HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06/17/1980DMIMIS.Sa' 10. -a:
Ap A
JUNE 17 1980
REGULAR MEETING 7:30 P,,M'.
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS-,' CITY' 'HALL PETALUMA, CA .
The, Plane ng' on encourages; applicants ^or, their representative to be
ayailab e' - :at, the meetings...to answer. �'questioiis, 7so, that.`n'o agenda; items, need
be deferred to a later. date due 'to. a lack of pe•rt"inent' information.
PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG '
ROLL,. CALL.:... Comm, Battaglia ; _ Head Lavin Popp _
-Shearer., Teneer Waite
STAFF':` Gregory. Erei'tas.9 C ommunity,;Developnieta:t .and.:Plann n.g .Dir:ee.tor
` APPROVAL, OF MINUTES: Minutes-of ' 3,, ,_ 1980
DIRECTORS REPORT:;;
COMMISSIONERS REPORTS:;
; PUBLIC HEARING'S
BIRTHRIGHT OF PETALUMA Public Hearing.;::to: cons de;r_a :U;se••.P'ermit application
703`- JEFFERSON 'STREET -., ' by ,'Birth'r.ight of_ Pet-a'luma t;o'.` locate` a quasi public
USE PERMIT_ REQUEST'.; - use of. aia. educational and: cultural"nature ' in an -. ;R -C,
(1.3.01) Compa:e`t.Residential.;_zoning d'istr'act at 703 Jefferson
`Street.
,DUFFEL FINANCIAL, &,CONSTR. 1. Public Hearing to evaluate: the:.Environmental
ELY BLVD1S AND CASA Impact Questionnaire = f'or': the. following prezoning:
GRANDE RD- E.I.,Q. EUALUAT'ION/ 2.' - .Publ_ c Hearing 'to .consider the request of Duffel
PREZONING`TO CITY STUDY
Financial-'& Construction Co. to prazdne AP Nos.
DISTRICT
(11.585./'3:240) 017 7 040 =08., 1 •13, 14 15 16, 19 and 20 from
+County `Agr- cultural.. :to - City Study District
located at Ely Blvd S acid Casa Grande Road.
KEECAN & COPPIN, CO • l.. ,Pub l- iC.Hearing to-r- evaluate--the Environmerit'al
1NDUSTRIAI QONDOMINIUM COMPLEX -.. Impaac't Ques;tionnaire.for the following PUD Rezoning:
N MC:_ DOWELL� AND CLEGG ST
2.. Public Hearing to consider .a request,.to rezone
� :E I, Q�ti., EVALUATIQN% A No. 13.7 = '110 =01; 0.2 03•, 04, 05 and 06 f :r .om'
. P Uj'D REZONING:'
M- L'(Lght Industrial') to •PUD '(Planned Unit_
(11.,591,/3
Development.) located at the cornea of N McDowell
and Clegg Street;
DEBRA HOMES, INC. 1. Public- ,Hearing.t'o..eyaltate the Environmental
FOOTHILL MANOR Impact.'Quest onin=a_ire; for ;the, followdngi amendmen =t
E. WASHINGTON `NR ELY BLVD= to the, General 'Pla n /Environmental Design Plan
E . I . Q.. EVALUAT.I,ON /GENERAL PLAN- ' and' :rezoning' request.
EDP. AMENDMENT /P U..D_. REZONING'/
2. Public Hearrig to consider the request of ; Debra
TENTATIVE MAP: Inc. .
Homes
(11. 577 /8..'S.5/3'.23�8J6'.416)
, to, amend 'the Environmental Design
.Plan” and' concurrently the General' Plan des`ignat _ On
for tie. property.located on.Eas,t Washington
Street 'near Ely 'Blvd. to Urban D:ensity°• (10
dwelling units /acte)..,
3. Public Hearing to consider- ;an, application t`o
rezone the site = R- 1L61 'to P.U.'Dc.
., .
(Planned Unit, Development) fo'r. 'a 42 -unit eon-
dominium•. developmena Foothill Manor`.
4... Public:. Hearing t'o. consider! the Tentative,
Subdivision, .'Map .
PLANNING MATTERS
unde o
KVline for.Madison d
Manor1 regul
Subdivision
for
g
g . g vision -at 920 'Madison'
Street. (6 . 3 6 6
ADJOURNMENT. °
:2.
S � •.ir F. i�
!. -. �
t, .. l ... ,. la i ':, ki , �r d `:
.. :.
.. .. ....
'PETALUMA, PLANN -ING COMM1 SS10N 4.
r ll 'a
AGENDA
Z. b .' • JUNE 1T, 1980'
PUBLI_C CONT "';D,
CAL- NORTH•.BUIhDERS.. &, DI UELOPER'S',
,. =
1. Public_ ' .,Hear,ng .fo evaluate. ;the Environmental,
VILLAGE ,MEADOW TOWNHOMES;-
Impact .'Questionnaire •for .a „rezon -ng of` AP
ELY B wb N AND' 'LYNCH GREEK-
Rol. 136 - X110 -7 :and. 21, from R- 1, -6 -, 5'0:0 °to
E.,I:,Q. EVALUATION /P.1U.11.
P'.:U..D.., a 120. -unit condominium' hous ng-
REZONING /TENTATIVE 'MAP:
development. to be located at Ely Blvd North
(11.,586/'3;,.24.1 /6.424)°
and Lynch. ;Cr;eek..
2. Public Hearing., to consider the -P. (Planned
-Unit° Development) =. rez'oning° request.
3. Public Hearing., to, consider the Tentatve� Sub;-
division. Map for• Phase I development `('67 uni_fs)_
DEBRA HOMES, INC. 1. Public- ,Hearing.t'o..eyaltate the Environmental
FOOTHILL MANOR Impact.'Quest onin=a_ire; for ;the, followdngi amendmen =t
E. WASHINGTON `NR ELY BLVD= to the, General 'Pla n /Environmental Design Plan
E . I . Q.. EVALUAT.I,ON /GENERAL PLAN- ' and' :rezoning' request.
EDP. AMENDMENT /P U..D_. REZONING'/
2. Public Hearrig to consider the request of ; Debra
TENTATIVE MAP: Inc. .
Homes
(11. 577 /8..'S.5/3'.23�8J6'.416)
, to, amend 'the Environmental Design
.Plan” and' concurrently the General' Plan des`ignat _ On
for tie. property.located on.Eas,t Washington
Street 'near Ely 'Blvd. to Urban D:ensity°• (10
dwelling units /acte)..,
3. Public Hearing to consider- ;an, application t`o
rezone the site = R- 1L61 'to P.U.'Dc.
., .
(Planned Unit, Development) fo'r. 'a 42 -unit eon-
dominium•. developmena Foothill Manor`.
4... Public:. Hearing t'o. consider! the Tentative,
Subdivision, .'Map .
PLANNING MATTERS
unde o
KVline for.Madison d
Manor1 regul
Subdivision
for
g
g . g vision -at 920 'Madison'
Street. (6 . 3 6 6
ADJOURNMENT. °
:2.
r ,
P
NOT OFPICIAL UNTIL^ APPROVED 'BY
THE �PETAIiUrIA PLANNING' COMMISSION
•
PETALUMA PLANNING, C01:4IS S - JUNE f7 i,9'80
RE(, AR= MEETING 7':30 P . M ;`
CITY COUNCIL - CHAMBERS, CITY HA PETALUMA CA
,
PRESENT';: C gmm. Battagi= is *',. Lavi_nf, Shearon ;Tencer, Waite
* 7:'35 pm"
ABSENT': Comm•. Head.', PoPP;': = :
STAFF`: Gregory Fre'l a`s Commuhi Development:' &. Planning,. Director
t
APPROVAL OF MINUTES'c° Minute's of ,June MISSIO -3x, 19'$0'• were approved, as
. _ � submi�ttecly,: ' ..
COMNERS- cREPORT:S ' Parks ;and, Recreation° Gommis'sion
Comm. Waite' reported' the Parks and'- Reoreat pn
'•Commis'sion, are euaWti;i6itig" l2' to 13 sites' to
make future, recommendations for parks• and atlileti'c facilities'.
PUBLIC HEART +NGS:
BIRTHRIGHT OF PETAIUNA .- 703 .: JEFFERSON: STREET° - USE`. PERMIT REQUEST
jTape lj
tem'.1•. Oi ,Use .Permit:, application to> locate` - a quasi- p:ub'1Ac use of an
educatioria�l aril cultural`- `n_ature in`.an R' �C, Compact ;Resi'dent ad', zoning
distract. °at 7,03: Jefferson;. The SuperIntenderi . of thel Petaluma" School
Distr.icG - Lesly`,Meye)rp requested' a continuance'. of' the aie on the
Use',.Permi -t for' Bfrthi-igh'& of Petaluma ti's notices were' received :too late .
for; the school 'district, to respond'.; The' ,Pub "hic Hearing was opened and
.:continued',':.- It was 'the. cond'drisus• of the• Coinrn lisslon that the - public li6drr
;ing 'b'e continued to 'the meeting' of July
Sp.eaker•:,. ,Ed :Millarij 13.25 St. Anthony Way`
to fanning Commission directed rc tlie '('ommunity De'velopment,
1 58 The P
Director- to issue. a Negative Declaration to pr:ezoiie,propert e`s located at
; Ely' B1'vd S' and Casa Grande Road.. The Pti life 11' ar.ing.was opened and closed.:.
Motion introduced by Comm:. Battaglia,= se'coiided'. by: "Comm, 'Shearer to direct.
staff to prepare a Negative D'eelar'tf — bas --- ed .on the re�commend`ed- findings
AYES'• 5 ABS
' ENT;:; 'COW;:- 'HEAD/POPP ' • • ; _ _
:. S.peaker: J'eanet {te Carst: ns',en, ,:250 .Casa Grande Road
DUFFEL FTNANCIAL &• ,CONSTR E1JY BLVD . S' :& CAS'A GRANDE ,RD," 'FRLZbNING
- - -
Item. 3.2'4,0 to:` consider tithe.'prezon' n of <.AP. No;. 01;7 -040 =•12 :from Count
Y
Agri- cultural to' ('ity"Study District, an AP No's. 01.7 040;408•; '13,,- 14- 1.5, 16,
1 -9 and. 2U froin County Agr:icultural., to Ci:t�y Agr. The Public Hoar. iig:
.was • opened an i1; closed. Motion i.ntir`odu'ced li�y 'Comm, Shearer °; second`ed ,by Comin,
'
PETALUMA PLANNING; CQMMISSI'ON
MINUTES JUNE 17', 1980
P HEARINGS CONTy'D
DUFFEL F..INANCIAL-. & 'CONSTR.- - PREZONING CONT'D -. ..
Battaglia to recommend to tit Council approval of the pre ' zoning of
g _ tud Y PP
A No:: 01 040 -12 to S District., and the , remain ngg'•properties;
Nos,. 017- 040 -018, 13,.:,14, 15,, 1.6; 19-,. to Agricultural zone.
.AYES.; 5 ABSENT °. COMM. HEAD/POPP
r
® _
KEEGAN' & GOPPIN. CO- ;INDUSTRIAL ,CONDOMINI,UM COMPLEX-'N MC DOWELL 8 CLEGG- -•
(,Tape 189. 7352) E "I Q 'EVALUATION
'Item 1L . 591_- - - The Planning Commission, directed the' Commun_ ,ty Development
Direeto.r• t'o':issue a N'O at vex De,61aration't;
g o rezone properties, ocated at,
l
the- corner o_f N 'McDowell and Clegg St "reet., The Public Rearing was- opened
and closed. - Motion introduced by Comm. Wdt- e.; seconded by. Comm_ ;. Shbaret .
to direct staff • to prepare :a. Negative D0clarat =ion, based on • tt a recommended
findings.,
AYES: " S' ABSENT °`;,' COMM.. HEAD /POPP,
KEEGAN '& C;OPPIN CO - N" MC DOWEL`L;. & CLEGG -- P ,U:�'D. REZONING •
Item 3 244 - to consider the rezoning' of ,AP No., 137-110- 03,. 04, 05.,
06 and 23 from. M =L (Li lit- Industrial) to,',P:U aD;� , (Planned Unit Development)
located at the.. corner,. of:N McDowell and Clegg,Street. The Public Hearing-
was,opene-d.:and .closed'.. Motion Intr6duc6d 'by "Comm, Waite;, seconded by Comm.'
Shearer, to 'recommend to City. Council approval of, the P,U.`D' ;. rezoning; -
based' on 2the' recommended eons witYi .tl e f 611owinge modifications.
AYES;: 5 " ABSENT: COMM. HEAD /POPP
Condition !`2 - add, -:' The landscape plans as approved by the Site' Plan
Committee 'shall become part..of tl e, development plan and such p'l'ans • §hall-
be incorporated -into the development plan._.,
Condition 'S =- changed to read. -• Bui.ld_i'ng =B' shall be. setback a< minimum of
53 fee from...,
Condition. -14 - .a'dded tto, read - The : condit 'ons:,, covenant_s and restrictions
for 'thee development shall be ,subj'ect to approval uy the City Attorney.
Speaker:: Jim Keegani. applicant.
: CAL -NORTH BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS',ELY. BLVD R 'CREEK E..I ;Q,, EVALUATION
(.Tape, 363 - 1007)
Item 11, 58.51:,.- The- Planning `Commis,s-ion directed `the Co
ommunity D..eVelopment "
Director to 'issue a Negative Declaration :for .the AP '.No,.
:..
„rezoning= _of.
136 110 =7 and 21 to P.0 -D., beat -ed at Ely ,Blvd N and -, Lynch (reek, The Public
Hearing was ''opened and' closed Motion "introduced `by Comm,: Shearer; seconded'.
by Comm. Waite to direct staff to prepare a Ne " —ve 'Declarat ;on - 6n the '
recommended' find'>ngs
•
AYES :.- . 5 ABSENTS COMM HEAD /POPP
: 2
;
PETA'LUMA PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES JUNE 17, :198 -
CAL- NORTHBU.ILDERS.& DEVELOPERS ;REZONING!
Iteiri, 3..24'1 = to, consider - = the ' zoning ;of: AP No 13:6- 110 -:7 and 21.from
R- 1= 6,,500 -,to P. ~.0 D. (Planned .Unit ,,Develo:pment,)' fora 12Q unit condominium.
development :Lo ,be: located at Ely - ,Blvd' North' and. Lynch Creek... The
housing de
Public Hearing .was o and :clos .Motion ;intt ,duced` by Comm. ".Shearer;
seconded by Comm, Battaglia to re,commerid to the City Council approval ,of the.,
P U.D.. rezoning, based.;on the:.recommended conditions with the .following
modifications
AYES 5 ABSENT':; COMM; EEAD/POPP
Condition 1 ad'd .Larid`s,capin shall comply with ;a'11 Site ,Design require - :
• °merits • .. � .
Condition 4, changed to read The inside.dimen§ion's 'single. -ear garages .
shall measure at Seast - twelve; '(12.)` feet `by ,twentyy -two ,(22) ''f ee't , and the
inside dimensions of tdouble car garages shallmeasure at. least twenty - two
(22)' .feet long with "the final width to 'be determined byr.the. SPARC_- Committee
:Condition 5 QQ
Chan gd to read 'Two (2) additional parking spaces shall :tie.
added in the immediate °v cinity of Units A and 4�9 :of Phape4 .( the
discretion. of .the SP.ARC Committee , Units . ,,2, .and
;_Condition 11 add No p- arkirig shall be permitted' along Rvendell Drive.
CAL = NORTH° BUILDERS 'DEVELOPERS - "TENTAT:IVE SUBDIVISION MAP VILLAGE'MEADOW
Item 6.424 to consider the Tentative Subdiv sion,Map for 6 units in
Phase .I of the. proposed.V 11 ge Meadow Townhomes :development.. The ,Public,'
Hearing was opened and .closed,. Motion ritroduced,by Comm: Shearer; seconded
by Coinm: Waite to "recommend 'to •the.+C ty .Council approval of the Tentative
Subdivision Map, tiased..on the recommended conditions..
AYES ": S ABSENT: COMM :.HEAD /POP,P
Speakers,:. 'Les 'Ruh, Assistant City Engineer
Lucy Webb, 620 E Washington Street
Jack Ross, architect
Mr s, Webb requested ;the., ;staff report dated June. 17, 19,80,-,3rd 'paragraph, `lie
changed to read - `,The City 'Manager is .also . proposng 'to. provide a lot in
Phase ^1 ... (in `lieu of- appl= icant) .
A. CONDIOTTI; E ; WASHINGTON NR ELY BLUR - E;.,I.Q EVALUATION
Ite►i., 17.7 to evalua_'te the " ,Environmental `Impact Questionnaire, for an
amendment ,to. the General Plain / ,Envir.onmen;tal. - .Design Plan and' rezoning request.
The ;Public bearing' was .opened and ;closed., motion ; introduced by Comm,. Lavin;,
seconded by Comm: Shearer that the B.I.Q. Evaluation..''be considered at the
same time as :the, Z'eneral :Plan[tDP ; Amendment., P..U.,D,. rezoning and-Tentative
:Map'... ,.
AYES .5 AB Fi COMA, FIE-AD
3
PETALUMA .PLANNTNG COMMISSI
MINUTES JUNE 11, .1980
A. ,CONDIOTT:I - E,., WASHINGTON NR `ELY BLVD. tGENERAL_ .PLAN /:E_nP AMENDMENT
Item .
to ,cons.id"er the request of A.. Condi ;ott . :to "amend the .General
Plan /EDP for the. property located on_ E: Washington `S'treee near ,Ely Blvd
to- Urban .Densi'tyb`,(10, dwelling units /acre),. The Public Hearing was og.eried
and closed. notion introduced ;by Comm: Lavin;se:conded by "ComTn: Shearer
-that the • M60- ndment to the. "General ,Flan %EDP` be considered at. the same time
as the E..I;.Q. Evaluation, P.U.D,, rezoning, ;and Tentative, Map and, at all
four items be .considered` at the July 22; 1980 •meeting.
AYES' =: 5: ABSENT.;' COTSM. HEAD /POP.P. -
S' Bakers Chuck'Linth
P "icum, repre$'en ing d "e'veloper
A.11en.Andies, 2Z0_8 Mari Lane
Marjo,rie'-Loughran, 292 Garfield Drive,
A. ition- date'd.'June 16, .1980, th 6:0 s gn'at,urpes ooppbs '- to ;the project Vas
received !and. filed
MnT1TC`(1N `MANGd:R -: 'CTiR11T +S7TCT(1�T_.' MAiITC(1T1- CTR.FF.T ' ?_ 'hT(1TT. TrATTLIU .Vn RTTRTIT�LTCT(1A1'
,Tape 1402)
Item 6.,366. - Mo'dif'ication- t .Subdivision Ordinance 'to eliminate the require=
merit 'for 'undergroiiridirig 12,; 'KV power lines f.or Madison: Manor fSu div,is on on
Madfson,* Motion introduced by-.Comm;. Sheare'T;, second ed. 'by, Comm
- Battaglia to recommend torthe City Council approva -1 of an amendment to -the
Subdivsion`Ordiriance for Pladison Manor. Subdivis -ion ands the requirement
for undergr;oundng 12 KV power 'Tines be waived. 'because visual b.ene.fts' are .
not present:,.
5
AYES . ABSENT:' COMM,. HEAD'' /POPP
Speaker: Emil Mog e 1 j representing Pacific Coast Development
y ADJOURNMENT 'Tle meeting adjourned'i at ll p.m.
Attes.t":
4
4
3.'' The �pro�ect ^ is.,not :expecied to generate additional 'traffic beyond which
.the area is cur.rentIv zoned.,
:Loading areas ar,e located for the purpose of cpnvenience, safety and
screening.
5. Potential future enviroinmentval pot iit on will be regulated b,y apprd r;iate
City, regional and State regulatioris..
ry ,
6. Development °wi'11 be re
equired to meet the City flood plain construction
,: specifications
7 'The propos.ed,.development ,should all small businessman an opportunity
to - pu'rchase a relatively .inexpensive industrial space.
8'. :.Th'.& proposed architectural design should ,enhance the Tark and .set- an
example for Tutu re 'constK g ct'tq l
P,;U D;_ - REZONING 4 Findings
1.. ,'The development plan cLearhy results in, a. grre desirable us:e'of land and
''. a better physical : environment than would be oss1ble under -an sin le
P Y g'
:zoning disttrict or combina,t_ •ion of _ districfs, due •to, the . proposed condominium
l arrangement,.
2 i'The P.0 D•,:.district, is pr;oposed'.on properfy that has .a suitable relationship
to V t- McDowell Blvd wh ch is ade,qua: -ey to . carry ;additional traif;f is
generated by' fhe deve- lopment..
3 i - The = plan ptreseri-ts a ;unified and organized ,arrangement of.,buildings and
'service fac li;tes which are appropriate in re-lat to ,adjae pr,
operty,
and.radequate landscaping and •;screening acre incl=uded to insure .compa ability.
'.44. "The natural and scenic °;qi ali of ".''the sate arg pr:o and adequate
public and priv_aae spaces :ar desigriazted on ,the 'development ,pl,an.
S.. 'The, p;ropo wil`1 not be detrimental .to the public welfare, will .be. in
e :best - nt•etesAts 'of _ the City, and :will, be in keeping w ah the general
iinte`nt: and ,spi!ri,t'of. the - Fetalmma _General, .and Zon ngA "Or,d nance..
KEEGAN & COPP,IN - 'N". MC DOWELL AND CL'EGG
'REZONING .Cond'
-
3.244 - P .D:> it ions,
1,.
Future. uses within the P U,: D. district shall be limited :.tb 'those permitted
,and Condit onalhy permitted in. "the M' L (Light Indus:trial) ng district.
.2.
Archi:°tectural.'and landscape plans shall be subject to design, 'review in
accordance ;with Section 26400 of :the 'Zoning Qrd'in'ance - ''kfl" r=equired
and design review :modifications shall `be" complet;ed.',prior to. Council
rev 'ew, of- the 'F.'U D. ; ,_xezon ng. The: aands'cape plans ,as approved by the
Site ,Plan' 'C'ommit'tee s ha: . 11 become part, df' the development plan', and such,
plans': shall be' inco,rp.orated into the, development plan:.
3
'.A f final subdivision map shal=l be recorded to' accommodate` the proposed
develo=pment., prio=r to :the, i0i ice of,. any building permits. (Section 1,9
8:03) ..
4'..
The 'City-well parcel located at the southwest corner of the site shall; 'be
full , improved with parking (as pr.oposed).,, landsca .in and a permanefnt'
y P g.
:. .-
iteture.
pump .house •which; is` consistent in, de_s' gn with- the building � archc
A11 .land'scapng and ,paving ;imp movements,' on the well si -t,e ` shall: be permanently '
mai.nt41h d by the owner's association:. One (l:) parking space Iodated'
d.rec.tly in front : of the well sh'al_l, be designated :for use ,by the City .
only..', Free access into 'the 'pu np; house shall b,e main=tained at all `times.
5'.
Build <ng =B ss}iahl ' be.. setback a minimum of` fifty- three(53)f from the northern
p;roperay line. Improvements ns:ide'' this setback shall include (as .measu.red'
:.
south fr:om'.. the property line),; :five (5). =feet of perimeter lands cap 'ing,,
an eighteen` .(18) foot- deep'p'arking, row,, a twenty - seven (27) foot minimum
driveway, and .ten (1 feet `(plus or-- minus) df, Undscapi:ng, and sidewalk.
6.
;Parking spaces .located in the 'rear of the.. building they s_,er -ve shall be-
situated °perp=endicular to `the -.rear bu=ilding mal1''to 1a1`;1ow; 'for' accessibility
;
at•. "al`1 t=imes (Se:c ion 20= 402)'. The parking'• space 'at'. the rear of Building
B -1 seal ;l be r:emoyed to, prov,lde` for ° adequa "te ,dr>iveway wid'.th. Parking
rows shall not, exceed. teri (10"), successive spaces wi „ thouf: the: use of' a
� 'scape strip-: , Parking spaces
minimum five (5) foot wide -dividing land'
facing townrds� the f`wont •of buildings shall be' provided with- pedestrian
�walksi” wherever possible. '° �� '` - -
7. `
Building :A =8 shall 't e provided. minimum. of. one (1) ..standard. -sized
I 'be'rfh " whichi does riot= project. any further 'into' the: driveway 'than,
Oe 'existing berth,. 'The- oii ''site 'truck route s hail l be' adequately- signed.
8 ,
Al i driveway en?t'r,anees s1 al.1 be provided W1 `twenty (2;0) foot minimum
curve; rad1 i,n. .o `the inner 'side~ of 'the' drive, ' loading and driveway .
'su a`c'es, . "excep't where Boinonit'e is proposed 'shall. be 'l roved:- th an
asphalt /.c6ndk- -to- , surface and - bordered by standard six (6) inch concrete.
curb,ing.,:
'9-
A minimum'clear-Arlm= eway•- width ot. ;twenty (20) f=eet ; shall be main ained at
all times between Buildings A -and B. This area shall riot. :be permitted to
include parking spaces, .loading berths,, ,power poles, refuse containers•,
e : ;t :,
KEEGAN & `COPPIN - `N P1C DOlTElX'-' AND CLEGG
3.2'44 - 'P ,D, REZONING Q. (ondltioi Con' "' - d
10.. Ala parking areas shall, 'be sexeened'';fxom the uaew of motorists traveling
on adjacent stree:t's- rby mean's of l6arth be as Per , the' approved land'scap'e
imas•ter plan :foz 'Uni ;t =4, of dus
the Intrial PPark., A m= niM d of four '(4.).
pl anter is +lands con't'aining= evergr- -e'en trees shall 'be .pro "vded - :'betwe`en the
rear 'wall of the. two buildings. .Driveway entr i& anCds` shal'1 be -< ncreased.
'-to ;measure •a 'minimum of eight ('8). ,-feet in; width:.,
"No a tional on -site signing shall be °approved ,iot'her than -that "which. is.
in accordance'withA proposed sign program.
`No ,outdpor storage. ;o'f machinery„ goods, cirat'e's,• boxes,. feac,<,, -shah take
`place. on- :site,. :No outdoor jab related :_repair' 'assembly, l lpalhtilng, cleaning,
{'etc., shall be c_oriduc on -site other than loading and un- loading of
I
ehicles.
1'3. The tinumb`er of .refuse stor- -age .'locatted' `between the :rear wal'l's 'of th two
(fi) ,bu.rl;d- figs shall `be increased, 'from ,:th'xee • . -- f:ive.• ('S).... 411 'refuse
storage. areas shal'1 be' enclosed on. all four- (4) sides with heavy. cons'truc.tion
matelr al,s which are: ;cons -1 tent 1h :d'esign, ;with the 1 ` iuildirng archliectu�re.
14. The conditions, cove'nan`ts, 'and restrict_ i'on's; 'for th'e'development, sha1 be
. subject ,to approval `by 'the 'C ity Attorney.
a
' VILLAGE MEADOW TOWNHOMES' = ELY�BLUD N& LYNCH; CREEK (CAL -N BUILDERS
11..5'86- - E .I.1Q. Evaluation - Findings _
1
-Lynch Creek will adequately aecommod'a the future 'f =low. of wa't,er, and the
possibility of d isturbance to vthe,Zk; --ek s'et,ting will be; •minimized as a
cond=ition, of tentative map ap,p,roval...
2,
;:The- intensity of traffic wouil be' consist'ent with the, land' use and
.no:
,adverse "effec a'r'e expec
3
Devel'opmena fee`s required± of the developer f:or the. school_. district will.
aid 'in .the overall p,l`an to prov'id'e for ad- equate school facilities.
4
�In tfi cour -se of development,, if archaeological � ma•ter.ials ar.e found on the
,'site; ad ate 'pr eservaton• measures; will be `required,':as a 'condition of
r+ thel .ten tattive map,,
5,.
t'`Preservat on of existing' trees w, - 1 , ;be. require&whenever possib;Le as a
,,condition of the:'t °en -4�t,_ ye map.,.,
6
The demand for additional. City services, wi11 be minimal,.
3 2, - P.:U D ..Findings,
1.
•
,The plan clearly resulis in a more d'eS_Tr,abae use of, land- and a better
1physica•1 environin na' than, would be possible under- any single;. zoning'
d'istrct..or combination, of zoning datrieas. ,•.
2
The -R.,U D d s trIc t, is propose& on ; property which has suitable relationship
to Ely B d';. • Nq'rth which ,is adequate :to carry, -.any additional traffic
ig:eneraied 'by the,- ' de vel,opment;..
I.
The plan.' for the proposed .developmen;t p resents. a unified= -and organized,
arrangement' of buildings and service facil -IUes which are appropriate in,
relation to adjacent or nearby ;prope-tties ad `equate landscaping ' is
inclu ied to- insure, compaiabilitty.
4, ,
The ;naiuwral' and` scenic qualm es of the site ar:e pro;te.c-'ted.', with adequate,
,availTabTe• public and priva;te spaces designated! on the Unit Development
_ Plan,.
The development of the- "subject property, in thee manner prbposed' b thee
appl cant,. will :not "be detrimental to the ; pub'lie we,, are,, will' be in the
'_bent interes -s, ,of the City' and will 'be, in keep'- ng wi-th the general in =tent
and spirit; of t;he; zoning. r-.eguIa.tions of� the City of, 'Petaluma-and. with "the
Petaluma General Plan:.
i
VILLAGE MEADOW` TOWNHOMES - FLY. BLVD. 'N ",& LYNCH CREEK (.CAL -N„ BUIbERS)
r .
3',.241, - P D. Rezoning"- Conditions .
Condition's
- 1 :. ,Archi:tectural arid:'•alan_dscape ,p,'aTl,s' shal`1 be subject to rev ew and approval
b°y. tfie ' "Ian and ,Architec,tural Review Committee. Plan review shah
consist of at least the .following ltems.: -building design, materiahs "and
colors,; landscape design, location variety,, and ,size,;' fencing, pedestrian
pa'ths,. street furniture, trash ;encl outdoor mechanical equ.Zpmen,t
�sc_rgeiiing light design,. ,and recreation area design;,, "Me development plan
shall' be - mod`- if-ed, to comply.:with' al 1 applcabl:e tentative map requirements.
Landscaping``shall comply taith all si te. Design :xe.quir.er�ents ;
2:. All ;parki.ng.and ,driveway edges ,sha1L be ihproved with
ith City - approved' concrete
curbing, subject, to the design specHication's of 'the- C iy Engineer, and
ro used, concrete` bum ers may be "removed Amin"
P' P y mum 'back -up area of "
'
twent seven' 27 feet shall be p g ace. Bomin p
P
y ( ) provi'd`ed for each parking' s 1 te,
S
pedestrian crossings shall. °be eliminated from Rivendel.l Dr>ve.. 'A11, pedestrian
s
paths :shal:l''be con`struc,ted'. o'f concrete. Proposed driveway Boiriinite cs.ossings
shall ,be- r`elocate:d at.'fhe: driveway entrances.
3.. The 'applicant shall enter into •.a develo�pdient agreement with the Ci - ty o,f
P_e'taluma in orde -r-'. to achieve the following ";
- The developer shall improve and: the homeowner's A, sti -a`ll •
ma nta m in - perpetuity any land .acq(tired by the City : between the ,subj''ec.
site_ ;and'Maria D,r've to• the..west and betwe,cn the site and, `Lynch Creek to
the south,
- Plians shal >1 'be; modified to 'create a. sufficient -in si -ze „to accommodate
a rel'o'cation. of an existing- •r-es denc`e in th`e vicinity of Phase - -1 L6t -14.
Said lot shal:I'be of:fe:red - for ded;i.cat on to; the Petaluma Ecumenical
P,t6j;$ct Council with the provision that the building, exte;r.ior "design
(,mater" als and colors°) "=.and' land"s&� Bing be 'con,froll:ed.'by .the homeowner's
architectural* review, board' ..in addition - to' staridar-d City requirements.:.
4.. The inside d"menso,ns of; srigl'e -car garages shall measur.e'at, least .twelve
(.`12K).:f:e:e,t by twen.ty -two "(22) feet', 'and' t }e inside d'- imens`io,ns : of; ¶ double-car'
garages ,:shall measure` ''at . least twenty ='two , (22) fee 6 Ii the ;final
width to be .determined'' by' • the $F. Comm, ..tee - ,
51. Two (2)' additional, parking spaces; shall be :added in the immediate vicinity
o U
f nits (M` and , 49 . of,. Phase =l (at` the. - discretion. of :the •:SPARC = Committee)
--Un1 s 2 and' 4 27 o£ Phase -2 ,; Units. ��7 and � 8 ,of Phase -2 Unit .4 22 of Phase :2;.
Unirts 56 and 457 of Phase -2, Units #518 and #59 of Phase-2, and Units #'62
and #63 • of Phase , 2 Pour {4) additional parking• "s "paces shall >be added.to
-.
serve .units 1'ocated in, the southeast corner of; the Phase -3' al:te.rn'ate.
VIjLhAGE ;MEADOW: TO1*THOMES - 'ELY BLYD N C LYNCH :CREEK (CAL -N, BUILDERS1
. U . ,.. ezoning - Con, &itig Coin
ont'•&
3. 241 P• , U D R _ _ ^ •
6:, The : "data" . s'ec;t.i on. of the S1 -t;e Plan: sha l be modified to exclude; .the ,,term.
from, the •tonal dwelling units .proposed for °Phase _2 .- Both building
coverage totals, shown n, .the• ",data" ,sec -tibn, and the development- plan
_ .,
scale are,. inaccurate and , shall be correc
The condi::tions, covenants, and restrictions for, the developinent, shall be
sub:jgct to •approval by the Coinmunit.y D'e elopinent and P1'anning D rtiectar and
the; ;City. Attorney p to Final Map ap,p.rovaMl.. The document_ shall cori;tain,
a st?atitemen:te prohibt�ng 'the on, site sto" "rage of r recreatonal_ .vehicles,:
Plans shall be r-ev.sed in the area ,of. Phase. 3i to allow for the preservation
Of :as many existing ma,tu;re trees a 9 is- feasible,
9;: Exi t -ing on -site fencing shall be removed in; accordance with the proiect
• phasang. ,
10',., The, ;phasing bpundaries sl al be mo,.dified' on ;the. ' deevelopment plan. to correspi nd.
with the , tenta'Ujge map;.
11, No parking shall:_ be permitted, alongl R�wendell Drive,,
6_424 Tentative Subdivi.slon,Map Findings
Findings, ., _ •.,
1,. The; proposal, meets, the re quiirements'o,f the City- 'Cod'e and the_ State Subdivision
Mapl
2. The; inost logical d_evelo.pment of the land • requires' 'that, 16,ts, be created
which are.. served by pr- ivate.. streets.
6,42',4 `- Tentative Subdivision Map. � Conditions -
1. 'The applicant shall c`ompl'y "With ' all , requirements of the City Engineer:
sp.eci 'fied' n the a.ttach'ed, let,tdr" , - and. shal'1, supply all necessary on, site .
utility easements as required' by T E..,. Pa °c "fic. Telephone,, and local
cable T:V'.,,.to .
• ahe final approv41 of the Ci,ty� ;Engineer.
2': Grading and st:o,rm drainage design .shall conform with the requirements of
the `Sonoma County Water Agency 'Flo Control Design Crter'a., The applicant
shah dedica n
te a ,hydraulic idainteance, easement along the creek to the.
City As required b.y the Sonoma'County Water Agency. The creek shall b
maintained in its natural state, with any min improvements' required by
the Water : Agency, Only quarry. rock.and° not rubhle'shall be used to protect'
the creek ;bank subject to approval by the Communiay Development Department
and Water' Agency.
- VILLAGE- .M,EADOtl ; TOWNHOMES ` ELY, "BLVD N - & LYNCH . CREEK. ..(CAL -N. "BUILDERS)
6,4424 'Tentative 'Subd =vison Map Conditions Cont'd'"
3 Du 'the course ,of development, -af archaeological ma "teria'ls •are .found,
al work: in ,t'he vicinity of ''the f�nd.('s:) shal'._1 b at
e opped d�
aci qualified
ar.chaeo`logis-t contac -ted" to evaluate the material's' and, make :t a 'recommendations
for mitigation as deemed 'neces "sary..
41. Community Facilities. and'Develodpment fees will'. be collected' at the time
buildng+permts are. issued:
5 The: loca1t bn ;- number. arid- ize ofl on si a fire tiydrants shall be determined .
by the Fire. ;Marshal .
6. The. existing' wid °th of:- 'kdria':D:rive° and. :Ely Road shall be nd Gated on the
tentative map'. Slope..- contour .lines under tree clusters shall "be shown on;.
the: tentatlie map., The location `of all trees not located an the. creek
1
V
hich have Qa, 'trunk;' diameter of greater thain, :four (4) inch °e's ,shall be: "shown
on, ,the aentative map All required dedications and easements shall .be i shown on the ten tati.ve trip . Street designation inaceuracie`s shown. on the
"Location Map" shall 'be corrected.
7. A `min "imum ten' (10) foot wide., public access 'easement contiguous'' with the
"conc.reAte pedestrian and bike pa=th" along the creek :shown 'on the P, U U.
d:eVelopment plan shall; 'be pr =ovided on, the tenta,t' ve, map.
8., Residential architectural features shall- not be
permitted to overh ang
contiguous .parcel_s'
9.. All private -.streets shall be • . given a name,
J r
,10 Tentative map' approval .shall perta=in only to 'the; sixty - seven (6i lot Ia and
the residual parcel, -: n. "Uri >i't One" an sidll be in'dica;fed,'.as; such _on the
tentat V map.
11. A City standard, bis pull -ou`t sha;l'I be ` "c.onstruct.ed on Maria D,r:ve at. >the
;sou;theast corner. of,. the.'Rivend611 :D'r.iv!e intersection: '
12. Th proposed building ,setbacks - `f:rom .Lynch Cr'eek'<shall b-e certified in,,„
writing, as to.':comp:lying, 'wi tth applicable:, codes •by .;the' :Sonoma County Water
Agency' prior to, review by �the'� City Council
t..
a
-.,.�
CITY F P'E'TALU;MA, California
POST AND ENGLISH STREETS :94952 o TELEPHONE (707) 7634613
June 10, 1980'
Petaluma ,P }lann ng Commission
City' Hall.-,
Petaluma,;.CA 94952
.i,
Attention :; Gregory C. Fre fas, Planning Director
Gentlemen;:
Subject: Tentative Map -,.Village; Meadows. Town Homes
-Section 29.16,4 of the Subdivision; Ordinance - specifies; that the .City Engineer-:
S p rep'a °r.e'a written, report of .recommendations on 'the'. Tentative .Map in
.relation to the. Public Improvement'- requirements.'of the, Subdivision Ordinance
and the provisions of the Map Act.
This depart
wth the Subdv
hrd i� ion. OrdYance
etatve••map And' €ands it 'to be in
con €ormance •
1. Rivendel'1 Drive should be connected to Ely Bl`vd North as part of Unit 2.
construction: -The improvements° on El should'be built at that time
also.:
2. The typical section for Maria Drive- should include the full 28 foot
half sectio adj acen't,, to the .tree area, as well as' a taper section 'to
approach the tree area:
3. The water system shoul'd,be,a complete loop between Professional Drive
and 'Ely Blvd. North as part. of. the first, phase of construction:. .
4. No parking .will .:tie, required',,,on ,portions ,of. Rvend'ell Drive for stopping
sight distance.
S eria-ly,
,TSH:LRR:mv Thomas, Sr Hargis
Ci -ty Engineer'
cc: CE
ACE
File