HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 09/23/1980REGULAR. MEETING .Sep -ember :23, '1980
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS;, CITY1 .HALL 7:30, `P..M..
PETALUMA, CA
The Planning Commission encourages applicants -or their representative to be
available at the mee,eings �to ,answer ,ques.tiorisr, so that ;no: agenda, items need
be defer -red :to a, later, date due ao ,a .lack.of. pertinent informa"t on.
P-.IEDGE' °ALLE sIANCE' TO THE FLAG
-ROLL 'CALL;: G Comm. Cavanagh HeadLavin_ Popp
Shearer- Tenter: Wai:te'
,STAFF-;:, Gregory Freitas, .Community Development and •Planning Director.
APPROVAL OK, MINUTES : Minutes, ofAugust 26,, ,1980-, and. ,September 9, 1980
CORRESPONDENCE:
DIRECTOR;-'';S ,REPORTS: _
COMMISSIONERS REPORTS:
ZONING.,MATTERS
PETA 'UMA; PEOEI:E SERVICES'' CENTER Public Hearing- -to: cons =det a Use Perm •t application
to arelocate the'Petaluma People .Services Center to:
115 LIBERTY STREET' 115. Liberty Street
CITY OF PETALUMA, l: Public Hearing -to evaluate. the Environmental
ZONING ORDINANCE AMEMDENT Impact Questionnaire. for' the following amendment
SLOPE DENSITY ORDINANCE to the Slope Density Ordinance!.
2. Public Hearing- to.consider an amendment to -the.
-Slope.Dens_ity Ordinance ,o:f.. the.2oning Ordinance
to permit additional dwelling units on 5-12%
slopes. within areas classified as:wUrban Density
(10 '.uni'ts/acr:e)on the' City's ,GerieraljEDP Plan.
rr.
PET•ALUMA,, PLANNING 'COMMIS'S:ION
AGENDA .
y dr .; r,
5 3s"� ",,,'. ,• �� SEPTEMBER ••Z`3,19.80:
SONOMA TRAVEL SERVICE.
P,ublic•Hearing to, consider .a var°ance.application to
SIGN, AREA VARIANCE
allow,. for A .24 sq.-f:t.; wall sign. -to be located on the
(2.2.8.8)
side ,of the Sonoma. Trave . Agency at. 3'51 S ., iMd owell ,Blvd.
which ex'ceed's the. ,maXmum_ on -site area . permitted
by the ,Zoning Ordinance.
JAY .DEVELOPMENT., INC.
1..Public Hear;ing:to;'evaluate ,the.Enuironmental
' OAK. HILL. DEVELOPMENT-
Impact,OuEs,tionnaire'for .th'e following.General.
1625' P.ETALUMA BLVD N-
Plan/EDP' ,Amendment,.,. P.JP..D:. Rezoning, and
E..I.Q'. EVALUATION/GENERAL:
Tentative; Subdivision Map..
PLAN &.EDP AMENDMENT/
P'.,,UaD.:REZONING/-TENTATIVE
2.,Public 'Hearing [to coris 4er aGeneral Plan/EDP,
-SUBDIVISION MAP:'
Amendment of the current. land use.d'esignations
'(11.5'99,/8, 57.%3.<245/'6.433)
..of the site 'from Central. Urban •and, `Ur -==.ban Low,'.
'Density Re'sid'entiai (4.,5•4weiling,units/acre)
to Urban,: Density Residential :("10:dweling units/
Acre).
3:. Public _Hearing to 'consider an application :t'o
;rezone AP No. 6-491=0.9 from,S:tudy District_ to
•
P.,U.D. (,Planned Unit bevel`opment),
4.. Public Hearing to ,review, the 'Tentat ve Subdivision
Map for 'a 60-un'it condominium development.
" T., LANNI NG_MATTERS, :,
'CITY OF PETALUMA.� __ -._
1. ,P-ub,1_; c-Hca-zip g, to=eva. ual:e -i i &-Env ronmental-
GENERAL PLAN (EDP) AMENDMENT
Impact Questoiina'ire; ,f•o.r ',the `following General
(11,.616/8.60),
Plan :(EDP)' .Amendment.
Publi.c,"Hea;r: ng, to consider A,- General Plan (EDP)
Amendment to -revise, the land use"designation
of 'Urban High Dens. `ty Resi'dentia'l,, 301 units per gross
'acre. (all units over 20,, low or .mode'rate income)
_•
to Urban'.Ht& Density:Resid'ential•, Bonus Density
(up to 30„units/acre).
-MATT- MASTER ENU'IRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT - COMAR_C'
DESIGN SYSTEMS
P'ubt "c Hearing to cons,- der the adequacy 'of° the Dr'af•t'
Master Environmental Impact Report: -prepared by
COMARC besi_gn Systems on th'e implement-ation :of
'the 'Ci"ty'a General Plan,
NOT, OFFICIAL 'UNTIL_ ;AP,,PROVED,. BY , THE
70
PETALUMA,. PLANNING' COMMI'SIS.ON
T„ E .S I
PETAhUMA_ `PLANNING 'COMMISSION 1 September 23,i 19,80 r
REGULAR 'MEETING ` 743U 'P, .M: i
CITY: COUNCIL CHAMBERS
P,•RESENT: i " Comm:. ,Cavanagh*,,. 'Lavin; - Shearer- Te _cet; Vii"te, !
ived_ at-: 8:'0.6: ;p..m:.
S= . Te: I' "Comm.. 'Head; Popp,
STAFF':' I •`..Gregory Fr,eitas, Community - Development. ,& " Planning' Director
�'
W,aurren ;Salmons,. P:r;neipal; Planner
Cynthia deken: .Assddiat.e� P`lanne'r. i
APPROVAI.OF MINUTES': Minutes of August` 2"6', ` 1980' arid, 'Se"p.ttiember •`9, 1;980
were approved 'as . sdbmit,ted;.'
k
DIRECTOR- --S'-REP.ORT:; Community 'Dev&lopment & Planning .�Directo'r Ere ;tas'
71
introduced' Warren Salmons,;Pr.in'cpal ;Planner, who
i
had 'joined the City" staff on .Sep.tember1 15th.' !
The .:commission wa's' 'advised that ,the City Council' "
has set September .29, A9,8.0' a.t° 7 :00 p m,.. as the time -fo;r" consideration and
action 'o`n •appeals from the .19'8.1 allo.tment..pr.o.cess:, One appeal ,ha& been file&
f'or proposed.. Sunny •;brook• , ubdsiv sign aocated' on+ Ely- North,- - .east:, zlde of. a
Petaluma!:
.It wa's noted "the'Commission' cannot act, on General
Plan 6rj Z,o.ri'ing�•'Change's .unless.'five Commissioners are, present.`
PETAL'UMA!'P.EOPLE .'S-ERVICE:S - CEN'T=ER "=_''U"se Pe_rrn ;t° R"eques;t' i
1'. 311),
w
Pt=,to. coside•apItem (1.311) milication •to relocate: ,the Petaluma
•Peop"le Services -'center.' to" 115 Lib.er;ty';$ireea,, 'The' pub`Sic'"fiear, ng` was opened` j
and •closed.• Mot-i0q »in_t.roduced '•by':Commis'Tone'r' `Shea'rer;,:s:e'conded''b•y ,Comm:
Lavin to.f :grant a Use Permit f,or the relocation o,f� :the Petaluma People•" S'erVices
Center to .1,15•" Liberty St_ree�t, •based on, the staf `'s 'stand'ard ,,,fth#ngs; ,and= -
- subjject to,`Kr.eview by 'they st'af°f din six .mon-ths_
AYES 4 :ABSENT;: : Coirim. ' Cavaiia'gli; Head, Popp
Speaker,,;" „> I ar'ry 9''ob:_inson; ;Exec;. _'Di r'. of: People Services Center
;' .
SONOMA,, TRAVEL-•-SE_RVIUz,;!' SIGN AREA VARIANCE -.351 S;. McDowell 'Blvd._
Item 2'.288 to consider a variance, request for 'a 2:'.4-sq. ft, wall. sign .af 351
S. McDowell. Blvd"- 'The public_ "hearing wade opened and closed,: Motion introduced
by Comm. L'av,n; seconded ,by Comm Shearer to deny the .variance requested,
based- on. the 'staff.'•recoinuiend'ed ,•cond= ;,ions:'
AY•ES,: 4 ABSENT:_ Comm., ;Cavanagh,, `Head, `Popp.: „
'The applicant did ,no;t.,'ap:p,ear. Staff' was' directed,' to ,nitify.appl,ican•t 'of:, the,.F' '
Commission decision and 'the,j_'e-q-day-.appeal p'rocess.: '
Recessed' At..18i:00 p.;m4
Comm., Cavanagh' arrived' at `;8:'06 p,.,m-.
Meeting reconvened- at:8;:0:7 p:m. "
CITY QF-PETALUMA ZONING ORPINANCE,_AMENDMEN,T'-'S.LOPE- DENSITY ORDINANCE
I,tem.`11:61,7J7.,82 - 'consider the evaluation :o_f the Erivirronmental_`Impact Questionnaire
on an amendment to .the' Zoning Ordinance to provide for. slope' density -to permit'
additional Awell .ng ,units on ,5-12=%-„s' op&s.,.. -The public hearI_ng• -was 'opened`and,
closed.. ;Motion introduced.by-Comma Waite;, seconded; 'by Comm. Shearer.. to prepare.
a' Negative Declaration for the, p0. p;os,ed Amendment ,to, the Zoning Ordinance;,And
recommend to -the Ci'ty,, 'Council ,the::•Zon ng.'Ordinan'ce be'amended: to permit additional
dwel=ling1 units. on 5-1'27slopes, ,within.• areas, classified, as' Urban- Density (10_
units[acre -on ,the City,'s General./EDP Plan, based on the 'recommended4jiudings;
with the' exception. that, Subsection A Abe revised to delete. "R-lk'; 'arid the 'words
'R-M=G
- and R=M H; `deletes the `words .'or more' ; and• add the' words "subject to thedisc
after.'p'ermiated•. notion introduced by
Coimnre 1a'ite�f secondect1byi1Commt��11Shearerission may'T
',
AYES: :5 ABSENT: Comm,. Head, Popp., `
OAK HILL, -:DEVELOPMENT - 1625 PETALUMA BOULEVARD NO- - JAY DE ING_.
Item 1.1..599 - The, -_Planning Commission directed the Community, Development. •
:Director to issue a'Nega.tive Declaration for 'the GeneralP.,1an/EDP amendment of
the current• land use designations o"f -the site, from, Central '.Urban and Urban `Low'
Dens -it . Residential, 4.,5 dwel;lin
y ( g units`_`_/,�acre), 'to Urban Dens;ty'-.Residental ;('10
dwelling units%acre) . The public hearing; was operi.ed ,and closed:, Motion
introduced, by Comm. Shearer;; . s,econded by Comm-: Waite:.to ,prepare a Negative
Declaration for the prdjeat, based, on. the --recommended afind hgs,:.
AYES: 5 -•ABSENT- c. Comm: ,Head;, 'Pop'p.' '
OAK; HILLDEVELOPMENT, - '1625 PETALUMA BOULEVAkD" oNO. - . P . U : D . REZONING_.
Item..8'.5'7 - to consider :the rezoning .o'f AP Noll '6,=4911"'O from. Study Diistrict to'
" R-U:11._ .(Planned Unit- Development) for z 52-unit condominium. development at '.:the'
site of the, f,o,rmer Blvd. North 'rock .quarr.y, The ,public hearing was- opened and,
2
�'-i.
4 1
closed: Motion introduced 'b* C m- 'Shea p:t, Waite:. to recommend;
y, � o,mm..., seconded; mme
'Coun!6,il approval :6f the -P' :U,:D. rezoning, based on the recommended
va to, the City.
conditions,;,
AYES: 5 AB'SENT;i Comm. Head', Popp.
4
OAK HILL DEVE-LQPMENT, - 16:2 5, PETkhUMA, -BLVD." IN6,._' Tt.E-.NJ'T'A-zTIV'E4, .SUBDIVISION MAP
rte'm: 3.- 24 5`1 to consider .,tbg:Tentative .Subdivisiori Ma'P, fbr a52-unit- condominium-
d e v-41opm-en''t at 1625 Petaluma ma, Blvd ,,'No.::- The pu, tc• hearing edrIrig-_waq, bpened and-,
closed. Moltion dirif r'qdUded; by CommWaite; seconded by-,, Comm.iLavin, ao recommend
"�,ve, Subdivision_ c6un-1, , �i, I , , ,to the City c3.- approva,l of:.t g, Tdrita't,,,Map ;based{ pn-.the,
fig, f ication-s':
Modi
k6c6mmend.ed, conditions with' the'lo'llow'i
Condition 10 Buildings No s. 'I- -through 9: shal�l;,liave, aw, se ' paraft-on--.-qf approximately
Added: ten feet, dnd further- that. -there shall be. A separation betweenV
buildin s No.�i -34L' ajjd__.3�5 't'q eli'minate-'the, corridor'look for the
development.
AYES:, 5 ABSENT: Comm':.;, HeAd, P6pp,
Speakers,: lone V6gensen, 1755 Petiluma. Blvd. ,No.
-Leonard •Jay, Dev
eloper
Emil Mo'ge-1, Mogej- Engineering
Dick Lieb, Lieb, &-Qud-tesmAv 'Archi-tects
A pe't-i-ti,orf,contaihing ,21 .,.signature's f d�6riqg -the proposed
project,_wAs, ieceiVed and -f -!:led.
CITY OF, PETALUMA, -,GENERAL PLAN -(EDP) AMENDMENT MAX HIGH DENSITY, 'RES ID.ENTIAL-
lteq 11.616 - to conside�f an -k a General, 01a(. Amendmentise the la - nd
-to'rev
dse designlatio6 of Urban High -Density Res idontia zl,'. .30, units per gross acre
(all uhit's over :20', low or moderaIe Iftcome)` to' Urban 14!izh Density Residential>,
'Bonus -Density. (`up to 30,, urikt -S[ a _dre),..' 'The "public hearing .was, opened' and .closed,.
end
'Motion :introduced by Comm:. Shearer,;, secon ded,by Comm. Cavanagh to recomm-
to
the City do ptIon ,of an, amend amendment: 'to the GOneral Plan and its
Ci,Council, the a
Env-i',ronme,ntal 'Design. Element to rev.I_se the land usedesignation. of Urban High
Density Residential.-.
AYES: 5 ABSENT: comd'. fte'ad., Popp
P
DRAFT MASTER ENVIRONMENTALL.IkPAC'.T_ REPORT ARC _ -DESIGN. SYSTEMS
,Item 11.'6111 = to consIder .-the, adeqdacy "of' 'the Drift Mast_L�-r Environmental
'Impact Report prepared' by, COMAR I C I Design, S y's.,temb on 'the, imp.1ementatiori of the
Ge n-eral Piarv. Pub.lic.. hearing. opened and, closed. Motion introduced by, Comm.
.Lavinn; seconded: by Comm,. 6hearet ':to deny, the, zdequacv° of ,thee Dt-af t: Master.
Env Irohme-d, Al Impact, Report- prepared* by QOMARC Design` Systems.
3
A
-AYES,: ` 2 Conim, Lavin-. Shearer NOES': Comm." Cavanagh, -'Tender, ,Waite..
-ABSENT: Comic. Head,, Popp. �r
Motion defeated-.
Speaker: Mr _ Gi'1' Cas,rle,. `COMARC Design Systems.,
•.: :...• .• 1. ':. _. :_ •:,•.. ..
Motion introduced by Comin. Waite; s.econded by Comm. Cavanagh that based .on tbie
understanding.that.the.'Master. Environment'alllmpact Report by COMARG'Design
Systems was. prepared and,submitted"with ri .the guidelines and" limitations
•,prebiously established' therefor, the Commission recommends 3°t° to 'the. City
Council for cer,tf.cation.
AYES: 5 ABSENT;:.. ".Conics: Head," Popp;
• - .. , 1
the 'meeting,. adjourned at 1.1;:30_p.:m.
Chairman..
Attest:
closed. Motion, introduced 'by .Comm,. 'Shearer,;.,,qeconded.,by Comm.. Waite to recommend•
to the City Council 'app.ro.vdl of the-.P.U.D. rezoning, based -,on thexecommended.,
•, conditions.
AYES: 5 ABSENT: Comm. Head, Popp.
OAK HILL DEVELOPMENT'- 1,625-1PETALI'A' BLVD. NO. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Item 3.245 - to consider.the, Tentat-iye Sqbdiyis'idnMap,;fbr a .5-2-unit.. cgodominium y
development d ..At 625 Petaluma Bl .,*No.-- The. 1c heari ed.. And,.
opened. public ng Vas. o en,
closed. ii(j't'io"n*"""n't:r.od"uc-ed,-'b'iy.,C�ordTh., WbLite',; * seconded by•,qomm. Lavin . 'to recommend- -
to the City CouncilapprovalZ .of,
o .f. the - Tentative, Subdivision, Map based..- on the.. -
recommended
ec.mmended 'tonditi6hs with the fo.. owing modifications:
C,6nditionilO Buildings 'Nos. I through 9 shall have 'a. segarat . on,-kof approximately -I
Added: ten feet and . further -that there- shall.be a separation between
buildings,,No. 34 and 35 to eliminate -the c6rridor" ob o the
development..
.AYES: 5 ABSENT: Comm...Head, Popp
Speakers: ne Vogens-eri, 175:5..Petaluma Blvd. -No.
.7 Leonard Jay, Developer
,..Emil gogef, Mogel Engineering
Dick.tieb, Lieb &.Quaresma,.Arch-itects
A petition'containing 21 signatures favoring the proposed
project, was received and fildd.•
CITY OFPETALUMA GENERAL PLAN (EDP) AMENDMENT URBAN HIGH -DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
Item 11..616 - to consider a General Plan.(EDP) Amendment to revise the- land
use designation of Urban High Density Residential, 30 units per gross acre
(all units over 20, low or`moderate income) to Urban High,Density Residential,
.-Bonus Density (up to -30 units'/acre). The public., hearing was opened and closed.:
Motion introduced
d by'Comm. Shearer; seconded by Comm. Cavanagh to recommend to
the City Council the adoption,bf an amendment to°the General Plan and its
Environmental. Design Element to revise the' -land use designation of Urban High
Density•Residential.*
AYES,: 5 ABSENT: Comm. Headj" Popp,
DRAFT MASTER* ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT -REPORT-- COMAkC DESIGN SYSTEMS
Item 11.611 - to consider the adequacy of the Draft Master Environmental
Impact Report prepared'by COMARC Design Systems on the implementation of the
General Plan. Public hearing opened and closed.- Mo-tion introduced by. Comm.
Lavin; . seconded 'by Comm. Shearer to deny the adequacy. of. the Draft -Master
Env-ironmehtal Impact Report prepared' by COMARC,Design Systems;.
3
N
AYES: 2 Comm. Lavin, Shearer NOES:,* Comm. Cavanagh,,.. Tencer,,,Wai.te.
ABSENT: Comm:`Head, Popp,
Motion defeated.
Speaker: Mr:: Gil Castle, COMARC Design Systems.,.
Motion introduced by; Comm: Waite; -seconded by Comm.. Cavangh..that% based on- the
understanding,that•the. Master 'EnvironmentalQlmp"aot Report•by COMARC Design
Systems was prepared and submitted within the guidelines, and _1imi•rations
previously a§iablished,therefor, the Commission .recommends: it to, the City
Council for certification.
AYES: 5' ABSENT:_. Comm. Head, Popp,..
The meeting adjourned at 11:36P .m.
Chairman
Attest:
4
` JOB #
Magnetic Card Center
- Lk Request Slip
Department�
Name' of Author
"D,r;�-Yt Frm''
• o
i
Date Submitted
Date Needed
Single Space }
Space- & :a Half
Double Space
Style -of Type. SOLO;
,
Additional instructions
"Final Form" .
:.Date Submitted
Date Needed I'
Recorded - Card Retention Peri,o,d
• No , of Carbon C'opies
Single -Space
-Space &,a Half
Double :Space
.Envelopes. Labels
t1ona:l lns t'ruc t'ioris
MAG 1-8/8.0
• NOT OFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED BY 'T'HE`
'P,ETALUMA .TL-ANNING, xOMMISISON
'M I N'U. T . E S }
PETAL'UMA` PLANN.INd" COMMISSION',-. September, r2'3; 1980
REGULAR MEETING
T. 30
CITY 'COUNCIL° CHAMBERS "
PRESENT .1 .Comm. Cavanagh*, Lavin,- :Shearer, 'Tencer, Waite' .
. ., *Arrived, ;at; 8.:06" p._m•. i
ABSENT:` Comm. Head, Popp
STAFF: Gr-e reitas; Community.Deve1•opment &;Rlann ng pirector
g y
Marren Salmons,' Principal' Planner
r'
Cynthia 'B'e'eken, Associate' Planner j
A:PROVAL• OMNUTES;; 'Minutes,. of A ,' g,us't 2r6', E.980 arid: September 9; 1980
- were ap;proyed,: a_s" 'submi.tted.' 1 {
.
DIRECTORr ;S REP,ORT,. Community' peveloprrient &; ,Planning Director
introduced -Warren °S'almoris, Principal Planner,,, who '
•` had joined 'the 'Ci.ty zstaff on' September 15th ' }
.'' The Commis.s.ion, wasi- advised .th'at the -City 'Council
has set ',September 29, 1980 a't T:00 p :m., "as the time for' corisidera'tion and
action on appeals ,from the IY84a'llotmen,t pro.cess.. One, -appeal has been filed -
for.propgsed Sunny brook•..Subdiv.ision, .,1oca'ted ,0n''Ely .North _,east side -of - `
Petaluma.,_
It` was rioted' 'the'_ ;Commission cannot..,ac,t, ,on General: `
P'1-an 'or Zoning, Changes" uriles.'s; :f ire Cammiss-iong rs,, a"re pres.en,i.
PETALUMA ;PEOPLE.. SERUIGES,' CENTER_ use ,P.ermriit Request
,I_fem ('1,3.1.1) to consider a' Uses Permit, application.. to ,relocate; the' Petaluma'',,. '
People Services Center to' 1F15 .Lgiberty Street. The .,public hearing .wa's '.o,pened �=
and' closed,., - "Mot -ion `introd'uced•.,by 'Commissioner Shearer; seconded. by Comm
Lavin to :grant .a Use -P.ermi`t. for the. relocation, of the, :Petaluma People .Services„
Center. to. 1.15 tl betty Street, .based' on the staff fss standard",'finding's, ''and
sublj ect it'o revi'°ew' by`the, staff ` in., s ix months': +f
AYES. 1 4 ABSENT: "` Comm•.' ^Cavariag'h,' .Head,; Popp
Speaker Lax]V 'Rob'inson; :Exe'c.; Dir. of People Services..Center
SONOMA'TRAVEL SERVICE;'--I&IGN AREA VARIANCE - 351 S.'McDowell.Blvd._
Flfem, 2.28,8 to. 'consider .a variance ;request' for a '24-,sq,. ft. wall sign at 351
S ' McDowell Blvd.- The ;public ;hearing was: opened and closed. Motion introduced
by 'Comm'. 'Lavin`; seconded "by Gomm Shearer to deny the. `variance requested,
based on' the, f. 'recommended : conditions .'
AYES: 4.. ' ABSE_ NZ: Comm. Cayanajh .;Head, Ropp:,.
4 ' ,
The applicant.did not appear. Staff was di.rec':ted to ni,tify' applicant :of: the'
Commissiont._.decis"ion and' -the; ten=day- appeal process:
Recessed at, 8;:00 -p.m.' "
Comm. Cavanagh' arrived' "at .`8r:•06' p .m.
Meeting- reconvened at -8:07 p�. M.
CITY -,OF, PETALUMA ZONING ORDINANCE. ,AMENDMENT SLOPE..DENSITY ORDINANCE'
Item- 11`:.617/7.82 =; consid'er .the evaluation' of tE�e Environmental, Impact •Questionnaire
on. an amendment to •.th 'Zoning Ord. narice to:' provide for sliipe, dens .ty..to permit
additional. dwelling units: on 5-T2%. slopes,. The pu'b`lic hearing 'was opened and
closed. Motion introduced', ;by `•Comm.. Waite`; seconded by Comm: Shearer to prepare'..
a'Negatiye� Declaration• fo;r the proposed; amendment' -to. the Zoning Ordinance and
recbmmendL to the City Co- ric,il the Zonzng`.Ord nance be Ate,ndedl to permit ad'di•t�ioiial
:dwel-ling units. on 5-12%` slopes' within' areas -.:classified as :.Urban Density ('10,
units/acre on the City's General/EDP Plan, based on. the recommended,f:indngs;
with the-• exception that; `Subsection_ A ,be. revised to delete "RLV'- 'and the words:
R M=G •and. R M-'H-'
, delete the'w0tds, "oi , mo, reand '' , add. the .words �"sutij eet to the
Ili •'
dise`r.et oir of i,ze Pla«ii gig Coilulzission - may after permi.tLed. -notion i troduc'ed b�
Comm. ?-1aite;, seconded by' Comm: ,Shearer,
AYES: S ABSENTc Comm': Head,, Poppa.
OAK HILL DEVELOPMENT 1,62'5'P,ETALUMA BOULEVARD NQ: - JAY DEVELOPMENT, INC.
Item, .11,.59.9 The Planning Commission directed the; Cominunity. Development
Director to"issue a. Negative.'Declaration for the, General *Plan/:EDP amendment of
the current land use des ignaf ohs' of: the siie, from Central Ur-ban._and• .Urban, Low
Dens ty,= Re's:idential ,(4•: 5 dwel ling, ;units/a6re) to Urban Density. 'Residen-tial (10 '
dwelling units -/acre):. --„The public hearing',was opened :and` closed;. Mot -ion
.introduced liy Comm•.. Shearer:; seconded "Comm.,b_y Waite •to prepare; a Negative:;
Declaration for the proj ect, based:. on •then -recommended findings,,.
AY ES`•: 5 ABSENT: Comm: .Head, . Popp. LL
OAK,HI_LL, DEVELOPMENT 1.625' PETAI;UMA, BOULEVARD N0, P.U.1D�. -R'EZONING, '
Item 8 5:7 t:o, consider; the rezoning of;;AP No:' 6-4;9L-09' from Stu'dy,.'Distric't to
.-
Px.•D. (:P,l•anned ;Unit Development) f.or, a 52=unit condominium deyelopn►ent..a,t the
site -of the 'former Blvd..North rock, quarry_ .� The public°'hear-ing-.cwas opened and