The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 1.A-Attch5 04/25/2011PRC�MP"NrtT, From:'agolt@comcast.net, [ma iIto: agolt@comcast:net] Sent Tuesday,; !March 22, 2011 7;05 PM To: daveglass@comcast:net; counci,lmemberkearney@rrie.com; mike4pet@aol.com; healy mike; council memberalbertson@gma,iIxom; tiff@tiffany"renee.com Cc: info@deercreekvillage.com; CDD Subject: Deer.Creek Village DEIR Dear Mayor and City Council, Although we live outside the city limits we are very much impacted by your actions! We need a lumber company in town! We spend. as much on our company's gas bill now as we used to spendon the lumber! Please make. the construction industry more cost effective by bringing a Lowe's to our town! If we spend less on construction; the homeowner can have a less expensive home! Think of the many benefits a Lowe's would mean to Petaluma's economy! We encourage your swift acceptance and approval of this plan! Ken Goltermann 1060 Skillman Lane Goltefmannn Construction, inc po box 409 316 Petaluma Blvd. S Petaluma, CA 94952 ---- Original Message----- From; matthew_danielczyk@yahoo..com.["mailto:,matthew_danielczyk@yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday., March 2j, 2011 12:57 AM To: CDD Subject: Community Development feedback form Below is the result of your feedback form. It was 'submitted by (matthew danielczvl<(@vahoo.com) on Wednesday, March 23, 2011 at 02:56:31 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- First Name: Matthew Last Name: Danielczyk Live in: yes comment: yes services: I oppose the proposed Deer Creek development.: businesses are closed all over town. There is plenty of ,existing, underutilized retail space. Deer Creek will harm Petaluma. more:'trails, bike lanes, transit -oriented development less. —Deer Creek Subject:: Project Updates — Deer Creek Please respond: yes Submit: Submit From: ", IA,nhie Van Maaren,'" <avanmaaren@.vehoo.com<mailto:avanmaarenpvahoo.com>> Date: March 25, 2011 10:35:25,AM PDT' To: <councilinembeekearnev(@me.com<mailto:councilmemberkearnev@me.com>> Cc: "'Melissa Abercrombie"' <oldeastpetaluma@Vahoo:com<mailto:oldeastpetaluma(@vahoo.com>>, <daveglass @comcast. net<maiIto; davep-1ass Ocomcast. net>>, <dfarmef(@ci:petaluma.ca:us<mailto:dfarmer@ci.petaluma.ca.us>>, <citvmer@ci.petaluma.ca.us<mailto:citvrimer@ci.petaluma.ca.us>>, <mil<e41)et@aol.com<mailto:mil<e4aei(@abl.com>>, <rrithealv@sbcgloba1.net<mailto:mthealy@sbcslobaI-net>>, <teresa4petaIuma@comcast:net<mailto:teresa4oetaIuma@comcast.net>>, <tiff@tiffanvrenee.com<maiIto 'tiff@tiffanvrenee.com>>, <chrisalbertson@.comcast.net<mailto:chrisalbertson@comcast.net>> Subject': FW: EverMay garden center - Small Business Owner Petaluma Dear Mr: Kearney: Firstly, I'd like to congratulate you:o,n your appointment to the Council. I wish you much success in your position; and I look forward to all of,the positive contributions I'm sure you will make. I'm forwarding you.a letter that psent to the President of the Chamber. It's..been a couple of weeks, and I still haven't gotten a response. InAhese dire economic times, it is imperative that the negative fiscal impacts, to existing businesses "in Petaluma as a result of the Lowes shopping center are being considered. I reiterate, WE NEED A'LIJMBER YARD, and we desperately need the tax revenue from a Lowes shopping center, butthe Lowes discount 25,000 sq. ft. garden center'IS going to hurt the EverMay garden center, Cottage Gardens and,the Rose Garden. Serious attention needs to be given to the economic impact Lowes will have, and I haven't seen or heard any consideration whatsoever. At one point, there was quite a,bit of chatter of how a Borders in the Lowes center would devastate Copperfield.'s, but not one word about how local nurseries will be affected. Please review the situation" prior to the April,deadline to implement the EIR. Thanks in advance, and again I wish you much success. Regards, Annie Van Maaren EverMay'garden center From: Annie Van, Maaren'.Imailto:avanmaaren(@vahoo.coml Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 12`16 PM To; pace.@petalumacharobet.com<rnailto:'r)acc@petal umachamber.com>' Cc:" Daniel la'E@ On I uma cha m,ber;cbm<rha ilto:'Da niel la E P beta lum acha m ber. com>' Subject-,EverMay garden center - Small Business Owner Petaluma 53 Dear Ms. Pellegrini: You were quoted in the Press Democrat on March 10th, 2011 saying in reference to the Deer Creek shopping center that the project would not take away from other stores' sales because "we do not have any businesses in town that would do what a Lowe's would do." My husband and I own the EverMay garden center. We are. one of three nurseries in Petaluma, not including OSH. I am speaking on behalf of the Rose Garden and Cottage Gardens. A 25,000 square foot discount garden center at Lowes will have a devastating, negative impact on all three businesses. I am not saying that Petaluma doesn't desperately need a lumber yard and the tax revenue, but please do your homework.before publicly making such uneducated statements. We love being a small business in Petaluma, and after only 6 years in business we have a wonderful customer base. But in this economic climate, a bargain is a bargain, and Lowes retail price for plant material undercuts our wholesale cost. We just can't compete on that level. I haven't seen the EIR yet, but hopefully in your position you have, and will conduct a serious, thorough assessment of the negative impact'a 25,000 square foot garden center will have on all of us. Sincerely. Annie Van Maaren EverMay garden center 301 Wilson St. Petaluma, CA 94952 707-762-8187 Hines, ftathbr From: Jensen, Deanna on behalf of CDD Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 6:46 AM To: Hines, Heather; Bradley, Geoff Subject: FVV: Deer Creek Village Project ... . .......... ... ...... ... ... .... From: Audrey Tarnbellini [mailto:ata mbell - ini@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, April 03, 20119:57 AM To: CDD Subject: Deer Creek Village Project We believe Petaluma * should expand to allow -more shopping choices in town.I for one am tired of drivingup 101 every time I need to go to a big store. for lumber etc.' I waste gas and poll -ate the air driving up over that hill. I know it is "cute"`to thinkofPetaluma asal:small quaint town but grow up! we need jobs, better shopping choices, and to, save energy and time. Please 'except the Deer, Creek Project. Yours Truly, Audrey Tambellini 1 Hines, Heather From: Glenn Mantoani [Mantoani@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 211 PM To: Hines; Heather; Brown, John; daveglass@com cast. net; - City Clerk; CityCouncil Subject: Deer Creek Village Shopping Center Fellow Petalumans, When we moved into Park Place some thirty five years ago, we knew that the land across McDowell would someday be developed. Our city has grown and with more people'comes more commercial "development. As concerned residents, we aslcyourcareful consideration of the' following: 1) The traffic on McDowell, Rainier, and even Maria is already highly used. 2) The;added traffic on McDowell will surely impact the accessibility to our Hospital. 3) The'air pollution will be higher than,acceptable standards. 4) There will be increased noise levels4orthe Hospital and the people along McDowell, across from .the. project. It is already too noisy. We would invite you to come to our home and,sit in the back yard to hear what we hear every day. A sound,wall would certainly help the residents. 5) The site is presently zoned; as "Mixed -Use". Petaluma's General Plan requires that "Mixed -Use" be pedestrian oriented. The General Plan also recognizes the need to reduce the traffic impact on McDowell. Please help us maintain our quality of life in our wonderful city. We are not asking to have the project thrown out, but we are asking that the project adhere to Petaluma's General Plan. We are asking that this project be designed as a walkable, mixed use. project. We would also ask'that the City build a sound'wall along McDowell where the existing fences are falling down. There is precedent, as the City paid for sound walls on Caufield and Washington Streets. This will help in two ways. It will help maintain a reasonable noise level for residents and it will assure that people traveling to and from the project will not think of our City as a blighted eyesore. We also ask that there be no overriding considerations. Thank you for your consideration, Glenn & Trish Mantoani 628 Cascade Court Petaluma 707 763-6512 1 Hines, Heather From: Jensen, Deanna on behalf of CDD Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2011 6:54 AM To: Hines, Heather; Bradley,, Geoff Subject: FW: "Deer Creek Village DEIR" From: Simonetti . Charlene 'mailto:CMSimonetti@mactec.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 4:49 PM To: CDD Cc: info@deercreekvillage.com; daveglass@comcast.net; mike4pet@aol,com Subject: "Deer.Creek Village DEIR" Indeed the East Side of beautiful Petaluma is, in a desperate need for the premier Deer Creek project. It is not only an enhancement.to the -forever vacant.prime piece,of property; personally it is.a'no brainer'to be handed the opportunity to create hundreds of'jobs.and increase the sales tax revenue for the City of Petaluma. We;,should be thankful that someone has -the interest in this economy. Most -of us have to, travel a significant distance to obtain home improvement items and if developed as displayed in the architectural drawings, how nice to have a pleasant place to just enjoy. The other plazas on the Eastside have no, ambiance, just stores and parking Jots. And a Farmer's Market too, what,more can one ask for.... My husband and I are definitely in support of this project and certainly hope that everyone else agrees. It's time; we need it. By the way, where is our Target? eCaaI&x sime"tem 1927 Buckingham Lane Petaluma,.CA 94954 I'd Hines, Heather From: Glenn Mantoani [mantoani@comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 2:11 PM To: Hines; Heather; Brown, John; daveglass@comcast.net; - City Clerk; CityCouncil Subject: Deer Creek Village Shopping Center Fellow Petalum'ans, When we moved into Park Place some thirty'five yearssago', we knew that the land across McDowell would someday be developed. Our°city has grown and with more, people comes more commercial development. As concerned residents, we ask -your careful'consideration of the following: 1) The traffic on McDowell, Rainier�,and even Maria is already highly used. 2) The added traffic on McDowell will surely impact the accessibility to our Hospital. 3) The air pollution will be higher than acceptable standards. 4) There will be increased noise levels for the Hospital and the people along McDowell, across from the, project. It is already too noisy. We would invite you to come to our home and sit in the backyard to hear what we hear every day. A sound wall,would certainly help the residents. 5) The'site is presently zoned as "Mixed -Use". Petaluma's General Plan requires that "Mixed -Use" be pedestrian oriented. The General Plan also recognizes the need to reduce the traffic impact on McDowell. Please help us maintain our quality of life in our wonderful city. We are not asking to have the project thrown out, but we are asking that the project adhere to Petaluma's General Plan. We are asking that this project be designed as a walkable; mixed: use project. We would also ask'that the City build a sound wall along McDowell where the existing fences are falling down. There is precedent, as the City paid for sound walls on;Caufi_eld and Washington Streets. This will help in two ways. It will help maintain a reasonable noise level for residents and it will assure that people traveling to and from the project will not think of our City, as a blighted eyesore. . We also ask that there be no overriding considerations. Thank you for your consideration, Glenn & Trish Mantoani 628 Cascade Court Petaluma 707 763-6512 1 5-1 Hines, Heather. From: Jensen, Deanna on behalf of CDD Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 6:54 AM To: Hines, Heather, Bradley, Geoff Subject: FW: "Deer Creek Village DEIR" -.....__... _ .... .... .... __................._ .... _...._............... From: Jeannette [mailto:jennaiz@comcast-.net] Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 7:52 PM To: CDD Subject: "Deer Creek Village DEIR" Hi, My husband Klaus and I are so, happyto hear that we will hopefully be getting a Loaves in town. We have to drive to Rohnert Park every other weekend because, there's always something we need thatwe can't get in town. We just had to go to Rohnert Par{cto Home Depot to find.an outdoor patio fan. We tried OSH butthey only carry indoorfans. We ended up at Lowes where we found a fan we liked. This is just one example of not be able to buy what we need in this town. It's really terrible when you think of;the resources lost in all those,trips. First of all, the tax -money Petaluma is losing. Secondly the impact on using up precious fuel resources and the extra pollution caused by having to drive furtherthus adding to,global, warming. If you add that by all the.other residents of Petaluma I'm sure the amount.would be staggering! As far as the other -projects they want°to add. I believe we have enough workout places in town, I know of at least five. Unless the one theyvant to put up has an indoor po'ol,-We,would notjoin. An indoor'pool would definitely be a reason to join though. More restaurants? Don't we have enough here in Petaluma, and e_yen the best ones are just trying to stay afloat in this economy. More offices? What'about.all the empty office buildings all over this town? Even in the downtown, you see more storefronts that are unoccupied than not. I say we fill those offfices before we start building more. A care facility for the elderly? If it's not one of'those.overpriced ones that no one but'the rich can afford, I say yes. How about Lowe's giving a,percentage of their profits,to help,that tobecome a reality. Make,it.,a teaching home wherepeople could go and getexperience to be a CNA, ,have the high school kids go and help to. get extra credit. I'm for Lowe's, and I really hope that becomes a reality, but could we think'of other stores that could kee"the business and sales taxes here? Why not combine Lowe's witha Sam's? We have Costco's in the other towns, why not a�Sams Club? We go out of town for Costco as well'. 1 wouldn't mind becoming a Sam's Club member. What do you think? Jeannette and Klaus Ziegler, 1528 Baywood Drive, Petaluma, Ca 94954 Jennifer Pierre comments -on the DraftEIR for'the proposed'Deer Creek Village Project: Pro'iect Obiectives The second bullet on page III-34 under objectives states that.the. project would 'satisfy the substantial . demand for regional and neighborhood retail, office, fitness, and dining experiences...' With a 40% office vacancy in the City, as well as vacancies in retail spaces, including the EIR's own cumulative conclusions related to Regency and Deer Creek developments, what is the basis for this objective? The project objectives dictate the alternatives that are evaluated.and although the current alternatives do provide a range of options as�well as show how substantially the project would need to be modified to minimize significant and unavoidable impacts, alternatives'that.have been developed to meet the current objective may result in unnecessary impacts to -the City.. For example, if office is no longer an objective, ,how 'would elimination of office space at the project affecttraffic? FOR should more thoroughly explore the combinationso& land uses that are actually needed In the City and how they could be applied at this site to reduce significant impacts (not necessarily to below the threshold). Overall Traffic Circulation The lR identifies several'sign'ificant.impacts, some of which are mitigated WITS levels. However, the EIR does not appear to include a.description.of how the implementation.of.the mitigation measures in combination with existing conditions plus,,;,project would change the current traffic circulation. For example, does the signalization_ of Professional Drive/McDowell affect'Washington/McDowell or other intersections? How does this signalization interact with the proposed extension -of the turn lane pocket? Does the addition of traffic in this -area result in changes,in traffic patterns on other north/south trending road's>such as Sonoma Mountain Parkway or Maria Drive? The impacts described are very compartmentalized to show what happens at each intersection, but the full picture of how the project, including its proposed mitigation, would'affect the regional circulation patterns should be included in the FEIR. i Specific Traffic Comments Please explain why peak pm was selected as the basis of comparison. Given that most of the traffic is generated from a home improvement store, it seems that a weekend peak hour -could have been more appropriate or thatuse of a weekend peak hour in addition to the peak pm hour would have been informative of the 2 types of traffic changes that could occur. Figure IV.13-5; section 13 appears to indicate that existing southbound traffic on McDowell is 917 trips and northbound traffic is 1100'trips during pm peak hour. Table IV:13713 estimates that the project would result in a net addition 0985 pm peak hour trips. Even assuming that the pass -by reduction of 28% is accurate, this represents:a nearly 30% increase in total traffic in the area. From a project -level �(I an&cumulative perspective, this impact is significant. The EIR does conclude that it is significant. However, with the mitigation such as signalization of Professional Drive, how does this change overall patterns? Additionally, in some instances, the impact is concluded to be significant and unavoidable. There is no substantiation that there is no feasible mitigation. No analysis is provided as to the types of mitigation that could be implemented and why those measures are not.feasible. For example, does the construction of Rainer mitigate impacts to Wash ington,Street? Would removal of residential uses along McDowell from Washington to Madison to allow for widening reduce the impact? How'does the signalization of;Professional Drive reduce the impacts at this intersection to LTS? There is no demonstration of the outcome to demonstrate an acceptable LOS. Does the removal of parking on Lynch Creek Road result in an impact (page IV.B-41)? Please ensure that the provision of 'safe and accessible pedestrian facilities along the project's frontage' during temporary blockages is included in the. MMRP. Does.the design of the extension.of the eastbound left turn pocket from McDowell to Washington (as described in Impact TRAFFIC:'3a) reduce the impact of°the project? It'is not demonstrated how this currently planned improvement would' actually affect the proposed project impacts. Was it designed to accommodate:the'.increased'traffic volumes generated from the project? If not, the design should be re- evaluated to determine if additional improvements need mbe made to mitigate the project's effects. HowAoes the proposed Washington Street interchange affect the.project impacts, especially related to Impact TRAFFIC 3b? Why.would rleft turns be allowed onto the Rainer termination? 'Why does the Rainer connection to Petaluma Blvd N result in a significant impact on site access? Why does the prohibition to turn left (west) to use the Rainer'crossing mitigate this effect? Mitigation Measure TRAFFIC 8b essentially forces westbound traffic to Washington and Corona, two of the intersections that would experience significant and unavoidable traffic impacts (and are already operating below acceptable LOS) instead of allowing that°traffic to use Rainer crossing. To be consistent with GP policy 2-P-92, Lynch Creek Way should be extended through the project area to connect to Rainier at a. more western location than is currently proposed for connection to Rainier. Describe how this would affect the need for Mitigation Measure TRAFFIC-8b. D*',truck access come from north, south, or both? What is the assume split?" How does a shift in this split=change the potential impacts of the project? Regarding truck accesswia'Lynch Creek'Way, why isn't the investigation called for in Mitigation Measure TRAFFIC 8c already, completed to determine the actual impact and improvements that need to be made to accommodate the 'full roadway width?' There are no standards outlined in the mitigation measure and implementation of the potential improvements could result'in additional impacts that are not described in the DEIR. How are Impacts TRAFFIC,8c and 8e related? 8c is requiring an investigation to ensure adequate roadway, while 8e is stating that the impact to circulation is LTS. Impact TRAFFIC 10 describes.the need to'•upgrade existing transit stops to.shelters 'to serve the needs of the project'related transittrips? Is this mitigation? Is"this being provided full' cost by the applicant? Under Impact TRAFFIC 11a;.does'the.4`h sentence mean:to,indicate granite trails on the northwest portion, instead'of the southwestportion as currently stated? Does impact TRAFFIC 12 account for the. gridlock that,is.expected to occur during the pm peak hour? Is the signal at Maria Drive completed funded? If not, should it be as part of the cumulative impact mitigation? Air Qualitv Imbacts How does Mitigation.Measure AQ-1 mitigate the significant NOX emissions? What are they mitigated to? To be consistent With GP policy 4-P-15and to comply with mitigation outlined for GHG emissions, the major anchors should be designed'in a way that building:orientation is in the south to southeast direction and to the extent possible, groundcover should.be used in lieu of pavement. All of the measures outlined in GP policy 4=P-16 should be incorporated1nto Mitigation AIR-1. The discussion of GHG under Impact AQ-3 states,that emissions were'assumed'to occur in 2011 through 2014' but table IV.C-7 shows construction emissions for only 2012-2014. Have all of the GHG emissions been accounted for in the analysis? - What does the * mean in Table IV.C-9? Why doesn't Mitigation Measure AQ-4 require the use of electric landscape equipment, instead of encourage? Why doesn't.it specify the percentage of parking spaces thatwould provide.electric vehicle charging'stations? Other l Rega'rdinggrowth-inducing/indirect impacts, it is not clear how the project would change regional circulation patterns. For example, will,people avoid McDowell and chose alternate routes? If so, to what extent and what are the resultant, Impacts on these roadways? Cumulative impacts to retail/urban decay from closure of retail seem to suggest'that.because the project.does not overlap with'downtown businesses, there would"be a LTS,effect. However, besides the proposed home improvement store, all other proposed uses ofthe project overlap with downtown and other businesses throughout the City, including uses that are already, in surplus (office; grocery). Thetselection ofAlternative'C as.the environmentally superior alternative'is not justified. Alternative B provides,similar reductions'in the magnitude•of significant and unavoidable traffic impacts and still meets:thergeneral project objectives. The EIR needsAb fully disclose"any impacts that are peculiar to the.projectthat were not disclosed in the• General Plan EIR: F'or example, the potential flooding/drainage issues, potential for presence of 6-0 underground pipelines and other infrastructure, and presence of endangered or other special status species needs to be analyzed. Additionally, description and analysis of the potential for groundwater recharge in this area needs to be included in the FEIRJGP policy 8-13-20). Describe in more detail how Alternative B was developed., Describe how modifications in the office/retail/restaurant (not including major, anchors) could be adjusted to reduce traffic impacts. Related to the first comments about objectives,, these additional uses need to be justified and there needs be a clear delineatiowof how these uses specifically relate to the increase in traffic. Describe the process for determining potential mitigation for significant impacts and how the conclusion that many were not feasible was reached. Proiect Design/Features Creel( buffer should be extended beyond the minimum required 50 feet. To be consistent with GP policy 4-G=1-G, additional native plantings should be incorporated into the buffer zone. Additionally, benches and;other features should be installed in this area, consistent with GP policy 5-P-31. To be consistent with GP policy 4-P-17 and to avoid future issues with McDowell capacity, the entire project frontage should be moved west to allow additional, buffer along McDowell with room for extensive tree plantings to buffer noise and TAC emissions from the project. Hovyjdoes GP policy 5-P-11 relate to development impact fees? How does it relate to additional potential obligations for developers of the'proposed project? GP Figure 5-2 depicts a Class -II bike lane on the project frontage along McDowell. y Hines, Heather From: mgfashionart@comcast.net Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 3:31 PM To: citymgr; - City Clerk; councilman albertson; teresa4petaluma@comcast.net; daveglass@coin cast; net; mike4pet@aol.com; mthealy@sbcglobal.net; council memberkearney@me.com; tiff@tiffanyrenee.com Cc: Bradley, Geoff; Hines, Heather Subject: Request a reschedule of Deer Creek DEIR hearing date of April 18th. To: Mayor Dave Glass Members,of the Petaluma City Council City Manager John Brown RE: Public comments on the DEIR for Deer Creek Village Dear City Manager John Brown,Mayor Glass, and Members of the City Council, I am requestiii'g that you please reschedule the date of April 18th, the.date of the Deer Creek DEIR hearing before the. City council, to 8nother,date.1 had sent this request out, in an e-mail, and in a phone call last Friday, also with e-mail, to the City Clerk's office,. who promised to put it in your packets,.befo, e the Council meeting of this last Monday. However, it was not addressed in your meeting. Would you be so kind as to move the DEIR hearing before the Council to another night, other than April 18th? If , the beginning of Passover at sunset that eve.. Further, I hope you will take into consideratiol4hat it is also the week of -Good Friday and Easter. Many interested parties are either in Jewish religio l s ritual that eve. or deep in Easter preparation including preparation for loved ones coming and others leaving town to meet with family. We would be' o grateful of the respect afforded by the City, of it's religious. community. My family Would be so a preciative too, as I am considering pulling out of the rituals of the week, to meet your date. My fami,l has both Jewish and Catholic members. Imagine my dilemma. Getting the DEIR for Deer Creek to consider.all impacts and comments: of the public, and agencies, befi re critical decisions are madeand momentum built in direction, is important to all parties involved. Let's please give an .opportunity for all parties to weight in on the DEIR, whether they are For it, Opposed to it, or in Neutral. Impacts are impacts. Let's all put our heads together for the most thoroughly planned, best outcome, possible superior mitigation's, etc., for all involved. I realize that'l and unavoidal mobility" from the impacts bi realizing the ti intersections.,. changes withil therefore., few elements that' ----necessary, to — effort not to dE ie "no project" alternative may currently be only way to remove the multiple "significant ale" impacts, and to save the politicians that ran their campaigns on "improved traffic -ommitting political suicide by approving this project, in its current design and ilt into it: (N'o spin could remove the political career ramifications due to the public affic impacts of,this project, in its current design, of an ."F'' LOS at freeway and various ind new que"s, reality.) On the other hand, maybe some brilliant mitigation's of i the project, with everyone's best thoughts to what the best land use is there, and ibly not create. gridlock, and not have to sacrifice other environmentally sensitive are S & U, maybe possible. Everyone needs to take a concerted focus, and the time -oll up their sleeves, sharpen their pencils, and -brainstorm the best scenario, in an grade Petaluma. i, Please, can tk is date be. rescheduled? I look forward to your response of a possible reschedule, as soon as is possible, from your governing body. Thank you for your time and kind consideration. Sincerely, Maly Glardon Gi NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION 915 CAPITOL MALL, ROOM 364 SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 (916) 653-4082! (916) 657-5390;- Fax March 23,-•2011 Heather Hines City of Petaluma 11 English Street Petaluma, CA:94952 RE: SCH# 2004092093 Deer Creek Village; Sonoma County. Dear Ms. Hines: RECEIVED MAR 2 9 2011 COMMUNITY DEVELOPIvIBJT DEP/ARTMEW TheNative American Heritage Commission (NAHC) has reviewed the.Notice of Completion (NOC) referenced above. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) states that any project that causes a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource,, which includ_ es archeological resources, is a significant effect requiring -the preparation of an EIR•(CEQA Guidelines 15064(b)). To comply with this provision the,lead agency is required to assess whether the project will have an adverse impact on historical resources within the area•of°project effect (APE), and.'if'so to mitigate that effect. To adequately assess and mitigate project_related impacts to archaeological resources, the NAHC recommends the following actions: ✓ Contact ih'e appropriate regional archaeological Information Center for a record search. The record search will determine: ■ Ilf;a part or all of the area,of project effect'-(APE•);has been previously surveyed for cultural resources. • Ilf any known cultural resources have already been .recorded on or adjacent to the,APE. ■ ilf,the probability is low, moderate, or high that cultural resources are located in the APE. ■ �If a survey is required to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present. ✓ If an archaeological inventory survey is: required, the -final stage is the.. preparation of a.professional report detailing the findings and recommendations of the recordswsearch and field survey: ■ IThe final report containing site forms, site:significance, and mitigation measurers should be submitted immediately to the planning department. All information regarding site locations, Native,American human remains, and 'associated funerary objects should be in:a separate confidential addendum, and not be made available for public disclosure. ■ The final written report should be submitted within 3 months after work has been completed to the appropriate regional archaeological Information Center. ✓ Contact the Native American Heritage'<Commissioh for: ■ A Sacred Lands File Check.. USGSI.'S minute:,auadranale name.;townshio, ranae and section reauired. ■ A list of appropriate Native American,contacts;for consultation concerning the project site and to assist in the mitigation measures. Native American Contacts List attached. ✓ Lack of surface evidence of archeological "resources.does'riot preclude their subsurface,existence. ■ Lead agencies should include in:their mitigation plan provisions for the identification and evaluation of accidentally discovered archeological resources; per California'Environmental Quality Act.(CEQA) §15064.5(f). In areas of identified.archaeological sensitivity, a certified archaeologist and a culturally affiliated Native American, ,with knowledge,in,cultural resources„ should monitor all ground -disturbing activities. ■ .Lead,agencies. should include. in their mitigation plan provisions for the disposition of recovered artifacts, in consultation with culturally affiliated Native Americans. ■ Lead�agencies�should include provisions for discovery of Native American human remains in their mitigation plan. Health and Safety Code'§7050.5, CEQA §1;5064.5(e), and Public Resources Code 65097'.98 mandates the process to be followed in -the event of an accidental discovery of any human remains in a location other than a dedicated cerhetery. S incerely;'- ... .. :.;;.. a Khez.,-.- .... ty Program Analyst ------ - - -- ---- ------(916) 653-4040 -- ----- - - -- -._..—..------- - ----- ---- - -- cc: State Clearinghouse �n Native American Contact List Sonoma County March 23, 2011 The Federated 'Indians of Graton Rancheria Gene Buvelot 6400 Redwood Drive, Ste Coast Miwok Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Southern Porno coastmiwokC aol.com (4,15) 895-1163. Home (415) 259-7819 Cell Ya-Ka-Aura r 7465 Steve Olson Lane Porno Forestville , CA 95436 Coast Miwok info 9 yakaama.org Wappo (707) 887-1541, The Federated'°Indians of Graton Rancheria Greg Sarris, Chairperson 6400 Redwood: Drive, Ste Coast Miwok Rohnert Park, CA 94928 Southern. Porno coastmiwok@aol.com 707-566-2288 707-566-2291 -fax Suki Waters P.O. Box 53 Coast Miwok Jenner CA 95450 Pomo (707) 865-2248 This list is current only,as of the.date of this document. The Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria Frank Ross 100 Cielo Lane, Apt 102 Coast Miwok Novato CA 94949 Southern Porno miwokone@yahoo.com (4.15) 261946075. Distribution of this list;does not relieve any person.of the statutory responsibility as defined in Section 705015 of the Health and Safety Code, Section 5097.94 of the Public Resources Code and Section 5097.98 of the Public Resources Code. This.list.is-only_applicable_for_contacting: local' Native,Americans with regard_to_cultural_resources for_ the_proposed______.___ . SCH# 2604092093 Deer Creek village; Sonoma County. Hines, Heather, From: Jensen, ,Deanna on behalf of CDD Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 6:46 AM To: Hines, Heather; Bradley, Geoff Subject: FW: Deer Creek Village Project ,From: Audrey Ta,mbellini [mailto:atambellini@yahoo,coml Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2011 9:57 AM To: CDD i Subject: Deer Cr`.eek Village Project We believe Petaluma should expand,to allow more shopping choices in town. I for one am tired of driving up 101 every time I need to go to a big store. for lumber etc. I waste gas and pollute the air driving up over that hill. I know it is"'cute" to think of Petaluma as,,a small quaint town but grow up! we need jobs, better shopping choices, and to save energy and time. Please except.the Deer Creek Project. Yours Truly, Audrey Tambellini li f From: Timo, Rivetti' [mailto:timo@timorivetti.com] Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 11;37 AM To: CDD Cc: info@deercreekproject.com Subject: Deer Creek Dear council members; I am writing in support of this project. I cannot believe- that here is a project that .provides jobs, sales tax revenue & more importantly fits directly into the General Plan provisions that took 7 years to finalize & you have still not approved this. I, You should be embracing this opportunity: Any, other City would be relishing that a responsible developer would want to spend over $50.niillion in their community with the projected $400,000 in annual sales tax. I urge you to pass this ASAP so we can look forward to a healthy new community to shop & dine in east Petaluma. Yours ,Sincerely Antirno "Timo" Rivetti From:. BUTCH SMITH[mailto:the.keeper@sbcglobal.net] Sent:,Friday, April 15, 2011 8:04 PM To: Councilman Chris Albertson; Councilperson Teresa Barrett; CDD; .Mayor David Glass; Councilman Mike Harris; Councilman Mike.Healy; Councilman Gabe Kearney; Councilperson Tiffany Renee; Deer Creek Village Cc: Deer Creek Village Subject: DEER CREEK VILLAGE ay®r and City Council, I was employed by the City of 'Petaluma for almost 34-years in the Planning sand Department of Engineering. In those years, I saw many many businesses that wanted to call Petaluma their home. But always, ,the City had what they.thought_ was. a great reason not to approve'them. Businesses like: Costco, (threeitimes) Food for Less, Friedman Brothers, Target, Lowes and even MarineWorld.Africa U.S.A. (They wanted to go where our current Marina was built. But, the City said YES to the Factory Outlet, the Car Dealerships and even a Marina... Seem the people found out real quick that what the Factory Stores were offering was last'years items and _seconds, items the main stores couldn't sell... As far as the Auto Dealerships, the people of Petaluma buy most of the vehicles in other cities, not Petaluma Then there is the Marina. It hasn't made the City a buck -since it's creation. So, because there's no dollars coming to the City, the City of Petaluma has NO tax basin. Something wrong with.Petaluma. The citizens are taking their money to the Cities to the North and South of Petaluma because the City has nothing for the citizens of Petaluma to shop at. The City has always said, "We want to keep the small town flavor to Petaluma" Well, you have the "Small Town Flavor" but you don't have a "Tax Basin" Keep the small town flavor in the downtown Petaluma, but let these proposed businesses come to the Eastside'.'When I' started with the City, the staff could review and approved Shopping Centers and 100-Lot Subdivisions in 6-months. Now, it's takes Shopping Center`and Subdivisions in 6-years. If they are approved at all. Mayor and City Council,, it's time to make a decisions on Deer Creek Village, and get that "Tax Basin" the City of Petaluma has never had. It's will be the right move the City as well as the Citizens of Petaluma. Butch Sinith, alias "The Keeper" rra'1 Received via email 4/18/2011 To Heather Hines Deputy Planning Manager City of Petaluma Deer'Creek DEIR Comments The Hydrology portion of the Deer Creek DEIR is full of false and misleading state I ents. It. is grossly outdated, with portions, dating back to May 2001. As such it is missing vital data from the 2005 New Year's Eve flood. Data from that flood proves much] iof the information in the current Deer Creek DEIR Hydrology study to be wrong. problemswith the Hydrology portion of the Deer Creek DEIR Among the many p y gy are,,: p ,l The comparison of the elevation of the Deer Creek site to that of the Petaluma River bank is not correct. This must be corrected. The portion .of the Deer Creek. site indicated as being in the Petaluma River floodplain comes from -long -outdated flood maps. The amount of the Deer Creek site that Js actually in the Petaluma River Floodplain has not been determined and must be made for this to be accurate. OveAw of water runoff from, Lynch Creek*and the Petaluma River onto the site during high water from heavy storms is completely omitted from the report. This must be determined. As the Deer Creek site is the lowest, point of elevation east of Highway 101 and it holds perhaps 50 ,acre feet or more of water during heavy rains, should this project be built, the increases of flooding are not addressed. This must be addressed. There.Cis too much wrong with this hydrology report for it to, have any worth whatsoever. The Deer Creek ;DEIR must be delayed in order for a new and accurate hydrology study to be done. If flooding isn't an environmental impact, then what is? r David Libchitz P.O. Box 955 Petaluma, CA 94953 707-763-6196 dave94952(abAt.net From::earispurgeon@comcast.net [mailto:earlspurgeon@comcast.net] Sent:lSaturday, April 16, 2011 6:40 PM To: CDD Cc: info@deercreekvillage.com Subject: "Deer Creek Village DEIR" I encourage THE PETALUMA CITY COUNCIL to approve the Deer Creek Village Shopping Center. Petaluma residents need :the shopping experience, the -jobs and the income it will provide. We cannot continue to cut city employees and ask them to take pay cuts. It' time to put this project on a fast track. Longtime Petaluma resident, EARL SPURGEON i i From.'Michele Malman [mailto:michelemalman@sbcglobal.net] Sent:! Friday, April 15, 2011 11:37 AM To: CUD Cc: info@deercreekproject.com Subject: Deer Creek Village DEIR When are the people in Petaluma going to have stores in thier own town to shop in. Petaluma has money problems but continues to fight good stores from coming in. We need jobs and slaes tax. Drive, around and see all the open office buildings I From: thestenros@comcast.net [mailto:thestenros@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 5:40 PM To: CDD Subject: Fw: "Deer Creek Village DEIR" Dear City of Petaluma, am from Petaluma, I reside at 1'609 Northstar Dr. We n `ed this development. We need to be Stop having. to go the "FREEWAY" to shop. (p.s. I'm' not yelling). The tax revenue that we give to Rohnert Park is incredible. support this, my husband and my family think It would be a Great Addition. V1 11 es�I! from us...: we can't wait to stop heading up the Hwy.... Now what's happening with Target too? Sincerely, Stella,; Stuarts Stenros & family ,1 1609INorthstar Dr. Petaldma, CA 94954 i Sent By: CALTRANS TRANSPORTATIO PLANNING; 510 2B6 5560; �STATF OF ^"1 �FnR*il�l j��;j,�jf,}F,Q�•'rj;��16i�(]IiTti'1+ION AXDi6 81N-0:AC•ENGY DEPARTMENT -OF ITUNW-I001F TA'I'ION Ili GRAND AVENUE P. O. BOX 23660, OAKLAND, CA 94623.0660 PHONE (610) 286.5636 - FAX (510) 286-55W TIT 711 Apr-1B-11 3:42PM; Page 1/2 :.1" .,. ..!I: EDMTnm�.�,�''.'Vl•:`iyt�_.c•�frn7 +bYt e!'•r ;1•• FGrx your poweN Be`energy ejfkientr April 18,',2011 r,\�,� SON:101893 Gp6 1' .:SON7 101.4.16 I1;t ' SCH 2O04092093 Ms_; Heather Hines ::>t City of l'e'Ealurtia ;f: 11.English' Street Petaluma, ;CA 94952-26.30 heal• MS.Iiines: lamer Creelc'Village - DrA t Enrvirournental impact_ Report'( 1b ::. .. sA; Thank you,for including: the•:Cal'rfilrpi'a Department OF Trens'poitaf `'n.(Uepaxtment).intbe environmental review process:•for.•the,prp ased`project. We fiave;; viewed the. application correspondence and have the following 60m.inenti4: to offer. a4 ' Hig way4 penalfons. �,;... . references to the StaCe s.ec�tii om c downturn-and'its.impuct 0ri'th.; ',O.A'lfre volume (i.e. page 1V.B- 1)•does.tiot relieve the responsibility..ty use curreni traffic data..iriA, W;of ttaffie data. from 2007: Signal etutrox '`iy: , Please send -the Signal timing•.sh11 be reviewed for all conditions: green times, coordinatiaii;. queues for ou6b movement, etc. ir`1 Hydraulics 1. The hydrology, study in AppendiX F shows -that flow to th'e' 4" uss-t ul.vert under US Highway (C1S-)101 will-iri'Grease.This flow •rnust be metered:hk —ro,existingflow rates. 2. Pleuse,provide analysis for a25-year storm event. `f Prgjeet Coprdina6n it The City of Petnl.uma1Shj uld•be atware:of'the:Various• interchang'e'I such as the US-101/Ea"st,Washington interchange, and how these projects!;., i#1 dffect this development. Cullural.li'.esoi&ces ) The Department•is:irnag�ent. with thc.findings in the.Cultural sbtlrces section of the'DEIR that there are no:.known sites within State=right-of=way (ROW)'w h will be affected by'this project. 'Should.project�rr;lated ground:`disturbing activities take:pf a as part of, this pibject within the State :RQW aiid them is,an inadvertent archaehlcigical or burial. "scovery; in compliance with CEQA,'PRC 5024,5, andthe,`pepartincnt.'s S.W.dard Environm, n; . • Reference (SER) Volume 2 'Caltrons improves moowsy aerom Califdr1ri1 G-2O Sent By: CALTRANS?TRANSPORTATIO PLANNING; 510 286 5560; Apr-18.11 3:42PM;. Page 2/2 Ms. Heather Hines/Ci;'ty''6f'Pebldma april .18, 2011 r. ?' Page 2 (http://www.dot.c,a.gov/Ner),•ail congt v6 ibfi vvithib, 50'•feet of:tlie j shall ccase. The Department's District 4.Cultural-lesouWe Study office shall•6e'ir` "' 'diately contacted at (510) •286-5618:;. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please call-CO"j ery Cepeda-of my:staff at (510) 286' S535. " ?; Sincerely; .I, ' frrr' BEMY 1~'1tANK ail District'Branch Chief .. a ederal•t3rants/lZail•Coordirtatitin' , •-'`�•.• c: Scott-MOrgarr (S'fate UMe ifighOtise) ; ti rik •23. i la "Cut&arto impmuee mobility a&oaa CdliOi From: Ida Luis [mailto:ibl@att.net] Sent: Monday, April 18, 2011 2:05 PM To: 01) Cc: info@reercreekvillage.com Subject: deer creek village del Hi Petaluma City Council Members, Please,please.,please let us have Lowe's and Deer Creek Village. It would be such a pleasure to shop in Petaluma instead of Rohnert Park and think of the money we would save on gas .... I am so looking forward to it. Thanks in advance, Ida ,Luis a From: Jane [mailto:browncjane@gmail.com] Sent:, Monday, April 18, 2011 1:01 PM To: CDD Subject: Deer Creek Village DIER I am writing .you in support of the Deer Creek Village project. For too long we have let our sales tax dollars go to Rohnert Park; Novato, Santa Rosa or other cities with a Lowes or a Target. Especially now with our city budget in such dire straits we need to be looking for an infusion of tax dollars not trying to keep them from coming to our city. I understand the role of the council in con"sidering the smaller local shops but I do not think that Deer Creek Village is going to be a deterrent to shopping at out local stores. I for one shop local as do many of my friends but many times:;have driven to another city to shop at a Lowes or a Target for items that.are not available here in our smaller stores. It is time to move Petaluma into a position of welcoming new tax revenues. God knows we need them and we need the jobs even if they are part time. Also the tax revenue will help us keep our city employees on the job and not furloughed due to lack of available monies. Please focus on what these stores will add to our community... not what problems they will cause. There is so much negativity in our city council and I hope now that there! is a better balance that you will vote to approve this project. Hopefully we will not have a repeat of the Target fiasco where a small group of "NIMBY's" were given $100,000.00 to step aside:J1 wonder where that money is going to go ... into their pockets? I certainly have not heard of any particular project they have chosen to fund. Interesting how quiet they have gotten. Thankyou for listening. Jane Brown y-M Note to File Photo submitted on disk by Mary Glardon at March 22, 2011 Planning Commission hearing on behalf of Janice Cader-Thompson. Photos 1 - 10 dated 2007 and labeled Roll 73. 5-30 'Allow' .�,. i..a ,_� l.. ,€ Ty',..?"is P ad.. "rs 3A,. `'r' :si'.',,,i ,'`'�" P` "sf,., °�.&�>a p,,k rog'y, Ap.,<[a .., q f `. LYT,3'j%p�.t> ✓ 3'>g.:il ya"� :e. <"a .T,_m ^'A ,o "�', b `� W, a,<=�, ,.p .. �„ „ ...... ..... .. """� E °.u, �•g ,m s f. ' sr r, ';'^ -�%..' e' Y,. m 'g, . rz 4 - F° �'.<,:z, , „ u s a s�vnSO-,,;,, f i I"�y�R de4' . +, � N .:£:17 �� F f, '<, r;4 S i, - My 'a. '•,'ai`}�, A..`•r =i'sr; .�4} • a:1 "q i. fooa A Wyk, ' g' S ' r. �„- ': # �-' i M��. �9 AP„� '? � "s..•' l'°� ! ��.s z. , �', \ i:.,.� '�Ay `;�. �,� '' >+i r�l\ a, .a . d�-�g ,� �� , ,�. ;,, (pt, � �'> t,:t, �� z=>`$�°;# �,• ` ry8 t p`<a t.., � , ,d �� '"�. ` � k& w < 3ry Y" �., . ".•. � ,p.. ,. °� {F �` � m � e ` �# his` §��c� 2r q' �.�; a - Y ;J. �� s> bra• e< . � • < � . % ....� ��'A., .. sr�,�;; < ` � - 'A§lki !v 'Etia. � �:� . . M . _ s. _, t,° ^�' S � ..... � ". ''S'^i . sm,041 l s ..,✓ Sr e i x a-wrcy 1e"'�a f'S �•<'� t� 8�;,�s ,� F"`:.�'.'t "1 '<� "t->z �� j'ii' `sty �t:. ;',�,,• ' • > �,. M • � ,'' w t ..+; to x,.; fi��^e, •��:.^:s<,:i^ �,`�"'.��'��.��<r>,`,, <.� Z�° ,;�.;r':+^;,,�;,;,. "�°^b. �„ F� °:KaF ,n; w, �� • r•i ' .- ": � - ' , , � �� a ' >� � , x. a..� �,t t.� �� •t �, �,F � � a t s �." tea, � .� „ r,� .�.: `a ' , x. 'aw.".; •,. ...�. �4wa ^ � : ,. a•�• m � : � �, '`�Y � w''+'r ac � : •Saxfx •?":. �'.� � � •,�"� °7s, ^-,y,;q.°�•,. :,w:��•a• :��' .y. r'Ye '�°°: •" tt �� ;`0&.,..�,'� F 5 e i .Et: Jn � -; �. ��. } R�� `e ,,, � � .. � , tx ��, '• Mks; HF f. �• °"'��K,� t � � � ° �d ', �. � � .. +s, e 154579 , ��.,, ✓• Xis �T';,', `;t �`.,. ..., e.. ... �"�. }, � �^ ..,, .,, „•,,, ,,xe � � " " ._ • •` ems, s '} 1'," :4x ??:^'! - ...>•} .�.� ,,>r �` :, :'�' l a ..... ., •..; .., e .,r r,3 z'� $ # ��.,, � Fri rE x � �, �. + :xs � _,�,, .." .. �. „<•;,, ..., , Woni<ao y 3 „�;r,.; .,t.s'":..?.� '"'r i.'4r.. ,. ..,a '€p•.�. ,��» � � ff"p �-:-'*• ,. of ' S � e T y� „ QgIQ - t t „ "; x £',, `b Via• % oVon W AM .. • ,ram. ��^i � } - .z 3 � E>s' ..°Mr tea �•�"n.Ij" Siq'�,' �3 �•q$,t•�r "y, ':I-" � � `� ,1. & � 3 �,'�;etlp, �Ey,, . lip to %y; •'g$g$ .ate < " , AM t g';Wn A AL ate` •.�' J '� - " " e , w $ a 3 ,r �, 7 REM OWN . .......... # . ........ low -Too . ..... .... .. . ..... ..... six, .... . .... ........ OUR 77771 77, ...................... K, Sw • -7 VT J,v a W� A Al 1:0, .00g `as INS, I all zrfigoal ........... �M An, 41 R mg f„ s r yy� P 0 �,¢ ,^aA ° fie '„ <^ " �a ' ? ,'c�ra, N�V*� r is4,� °�,>$ � ��^ i I �f s� p�Y, s €x°ffi' !g� zM,� a gp�.'t e a a3 f4. ORA AM, E p, ; .. - EE •S 3 r - ,":, 7- -too,r •a. ,w. � :. .,,, ,,,.,'q&!K•,„, '.. Ls.=,viF ,r^:>'': a,„;,,1 'n.',, :,E:a �a< �"i?,>.�„ .�, �1:10,,:9TIN 'gg „J'vy „f '&, ,•E, :k� a� �� .,, a, off` , ... �- nw.,,,,�#'� 3�4'"" S�g�r.••'ya,>4:4�a�'e..F `� �g�<;Fz'>re, &, ,-.�' 1 f°,, �y � i � x B � y� =e• ) .9.#'s „a5e,� ��t`< #, '' f :1, H•_'. >��;�Y�. 34 •:�';��r��',-#••;�'r:, � ��$ ��.; :n.. as �a' _..' .P„, .l�= 4. F "A" ,� ,!.. �i <.�/. .,•� �0 x'kr""' < ]•, .i;.� ..i P., �, gR0.: 42 � d.< y..>a• 't ° r - „� <�• � � .a# r.��t, z,� .A�" :"J;.✓, , �a '=t..'. df .v „' -a. �,}., ,?r.s.tiqq. •._, F�•' °e h »"! a x.. .>,3, 4' �: Pi` :i,. s;. a..?;,'";:.:' »'..£,'.',`'•. -,.,. b,gg�. :k ,•x �tY{{ "b'. art, {,f° �. )�y°. 1 �' 33 ,�.e „� � �` `•�•=� w ?�`i�.��t ;. `x�'°`�• �j.=.�<.a; i:�",� _ "PS 4: ! 4 ,4P �f•q; ;�. �,�:�#�'i°"::I �YP�'. >y}' ��@ �r`, t 4 $"'P t $, .: '�g°, n"V ��E,a fe>... � y"Y, €$°. �` q5 3y .i'v �"" a. P!°.8, .,i6...i' .3> °`&R.•t.v &.1 �" f; i'E t'ti",� .�ai �#'a:. ..✓,4 .$°.t�=-,�, $" w, yl','', fir,"\Y-a'�,., wl'q S�i 'sl� ' t, ' � sF t?tvy&�?� "'° � ,- � `'� �#��; Wes„ ' r;ia k'. •<&�' .2 ; �, .:�� "'� .�. t �,m., ` �s, ra.,�; `�a . ^;. -tea .a � rw '�, „�,'• _ � r � � t' B� :�- ,,,�' :� �q �'°�; •�°,�� s �v�tna?.c �' �� > 'S �'-�'-°�e , y #sir > �r ; ' >• f t.k l° ,� e r " t"'' 4'' .8 < a1'�,�,. 3 tr, "€� k{ ."<� �,T°x u oE` °� �,'3,:�1 �#'r' ',9>.j„ `° e+,� C „y v a.. e§ >+". ; 7 ''' '• " a k;, E a, a&e,;$ ''.,;> a<a 'q 5: _ „>. #'`. •�;. $a'%w^., y.� Y �'s _ 9. a >,�;�7 .a, fr -�q�..`` t s` x ;a.` '" � �•a8}p_; � °i�,'°ys�<,� ;;, nn° ^� �s,w aY;e:ga W & ,s"ir � _•% o- > ��- ��<. i&> ;at' _ �4 a x ... ,r1 •f�r�s' _ n�t� r•# �i`k y1�1 • �afd `i �:hL.tak M�•'�•"bke?x�4+Z '�'�.°1'as P.�� hv: �`r'". °i 4r•%"<�».'� .R'.,ti` c`. Note to! File Photo submitted on disk by Mary Glardon at March 22, 2011 Planning Commission hearing on behalf of Janice Cader-Thompson: Two photos dated 2008 and labeled Thompson family #3133. z 'ev. ol V: zly 1n, vy- . ..... ..... for, �i 4ft al VAN! VAX 01 Note toTile Photo submitted on disk by Mary Glardon at March 22, 2011 Planning Commission hearing on behalf of Janice Cader-Thompson. Photos 1 - 4 dated 2007 and labeled..Roll 1.13. w -t--X R's QI� Note to File Photo submitted on disk'by Mary Glardon at March 22, 2611 Planning Commission hearing on behalf of Janice Cader-Thompson. One phoio dated 2007' and labeled Roll 92. �'f 0 Note to File Photo submitted on disk by Mary Glardon at March 22, 2011 Planning Commission hearing on behalf of Janice Cdder-Thompson. i ti Photos 1 — 31 dated 2007 and labeled Roll 73 551 .-777,7777, A k b AS ARM, oil4 - -.-� y g 3 , � sw low a' Now H 3 + fit r� "A y. 'Aa 57 7777 -77 7777 MOM am n .01. OWL ff Ian ,W, ................. An y vA Qr in TOP", 4k W, :MWAS• A for • SlY QNsb . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . �V'n�4" ww,j,vgr "Ono VITA WAS MAT I 'Ann; 0--ay` kitit oy. vs Jam QW.— My VON MAY v 41 iv n at M A ME .r �. 1 p .. ...J, ........... t t„ t .. � < t y 8 ' f f 1 ..,.Y.Yit s , f . e u o � grow a. flow" t3 „i • a >"` y.., .. f: c�.i."', �d ems, r r o s WTI Zr '��`'�`r`�e MEMO�:,' .:L� A; ' M.,, i = �i =''f' `?',•.•: ;.� F. s'r ° F a k`m-' .yam. �Ls,�, . fi `. " ip �.: r`! 51N-0 aAe �. ...4 woOw?ua <°i:� '��'• .�,g¢� ems:% �% • .,.t' £�<'i ` .':a� ��t,• .r..,. u"'�, ";�i,,s.,, y>; 3 s a ¢� s MM • '„ `, =`.:", �.�,, ^^''a,, °A .•'0.i *''"' �'tWy ^':..' - e� : Z 3 t'r kwllu st 1 s qw "I RIZZZ ` •:8.. 4a1"°A>s F:, '.,mod ` ..... I; 17: M =„M=n",'si'3 •`.£' LL`a r an.``idsyy VETO Ste' Yl IV ` �',.� 4: e'.s r.'r�"T E°'ma ;Y;; ^"t' x- .. ' , c• ,�, ,'t' g `+i� '�' `.=F A ` n , w'�v "` y' may, � a., .x. � ,•., � Fe ,°. � �� "mx E:: �.: �• � � �q WK PC two `f e FEly''.';'z v;; .•F '°R' w°m, mom, ^.N. �a�^ VY1 "Oft & �� a S •rya .:°w n PRO .,. L•p' ,{ ,l<,m% ,f :• i� � F� a ,.,� �1�+��„;':"r.,• t.,��"'xv,�,, a*�'" ^r, ati, i?+t&�.�'f F:�,r.�rv"°d:S. ,..3;'+a�.:t ��.�F�... �ztuak �r j ' £a ' Y :, iCs,, d f A r, ��# K �y ` E ` � ,�, y£ ,s * t ` i' & •'�� d.s , .. PIT Ad OWN WOW lot Yn too �,, .;p J:,�r,xi, e'�, ,f =a i. e #1. t ,3,r �= • 10- NOW I " ' �' ' L m �.�g C.. � �'", rt;. ,. �'� . - y,"' s :RPsa� �.�3 :`d )� -� •�d�,s R f ra` °a:3 :g -- S Of eits in TM malt} - i `.cam ' i A• Yi ,8- -.' \ is Now r vro',,.:q , "'Y „Sx1!' Y• :• i - 4F, '":F fly - , . .ar' ^ >., • • S >a ° . . , ¢ -; 9, �'. " y • r - . r O fin a 'z � �,..r • o , � .' = .ate' •, €.-'`°•� ..'a �a � .._ - s � � ;, r !. p i• a> � � &,e6. AST y,•' � .® fg� 'e •tea NdrY g, �Mf "7 "4 AZk CAI, �Aw4, A A ------ -- TO f M& W'T vA� . ...... ..... . . "To in post ........ . . .... . .............. ... . ....... .......... ... . . . . . .......... . ... ........ . .. ..... .... .. ..... .... . ........ .. .. . ...... .... ...... . . . . ... . . . . . . . ....... .. a meµ: � L• � $, ..;�. �-• � �S> �6' ,++ P. :,�' i :«;;v� n ;, ^a,. �",: : ^"".: F t 'r �t s e '7 Ymv 5 s � :' "`. • 14«•°a^ :< �. ., '�' y �^"' t� ' � �Y €,;rs,��ki a rs<,�,,�� V�`�'� ,s� , E y �.• , .s`s.•' •ti �•' '�•: ` y, � �E •� t.» is w» ^ a'", w'`*`� !:^a; _•'••�''�""'.,:, �: -� `-`'ts�>€ st°' ,r �€ � �� y,; a. x> �`,��•� „ .� •".'�'�z 'ez8�€!,a'r. �.�t5,sr.a .g :: '::° ,� : �.�''•a �',,, � �,y .i, g � s 42.'� � � °W.,�° , Viz' ., ,„�zz nq � '?e - g � •'•v, ': .. � A� F, � e �2, '� €' �.�� .�. ��' �° � , x, k^ x Fx. W lips, e Y .•Y f Z ro"'�'°? 3xb ' ,< '..g � ek 3 1 �. ,r• x T f"-.a+'„'4''-'t' •a. :n ''<"',3'• t.` -�„n.r�i.°e' Y $� ��•b �°y� dt: � ,� ,s ��'a �fw>4 c, �,".f' eu s`zN.e a 3 € � INK r` �� ,� s � •�x ' �' � ;� z�' „ F� ��,� >.�. •��'a, k' Rom,, z.° �'�ta*. > n ",: ..r �.:. „'•f> ,f�p< ^, 6 ::-.t #. 9'• r gymn a� .i : ` A To Awl, -t?0020 «..,� y,,",,,,:.; '>,•,,,a.' a,,,,�a,,, ,.,,, ,,,,,, ,,,,,,, ,.>„",,.�> g „�,g °rya°,°z:,•" ��<'�s �9' r'} 'fir �,� jell, �, 3�� 'r � � ^° a�, •�� '•••�a "" s.t , �"�� '��`^��'.;; €��r,�„�: ��S�s . <., .j` i va�g d ..xz•`; +, . d,a,-, �� r.�:"`�s; m> ,':'g..�t;fia' s �..�.. �'.Y K�=s ,;��.• �... « :«a,.-0 Q'."'$�, a.<:k �; a'3 �� »,�'•' _A°' ,h ... ,' ,� 'r .� 'i .. ,g �(6•�� `e� .-';-.'"^�- .., s-vi=:34— - �� .,� ate «k• x„# .€x, � �� yr� r � ��" . .� r -Y - .. _, . , - ff ' a • x,' .., „ °..., „ ° ....,.... .... . - ., :.... ..- ::.: .,, '. ..:.. ..... .... ,. ,..., °.... .N .,, w ..,, ..X ... ,,. a .. .. ,,,...... F ., . .,, ..... . x.•,..,,,. ,,, ....a.., w.. , ,,,...s ..., x, .,,.... ° d .,,,....a%....,...< °.,,, .,...x° - b - ,:rah £.. w'� � ";, .ate & .,re'a, m•' .i, ,�,,,, 1'. , e4� _R tea•«.€s 5,i'.i °`°�� '?', �' �..'"w=.:,,' .= •• °. " '>'... `F '�:, k, '�,"`"�„„�' �," .' ..0. <.4, ',a{.•+�M�l'q'� ,`�. �,°=e,.�;. '�S>; ,' k� �aR', .;. yas„ _ �>, ., sa•; OKA An AN 'nit, \h^. (+„ „m,. `'n , k <,�;;' .' �, .i,. a r 8 JE,t",a,1.«y.yY „,�, i, ,k,..,'(}`�a n i ,' a y, t' ......,,, -'z �- .a ,"g',..:=„"e �. r .. �,q '�y i• ' ;.i�\sp4i }Syrrl °,, a y �,,, .,- ' f �g•'kii S GaY 3:Z '� �b ay „f ( ON _ '.�-Fa':da'�` .fit^, �;� "[;. •� a � ,�°, k�' � . oil .Yw >Y,,� � h i <_''�z s �•:.<_,+;. :«;, d� y' ay'' ,,. ;, :ln ; fr'p.^z: .a',.+'� t.' r .c? �'•, .ss 'Qy'' ` "f°''-�` 't� 'f. w�4 '! .$. ' >e;f�an-.'%,het: ':;'" i,�' �i`,x a•��;r.._: •"'e,F�. "!' °=8 { y ,��'.:�5 =?g ,f; �r;•f,if' 'ate«:;' g�A�s.�.,F:�;'�a ),�. "a�` "`' .`3ay. a, "I Y Y:-, ' »s `z�z„•' � '�,j>�::. �' < .. 9:' t�3 -:1' �'��" u�= 'xr �• >p', •. _ . ". E'ew._< •�+s a�• °r f 'a'e� 'a. ,,,� ,�4t' Fi`e4� i„ =sb .at, .�•..Yy'' .'\� •!- '�{ »�' S ��'�'i. -, =e }M P , s „H"la '�i ny')u •r' Zk �Aa'$4'4�„ ( ^$� y^,��&4'x"{ 4•"#' 1➢''.$: VIA SAP :" K11 ; ' �" '. `�° • :tip ^."3,'° _. � ��_'. R`, �-' P a-%aP�A','•e' ,5:�='. .'$i';.�' `'sxi'�,•, 'F�;, "a�g, ,yam•. �< 'e'''" f ' "•P `:.. ^rq �y rfi' k �.- >?: re.zt'; ..,., : , is f .% = • • ', r � ��g �,�' �., - ff ' r.W 1 z, • e ; , ��!, ; a. � < .',? E i` ea g „;�.. ",:,b ,� a,•va,;," i�a;;;', . a'<=. '� '^ ,,,.,rr, �.. rr'„ .. '-«y � „ � � .&,?', � .<'g x ,�.,, ,' 8 :i. s 4 �'. '�yd3. g Y,: w✓z, '� F�,_£ h„��'}^- �' Y '„�' aC;' .»,„ �iA%' f„ (y�i"Ei'��iJ �a'��A9�n`eYra �>y.: :.: �..S��f�f; °�,� %'' a �� ,µa � � "��.�. " � �� {�='r. � • . � s,; + a st,''3'.,'t�? e ,p s , XN a e �m�", I rx b r Q. '-a. -_ .Y- •=.3° °k 'a YY.+'E f t S ,fad .�f.i.'�`.' " VIA.. `•%"' « - •'fit �'e -� �*" ,,,€., ,, , � � "�: ;? . ' r �-;, ` xd e,�.�, d r�"."' ',,$.�'s "=�• ,„ ,p's '. a" j1'.' Win `Sad"'', r>aa < ° : a.,•"ate` y „<,.. .g g rah ,a', j. of :d f r"<,� Z, .Y fv�a, 1 r Ar p ,a Fw'ncaa„w�,,,�„,,,., ,ta*, "•,, 3'aA.�`•°^ ,,, edu`.�3r„�....wr e. €`, ,, ,,, ,..". w;.,,, ..,, ,. ,�. ,: ,..,,a„, �,.,:°eA o."..,,,.„: ,.,.".,.,�„as". 3..,, ,»ssa k. '... ..,r .,w rn,,.,.....b...."...,',r.L b)°a.&`a..,ea..d �?,,,,,, ,,,,,,,, "Y.'dduk:'�io'..a pi WMA R. 11 � „a•'z r: .j 1a, r Y � .� � t „a.,,, a FgR �', .x.r ,�, „�,E�a a,•. f„ -, � ,, :.' - a^y�� . eg ;z IN #aJi: �..,,.,,w.„at..1f '{:. �ta.,»?r,)�z„°,:. Via, :<<1,....ebS�.d>f�.`�ia»'• ,.:r Fa: •, I Cu"u, W-7,14-I'lAtt"!, py, . ........ . . . .......... ..... . . .. NN 'g, ij��A 'J.. rQ I �v ot�- ��°'�' ��",;s; a .ir"�ri MWIMIN too vt, ins Iff 77 ";jz N� , , MW , , _ .� ,a lay. .. �.' > S> �g.,i •„a:°, `{ 1°• f 9a m � ° � � #g•,� r f ® � �,y � - t ia" r>c�h ��# a. 'S �"�� aY.s•#t fib„ fir, ,< % �'' r ',,•>°$4a,.^ .a,• •', Y '73,' > a :r non" = t 3," .g :>d. -hy ;• ; ",i r:•a>. € s .. i.. i . _ < .fir^ .. �, ak7 ' � <s ;'+a••n <L;' ;'�.- ', st r' 3 "� �.�','�`•_ 3 ,.n A ... ... _ � f - . izx., r' .at .,,, `rtd ' ..� s,`,i.},' . `s. a, ,_ ,•�,,•=•t• f�'td,'„,, f ia 3y �T, `'^ t f g '5 < O„ � ` HHH � 788Y 6x y, r f t >n'g.,t `V:�:�ZI":� i„','#�.', .t- �a�:�#>p�r..23�re• �'$">a>, 55��s^e � tl.�?t gq;: ° t Yq7 $ ��i � ° �_ z i . x�., ,�,.ai .R y °�� P'`.'.'1.t. �, ,tv3x'�3=,. °@$; a,F M•,', t�.: i'. 'S @y° ,�. •y= '4;• '° .t',•f = '�1 Y., ••% "•i/ a�`dr �'8> <'�, •'•� ` it �• .� 'k uC. ,i , 4� ti=i4 r,f,'.+3. � LL �'�`�`, ,`� yy @�•'•4 tt ",. &�-, �.,'€ .a, t.€t' , ,r,; fj •4s�S .i FjLg i'- q, a,, b• „� :•a S _ 'r, ' '^ a$'>.�.s; _ 'P al,�'• } 9�=� •r, .,t:: F � i,, =.�E". ,=r' Ya P ";' . &`. G f �'•,,, ;aM ', � ># y •,+y..:' Sps° ",�: ;y,`• � '� F � `.7i. +`t na� ..�•E, X ,a , .: ��''' ;'•�•a • t'�a t'�' ,r ..�'• �. � 4. ;S.' t.. •M� ' �� , ' a •, �. ,,$$ 'rt' p., a^"1,� £ 'Fx.h ,t=° ;Sa •;�i':"tk a.=aE;#� �.riki t =7 �€.�,,r.:'�:, � �d i r�� =,k: '.'F.�'••c �� i, •.._'�"' '' �`s.<"'d�dd �a ;:?�;{•'=a; `4v ,'J r ...� • K •'i ,i3 =..F! •� = lY?T a L ° •;'�i '# � f a�Y' y '�� .� a.i+^'. vas :r�§• �t.'>•.� ` nx4� Ye': r,,.. .:��;sr�'m q'r`°.}}++ ,Y `S. ,.. xk!`..t a.,'> ,a• .d 1,.0 ,, :'i:*a •`j sr� .£gam#. 1; .e, ,;r��?% ''L" .e rat"•,:°., '^* `sr, •°4`' ta >' •f.;" 'Du3 = 'i,`°� .'r } r i >s ' : 4 ^£,r p4y :s;> • t ,� �'s 8 ''' w ,: - ";'*a•. . § f'. ��•t 1. °°,5°, i`x .. #S. �r4 �:' `yq: ii;=P:'=�„Fs ;: �> d> F".tA!,. �8 s�, .i.=�. .i "".' 5�" \y '¢^� y i 4° �, a<i i "yi..,� #, e E. •„°; •; � . �'y ',• ;�',{ � t9?'< ';F�• .s t�•.a::' T'?ad'°sy $",c. � �, `$'f j ti� 3�: �.�.,y +x:: �.t .: �„'> ��„ ` �.,v' .4�;".a" B;' ;'=F , f <, t `4'' i .£, , ..t:' " Tf .ti a F �?•`• t t'�4 yT ' a r�':;: g,, i 4.,.. �•;: ;' ` Y.. `'_,:.;:, r�.; r'r;?a, .>, s igR. `' ,+ a7 y�r �;� ° ,; � •�P' a �.Y �,d"�� wt, .,�-'=8'"+�' ZQ ;� �>Y `�#x d''S•�.e v;5,.... ��t k '•x>' �� _ frp, �• � ', Z'�,� a9 tF. � e ,i. �, t� ,� .•� y � tr �;,i�t; �a �� >`»�•,;," �a �, i ."� i,'�,a� L � .�.x,. �, rC�,Ev� �'L.. 8 .a.". � >� !. �� 4g '�$��•°S*.= �Ya'�}z. �, 'Y �i.8�� s"�_>�,� �, �"`"�M�` a'$ja°,'. �y3`+`i, ��yy a�° '�a�� .'x,�x�'M'. x,� %..� ., :a, �•.°" ° �, '�s �'•� R � i�F � ��af. "�at�F � i> .� ri,�,z�;> ,fl��, �� •��:^� t" uw a .,c`�.�—� •a= a � �"°��Z.; " e r: > ,�Y `�•\; �• a' ��'° S"Y ��:. y °�,a �S ''<sa> `k. .,ki4. „• € ,{ �.,, z <`r 1 < }� `>� , i`sg .;! B''' .S � { rYh '� h *� .� ,a� _,, � �`t`•,., ky ac:;i �•.. r#' i �, X d: ', ''t$.•�'+g}F xa%) i'1' 1 i��>x '-'., �!. ¢^i; ,A{' •�.'A"�$'t < Akan s' „y. .;fie "T +. X°N Y< 4 �•'f..""6','"" m.. •x a: - '.;%�„ ,-.z. . . . . ,. . . . . . . . . . . d �� d 2� �� . " .� � � � .�. , . \ �� /\�� \� /� :�� \\\��\ _:i:�ev�� mw Note to .File Photo submitted on disk by. Mary Glardon at Match 22 ,2011 Planning Commission hearing on behalf of Janice Cader-Thompson. Photos 1 — 15 dated December 27, 2004 and labeled DSL. : - f : - - hp Z .... - 'i"4 .l %, .� ,; •rya ,,� M•,�:g, ., a ., s ,., �, e': - ;;: p ,.,.,.e ' € e 4'?'e€:.s's sue= '^'-��.�g '�,;y}`'.; :"Qe";�:>„4':��,'"tF�'>'�°'�,•,.::',,;i'9a.;s�;,:�,ka�,€• �Txuk 9;,.;°��:.,rg� °Ee�',�.�qs;0,I.z'°'',, �°.a•F. .' �°g :h. ..? ,�, rt. ,.€tar.;;�,. �,;<.,.7� >>c_„:4rA k' ,,.i 8'°edr�;' ,e, ,.�E: ,-z.a ,r°5 t,�.4"a• ��„„„'4 ap.cb ? 1°>,, .; 'R`�i,F�•.FY;@" �p:,> l'�; •.js:i a �''°�b <;x4't.? �,� � �s :'f , i� ((`,' �}�ii ` .:,gi .�.•s �. a � � tt :., u �� p, `� h �`�1:t�4• °<��."' ipp:« i�}f {� i ��' k' �'�@"' .Er.S•�, 6.' :YF}. E Lf# H�°;� s 8'j ; S• E' 't:,4• '�' `�tri ab L as .<Y, r, s di t ��' �,, '�a€a •,q+-�,,ad,r., a� n�� ., t•^�,�';ari'#' •''' �: � � 4< ��` `y s'�„ s' a, y. $r `^"� n�o� d „�� ,, �•'• ,, t„ems ..;.P'�tw�a:a".wSaebfsiid spa a • f. t'' 3 .: f�"�"• .g s ro ¢¢ -fit 2 i NLM ., as � 5 .. � MON j Y i y1j • p 4 '�� a E `' ,.rya/, .: , 0""," 3/ vi t 'id t I ��'� v t _ a v• s