The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes 09/05/1979P PETALUM9.PLANNING COrD1LSSION SEPT EiiBER 5, 1979 'REGULAR MEETING 7:X) P.M. CITY COUrd :CIL CHAMBERS, CITY' HALL 'PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA The Planning. Commission encourages ;applicant's or - their repxes °entative ;to be available at .the meetings to• answer 'qu;estions:, s'o that` no agenda items need be 'deferred to a later. d'at'e ,due to a lack of pertinent information:. PLEDGE ALLEGLANCE TO THE FLAG ;.ROLL CALL; Gom_m"'..3attaglia Head Popp Shearer T:encer Waite 'STAFF: Gregory Frei .-tas,: Community Development °& 'Planning° Director AP.PROVAt OF MINUTES': Minutes ,of July 31 and,..Au °gust 21,. 1979 .CONSENT CALENDAR: Items appearing on the Consent Calendar -will -be considered to be routine by the Planning Commission'. and :`will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discusson.of these items. If discussion is desired,.'that item:(�or items) will be removed from the Cons'en't Calendar. DUPLEX - 231 EDITH. STREET fSit'e 'Design Review of' a p=roposed duplex for SITE' DESIGN RE -VIEW: Toby Ross to be. _located at 231, ; Edith Street. DUPLEX SIXTH ,AND .I'STREETS Site Design Review of, a. prop,osed. for SITE DES`,IGN REVIEW: Earls and Ander's'en to be lo'c'ated at the corner of Sxth and . I St=r-eet!s DIRECTOW 'S PEPORT COID 'REPORTS PLANNING_ MATTERS PROFESS -IONAL COUNSELING' Discuss; on to- ';jmend R-C -Zone; to. allow, a ' Permit' SERV-TCE5 -16 PARK AVE; for ,profess oval 'counseling services 'in' ,a p rivate USE - PERMIT. ,REQUEST': home located •at' 1;G• °Fark' Avenuz (•Leo Cou:lsuLL) ADJOURI\?MENT M I N U T E S PETALUMA PLANNING COMMISSION" REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS', CITY HALL PRESENT: Comm. Battaglia,, Head, Arr. 7:40 p.mr., SEPTEMBER 5,. 10,79 7:30 P.M. PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA tavi Popp, Tencer, Waite ABSENT: Comm.. Shearer STAFF,: Gregory Frei,f.4 :Community Development .&. Planning Director APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of July 31 and August 21, 1979 were ,qpproved as submitted. DUPLEX - - 231 EDITH -STREET SITE DESIGN REVIEW I tem '5.605 approving a dtiplex for Tob y Ross to 'be -located at 231 Edith Stree�t, subject to the recommended by.staff with the following modif;fcation. Motion intr by Comm Head; seconded by Comm. Popp t_o app,.rove Site Design,, 'AYES:� 5 ABSENT: LAVIN[SHEARER. Cbnditi.on 1 reworded' to*read -'The.proposed col6r 'scheme shall be harmonious w ith surrounding buildings. Roo.fing with a minimum pitch: of 6/12 and cover- ,ed with asphalt composition shingles -shall be, incorporated' into. both buildings: Decorative.front porches be integrated into. both buildings. Side elevations shall be, redesigned to brea up the' :Visual monotony subject t' o approval by the Communi Devveibpmen Depart-ment- Both garages shall be constructed with gab le ro.of and the same exterior appearance. Architectural tr,im.,,dqor and window design shall be'characte of the architectural time period of the neighborhood: DUPLEX- SIXTH AND I STREETS' tARLS.& ANDERSEN SITE DESIGN REVIEW Item 5.591 approying a duplex, for Earls & Andersen to be. Iocat-ed at the corner- of Sixth and I Streets, subject to the following conditions recommended by. the Architectural:and,Site De`sign Review Commit-ttlee., 'Motion introduced by Comm. Head; seconded by Comm.. -Popp to approve the Site'nesign'. AYES':, 5 ABSENT: LAVIN/SHEARER 1: All decora-tive exterior building trim, doors 'fireplace design and 'fencing shall be characteristic of the older buildings in the surrounding neighborhood. 2. Troposed side and rear yard landscaping maybe reduced subject to approval by the Community,.Develophe t,'Dbpdrtment. 3 the on-si.te tree shall be preserved in he'Alt_tfy growin condition.. The applicant shall comply Withrall of the City Engineer,, Fire Mars Chief Building Insp'ector, and with all other applicable City re,gu'lat ions.. NOT OFFICIAL UNTIL APPROVED BY THE PETALUMA, PLANINING, COMMISSION PETALUMA 'PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 5 10 MINUTES PROFESS'IBNAL ' COUNSELING SERVICES AMEND R-C ZONE OF ZO NT C ORDINANCE A'disb.p�§,sion was ' heid on the request by Leo Coulson 'to amend the., R-C, Compac,t Residential Section of the Zonlhg Ordinance to permit the specific occu-pation of State licenses psytho�logist-mar.ri service in his.'home at 16 Park - Avenue , . Nine letters were received and filed supporting, Mr.. Coulson request. Mr,. Freitas'stated the Community Develoi5ment Department is'. concerned, not s0, mu ch f or the one particular use zone wher going in a e 'a single use might be compatible with aneighborhood, but with . the geneta 1 1 . And - overall • qpe regarding the intrusion of commercilal/professional, uses int,o. residential zones:.' At - the present 'time 'th'e City Code does - not allow' commercial-/professional use's of any nature in xes1de.ntial zones, mainly `because, of the type of problems pqrticularly in the areas of traffic noise se and parking which can .be ,generated and effect the neighboring; resliden nces.- The 6o� mmi_s'sion_te,f &rre'd Mr. Coulson's requeqt to the' staf for further . :review de7d under' to determine if-this iise couldbe inclu - a Ho m_ 'Use on a, limited. basis. • SO COUNTY FOUR LOT SPLIT PROPOSAL:� Mr. Freitas� explained a number of proposals are received from the Sonoma County ' ,.PIannitg -Department regarding land splits which, are located' outside the c`ty 1--imit.s but are within the G6neral Plan area Most of the land splits. - a , re wes north of town.. Areas given as an example for -two 'to four land -splits were in the Skillman Lane, Peta1uma-Blvd N/Troudy ,Lane, Magnol-l and Eastman Latie areas located within a mile of the City urban growth area,. Just out- -side -the City limits' there 1s: 'a band` o very small, i.6ts which are - split- so fine t"t there is not enough land left to split where they can be served. by road and City services. The ,staff is working .,�, with the Sonoma Couh-ty.plahning • D'ePar,tm,6nt in formulating.. a cohlb"ined' P olicy approach to land development within the General Plan area and growth area,. ADJOURNMENT:: The 'meeting adj at 8:25 ;p. m. CHA ATTEST`: V ' 2 • LA F� t , DUPLEX"- 231 EDITH STREET - TOBY ROSS SITE DESIGN REVIEW Conditions - Item 5.60.5 1 The proposed color scheme shall be harmonious with surrounding build- A 3 ings. ,Roofing with a minimum pitch of. 6./12 Wand covered with as,p composition shingles. shall - be incorporated, into both.building Decorative front porches shall be integrated :irfto ,both buildings.. Side.elevat:ions shall be redesigned to break up: the visual monotony,,subject to approval bylthe Community Development Department., Both , garages shall he constructed with gable roofs and th same exterior appeara -rice. Architectura -1 trim, d6or and window design shall be characteristic of the architectural time period of the neighborhood,. 2. Parking and driveway areas,sh'all be improved with an asphalt /'concrete surface. 3. Site plans shall be adjusted to permit a relocation of the rear building ten (10) feet forward. The driveway to be reduced in width to measure twelve (lit) feet. Excess parking area shall be'replaced with landscaping. 4.. Final landscape plans shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. Existing trees shall be maintained in healthy.growing. condition whenever possible,. Fencing design.shall be redesigned in a manner which is characteristic of the neighborhood's architectural time period. The proposed trash container shall be fully enclosed.. 5. All required modifications, shall be subject to 'review and approval by the Community Development Department prior to the issuance of a building permit. 6. The applicant shall 'comply with all requirements of the Fire Marshal, Chief "Building Inspector,'and City ;Engineer, and with.all applicable City regulations. Standard curb, gutter and sidewalk shall b:e construe -ted subject to approval by the City Engineer. A 3 DUPLEX.- SIXTH AND I STREETS, EARLS; & ANDERSON. - 'SITE DESIGN. REVIEW Conditions - It em 5.591 1. All decorative exterior building trim, doors, firep -lace design and fencing shall b'e characte- ristic. of the older: buildings in. the surrounding neighbor- hood. ;2 Proposed is d'e.:and ream yard landscaping, may. be reduced subject to approval by the "Communi;ty Development Department. 3. The o-n =s -ite tree 'shall be preserved in healthy growing condition., 4. The alp.plcant. shall comply with all, requirements of the City Engineer, Fire Marshal, Chief, Building Inspector; and with all o'th'er applicable City. regulations. 4 0 •