y,
asked . Mr, _ Schoenlein l gy I i�t� d. be done'
a
" felt there was ,anything that cool
to I make + N i t saf `r, more protectiv Mer e,Schoenlein rep ied "that
+ ",!. Y � u,. �Id ur � _ ,hW . , I
the faeilityy,- need`s to have, 'a_ quality taff and .a'suff.io ient number 1. v F7:P' t
�r, so , d n f, r t r o assure P F i M f �. a n ally provid`edf :He .
qlt y
of stlaff w e the er method " gr
n �, Est %ated,'that anotht the car sethealockin facilities.).
However;, Mr , "Schoenlein added there was no:,law'. that °;says: the-.fa-
, . t !
I t
ci''lityr,N,has..,ton bet' locked III Hel,�,also,t�adv sod thatr -fenc ng-k is' reason. -'w
R T, •o-
a able' ode`" endlri l O t�le' I18tuY ' ' the `' " tierWs ° , ..1 n' "the „f'aci'lity;' since
�.
in mo facilities that car for mentall t erect pati'ents;.
° 111 there. Are eo 1e..who',n'e d and retreat '
a P
on In an ('enclosed'
I ,
II e
area
'T
r u I ,PY u° F m. ' a
p ¢
+i u'I yl "' . .,ulk ���I +j 1N EMI 4111,,, ra � u,t
,
J
Comm ,''Bond Aske i' flh' e' . 'hadcanylo;ther'suggestions.,. Mr. ,'Schoenlen,;;'
re lied that he f tk p� a g y "on - .the cooperative
d a , P ,' U
effort.Iofthe,; eoele Iin i mmunit re 'Heastated that nput i fromh
the Count- �Mental';Heal'th Pro ram in terms ;of` rovidng s:` chiatric
staffs" ro su "" lemenv thi staff of , the facil 't pwas aSso imViortant
, PP _. -
F PT iq UL �� I, y P
A
„ m , �.r � '.,��`'�' . „gal» . aMr. �Schoenl'6iA'adyisl that ,in facilities where the people inl the
community are involved` as volunteers; it tend's to make 'that - ,fa
c'111t ° 6more dka 'r'� uof the 'communt and ''the communit will then
y I r 5 u,. ' r � !�. P �: y
n
not tolerate ,a bad .faci.lity Het °also,�clar fied''tliere was °'sno d'ef -
1 r.
c'ertan of at of stasfabe.su lied for a_ I.
� pl te re �uiremen . that a� tor � r � � t l PP d � by the
fain amount
1.eVel'.,o'f ,care 'neeed in a m p eterminer
” ents since thestaff
given facility.
4 ... n�'
Al i Art' Lafranchi''.advised „k 1 � '` L
' - . City; org ci
down�wi h representatives�of � � - "' an y tiz � P epared° to, sit
k
1 D
r { a in er, was) r • of the
ens
r J �. t'�''� �I- 1 t r. r ... ' �Y'.,� _.p .. to n. '1 , ,.
,communi'ty,L to,�talk�about the secure- j ecifics He stated h felt,
1 r :VIA I 'IF y(I!,r „ .`,a, t^I ��. ter, if ,�IA4e'w�prki 4T 1 r.4 II ly j � A nI I I.',. a u.. .,
It was l impossible "ifor'I_ this.' body to draw p up A sp e ec =f , c- guy deline's . at
Ili a I. I�• !�
th
I�"M cFl �r1.S x t lme t 1 ,l
I� ,� P . �, t� -
_ II M1n ��� I, _ I' :. �. r
Another, member" of the audence' .patients .were''allowed
CrC »r to take walk Al at ^g one time ;y since,she, had ,see
n at� 20 patients
1 °'•' '..'�, W'; w '' 'V, G �iw ; th�,only two, at'tendan�ts,l'I_an ', "questioned�ll�the ^'capabil� ty' o'f two
��
o .r3 + ��• ,
attendants handling 20 patients if they choseto run away,. Mr.
a d
; ;,, „a �I �, „'�` 'II' II D;ah��ling�er, aag'reed that �two'!�'�eo rle "coul'd not phys cally I hand'�le'w'suc�h .a I II �1 I' r u, 1 f yk ffy, P,� p,ll siY the 5s hav�ng the I y abili tyP;to walk under.
, Itl 9 nl”, 7i, C Ilu. 'y Mlle r �I d§ 4 6 rt O �, . .4” 1'* il l Ip .. I { f
c,ontrol pare ;allowed t 1toG go 1 Hel„ further 'advised) that t +here;;,. had never
ft . y'.. � � „ �� 4 0
.'
b een
atierits T.ked aiaay �l,f,rom�the 1pt ev
r @@ N a a d• P. d - Y P
�Ir ,.•p � -I
II• 6 'li 1 C I ° +, „ �'4 r ovTS , � f �,I +174 d� . r � I�. �,.I ,I� ,rll
III P' -
1 tl ,h I I I
,N lie, II' I °II„ ', I I °I ; , e'�I , ,. v ul I IL , I j. I I I. „ ' :C � �, �., I'' �;'� „ 16��✓j, q „ II .,, a ,'tl � I
"I
Petaluma, City Blann ng Commission Minutes= November 4, 1 "975A`
Mrs Barrett' asked if the agency „provided' someone. 'who was' gualf i'ed
`that,
tq` physically control the- persons!: Mr - .Dahlinger replied if
all 20 ipatien 4 e6idedtol run; away at- once= iwt .would be, an 1. os.
sble stuation,`'`however, ,he advised t�wa's not. likely to happen °
a•
and had not ha erred ri the °past,.' He' explained - the ,peer control of
pp
the in
` group itself witch the `patient's are` involved. 'in self
government, help'`organize and direct behavior toward -the other
`
patiens , and also help control other�� patients,.
Dr. Norton again addressled the Commission;; his= concern
regard _ng the incidents that had reportedly. Occur red,., He :stated if
tlies.e ricide its were not reported" to him by° his -sta'f'f ; he .was; 'sure.
it was .related to the ;past management, of the 'facility and he did ,.
"
not lfeel these incidents would be allowed to happen under the hew
management to that ..degree. 'Dr,. 'Norton advised, that if the people.'
W
in: °the communit continue 'to have incident
y s Tor. complaints „that they
`
Q to° "w ork out with M Dah�hnger; he would appreciate it
arse- not able' :
”
y
if they would report' them to him. He ?furthern advised that., to `the`
..
„
best of his knowledge and ,ability, no one who: has the °potential to
'
be d_"a_ngerous or, who is:" a sex of fender' ;will, be or ha's ever °been
x.
ii
placed in that f ac 1 ty
Diane; Sievers referr=ed to the • type of individual. who has been
, nd, then 'rplea_sed, :only to go back :into, ,an ;
- institutionalized ; a
institution.. ` She uestioned how' °'an one could anticipate
q y
ti
what would' happen, when the ` patients were out for walk s or unoffi
u
cull walked awa. from the hos tal ' 'since
y Y P �, it would .,take only
incident and 'it :woul'd 'then be too::late 'to d'd. anything about it,:
Mrs DeYoung a 'resident on `Madison Street„ stated she, ,had observed
one of -the 'patients peeking ` through windows' and, at : te "' Ling to -
obtain 'entrance by means of: the windows , ''f'enc'es ; and doors 'She
:.
... y
A1 'uestioned ;w,hy 12_ to' 20 people had to' taken for a; ;walk,•
"
•one time, .and stated- her fear of 'the situation..
The pub lie < h'ear.ng was `clos'ed'" Mr: Boehlje clarified that a,. public
hearin had. been held at the issuan
,.g e time of the issuance' 'of the original'
_
�
Use Permit which.'`Fiad subsequently undergone periodic
however some of tlie' assum 'tions "Tof 'that. Us,e, "Permit were diEf erent
p
than those operations , exis.ting ',now Comm :'Waters stated` that .sin'ce
f1 e'•use has changed since 'the time "of' •of the Use P ermit
_
he felt the ;Commission ,had grounds for,'`reconsideratfon . of : , dais
;usage..
µ The City Attorney, adu.sed :that the • law doles- noti distinguish between
types'of :'psycliiatric`patieri''ts,; 'tire ability 'of, the faci'lity
• "
itsel to handle any particular' kind !'gf psy_chiatric patients is
: 1..
then aef.t'�u to the. ,l de agency'; He stated lie, understood_ - "that
"
the Commission had ap `roved '
p_ the ''use assuming`a, specific kind of
patient, but after, that dec- ision_ had ',,been made, the ::State *had
decided a'o put p"sycli atkic'�care under' the "local government.. I•t .
"
`therefore changed' the rules'; and., the "Commis1sion''s decision was made
"
s,iib� ect; to •that particular section which does 'no distinguish
p L „
1 1
I, s nh
ITT I
on Minutes;, November. 4 1:975, _
Petaluma C � Plann n Commiss u � � � ���
1 .. Y o, o. g Smi 'itm ;�' �'ii'�.v r Y' �m�'w �A1
A� l ry r f �q
� I v `� "�; , y . "° I ,
is
h '
„r , I„ ,.'.. 1 ., '. ,. Yp , -,' , R . r; .. pp' : fate Yp.
H WI .,,. � t. � + °,:lo�between�;the�tl .I es of: _ ate enfs r coTnmr, P : �, ,,,� ,;II d t t �
r 9, tl $ !IR 1.x q },� ..t t :.. , r �!� I 3
acility was'.,located in the�',lK commune y "now because of tthe r
e PO A 9+"r .?3 .3r, t C- r. i.l co C s* "tca,t ta.r
.
� r m , closing o,f,. State , hospitals, Ahe, mmun ty ,_ must face theafida
1 , 1 , AIY f] t :�.',e z ' ' r . er, 1'e ::have: 'to 'be4 C ared` ford ' He` recommended °a 'meeting IT I ; . rd 1 �
that ��the�se�p °p citi a�nd the�'Pol�ice, Chief to. determine
'
r of the owners , the z,
f .`£ J 5 S':'. <s'k3f� y t +r +! erlw � As.k -vial 5:t#� N"a 1 n
_ 3 s a i ! 3i^ t t +t1.,3 • }„
n , 7 lion.
! `L, L ., -v IR �I 1 17 Ya m u, � ''� n4 T I `•t,{. `d'i
nec'essar contro' s to r.emed the situation.
tk�J CMa3 Yt� a'
F' ! a�Jkn� �wb . �s ��€
' u q hat o tions were U o en for the 'Commssion to
Comm B' ��✓ w
�� and uestioned. x .s,� Pa .. �; p�s�,�>r ' .
°' 1 t7 s£3t t,J;dP rlt.
p �I!n� „ "I u''�Iil, Itw , k ,� pu ueyto that adequate �secu� y precautions would be taken, °,,„
q idlr, 7 u sk to � i t , 6 fi.lk 1 "d ff'o
b Mr, s Boe'hl� e '=replied tha the Use 'Permit coind be condit-ioned re
lating to additional security measuresp, s n'ce' "the necessary pubaic
i pity •ry,i ! d �G 1 �w .I,a qtr, ^ held 'However he s,tated., - h6
hearing had ,been ���' ' `�' was not sure he would "+I''
J
"� 11 1 t � Croy . d' r ,.a 1r3�' $ m
3'� b:rc {ommefnd� any acto t t�h ass porn , { sin e felt it 'wo.uld b.e .;b:est''
have Mr. Mr Dahlin er: sit down with the Police ,Chief, 'members of
„ ¢ <Of4A 1
the, co !
, av , P
s,ecurit: t situaion rah remature conditions ,the
„ minunity„ andq himself t'o discuss y "the ossrble�, solutions fo
-u * � ,.r:. :� ; � a tR y'� t ther than to attach. 3. s,, .I .3 t'f: .)-�'�. d• wr3. .M. t'�;a.,d 4 «�.+ u.1P � i� _'at
I,�, "JV�' d, .1 thus time that, �' berfeasble �,:, Comm. Bond stated he felt
A �u o;. z
� "r: 4Lj,' t" t �rw 3 ,:E hr t; I limhg t T10 .': n.Iw ad,� . .
��, t'he Commission should .be represented on this, e an`d added
4 of "" an. meetn s' that '.Mr'.Nh,Da" g� hake the - place
y u e'et ngt h kl'this' hl g�et"I ht "hd to' educate t,
that he
Q I; 'ti , ' ;, ; i"� r ' h I i
?ro':.e ✓ ,.en t�, l,� �dA •i,/,+'w+'!"l dry,l ,y4t!4 taT fr ",,,y ;+��tr. 'y .'' i?, .�. �1 .. ,-' AU; " Y N . •: '•i' *'k'I ,N �:' " .:I.
Ih rl r;q NA ., . Ddhl n eri'had indicated he, is alreadylR °;
Comm. Head s,t'ated that Mr
's `�" ��I' d �� `� ' r' 'riew m ° rovem nts; �andd�h felt the Tbtf scion should wait, and
mhen ' h .. , ",. t -�, mm , Popp disagreed,
g P
then have the city and „County checkif`, out Co
IIII "ua a,; nl ll+ J Iu t ; stat ngj that'' he, fse t act necessary at : this time. Chairman '
4 u'
" . dlri�Zted _. the
.N P .I r g ect et up a meeting
Horciza; Tepr, esentati .veshof- thenCommDss;i.onor tq a •.Chief,,. _: �'�r,
IT
h b embers Of the ° communt 5 'arid Belcor '. Iric tComn lice „ t
y /y h Bond and Com m
n f.V�-3 {i� 5 ✓ll� Ra i r � 16�t �.X k r }\iY� �.Y Y l ' S.YA"l� �� 4 9x'j'�:G ;.,�,',�. -��. '�y
��;P,opp mo�lunteere&'fo b`er:repr.esenta'tivaes for „'the!` Commission, rah .,
,I� lY j i 'L'.!I 4 i�', ,u..� � _ # Y � L x �. �"3� h'.. U,
a F
n # 3' j# r r
m'.. -
I II ; I I,. A.
m _ . , _, -.. ., a y °; � ; .i „ ,. .. ,. , . , � �a 4 .0 ..+.r z'N ..�. Jd v •? ..L'::.� # :+' ;'
A recess was called at 9 45 p m .and tthe meet ng, resumed at 9:5:7
Pr y t t y T
f ” ` ,'�''
q m �p I
I
t p;'r J u x , t II''A�I� P;'
fra.. '...,lk �.:'� :.'�ul�' < .'��i`�"�tb � y''�4;r"
l „
I 0 ,' I�.BOe J I dul ✓. Yap ,. T d r_. ILIr1 -ti,� 73 Rq'?h rd
+
VARIANCE to C Vi car -art w 'th
allow the construction of a one car detached
hl e t eft ex lamed the +T reason a var
3� t ?'rdi ,c a �rS ,} .� . �1 tl n, P rr rt
o-r drivewa'" ,,w,id'th' =and length .adequate for only °� one' .car at 64 .IF
oH,4 .b d a nd m �l a ,9'b 7L ,"o 41 r aF� .4 A *1�. ,r �uuG�' .at7 g ,., p�
air= °bra,
S, �..lso wax ° .Yathsrreer1 .rrc�rr�a 5r ,� y to approve a,' e
�,�k,,;�� A,r and read recommefi y he s taff for
an c
ded b' t
Ilhi,r,'!,I:t a _a „wl�C �71 ?a e 3., + ! °1 t, a.iS sr S��•:L 3 I ! t �yt r t a
appva
�N a �,I rol of the, variance
Jh , t ed N'• 4� ^�, 4t &!v� W } p " �d, aP utn �,
,yP, din,, g V:` w Vr$+ mr''N.i - * , + i ,v 1 4aV $��..r�WV k',I. �..f .7
Chairman Hor -ciza asked Mr. Young If hf Mrl Youn`re lied inthe
ndit Bon „asp recommended b, w the staf a
I 9.
e was reement wit t
f ;
a� P
i
F 30 �� `•, sslt "�� � e� �,hyu 7 r� # y� k k �i %� 7a�a L .
k
G
a'�Eryd�.dtTltb u�
a t�e5:,1,,'tl'"" 1u : rJr,,�r�:
10 e r71 '� 3 �.�:OITllll� ''B.Ond �II1ppVed .r t0 ,grant 4i t ' 1tlOnS' Of ,
;i °'' �"J °r �; ".' >� ° ?,;�_��,�ti .rz:a ��L. =; t�,, t:e var.ano�withthe ',three' co ' nd b
l as.istated in.the staff. report The motion- was seco e- y
approva
�, cif dai'hP ar7r'�1 T� #+a ° �, �r:r a•ra�e, ":i juw '
r �l n� I L.' w ° J , Comm ¢H go S S II
�
Is h7 1' s
t I I J1• 71 " I r• T '
a r
A N�ES
YES 7 ` ` � AB SENT
. r �
�
I c !
i
�I I r li Ih J r P
,; I1;1 '
' y , I'
Petaluma City,. °Planning Commission Minutes,; November
b fi + 2 _
M r,. `_ dd_ p ....l � ..- r.. :2
iH `& H' ,:PROPERTIES Mr,. �Boehlje � lriefly reviewed. the .proposal f;or' an. open, storage yard
rEIQ EVALUATION &, for trailers boats„ recreational, vehicles,; etc: to be located at
"SITE - DESIGN, g REVIEW 421 P '' ayran Street ,in an M `L }District ` ". He then, "r.ead the conditions
approval rec by the s aff "and advised that.; the Arch
tee - tural and Site Design Review Committee. had, reviewed the, project
i
_ and had no addtionaT to offer-
Comm Wright, questioned' if there would` be washing of 'the vehicles
on, the ite ,Y The'Rapplcant,. replied this was no;t 3ntended::at th_e:
x 9
p
resent time. Comm Hlligoss questioned the deferment of the.
curb, ;gutter r and' „sidewalk construction 4 Mrp BoehlJe' replied there
, c : t j
= , y 4 � �g P , :require
�• 3 �� � � -'
m eri t and there were other m use there was no need for ithi;
was no such condition beca f
1 4 _ �
M - _ n ri - t nts
means o: re ui n he's e' im roveme at.
5.
= r a future date s
Comm Pop moved to id Plan ning D r'ecios to
Pi ! g � S Px rt
i po a Ne Declaration for the ro ect The motion was
re are an
,. seconded by Comm, Wright
r
a AYES 7 NOES`- :G' ABSENT Ot =,
Comm Pop made a motion to approve the site design with conditions.
P -
of approval „';as recommended 'by the' staff T_he moaiori was seconded
by Comm. Hilliggs '
.Jto.
;il } •, -AYES 7 , NOES, 0 ABSENT
RON HARDY EIQ The staff report: for the constrietion..of a ; duplex on• the same lot
... r
:;
'!EVALUATION & SITE with'an ex stirig family dwelling at 709 "G” S `,tr'eet' was,. briefly
DESIGN `REVIEW,
!, The Commission was informed' - 'that the liad ,`prev approved ;a
site design for 'this s however, rytte plans had been changed t'and .
t he
present; proposal was only for a portion of 'the .9 :te previously
considered.:
Mr; Boehl�e :advised the' Commission this pro;�ect'. been
evi'wed by,the Architectural and Site- Des .gri,Review Committee
b 1..
ry ecause the,;applcant 'tiad not been notified of the•,meeti:ngr The'
...,.. n. ,. a ._ n
memb'ers' of 'the _Commiss on were t'kierefo.re presented•' :with .plans ;f'or
wereethenTheacond . tions o'f approval as rec y f,
ommerided -b the; staf
y y
such �aHsmal�loprojectt Boehlj 'elrepliedathata4wheneessar�y for
g q.
there' is no'- .
-fire- , hydrant, within a close', proximity,'., the Fire ` Chief requires one
A. r y viceetheeeritire have `to supply a 'f ire fiy .gaff
k ,
Mr
Ha' stated he re
sooner or later- to ser proposed ,project,• and he
would.t`herefore accept.the,conditions " of approval as 'stated. He
Alsowasapre'sentlhat 'he owned the exis',ting, single family rtes;idence
y remodeling it __ - .. - - , , .. .- •.
W;� 12
I 4 14
M ,' w
r '
u, J. II BI
l [
Petaluma ^City
Planning-,l Commission Minutes' November ',4, ^ 1 4 9,7 +5 "'
b B . '
Comm Waters' moved' that � tl e'IkPlanning Director II be'� °'directed
• pare `and post a Negative Declaration fcr, the project. The,`•motion
II wa "s seconded E by Comm , Bond
4 I II r � Y x
1
n ( n ,a Jn b Ex Y^R� P1144,a
r rm 1
I, r' '"''' �Y N ,. } 1 rr�. c " s t ar,,'� yr , {
AYES: 7 NOES= 0 ABSENT ,' 0
u a ', � i IP
„ C I y
r Y'r '• M
1 '
I i
. .,
Tl'e .design of die, duplex wa "s briefly discussed •.Comm: „ Bond ques-
tinned whow the entire'pr : ect dif-- ''fere"d� °from the-Yori ina
1 l :plans:.
I, •C u. ' 4 p4 ri X11 IP �C, r �I g
11 Hard ' hed then -;e we e'Ik to,b.e, "two c; and a
n, d fferent layout,.. x Mr ' Boehlr e 'then bri` #ef t ex n lained ts he H ke rent
t
Brl L.. II ryi a„'' ut 1 1 " „, , -, ,�, �. {,- '•"
I ization of the land
I 4 4 P F f rl v 5' 4
1
tl I u ,• m f .,Y.. I, ,: , I Y, . � { I !f4, x,. 16 + H wry , +, F td 4G � . �' •, ,� ' .
Comm Wright madet a' motion to ,accept t- he site d'esigri .review" wi.tfi,
i 4 ',.. ro al "� _ _, ,
w.,I u.l,,.co sec nditions of la v as recommendedb the ,< staff_, ,,,;Comm...,Waters
p ��fl r
4 B I I p,
, I � '7
' d I + �� P 1 ' I � �I 1u I'• '� I 4 "a r d1 11s;,�,�'� �, id I � ., ." � _ , ,
onded the, motion 4 " • w
11 Comm H lli• os "s uestioned�"h - 66 'the ` . es_'sto g u
,�' ^ "ill «�' ° �" > L Z,�° , . g, qf' -� " fir g g' 1 ,� `1 ra a urea would be
! �I Boeli�l�re '_stated that it is " not'`,specfiede on ,pro�ect_s . of
r this size Mr Hardy stated he had not thought'about.it, but there
�o�f ( room toacc min
oodatel X I
C
, A
YES
r 7 NOES 0 ABSENT . 0 B y
11 'a x 'o'1, "dl' IB ''
"
^
� I '.
1 I
�. � ? _mn �k. .I_.�u .z I ma'h.i�'� i . 1 � „. �'. 4E,.� N.,I �a =r:' 4, }.1,. rJ.� -�� . 1 •.0.,. I I ”
{ MCR USE PERMIT B y J a ` W J 9 z la .." , . q ^ P1, o' boning', '
J f the 4 -
B •" N ,,�l. w k Mr f Boehl e "I indicated ' the location o rt �'41 opbseoameR t
ro o e
"B. ents to .th6l; existing Royal Tallrow ` "'� ing
ITE DESIGN plant 'ad } ,
VIEW & ,P,1 ^ . � " gd Y a : : ^ om an a The• staff re ort .,° not
P
III II u 4 a a ,tao'f 2 the4uRokal1Tallow ands Soa ndCadvisyd' that MCR Inc;. waswas
brief IV, rev eae�d "and �tlie� conditions of site des gM'�
I • F �! 1J - � Y IY ^f „ !
I. I
recommended'by, the staff we're read r L
i, D '..�' d� ^ ,f Ila'2, NIB �I tl I �' X14" n t w� 't '� +. �': 1 k N ,, ,. 4xf.,. , is „ • fru
Mr. Boehl�e i adv sed that the ap had ob�ected'at 'the time of
r the Architec ural,. and Si "Dls `gn Review Committee to; condition
B' II C ry
;I �4,a T �l ,':ilsllrr d". .K+ .4 �,
wh ,Irequired him ^to nst
Vq
allr separate T� rivate ,laterals to. the'
r I� -k.. P 1
nt
existing sewer system -•for the proposed de- boning pla and the:''
M . ,Bj41 �^ , ated that he could not use' the
,
to
,1 , exist ng" septic'nt , ;ank owever, ° 'ttie'Arehit'ecturaBl,i arid' Site.
111, : y.•4. yyG1 t 1' .
y p
' g Pr that the site 'design be,
. u u1 • � II
Design vieC
w ommittee ha
d recommended
e b s,� a ka prove 111C conditlOn' #,8,'•aS S:tated;, r ] I �
I I ^ 1 p,p i g I" ��� Mr. Boeh1 a advis
e
I
{;
1 that iaf'ter d' s'dUssion, •with:;'th(Y City 'Attorne ari "dr _Ci•t. En ineer I the °'
City Egi.neet agreed that if the. Corps of. ,Engineers and the Region-
y;: " 1 ajle'Water' Quality`'Contr "ol Board„ 'a's 'well as, himself ;c'ould
„III 4, a+. P.
allow exi "s,t nguseptic sys -or us. b the Ro al Tallow
system he would be, Fa re"
„ �? _at; , I o y and
I' , ,1 ;; 1 1 ~ �'R ”' " I ;,, , ' `,', ? ^B , "Soap X ' - T , Mr. ,Boehl el!"• there'f oref recgmm "end_ed, � changing : cond•i"tion `
1 {II h '' 14 m1111u
41 I :I,? ,d " a1 ". "�,� r 1
o I � a a - I, n
ccordingl�y� .
J/�!.
f ,"'
f�e•.' NI I �d, -, � '.�A CI.�. t, a, ", I�Tj, ��. n . i� d � " 1k rr� ! 4 01'
BB _
_,•� , ,� r , Discuss on followed yr " re uirn hook
I 'u to the sewerll system
�� Irl g q gl ; ,P
versus'util_i anon of °the existing septic system .Comm. Head asked'
m i }I," � , 4„ , „ f, Tall ox 4 , would�.'bEi forced' ,to the sewer system i.f',;,
, . I , A "I , �,'''.. 1k �� �l r l d m ., . J 4 x�.ASha #e1 h' - -4 f S' i.� t ,� x . �; �,', .
Z � �I� City �Enginee'r there� may' �'or the re Bma'y�notrbe problem t at
III ~ I 1
J11" um ugdri „ " 4 a•� u { "`
W N If o
jl'' �h +�,;,� Y ^ ". �f, "44I' +�••xf II i� — I� „e 1 L,
4 x
Tj
Q� 1
n V' 9 d p. I' I' 1 1 1 ,,. „o ” ^ -1 1, •'... ,
i
Petaluma City'' P -lanni ig ;Commission gi 'te§, NpV "e'mbe'r'- 4, 1975
T + this time, and that hook up'to the sewer system 'could be conceit/
abl re
y quited ,if it does t
no' meet' the _proper standards. Mr.
r
Boehlj'e. further clarified" at a_r:ea fell under the jurisd -c-
f, ton of the „Arm Corp of En inee >rs and th
e Re Tonal Water, ual'it`
y, g ;t .E g, Q y
Control, Board f �, y..;' .
Mr.: randhi. At orney for the applicant, 'stated that: the ppl
r, . ,.
cant had only one basic object�on'.to th
r 'e,condi t ons of approval
' r to condition y8 He` stAed ,that :the Subdivision'
and ,that was
Ordinance ha_s a. 'special s`ectaon that refers to parcel map's and only
requires= that the sewer system be sansfact to the City:,Engi=
neer, and it was :his .contention•. that this portion of the- !Subd =
v si.on ectualhy applied Mr Boehl�e 'agreed, stating
r r
that the requirement is not - that' of the Subdivision °0 dina nce, but
'was 'at, the discretion of tie City Engineer.• "He then read, the
recommended ;change to'"condition #8„ which added the "words:
unless it can be demonstrated the :satisfaction of the C "ty
Engineer „� the Army Corps of Engineers' and the Re;gi`ona Water
Quality Control :Board that'. an alternate system adequately treats the waste, "' iahicfi' "would allow the condition; to be a'ppeal to .'the;:.'
City Count 1,
Mr Diek, `Li °eb.; Archi ec ^t' for" tfie project, sitate_d that the plans. as
1, submitted for the; de bpning °operation : cons -isted 'of the human w"a"ste
going nto the existing septic tank system and the wa°shwater in o
the holding 'ponds;, Mr. Boehl� e elarifited ghat the City Eriginee.r
s'
was willing; to consider using the existing septic system• for Royal
Tallow',, but `,not for the new MCR Inc.. project'.'
Mr.. Lafranchi stated that; dep*eiiding up.6rf what the other a encies
d'ecid`e, the applicant might give:, up his right toy :appeal if he:..,
agreed 6to, the modification..' He therefore asked that the Commis ion
require that neither o P eration be hookothe City, sewr e
_
facilities l the, site
fi , t the new operation be.� allowe't t
systemand t ha o, use the existing
.
c _
_ provided it cbulld pass th
on e standards that
�...
c
an be ;imposTed by 'the City Engineer. only:" Mr Lafranchi also asked. .'
that condition X4:1 "'be deleted; 'since the '-parcel map re.qui�rement, "`wa . s
'
that bf the `Caty' 's in .thef first place,. ' He'ahen questioned whether
P iF this type of'division 'was: proper' under the 'Subd -vision -Map Ac;t.,
since 't ha's the same, ownership
Mr, y'� g :« - ; ' a he was in t agreement
with all of
Jake Gray' mana er "of Royal Tallow stated _
e he conditions ,with the exception of #8L. He s ated. he. °..
'fe lt the existing septic system* Is unique for this area inasmuch,.
1 2'4 hours a da. "He advised' thatf ponds and; four aerators' op °erat'ing
as
it has c'l'ose t'o three 'acres 'o
y. all' of the wager is 'field ,on" the,
` 6d � Petaluma River,- and the system -has'
.4 P- P y dump
, 6d ro ert� and dum ed into t e eta
; t. a good "leaching field Mr, Gray .advised that the sys`_tem had •met
.,' all of the requirements of the Water Quality Control ,Board; in :the,
d bgning,proces "s� was added to. the system Mr Gray stated lie did
r l , s ti _ -
ast and he felt that it cou ass urt er ins ections i' the
not
wish to. .connect- the: rendering plant t.q the City sewer system b.ecaus;
of,. cost involved :, -and asked` the,rCommission .to take into con.
s deration_'the physical area involved',.
-14
_ q
� �a I� I � rvNl,,, .f: • .,. � h ' ..d; r �f ! , �' r'�'I''., ,- •, Iry �, .. -. ,. ' I�" li,'" -.
I VIII JI, ( Cd
41 4 d "M. y J. dll
I '" Petal��uma` Cit Plannin J omnii'sson' y .November
V. 6�
, . . y a - s g �' .., f. ,: 1W.I,r I /.e ..t. .�' „.i .il r 't ° :a 'P:.1 S . 4, .,I •= " 7 :NT.. f ''I• 1,
dy
�.
h
'' J !G
II Wright ( questioned why�','Ithe "City En ine'er ^ °xaan te'd "the sewer
s M COItIIri
1 d, { t J d he gin
had orially.
�ry _ since - it is, a I, e l e advise
1 ';ti „1 ` °' ! �';, r'equired "conecte'dF Mr Bo T h quirement 'of the Subkdivisot� Ordinance
7
"; II L, " : a
Ano_ ° them, fa�c' wads tha,� Federal ifunds ha`d,•.,b;een u'ti`li'z`ed�'for they
cdns,truetion, t ahe new sewer plant expansion and 'they: caleiilations'
for the, p rea hadl been'Rincluded` in the expansion
'Comm
of t
VIII 1 , l� III pll ,.r *. Ih I I• P - `
r c
- a �Wrght�' asked�if- th�e ° `qf' =tle' Cityi +Erigneer`ouldbea_M;'
J A would re-
could.- but but �t
ld he
I+ y ,,�' / ” " r coiimienclea anst �Bt PP .' ' "• Y R'P I the...
"'' Ag -rv� �•,; 9 °" the could a'haa s eal .
j s condlit'on . to
} , they City .Council
��e B 7
'min ' fated* that,, Il sinc;e the' Subryd'ivisonll Ordinance ] e, a 'r
r r e Y g - •
ands d ft th
= _
d�scret
ion of the Cit En sneer, the Com-
quirement up t the e s ecif that t e.re uirements oi'f the .City
b mission could therefor p y, h q
ngirie "d "� be , met ' ;'; L .. ,
.1�I :•• � would �9ti'ck;.to that r.e'
Boeh J dvised that,• ,the City Engineer
i be de.irii e
: ,
� _ ° qu refine �nle
� ° nt u ss it coulld � fl
d�:r .I -
I �� I: °+ T proven Nby the,�otl`er, +agencies �fhe� "'existing •system�lwasadequate... hdl. I ,h He "�` Iiadv sed, °that "I i'f , hd Co
t,,,'inm lssi.q;r" t q at
dele.' ted this re uremen t
6 r ^
the site desi level,,'', the :'City Engineer could . regt}ire it, on the
r .,`, '�I e ii, ,,, "fi, I, �: N ,t ti �" r a � p
F arcel' I� nap N , Comm':ry i eaCd'land' Wright' °b requested further reasoning:
oth
SIR y ,� y' " neer;'would notl allowr.the e
why the Cit�J ":'= g . "�'` _ u:r xistng septic system
oehl je reiterated'' the �Cit En sneer's ,concern .ab he
J
Mn Mr g out t
;.
°existng)f�acil +sty, ands: the, fact that - he did (not. feel
I, ',a� ; ' �� '' ` phis `jiid'gment was ` suff ici'erit" to rvd'etermne ttfs' ,.it was adequate without`
4
! P ,
L consultation with''a p g� he Water Quality,
1 ont � � � ' ,I I � ,�� °: I� � C� r ol , I IBoar,d , I , ;• the r Cor s � of h Eri sneers ° and ;t
4 a•'
r; „ ' I r r l :- g wa's opened Comm . `Head' -
,made a motion to con-
The Public Hearin
9 II';' iii �`! @" ` r Ca �1i 11 t+ p ` "' l g F M
missionln orderns _Mo rom t
h 'T
r tie to,',;the next)*
1 -low more input 'f y g he
"motion, was w seconded by Comm. Wright'.. Bond questioned M Comm. if the
r ' I ineer � would I�be able to' pro�iid' 'more. inf'ormat'ion it: the ^ :" 11 �}, City g
._
matte -� continued " Mr = Boehl'je }rep-liedjtfiat he could possibly ;
y , . , .. I dy stated the reason ' g City'
M " g P , in of t pp ,f;
p Iii J elaborate more, brut he, had alrea
"; E ha asl ^it had beenex bl'ained� to4�lhim'�w�"Comm'. °Bond and. Po both''
' =rt T I r spoke in opposition, )ton continuation 6P the public hearing.
M is .A.,�1 iAYES N r K,2 J „i NOES MSI IN 0. :'i. l'
l
i` 11 Y'1 4 H. Ai F r r til r a a u r
,.�... t'. ��'' -a ,• ti n Z a . .. , ... - . i- . .
I
1 wl; � r `” `�1 hn• �Nr= The motion ;;wash d "efeated 'and' �th hearing „was) 'closed.
rl �rl” W �I' I� nl �I� ru h � l ll'� j .. JL"I'l l „nN Iry
. r ., c4 r
V • � ` , pp to
subject•
i44"AF. � 1 =II 'r cond `fal the,'sa'te' des a rove theTheemot ont 11 z' =e. I - ti Comm Popp o' r a,.fir ry , fio to, n v~reiew wasp• seconded by"
made a mo
„� II
° I, 4b. a + �I COmm�. Wa�terst. a
" R 0 F ABSENT'
r �
AYES", 7n ' � � tC NO J rv• J *. � I . I � r r
,A I G
e . '•� . , , C '�, Iq„ °PI `'' ;�. �'r b • '� a 1 . 4, ' 4` ° ' ' �
Comm ''Bond moved; 'that the site d`esi n: be approved with the con
7 rv , r n.
approval j as ,r-ecommendidd'.
by the staff , a,with the exception
condition `��.8 be 'changed to ;`:read: "The applicant ,shall 'provide;
_ F re urements of the
j I, t� 11, „1. ila J 1 C1t E' e dleT I'I y r d e ',.
a 1 syste in",acc'ordanceuwith the
sewage osa
I
OA
y ngine�' Popp
Comm. ,seconded the motion_
M
AYES 5 NOES'. 2 ABSENT; ,0
IF
r d I•
m 1
, .:
'Petaluma "city Planning .Commission Minutes, November 4 •1975 "
At' 11.:;25�p "m theComm_ssiori' determined to continue the meeting in,'
order- to he_ar.. the� ;'item:; on the agenda, however., Comm. Head. left
�t.•
at-,' thick time;. -�
"D" STREET- - PLAZA Mr..` Boehl�e ,Briefly „reviewed the staff.re ort c'oncernn the ade
R: quacy ofs thee - Environmental Impact. Report, prepared by ;Del Davis &
":r 4 ., r ASsocia;tes fqr+ +the ro ..pggd -_D "" Street Plaza Thi.'s ro ect: includes?
P P< P- �.
`a `'7 Eleven Market:. and adds =t onal .,space:, for .retail s toxes to' be
located at 122' ;Pe'taluma B'1'v.d.. South. . 'The :comments of the ;City
m'e. to he included in, the
Engineer which had ,not., been received ,in ti ;
F. report,., a then: _read. r
A
nm
.,Comm.; -,Bond.Fasked.,for clarificat ion .as to •whether a' protest coul da
be made': regarding, the issuance; of aF license' for .off sa le beer and
in _at, this. location,_c .Mr:. ;BoehlL� e, clarified that, although the
30 -da erod for; <a cal of” the on inal,.;a licaton has: ex ired,, .a ,
r Y P PP. g PP _ P
= �protesf =could later be filed for> fthe - purpose of revocation" of that
license; .i.f^ t:,�.was1 deemed necessary Gomm Bpnd' ;asked' fo r elar -•
�. z r..-ficaton-of,'the staff; report on, ,Page 5 relating to traffic and
+:..; police .Im Boelil e replied. �that'.'the ,staff an only -
yr.
ridicaites that .the police concerns `had' been reviewed and mitigating'
measures ,provided, in the,E.I R .He also ad'vi�sed that noise miti
V „ s. j ,gati.on�as referred to, on Page 6 „was already' part. of. ahe� -E'.I R and
it would not have: to be ;added..
; Mr Del Davis
a statedahe was hering was opened avail
'> + •.-
r .t... ommerits -. - No•, other comfnents were , offered f the au..
� able fo.r c
r ,
.j 3 L dience,_-and {,•the public- - ,hearing•was, closed.,,
iA G
„Comm Bond ref,, rred .to ,Page U, 5 of the: E I,'R.. and questioned 'how he,
t .could,'.proj.ect - traffic: impact, when th&-iexadt .usage of the retail .
sales portion was- not 4known: Mr. Davis. replied that he h'ad..as "sumed'
comparable_'uses;.{yut,ilzn _-
g the State ;Department, of Highways uses
He referred, to,Appendx -C of..th,e E IR , stating tha-t,`he had wo.rked',
:. with ;the, - gr;estest. deg "see; of specf ici.ty available, 'and had prod'ed .
.different, varieties of uses. Comm:. Bond, questioned. why. the, highest
3 degree ;had. no.t ,been incorporated into' the E L.R. Mr. h Day.s 'rep; :lied
that . it` had.,,,,, since the calculations on Page V.4 'were; based, on , that.`: s
of a restaurant.'. added ded 'that: `he woul
' " • ` r � d 'be .ha t:o. "incorp.orate - -"
other uses ',the E.I:R r:thatAthe °=Commission : wished: Mr;.'.
...; B.gehlJ'e advised that if the actual use of the retail p s.tor,es, in
' 'dicated, a'generati6n ',of'-substantially- traffic ;than that stated
in the.E I R., the Commission could always require an additional.
traffic analysis:or an addirtional E He also stated -that, ':if -`
the Commission asked for more. rsuppositions; 'they would .lave to,b,e, ,
rr :, , ,.� - r .., more. specific as-, ''to +their ;natures.,,; Mr. Davis, replied' tlza the would ,
provide, ra list o,f trips generated for`. odif f erent;'types; of commercial ,
uses' and ,indicate, what the'' ratio would be ,f or- the 'floor area' Pro—
posed `in' t Final E I;: R ,
Comm. `Bbnd'. referred to. 'Page 'U 9 Line 26 of the and ques
" tinned of thi's gook into account the ,extra, °police. c, that would
_ _ .. _ -
" `be incurred Mr Davis clarified that 'the; total tax revenue
public service cost involved„
received would .:exceed the amount' of
-:16 '
til A 1 I��
'
QQ I
Petaluma City, Planning Commission Minutes,,, November, °4 . I ,I
O '� `
p.
On Pa e��, U 14; ", Line l7 ) ° Commi Bond'suggested �cha Bing, the word
g J
n _ , s,. 1"' I , �,
to" "would "probably since, lie felt the!, matter, sshould,l'be stater in 'a
weaker sense. Mr:: Davis said the suggested change was
1 ,
„
kc
o
Item N 1, under Mitigati.o
re g n Measures,
V.
to Pa e V
Wz th re ondl
p
d an cont�
Commi ssion Ino 11 lon 'er ha' rol L
Comm B st pit'-
y
J4^
GI ;I
over this, i,temtesincef 30 day:,appeal period,`for the granting, of
c beverage license Mr. Davis replied that.
had e'1 ; sed,.
the al'coholion,
Ampose,':c( on atlie, retail 'Isitel,rdesigii, if'
could m ose conditiona
th'eCo
"
they f - y
%t to. be
nt �on�1l�Pag�e� tl,. 1,
Hilligoss.l questioned t ° ,q
mm.M st V 5 that
h1.
+ 1
1 "ev:els_ on Petaluma Blvd. and ?D," "Street wo'u�ld "r emaintlat, s_ervice��'
'
thahi
rin hours(: r Davis cl arif ied t this state
I evel "" " " C 4u ring 'peak
i ,
ent meant that u �rnoimal rcirc umstances there
1
1 h l L'
flow' of traffic withra .minima "1 amount, of 'congestionuland
�Hilligoss
additional traffic 'would not be appreciable- Comm
!
II,
: ° „ r ' Line N 30 of tl 'e E . I. R 'L ''
q
° '
:, I " r 11 "IId
Mre s ;that t sho`uld lie un
, ,
Comm Water's, excused' himself lat •11 58 mil
,. Comm.. Bond asked Mr,
Davis how he :would gq,�aboult;determining' the impact,of the sale ;of
a g omic and.
lcoho_lic bevera es on the park community, since, econ .
social factors hard to be I taken rotor cgnside'ration He stated` lie
�
a1
esidents in the "'' diate'`Vici
ni.ons of -r _
t'aken Along, discussion followed, duringlwhich
I,
fa'ctor he A- 'stAtementtsaying'that there -
� y, e of the closeness to , ark of the sale of '
�'t'
! ., I,,." „ l
i, '
e on'I� "the" a "ddi't, ''onal_
W„ I alcoholic b'�Verages, that "i't may `have,%somep ° °
I�.
9
41coho,lic consumpt_ j-1 in the parka Comm. Wright stated he had,
.
ould to ch "dren
found broken lass in ,sand which could be dangerous
g '
�'•
� ht u . I.
and he f ''that fact or Jshould 'also be u Mr Davisi1l
g p <"
4
' the
stated, 'he would work, some comment relating 1 to that ,aspec,t int o the
inform t w p
i ran
„ "
of,the` C iofV din Ce
n I W
c'
r
banning the : consumption ",.'f - alcohol "vc', lieverages'' b`e 'a'dopted;'' "�`
0 "'
u11d r
Mr,. Boehlje, informed the Commission that Mr Dav espond
IN III „
Im �'
I w,1 P
eveni�n Comm. Bond asked Mr °-I Dav sil 1f Phe, 4; I�.
omme �•
the c' nts,'� made this:g
"I '
a - , �,.
had' 'Ealk6d at length with the City Engineer regarding traffic Mr
:.
Davis repl
l^ „ 1
'ted' str- n ^C•re l uirements: ha
,
Sh "111 I ,,
'bee nlspecifi`ed',, such as the `right= hand "urn only into site's I'dl.
1
f Council -,
Cal a, motion to�, recommend` to the Ci
= „ that �
omm. `B be d certified "
t
y.'I _,
as being. ade uate.' Comm. Wrig ht- seconded 't °he
;1J. R. q
E . .. r
,. of n ��:
�, :y AYES �5`y� NOES' 0 "� ABSENT' 1 21 ,
T.
�JOURNMENT
eing; " ',. adjourned at - 12 2Q
There b no further business the meeti ng
i.,m �I
;
IP ;
�r
.1 Chairman a
„ r
d
A�tt
„
�I