Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 02/22/1978REGULAR�,.MEETINGI FEBRUARY 1978 , .CITY COUNCIL -CHAMBERS' 7:30-.P.M,. CITY HALL PETAL -UMA, CALIFORNIA The. F,�launing .Comm i.ssion Ap p7hicants' or," - tl thei-r.represenative to be availabl ., he��:nieetllU'9.9: tro. items need be deferred , to -,, - -.Iater. , .,...d - ate;;due' to• . a .lack ­,df 'pert-1 nbrit, information. PLEDGE,, ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG 4 ROLL,, CALL. fforciza Lavin, 1�t' _-;Shearer.._. Waite-., Wright APPROVAL OF MINUTE CORRESPONDENCE:. CONS ENT .!CALENDAR: Items ap ,pea Gbnrdrit.:-- Calendar ;, b�EirdiitLine by the Plafih no separate d1scusslion..- of items) will be removed f romr tfie Calendar. Lleb & ',Quaresma_: K. 1" Q.,: &Ta1uat Aonand Site -Desigh e R view of a pr.o. posed: duplex : to. e ::b ..loated 52`1 Baker Street. � c DON ON E­.- I . Q'. EVAL UATION -/ I ONI/ 1. Pub Eiiv.ironmental REZ ONING ..,FROM C-41': Impact QVe�stibnhaite: fbt. rezoning. CONMERCI ('COMPACT 2. Public to consider the proposed RESIDENTIAL)'/SITE `DESIGN REVIEW,: I i rezoning: t-of�the - propprty.located at-16 West Street - _f-_.om:,C 4­, g . T ­ • (14i hway Comrnercial) to R­C--,'(Cor4pact Residential). 3. Site:.Design-,.Reviewof :the•prop.osed project. SUMMIT;- C.0, 77E., I,.`Q ,EVALUATION,/P_RE2ON ING FROM COUNTY.'Alli'TO R-1-6,500_: li Public Hearing to evaluate,the Environmental. Impact Questionnaire,for.a proposed prezoning of 'the property 1ocated at the,intetsection of Casa Grande Road - --,and- Sartori Drive from County Agriculture to R-1-6 1 ,500­ ;ADJOURNMENT::' 2 PETALUMA PLANNING "COMMISSION- UARY FEBR 22„ 1978.. r..• AGENDA ; .: SUMMIT BUILDING• .,:,.. r • 2 Public Hearing;•: to - consider - the application to prezone the, above property. 'located ',at - Casa Grande Road and> Sartori Drive. QANTAS:: DEVELOPMENT `CORP.:_,.:. Public- Hearing_to donsider the pr,o:posed prezoning PREZONING! FROM COUNTY "A" request from County - "At' to'City PCD (Planned TO CITY'PCD (PLANNED Community District), of -approximately .60 acres COMMUNITY'DISTRI-CT)c located.on Ely Road North. (continued), QANTAS DEVELOPMENT CORP.- 1. Pub °Ic Hearin to. g 1 .. PHASE II- REZONING FROM. proposed rezoning PCD TO PUD ^ /TENTAT,I,VE' of the pr,opetty located . on° North McDowell. - SUBDIVISION, MAP: Blvd.�next to..the'proposed, hospital site from PCD: to PUD:. 2-. Tentative ;Subdivision' 'Map. ,;Review of the proj;ec,t.; SCENIC LAND PROPERTIES- 1.. Public.:Hearing to eyaluaae the Environmental. E.I.Q. EVALUATIQN,AND Impact Que•stioinaire.f or a proposed rezoning REZONING FROM,STUDY ZONE of approximately.18.acres located at 1051 T0. R- 1- 6,500: Petaluma Blvd S'outh_fr-oti Study Zone to (continued)' R-1= 6,500.. 2. Public. Hearing to consider'the proposed rezoning request. DODGE CITY RETALUMA- USE . PERMIT RENEWAL 1. 'Public Hearing... -to - _ consider"". the 'rene"wal, of a CONSIDERATTONt conditional Use..Permit granted for the family - "f -un center:.loca_ted at 14222 .East.. Washington.,Street. ;ADJOURNMENT::' 2 February 23 1978 - y i i (Correction to February 7, '1978'' Planning Commission. Minutes: j Page 6, para 4, line: 5, cor.rect'ed to 'read: the site to serve • 55 lots. • 1 I' RONALD F. HALL j Planning Director J C R I� Y •r r6 NOT OFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED BY THE PETALUMA PLANNING`COMMISSION M, I N- U T 'E',° S- PETALUMA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 22, 1978 REGULAR MEETING.. 7:'30 P.M. - CITY COjNCIL CHAMBERS!-, CITY,_HALL• PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA PRESENT:` Comm'. Balshaw Hor ,Lavin:; `Waite ABSENT: �'1 Comm.. Head Scharer Comm.: Wright's resignation was. accepted on February 21, 1978. + He had been s accepted..as,. Deputy Coun Counsel-. for Placer County. STAFF; Ronald F. Hall,, Planning Director APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes of the.meeting of February 7, 1978,, were i approved as corrected. CORRESPONDENCE: ,None. CONSENT CALEN'DAR:. The motion was made by Comm. Horciza, seconded by Comm. Lavin, to - ;approve the. Consent`:,Calendar. Motion was carried unanimously. A" g enda Item 1 _ Lieb & Quaresma (Rowe Brothers) Negative Declaration ., 1 , and- Site:Design Res 51. approving duplex to be located at 521 Baker'Street.' Comm. Ho�rcizavmoved that the Dodge� City `Arcade Use Permit be considered next on the Agenda. . The ; motioni..was `seconded by Comm. Lavin. The .motion was carried 4. unanimously.' DODGE'C:ITY PETALUMA -'-Mr. Hall explained'the application for renewal'o,f the USE,PERMIT RENEWAL condit -tonal Use; Permit fo"r the, Dodge City Arcade lo- CONSIDERATION: cated•at 14.22 East Washington Street. A conditional U'se Permit had been: approved for the family' fun center on July 1 17, 1.9 for' - a six.month term to the original applicant,, ' L-arry. Lacey. T;he ;cent;er•contains approx mately.30 mechanical and electrical amusement. machinesr,. `Th'e faeili.ty.is-:frequented'by older teenagers,, young families and persons�•'waitng to get. into 'the -nearby . Upon investigations, of the site, i;tp, was.. found - that the conduct ,of young, adult`s 'inside the building was orderly a behaved. Noise - treated: by music could be•heard from the outside•;uand t_eenagers, were •observed collecting for conversation around the build -ing. entrance. -Mr. Hall indicated the following - correspondence had been received?: (1) Letter from Ken Conroy; dated,'February 20,•1978, c'ommendl g Dodge City Arcade; (2) Letter from Imperial :Savings, dated February 14y 1978 i-n: opposition to'. the renewal �of� the Dodge City., Use Permit;.. (`3) Letter- from Bill Lockman; 4 ' , 300',St'ony' Point' .��3`1'2 dated February 17; 1978, favoring -the. Dodge City, Arcade Mr. Hall. stated. the'.-criteria under, which'. this ,particu'lar. project should .be j'udged would• b'e those things happening `on the inside and those-things, happening on the outside o:f'the building - Jvi- should be looked at as to what is generated to the.outside environment. Petaluma City ,Planning Commission 'Minutes February 22, 19:78 The Public Hearing 'to .consider the Use Permit was opened.. Andre`Bjornskov' President of:the Sonoma Security Systems, spoke,:in favor: of the .center stating that with the new owner and after sec ur ty' measures had been estab'l shed,- the centek;..ad been cl'eaned He 'has; had good tvo dration from the kids out "side the building,. _,Mrs Deering,, '.Sonoma Travel'.Service, opposed the; - center, stating loitering .,'about the premises is very bad, and has . caused her to- lose "business. Things _are not -as'bad .`as. they were- in the., beginning. !She has lost business .because-clients 'have peen. harassed. I -is a hangout and a: very .bad drug; scene. A letter in opposition to'�the- center had'been.submitted by the travel service ,on December, 5, .1977'. Pat 'Hllstad, 1677 .,Baywood - Drive,. stated that 'when. he makes se.rvicerepairs ; at the 'center, cars are-moved ' so his service• trucks can get ;through. /While inside the building • he. •'has had. coopera.,tion, from the kid -s. As far.:as drugs, it is not Only here, b:ut:every. place. John,lBrown,; Manager of the Financial Savings & Loan,.state'd he is very with the teenagers, but is not .sure .the Arcade.is the place for them to go. They are loitering in front of ,his place of 'b;usin.es's. The location is • a problem. Petaluma will-have to• face 'the:, fact that teenagers need a place to' go. Will., Posey, 4.4 Wilson Lane staged. he had not - ob'served any harassment or cars being.brokeAtinto., Tim Mathias, 3121 Edith Street; stated there is very little for teenagers to d&.- The - Arcade . is a decent-place for the 'kids to hafig : -out People ,le leave -the neighboring, bar and drive the wrong 'way down the street. Vivian .Hunter., with the travel _agency, stated there is a drug. pro'blem. The kids have : 'been, asked to get off the cars and smoke some•• place else. It is a b,adFproblem. Robe #_ Campbell, 3740, Skillman Lane,' stated .he had observedrthe children and, was upset at -the passing ou't &f lit pills; and he.'.had been p'ropos tioned'by ,oung The problem of traffic deserves a little, attention. �Bar•bara Michelsen stated• ' the •drug.problem is io.,worse -there than any oaher,place in -Petaluma. She has never -been, harassed - the. at -the Ar'cade;,.or- seen anyone harassed the.kid . Tom Gilligan stated'th.e problems at Dodg&,:City are unsurmountable. There are times when you cannot' drive through the,.alley because the'kids will not allow you to-do so. Dodge:Cit:y is located. in poor, place. Joe Costa stated all the,'guys at the Arcade are real nice, and it - the : only,,- plane where . the kids- can= go,. Joe "Marion, 9,17 Madison, state'd:he meets -his 'friends -at the Arcade. Petaluma needs a place jor.'.the kids to go.. We need a,place to get away from.our parents and visit our friend's.- He has..-seen people come out of • the - Golden Fleece :drunk' and run over_ th'e curbs with their zv ehicles:.. C Harr s, Rohi ert Park, .stated , that as. far as `robt ery ' ever.y` body godsi through.'little trips, growing :,up...,Do is- sold all over -the U.S. The kids:. sholuld ; have.a;- place where they can go to' ° sho.p and also have fun: He' h'a`s learned how- to. with his other b:rotheis.at the center'. •On the streets,in•,.Eetaluma he; is. called a nigger. Chuck.Lavck; 1,Q00.'Danel Drive, i n dicated he %pro&uces',concerts and one of the complaints from t teenagers iS there is nothing'to do in•Petaluma: The real problem with Arcade is that it is.in•.a; bad location due to the -narrow _,alley. The Arcade, h sLlnever had any activities that have.been :damaging. The,owfiers are generally ;outside patrol- ling, _A resident'at. Middle Two Rock Road,, stated the,people�at the center try to keep t zool,. Shirley Ransom stated: that' two cars ha e.been h arassed by people attending the Golden Fleece bar. William-Brotnan, owner, presented.a petition with approximately 255 ,signatures favoring 'the Arcade-., ,Mr. Brotman sta'ted,..the- center has been.accuse'd of, many, _. ' things.. As far as harassment, .vandal -'sm on carssand dope problems, there is. not one,.tecorded incident.of cars being Vandalized or of, hard drugs being pushed:: He inherited 'the harassment - problem from the previous owner. As far -2- Petaluma City Planning: Commis'sian Minutes, February 22, 1978. as parking, 15 parking, pp ac'es are allotted for-the Arcade:, Imperi'al Savings, Goldeft Fleece,,- the barb&r .'shop, ;s . hoe repair, and 'the travel agency. He ­ _ . - ; i I: p _ : : 7. - believed he had'A go bp and has been* 'suLcesskiil with , _a pr that was proble m em irihetited.. `Comm W qu&�ftibned when the lea,�e'.would, - expire? ` , Mr. Brotman explained that commencing six months ago, he had a, five,yea lease. The total experi$,e of the operation.,; runs. from $21,.000 to:.�$24 ar,. Li . O a yeeut. Dennis DeW .1 it t stated 4 n a rc ot i cs' . . . .. . , Police Department; sfa "'d there are -n, - the area and other p1aces � i '.in Petaluma.', 'We . still g . et "calls - re1at -� t�b:pr6b liems on the o utside, and there are still 'problems in t e,.- area. The a116 ay is a problem. Mr. B'rotman,•_manager, stated there have been incidents -of people•coming out of ,the bar., driving d6wn'tthe: alley b A ­ - g side ah 6he time knocking down �t _e - h` on �wr, s a security guard; people, staggering T rom bar, and propositioning girls. There are no security persons in,fro of -the ba-f., The Public Hearing was closed. Comm., , Lavin-stat6d there is a -need to have :a place for children, and it is also desira work" out, something. btisiness. needs -in .the -area are satisfied, 'l, as the children. - Hd. as, wel wo ul d d like to see� if the.merchdnts,couid come to some'qgreemett,with Dodg City.., Comm. H`rciza stated it is difficult to sort out how bad is bad,; evidently there has an.-improvement; however, there is concern about,the e f f dc.t ^ o I n inesses. It is very apparent that tight control of thi's us'e'Ts -neces Alous.'In - es's 'of this 'type should, be resp6nsi,- ble f Or the c6ndikt.­o,. its patrons;. We should., ddlow,a use f or various 'types of our citizenery.. -Coimn. 'it',.appea'red as though the Commission was being, an landlord'a'nd the tenant. Comm. , Horciza stated -there seems to .b6 evidence' o f "improvement with the new management. • Comm. Aorciza in 'gra Use:'- Permit t for the Dod ge City Arcade'. 'Comm. - he c - La-vin. , .stated s6m& oft. -,*. dems `an be •mitigd-ted. and, seconded the motioh, . conditions as recommended 'by s t af f, - With.the following change. The motion carried "unanimously*. Condit =ion #'8 The, plicant, shall - a pp*ly for renewal - the Use T6:rmit on ah•annual basis, and reView-shall,-bo'conducted at-anytime sub- stdnt ial . and repeated •c6mpiaint's 'are - received by the ,- Planning Department. D ON HA"M MILTO N-E I.Q. 411 Mr..H 'explained the:request of Don Hamilt6h to -re- i E VA L UkT 1 Nl R E 2 0 NIN G S .; zone 'property loat'd at T6 • Vest .Street f rom Highway FROM C =H (HIGHWAY 'Co mmercial to Comipact.-Residen'tial and ' a -Sfte'�Design COMMERCIAL) TO R7• Review of a P.topo�s:ed The s ite is . (COMPACT RESIDENTIAL/ currently in use as 'a single-family res'iderLe._ The SIt existing house i s' r d'"to' be' converted into - ..,: I P QpRs� n. I. o a. du plex, , 'Th e - h' ' - ­ J df 6,,775 square f 4�p e! J.as. an area e e e;. The Publicl•Heariftg to c6nside.r...,ihei Impact•Questionnaire,was.. opened. No comments...were from,th6 audience'-and -th&-Public Hearing was clos'ed',. C6mm.. 'Hor iza.. C moved-to direct the. Pla,h'ning Director to prepare and.post a 'NegatiV6 Declaratibn f or the project., The motion was seco'lided.by Comm. Lavin. The m6ti'On­.carried., unanimously. , The Public Hearing I ­ Ippened. to .6ons,ider,.the, proposed Compact Residential Distri rez the audience and the Public 110atir ig, was closed., 73- Petaluma City Planning Commission Minutes, February 2'2, 1478 Comm Res ..Horcza moved to :recommend approval of , "the requested, R -C; (Compact- ;= u . denti6d) rezoning to the , City Council;; with speci-fic findings. , Th'e motion was seconded by'Comm.'Bal `The motion care ed Comm Horc za moved to,approve the site des gn..for 'the proposed duplex , coneer - Sion,with ond`it ons 'of approval as •,recommended by the 's"t'a�ff .and concurred -with by the Archi ectural and S fe..D'es ;ign 'Review Committee with the, 'fol- lowing change. . The motion. was seconded .by Comm?.` Lavin. The motion car "vied unanimously. ,Condition 411 - added The proposed layouf of `the bathroom, -front room and kitchen • 1 n the, rear unit •shall be redesigned to create .a more_ .. functional unit". oriented ;toward the rear, yard views,. SUMMIT'--!BUILDING, CO, Mr: Hall, explained~ 'the ,application of Summit - Building .. _` EeI Q., ;EVALUATION/ Company' °to .prezone approxima't'ely • 5'5:3 acres - located at PREZONING PROWCOUNTY the southeast< intersection of Casa,- Grarde:Road and A TO R -1- 6, Sartori Drive from Country Agr euLt ftal to City :R -1- . 6,500 Plans 'indicate the eventual deve,lopment.of :193 1. - , single- :family •units A total of 32 units were allotted, for Phase I,. The :. average density, is 3:5 'units z per`,,,& acre; including a proposed park. The allotmentiplans ishow.a series of ,long - 'straight .lo;cal- :and`.:collectox 'streets which could-1-nor-ease vehicular speed,,deerease aesthe'tic•g:uality ' and . pr A 100 -'f66t wide ; landscaped strip is proposed in�the�.,vicin ty of. Adobe,Cr:eek with. a bike path along the :s'outhern bank o•f Ad'.obe Creek In order to develop .the property located southeast o'f Adobe Creek, the- developer wo'ld:'have.,to con truc•t a mad °or, trunk, .sewer, in confotmance.`with .the Roder Ma!ste Plan, from this development-'along F,rates Road across Lakeville,to ' the • ex-is tin& t , sewer at the end ;of :Erates- Road' at .the old, t , s:, - as.�,the ; - capacity of the sanitary sewer, existing in TF dr tes ;Road at the old railroad tracks, a's 'h'e capacity of the , sanitary sewer existing in, 'Frates ;R'oad its- not adequate to serve t his property. This development would add•to the traffic mp on Lakeville _ Highway, S'mte Route 116; the north and southbound,101 connections - to Lakeville Highway, 'State Route 116; and•, .Casa Grande : Ro "ad.. Thomas•Hargis s:ta•ted. that. the sewer line that serves Steno Wswa•sher, is .limited in size 'so that only properties south of Lakeville Highway .can ;be s.erved It would: be, the- developer' responsibility to ';develop . the sewer to the existing, man..from a point •across his property -up Lakeville Highway. If, the City Goun`cl desires,, there is .,a • reimbursement', policy .by wlii'ch. 't'h'e` developer can be re- imb ;ur.sed for tt e. ,oversiz ng; :of 'the. ifta'in by; any new d "eve'lopments connecting* to the.sew,er, Comm Balshaw•askidd if th�e_re. was a reason why concrete is used in. the chari.nel: Mr. Hargis explained.. that. usually. 'the d•eveloper­proposed how a channel will be .develop`ed'.. ` tConcrete s� used when there ar'e erosion probleins. Comm. - :Balshaw stated the E..R.'Phas a cy f'or' the preservation , of creeks. He asked if the.channel•can remain, in its natural state? Jon,Anderson,' MacKay and Somps, , stated. , this is one of - the• largest mea de`r ng creek beds, in .Petaluma and••the watery flows very fast down •through• 'channel.' The Casa de Arroyo` development - dead'end's • Sartori Drive Sartori .Drive will bend :up into this de- •velopment and turn away from` the: intersection=of; "Lake, lle'Highway. The ' ubl-ic, Hearing 'was opened to. der 'the Environmental Impact •Quest on- na rep ;- John: Novak stated a 'fenc'e -and bicycle paths :would� installed al -4- Petaluma Cityi Pla"rining ,Commission Minutes:.,. February 22,E -.1 -978 the c e_gk trees would also be planted._ Jon, Anderson explained this, project ended :up with the'.thfrd highest .points in the. allo;tment..system•. As far as -: . traffic, this, is coincidenta'l.wi•th the Master`EIR. Most of the mitigating measures indicated by. ;alt = tans have been taken care • of by t•he east :,of Ely ..,, . pro7eet EIR. Comm Hor&UY stated this project ,is in an- entirely different' • location and traffic converging onto and McDowell'Blvd. would' be'* different. Mr. Anderson stated would, be, a, better traffic_analy,sis with t 6: .CbkARC System.' Most o,f .the. mitigating measures have already been outlined w,ith,' oather projec -ts. Comm, Balshaw stated unless, we have-,a way of. assessing responsibility, a proced`ure.should • be estab'lished'determining the number of vehicles a' devel'opinent would: "mpact, and, an. assessment fee.would, then be,::set for' the effect, .the impact °would have on an • intersection. Until we have a way of-allocating-the respons1bili•.ty; we are ;playing`.,games "with numbers. Comm. Horciz,•a stated we also.,have•.to inspect the environmental `impact. It is obvious that traffic` is the major 'f a. ctor', Comm Lavin. stated• that if we can establish th'e.fact - that we;need•ano,ther lane this is good .data -upon which decisions can be made. Comm. Horci'za stated'South'McDowell! and Lakeville- could - possibly handle _this traffic we-Aped- some documentat'ioh� as basis. Mr. 'Hall stated .we . do, have;_;a- respons;ib-le agency in LAFC9, _ They want • to see an environ- mental'- review - thdr. is sufficient for -an annexa't'ion process: If the City does not require an EIR, LAFCO q, uire .'EIR . Comm. Bal'shaw stated:a previous might 're an, developer -1 dd recently 'been 'given ,a ,Negative De'claration with the requirement that an `EIR - be furnished ,at: the 'tentative map' stage. Mr :.Novak stated he would be will -ing to : :along with the ,same conditions' as Joslyn:. and bring in a letter :to; that Of e'et..' Comm •: Horc'za 'stated did not know.why 'the developer was so concerned' over. ^furn sh ngy a limi ed E,fR, 'as'. they &-an "be • done. 'within `a• two -week period and this document would a'd LAFCO, and agencies-. The Public Hearing: was closed Comm :Hotciza stated' t is ip'to the Sonoma County Water Agency to ask•for d eep enough . channel The impact of - flooding from this ` developmentshoul`d `be very minor.' 'Comm. Bal'shaw .,stated that- 'McDowell Blvd. is - sized, `to handle `the - ;traffic "Comm . ".Horciza stated he. impact 'in changing fro - agr culture to residential is obvious. Comm Lavin s ated•some.f'orm of d'ocumentation'is necessary. Comm 'Horciza stated the request : for an 'EIR should be consistent - wth` -each developer Mr., 'Half- explained that an ,EIR • is an instrument 'where mtiga;tng..- measures can. be'•brough't forth;: Comm: Waite •questioned •.why LAFCO. was not copsihdered i the prey _ous Qantas pr- ezonipg' as this .development would, have more impact on, the street highway sys.tein. Comm.. Horc za asked how t•.can be said;.ali's' p:ro�,ect. will not... create an. impact,? Mr:., Hall staged there is a' tendency to'xegure'• an EIR at !th'e: onset •"of a project:. If an ETR is not required at - thrs t me;,,"a Negative Dec>laration-`should be- conditioned to reserve. the : right to require an EIRt'at tFre Tentative Map' 's'tage. • Comm ' Lavin ,moved to, defer consideration o,f. the p.rezoning application•.of Summit Building Company until time as. `a limited EIR has; been completed addressing the following items,; 1. Adobe Creek will require significant 'flood p- rotection improvements`: 2".. Increased storm runoff',coul'd impact on'the• Lakeville. Highway culvert'to'the_ point of nec'essita , thp�. construct on of anew culvert.. 34 'Substantial .vehicular movement will be generated on -surrounding. arterials arYd in, the 'v c pity of 'Casa -­ Grande High- School. Petaluma City, Planning. Commission..Minutes,.`February '22, 19.78 4.. The section o•f =major tho- roughfare designated for- the, site..on' the' .E D P... would,.no.t be developed.: The mo;ton seconded by Comm. Horciza. The motion `was carried .unanimously. QANTAS °DEVELOPMENT It '.was the consensus this item, be continued.. to the C©RP.= PREZONING FRAM Planning 'Commisaion'.Meetng o,f ,March 7; 19:78. COUNTY- '''A," TO. CITY . PCD . (PLANNED COMMUNITY. RISTRI'CT) (Continued) : QANTAS :DEVELQPMENT' I't was `the consensuus this; item. b;e, continued ;to the REZONINGAFROMIP'CD Plannin Commission Meeting o'f February 28,. ;1'978,. TO PUP - " SUBIVISION MAP':; SCENIC- PROPERTIES Mr. 'Hall explained.the_•application:'of .ScenLand Pro- - . . Q.., EVALUATION: ;AND pert es to rezone 18 acres located north,;of, Petaluma. REZONING FROM' STUDY Blvd_: South at McNear Avenue from a,. Study District `to `ZONE. T©R 1 6' 500: R 1 =,6;, 500 .' sin •le famil ,, g_ y' had ,'been` ,referred, (:Continued) to the City Councii for consideratio`'n as' a park and- r ecreational site ,By co'py of "'Resolu ti on Not `'81 NCS, -_ the City Council had determined that. du_e to the lack- of funds rior commit - meets for park-acquisition monies ° the ,exrsting.EDP,Aesigna.t ion, ,and other priorities for. a Purposes' at -.. Mr.'. tHal- lcstated ar Manor - . _ Estate .for ar_•k otental impacts such as th'e removal 'o:f trees 'and th°e .after effects =:of grading 'Pn the site characteristics ahould b'e handled •by ;tYie - developer, b'ut could be, "done.;:`, .und'er_ the inti:al.'sttidy at the• Tentative Map istage ; Comm Waite stated .the • s'etbacks . are 11 feet and 120 feet from the oil storage tanks The 'develop:er stated'.: that by moping •Lots. 38,, 3.9 and 40., located next . to: closed ks, to the; west,, the street wo,uZd `be narrower: ;The P•ub dc Hea -ring was,. Comm Balshaw stated legally until: building perm as are let we.- are•not com- mitaed to ,a' d'e'cision -of 'thre, a'1lotment • board,: W,e •'d'o Twt .want ..to, get into the y g • allotmentt e m board l'ike thedesign of home. r ezone the Lav propt t:ecause g a Comm, n . s,t a'ted the . Commis_sion . is not " J& gally committed to a specific_ project for the site-: because the,'Re'si de'ntial Allotment $oard•• approved the allocation or•• because -;they .like the design. 6, f., the. 'ho.uses:: Comm Waite ,stated• that; .;the. 'EIR previously sub ted .fo;r -the p,r;o,perty.;.was• a: thorough 'and complete report and pertained t the,�proj .and the. land use._. Comm:, Horciza'moved to , d ' rec't - the - :Planning Director t`a•••prepare ;died post 'a Negative Declaration ;for the, project; 'that .an .EIR.-,was riot regui =re ,based on -an,- earlier:.•EIR Study and findings made on the property'; The m _'tion'.was+ sec&14ed by. 'Comm. Balshaw. .. AYES 3 NOES_. 1 ABSENT '2'', Y y g y Petaluma Cit Plannin' Coimnis_ 'son .Minutes February 22, , 197 8 Tom Gamboa,.Scenic Lands, stated he-l-kes to-.maintain a low density type of dove aands6amint.with °noeehave,.to have privacy an s_ ce They•want, the o prsper ,= p g' ' rosion They a' re here to work with the people 'to 3 make A,.successful pro j ec't Larry ,Jonas,, 411' !W' Street; felt the proposed `k -1- .6,:500 zoning was wrong and should-'.be..PUD or..PCD 'There is "no" diversity in the•propos_ed plan: There would be houses on houses exactly like Daly City.:`The. lots sho.uld,be broken:up, and close •scrutiny . mide - .at, • the TentatT "ve Map stage: Wally'Kieckhefer, property owner, stated the. ha .an. attractive project. Comm." Waite. indicated , was opposed; to R- 1- 6`500 loaf zoning because it is incompatible with the ; surrounding.indust -tial uses J :Comm Balshaw stated he likes. the PUD zoning,. becdus,e • a hook can be •pu_ t in This would. avoid the Daly City appearance of,wall.to wall,•houses. Comm. .Horciza stated it is the same R -1- 6,5`00 that is•seen on -the flat ground.;. He could •see a lot - of cutting and filling `for- R -1 6 ; and a 'PCD ,or, PUD would be..a better• zoning. There would ;be .wall' -to wall fencing and' hillside •cuts., Tom Gamboa stated'.when. you 'see open space, that is.-all y 0 a are getting out of it. Open...space. could be .W ed by tenants . for garages and. ;yard areas. Comm.. Horci'z`a asked the - devdloper : i,f he wanted to build ths' of development., why he di` : d "not,•do so • on f_1'at land. Comm Balshaw s ated .with,. a PUD, siting becomes • past o :f the ,atchit6ctur"al plan . You can still have,'s- ingle =- family development. a ;. abut would`'have. a vast variation It.,,gives the flexibility .of moving units }• aroun&'the individual lots without the street patterns. Comm. Horciza explained this par - titular hillside has been',a landmark in Petaluma for many y.ears-and he would like to preserve part of the „park like appearance. Mr.: : = Gamboa ;:stated they 6an'sti11 do' a gorod 'jot with; .a PUD:; but. there. woul still be A substantial amount of grading, ° 'cut : and fill and several frees have to be r`:emoved .but- would b.e' replaced: Mr._ Hall expla ned a. PUD could-be considered more appropriate;'but- 4ould need 'a d'evelopment 'to accompany it. Comm. Horciza moved that `the rezoning, be continued,to March 21 1918, when the property would-be considered for ,,a PUD- The motion was, seconded by Comm. Lavin. The motion carried unanimously` RTHER.BUSINESS S[E•.CORNER ©F ELY Comm Bahslaw. stated the,.time''extensi on, on constructing AND EAST WASHINGTON the roadw y at Ely and.­East Washington has lapsed and &TREET:. unless a commitment' is` made 'to construct the roads-this � o the ,should be c'onverte'd a , F•Y J , esidentzal. Comm `Balshaw asked ,that a` study session tie held with` the City Attorney so an opinion,.cou`ld be 'given on how significant�environmemtal `impacts should be d :elegated�