HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 09/23/1980h . I
F a IUM B I'D
P O I omm 101
r -
REGULAR MEETING .September :2`3, '1980
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS;, CITY .HALL 7 :30- `P..M..
PETALUMA, CA
1
The.Plannirg Commission encourages applicants- or- their representative to be
available at the meeting's io ,answer ;questions "so that no: agenda, i.t'ems need.
be deferred' to a later, da e due to ;a .lack . of pertinent imformation.
PLEDGE' ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG
J
- ROLL 'CALL V Comm. Cavanagh Head Lavin Popp
Shearer Tencer Wai:te ,.'
. , STAFF , : Gregory Frei,tas, .CommuA ,ty Development and •Pl'anning�Director:
i.
AP OFD` .MINUTES c Minutes, of: August 2'6,. ,1980 , and September 9, 198.0'
GORRES_PONDENCE':: _ y
r
DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
r. w
COMMISSIONERS REPORTS:
PETAEUMA PE
QPI:E SERVICES CENTER P`ublic:Hearng to consider a Use:Permit application
to arelocate the Petaluma People Services Center to:
115 LIBERTY STREET' 115. Liberty. Street'
(1.311)
e
CITY OF PETALUMA, 1 h
' - e Public' Hearing evalu_'ate. the. Environmental
ZONING ORDINANCE AMEMDENT Impact Questionnaire-for'the following amendment_
SLOPE DENSIITY ORDINANCE to the S_- lope'Density Ordinance!.
-
�, 2. Public Hearing- to,consder an amendment to the
Slope Density,Ord'inance -of. the,Zoning Ordinance
to permit additional dwelling units` on.5 -12%
. � slopes 'within areas classified as •Urban Density'
(10�.units /acre)' on `the City's General /EDP Plan.
i
e. •
r
PETALUMA,.PLANNING COMMISS'.ION
M
AGENDA
j SEPTEMBER 23,1'9.8'Q
SONOMA TRAVEL - SERVICE
Public Hearing to consider •a sari °a.nce.applica.tion to
SIGN AREA VARIANCE
allow- fo 'a 2'4 s ,. - ft .i wall i'gn to be' located on, th
(2..28,8)
side of the Sonoma . Travel Agency 'at, 351 S,, iMd owell .Blvd
which exceeds the,maXimum_on -site area. p ermitted
"
by the ,Zoning Ordinance.
JAY DEVELOPMENT., INC.
1.. 'Public Hearing to; the: Environmental
OAK HILL DEVELOPMENT-
Istpact,QuEstionnaire for fhe following ;.General.
1625 PETALUMA BLVD N-
Plan /EDP' ,. P AJi D. Rezoning, and
E I. Q. EVALUATION GENERAL,
Tentative" Subdivision Map..
PLAN & ,EDP AMENDMENT/
P.U..D. REZONING /- TENrAThVE.•
2 . ,Public Hearing `to cons`ide_r a Gene'ra'l 'Plan /EDP
SUBDIVISION MAP;°
Amendment of the current, land use.,d'esignatons
'( 11. 5'99,/8i.5.7./3.K245/'6'..433)
of the from. Central. Urban •and. - Urban Low,'.
Density , Re's idential (4, 5 .dwelling units /acre)
to Urban, De sfty Residential .('10 :dwelling units/
•
were):...
3: Public.Hear-ing to consider an application ao
'
rezone AP No.' 6= 4'91 from ,Stud'y Dis riot to
P.X . D. (Planned .Unit Development),
4,. Public" Hearing review the ''Tentative Subdiyisign.
Map fo:r. a 60 - unit condominium dlevelopmen•t.
" '`PLANNING- MATTERS,
_ CITY OF PETALUMA.� _� -
-
_ 1. cpubly-c- Hca -ri . -'to eva uai:e -- _1 e-Env 'Tonmen -
'GENERAL PLAN (EDP) AMENDMENT
Zmpact Quest.ipnna'ire following General
(11. 616/8..60) .
Pl an ;(EDP )`.Amendment.
2,. Publi.c:'Hearang- to, consider a General Plan (EDP)
- _ Amendment to revise, the land use 'de` sgnation
of 'Urban High Density Residential, 301 units Per gross
'acre (all units over 20,; lqw or :moderat'e income)
=
to Urban'.Ht& Density °.Resid'ential Bonus, Density
"(up to 30 units /acre)'.
DRAFT- MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL
Pubi c Hear"ir g to consider °the adequacy Hof; the Draft
IMPACT REPORT' - COMARC
Master Environmental Impact Report; - pr-:epared. by
-
DESIGN SYSTEMS
e on nt
COMARC Design 'the mp'leme_at' on .of:
(11.,.6`11)
the bit sGerieralPlan•
"a? 44.
SONOMA, TRAVEL- •- SERVIUz ' = AREA VARIANCE - .351 S:. McDowell 'Blvd,.
Item 2,.188 -= to consider a varAiancel request for 'a 24 -sq. f:t, wall sign ,at 3'51
S. McDowell Blvd" 'The public `hearing was opened and clgsed' Motion introduced
LIN
by Comm. Lavin; seconded by Comm . ,Shearer to deny the :variance requested,`
based-- on, the' 'staff:' recommended cond= i
AYES, ; ., ABSENT... Comm Cavana H Head `Popp.
g
The. applicant did not ap;p,ear Staff` wasp directed, to ntifyapplicant 'of the
Commissioon dec :ision and 'the,jen -day `.appeal „process:
Recessed at =8Q0 p.;m
Comm: Cavanagk arr,i�,ed at ;8:'06
Meeting reconvened- at , :8 p .m.
CITY OF`PETALUMA ZONING ORDINANCE,_ AMENDMENT ' - SLOPE: DENSITY ORDINANCE
Item; 11:61.7 /7.;82 .- consider the evaluation .o_f the Envi `Impact Questronnair
on an amendment to :the Zoni: Ordinance to provide for 'slope deris:,ty -to permit'
add - tional :dwelling units on o5- 12 % „slopes:.. The public hearing' was 'opened "And:
closed.. • :Motion introduced . by Comm. Waite,; 9 6con ded by Comm,: Shearer to prepare.
a` Negative Declaration for .the propds-ed amendment ,to, the Zoning Ordinance and
"redommend to City Council ,the:;•Zon ng.'Ordinan'ce be'amended- to pert' i't additional
dwel=ling units. on 5 -i12., slopes, with areas classified, as' Urban` Density (10_`
units/acre on the City "p General /EDP Plan, based on the .recommended -f� ndings,,
with the" exception that - Subsection .A 'be revised to deie'te. "R-lk” 'arid the words;-
- R M -G land R -M -Ii, delete, the `words or more ; `and add the w.o:rds. "subject to t
discretion 'of • ti' ie Plaidi _ig Commission may" after 'p'ermku ed.. "notion introduced. b
Comm. ?laite; seconded by Comm: Shearer.
A'YES`:' '5 ABSENT'c Comm'. Head,, Popp .. `
OAK HILL._:DEVELOPMENT - 1625, PETALUMA BOULEVARD NO,.. JA`1 DEV.,ELOPMENT'; ING_.
Item 11.,599 - The Planning- Commiss on ,directed the Community Development,
Director to issue a'Negative Declaration for 'the General Plan /EDP amendment of
the current land use designations of t he site, from, Central Urbari and U,rban 'Low
:. Density Residential, (4-5 dwelling units /, to' Urban Dens ;ty'.•Re side Iti.a1 `(
dwelling units acre ) . The ,public, hearrng;4was opeded. closeds: Motion
introduced, b Comm. Shea,'rer,; seconded by - Commli ' Waite:.to prepare a Negative
y
•
Declaration for the P ro: ect, based, on. the-recommended afandngs
J
AYES: 5 ABSENT ::' M Gomm: ;Head. 'Popp'.
OAK'HILL'DEV,.ELOPMENT, 1.6.25: PETALUMA BOULEVARD
N0. P:U D. REZONING
Item, •8.57 - to consider alie rezoning o'f' AP'rNor
6 -491 Q9 from: Study D'i'strict to'
p ) r a-52
unit -co ndomi_n�.um development at '',the
une
site. of the jormer�Blvd.JeNorthnrock
. � quarr
Th ; public hearing was opened and, .
Item .h1.. 6f1�1 - to cons; - ides . the adequacy of the Draft Master Environmental
Impact Report prepared by COMARC Design, Systems on `the imp.lementatiori of the
G
eneral Plan. Pub -1Pc; hearing. opened and,,clos -e:d. Motion introd'uce'd, by. Comm.
Lavin; seconded by Comm Shearer to ;deny the ad`equ °acy o,f ,the Draft: Master.
Environmed Irripact Report prepared by COMARC Design` S,ystem&-
3
N
o ted • Motion by Comm .Shearer, ,second'ed by,. Comma .. Waite , to recommend "., y _
-i l roaduc o e-d
r ' al of the P.`' based on the recommended
to City
Y, . PP. .. U.D. rezonin g
conditions,;, •
AYES: ABSENT;,; Comm. Head, Popp:
OAK HILL DE - " --:� ^ • - - ; .., = ,... , . . - _
J VELOPMENT`- PETALUMA'BLVD. NO, = ..,TENTAT;IVE_SUBDIVISION MAP
,1.625
h <tem 3: 245;1- to consider the Tentative Subdivision Map for a 52 -unit condominium
deve _opmerit at 1625 Petaluma Blvd, . No The pu blic• hearing was, opened and .
.. ;.
closed. Motion introduced by Comm Waite;' seconded .;by ,Comm Lavin .to recommend
to the City Council' a royal of: the Tentative S'ubd Vision Map ;based{ on ,the, _.
Y a PP
recommended conditions wi th the.foflowing modifications:
Condition 10 Buildings .Nos. °1 through 9. shall have a separation"of app.rox mate'ly,
Added:
ten feet, .and 'further `that. there: shall be a separation between
" buildings No - 34 and 35 t`o elim hate: •`th6 corridor 'look for the
development.
AYES: 5 ABSENT`: Comm : "Head, Popp' `.
:.
Speakers,: Lone Vogen`s.en, 1755 Petaluma. B'ivd. No.
Leonard Jay, Developer
Emil Moge1, Moge1 Engineer
Dick Lieb, Lieb &.- Qua're ma, ;Architects
'
A pet .tion'containing..21 signatures favoring the proposed'
P Ject was received, and filed.
"OF. RES'IDENT,IAh-
CITY PETAI:UMA - ,GENERAL; PLAN (EDP)) AME..NDMENT URBAN: HIGH DENSITY .'RESIDENT
m 11-616
Ite u'se
to `consider' a G_ enerah Plan (EDP) Amendment - to 'revise the hand -
desi ri'ation'
g
of Urban High - Density Res dential,. 30 units per gross acre
(all unit -s�
over `20,, low or moderate ;income) t'o Urban High Density `Residential-,
Bonus - Dens"
,ty. (:up ,to `30 unit- s/acre) : The hearing .was gpened' and :closed,.
Motion "roduced
"public
o
:Com: r;, seconded b..� Comm Cavanagh to recommend t,-
by m:. Shearer,;,
ynt
the Cit Council
t he General Flan its -
theado `t'ion of an amendment. " o t
P
Environmental Design, Element to r:ev_se the land use,des gnaton of Urban High
Density :Residecitial. - .
AYES; 5 ABSENT: Comm. Head, Popp
s
DRAFT MASTER .ENV ^IRONMENTAL.. IMPACT REPORT " -, COMARC, DESIGN SYSTEMS
a
Item .h1.. 6f1�1 - to cons; - ides . the adequacy of the Draft Master Environmental
Impact Report prepared by COMARC Design, Systems on `the imp.lementatiori of the
G
eneral Plan. Pub -1Pc; hearing. opened and,,clos -e:d. Motion introd'uce'd, by. Comm.
Lavin; seconded by Comm Shearer to ;deny the ad`equ °acy o,f ,the Draft: Master.
Environmed Irripact Report prepared by COMARC Design` S,ystem&-
3
N
.,closed. Motion :introduced 'by Comm,. 'Shearer,;.,, qeconded. by Comm... Waite to recommeft
-D. rezoning, based -,on the recommended
-to the City 'app.ro.v�dl of 0.e.P.U.
•,
conditions..
AYES: 5 ABSENT: Comm. Head, Popp.
OAK HILL DEVELOPMENT'- 1625 '•PftiALUM 'BLVD . NO. = TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
Itedi 3.245 o t conside the'T . entatiye Subdivision 'Map.Abr a .52-unit...cgodominium
development i t 5* PeXal d
No. The. public, hearing p , Vas opened. and
R 6.2 , u
' v; end-
dlos,,i�d. MAI on ntro d' * uce dly B Comm, Wai e,; seconded by�,qomm. Lavin in 'to :,recommend
to the City on the Cou*cil pr 'o t'h'e - Tentative, Subdivision -.- ..
n p ..bas
re commended il'
conditions with the f wi modifications: o,- o
C,PnditionilO Buildings 'Nos. I through, 9 shall have 'a.. separation. - k of approximately ,
Added: that t ere ten feet and further h '- shall.be a separation between
b 'ildings,,No. 34'and 35 t 6 eliminate: e. - the corridor' fo r . -- the
ti 0 or.
development..
.AYES: 5 ABSENT: Comm.-..Head, Popp
S p .,•'I'Pne Vogenseri, 1755. Petaluma Blvd. 'No.
Developer
7 Leonard' Jay,
,,.Emil kogef, Mogel Engineering
Dick Li.eb &.Quaresma,.Arch-l'.tects
A petition'containing 21 signatures favoring the proposed
project,waa.received -and fildd.•
CITY OFFETALUMA GENERAL PLAN (EDP) AMENDMEN URBAN HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
Item 11,616 - to consider a General Plan.(EDP) Amendment to revise the land
use designation of Urban High Density Residential, .30 units per gtq'ss acre
(,all units over 20 low or'moderate income) to Urban High,Density Residential,
.-Bonus Density (up to - 30 units/acre). The public hearing, was opened and' closed.�
Motion introduced by'Qomm. Shearer; seconded by Comm.'Cavanagh to recommend to
the City Council'"the adoption,bf an amendment to the General Plan and-its
Environmental. Design Element to revise the'-land use designation of Urban High
Density .Residential.:
AYES: .5 ABSENT: Comm'. 'Head " Popp
fi
DRAFT MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT - REPORT - - COMAkC DESIGN SYSTEMS
Item 1-1.611 - to consider.the,ade-q'uacy of the Draft Master Envixonmental
Impact Report prepared'by COMARC Design Sysrtems on the :implementation of the
'
General Plan. Public hearing opened and closed:. M6tion introduced b Comm.
Lavin; . seconded `Vy Comm. Shearer to deny the adequacy . of. the Draft , Master*
Env-ironmqhtal ImpactReport prepared'by COMARC,Design Systems,.
1
3
1
•
AYES: 2 Comm. Lavin, Shearer NOES:' Comm. Cavanagh,,..Tencer:,, Waite.
ABSENT: Comm: `Head, Popp
Motion defeated.
.,Speaker: Mr. Gil Castle, COMARC Design Sy,s.tems.
Motion in"troduce y! Commi understanding.that Master' EnvironmentalbImpact • ,Re' a ort a bh COMA-C -IDe on the
Y g
g. P ,. P Y RC Design _.
Systems was prepared and submitted within the guidelines and_limi,tations
previously a §iab'lished therefor, the Commission .recommends; it to the City
Council for certification.
AYES: 5' ABSENT:_. Comm. Head, Popp..
The meeting adjourned. at 11 :36 p.m.
airman
Attest•
4
1.01
JOB
Magnetic Card Center
- - I :R.rl. I Li, . �Jbr,�:
A
Depa_ft
Name: of Author
Recorde,d-Card Retenti.on Peri..o.d
No-: of Carbori C'op ie
'Single ''Space
-Space a Half
Doubje :S pace
:Envelopes Labels
16it"idnal Inst'ruction's
MAG 1-8/80
NOT OFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED, BY THC
- . P,ETALUMA 'PLANNING., COMMISISON -
^M 1 N .U. T. E S
,
-
UM tember 2 "3 19;80
PETALA''PLANN:ING.COMMISSION S' ep
r , '.
REGULAR MEETING _ 7:30'E;,M. ,
CITY 'COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PRESENT: Comm. Cavanagh *, ' Lavin,: !Shearer, Tencer, Waite .
*Arrived, ;af, 8;,:0.6 p -In
. r
ABSENT:. Comm. Head, Popp
STAFF Gre g or Freitas Communi Develo" ment ''& Plannin Director
. y Y P, g
:., W,ar.ren Salmons',- Principal Planner
Cynthia B'eeken Associate Planner j
APPROVAL• OF' 'MINUTES;: Minut`es,. of. August AT', 19 and $epfember 9; 1980
_ ;
- were 'appro:ed;,a submitted.'.
DIRECTOR',9 REP&t:T Community "Deve`lopment & 'Planning Director' Freitas ,
, - ..
introduced �Warre'n Salmons, Principal Planner,,, who
a
• had joined the': City 5staff on September l_Sth_.
The Commission, was�_'advised thaf, the, City 'Council
has set rSe temter, 29 19;80 at. 7
p � .00 p m. "as the toe cons
f .idera'tion and
action on appeals •fr.om the 19'841 a 1dtmen;t prd,cess.' One. appeal - h'a_s been filed
for-..proposed Su nT brook'..Subdiv'ision, sloca'ted :on''E1y North _,east side' of
Petaluma.,..
It was noted the - Commission cannot. act ;on General
P14' 'or Z g, g_ e :five .Commissioners "re present.
onin Chan es unl
• -
PETALUMA ; PEOPL,E,. SERVICES, CENTER_ Use''P:ermi f Regiies,t
o , - . •
Item (1 .31 to consider a Use,, Permit: appaicat on. , to ;relo,eate the Petaluma
People �9brvices Center to 115' :Liber ;ty
S freet The . pubi c hearing :wa's :q,pened �=
and` closed Motion `introduced by Commissioner Shearer; second'ed' by Comm.
Lavin to rant._a Use Permit f`or the. relocation, of the Petaluma People :Services :.
• � sub: t' ectttolreu^ ieweb= tytherstaf�fbines 'iXnmonths,taff ss sftandard','findngs,� Farad
AYES'. 1: 4 ABSENT. G,O Cavanagh," `Head,; Popp-_
Speaker Larry Rob "ns:on :Exe'c .,,Dir. of People Service Center
y ,
SONOMA TRAVEL, SERVICE -- IS°IGN AREA. VARIANCE - 351 S .. ' McDowell. Blvd.
Item, 2.'2.8;8 _ to consider .a variance request' for a �24 sq':.: f°t. wal sign at `351
So. McDowell Blvd- The.;public ;hearing was:oRened and closed. Motion introduced
.
by 'Comm'. Lauin; seconded "'by Comm Shearer to• deny the. `variance requested,
-
y
..
based on '.the s',.taff recommended;: conditions.:
AYES: 4 =. ABSENT;: Comm. Cavanagh, .
The applicant .did npti appear. Staff was directed to ni,tify applicant of: the-'4'
Commission decision and :Tfhe, ten -da - y' appeal pr'oce:ss:
Recessed at, &:60 -p.m,
Comm, Cavanagh arrived "at 81:.06': p m,
Meeting- reconvened ,at -8;;07 p:,.•m,
CITY ,OR 'PETALUMA ZONING ORDINANCE; ,AMENDMENT = SLOPE _DENSITY ORDINANCE'
Item 11:61.7/7::82 =; consider .the evaluation` of the Environmental •Impac;t re
on an amendment to „the _Zoning Ordinance° to provide for slope, densty..to permit
additional dwelling units on'5 -12 %..slopes. The' public'hear n_g was opened and'.
closed :r - 'Motion introduced by ",Comm.. Waite'; seconded by Comm: Shearer :to p.rgpare ..
a 'Negative Declaration for the prgposed amendment ao the Zoning Ordinance and'
recbmmendL to the City Couric,il the 'Zoning` Ordinance be ' ame-rided• to . perm't additional
dwelling`'unit& on 5 -12%' slopes within' areas - ..:class f.ied as' .Urban Density ( 10:
units /acre on the City's. Gerieral/EDP P_lan, bused on the recommended findings,
with the ` exception That `Subsection 'A be revis ed .to delete "R -1 ', 'and the words:
R M.G and. R M -H delete the words or more ' ' :add the words "subject to .the
c�iscr.eto�i, of c.��ze Plau�2�u Coi�u�zisson � ma "after
- - _ g - y' -' te•r •permitted,. Moti on introdu ed b
.Gomm. Wa te;, seconded byy' Gomm . Shearer,
u .
AYES: 5 ABSENTc Comm: Head,, Po P.
P
OAK HILL DEVELOPMENT - ,625'P,ETALUMA BOULEVARD NO. - JA`s DEVELOPMENT, .INC.
Item, 11:59.9 - The Planning Commission dr_ect:ed the; Community. Development
Director: to" issue ; a Negative:'Declaration for :the: G'enetal - Plan /.EDP amendment 'of:<•
the current land use designations' of the site from Central Urban._and. :Urban, Low
4. g . _
it ;units,
Dens = Residential n Dens =ty Residential (1Q'
/acre.) to Urba
dwellin g units' /acre): TheWeublic;heari
p ng:,was op.en''d :and closed" Mot -ion
introduced by .Gomm.: Shearer; seconded by �Coinm. Waite to prepare a N egative.
Declaration fo;r the project, based`.on •the• recommended fiiidings,
AYES`: 5 A BSENT. Comm: :Head . P,opp . LL
OAK •�AILL,, DEVELOPMENT = PETAI;UMA BOULEVARD NO -., 'P -.0 1 D�. - - REZONING; '
Item 8.57• t:o, consider; the rezoning of ;AP No: 6 - 4, 5 1 09`' from Study 'District to-
P.U.D (P,lanned ;Unit Development) F;or ,a 52= xirit condominium development. at: the
site - of. the former Blvd. .North rock 7 ua:r,r y ,, The ,public° hearing. =:was o,p.ened and
q . '
2 `
�„