Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06/15/1977A.G'E N D A PETALUMA CITY PLANN WN %C.OMLKISSION ' JUNE 15 , > 1,977 ti SPED ._ , IAL MEETING;' 7:3` P M, CITy couNcii CHAMBERS CITY;HALL''< PETALUMA. CALIFORNIA . ' The Planning Commission en'courage's, applicants oz:. their rep.resen atiwe to be available at, the•,meetings• to answer questions, no:. agenda ' i -stems need 'be deferred: to a later .date'due; = -to a,•:lack .o:f pert inent., inf`ormation, , PLEDGE'. 'ALLEGIANCE. T0, THE. FLAG ROL`L' CALL. ;+ Comm. Bond . Daly ...,- . Harber:son '. Head ( Horc'za Popp Wright . .' STAFF:; Ronald Fe Hall, P.l.an.n ng Director APPROVAL OE [ MIN UTES,' CORRESPONDENCE: CONS ENT'CAUNDAR: ^ Reins appearing- on the • Consent Calendar' will . be eons dered t tie routine by the Planning Commission and will be enacted byt motion,. • °There will be no separate discussion-of -thesel items. If discussion is= d'esired', that -item (or; items) will be removed from the Consena `C,alendar. A. Manuel Pacheco 1: Hearing to :evaluate the_:,Environmental Impact. E 14, Evaluation/ Questionnaire for -a proposed four -plex to be Site De'sign.Rev ew: located at 415 Kentucky Street in an R =M -G (Garden Apartment - ResideTitia -, l'). District. 2 =.: - S'it'e Design Review consideration for the. project. B,.. . Williams!4 Aguirre Site Design °Review % .1.- Site .Design Review• - consideration for the proposed Final ;Map : subdivision, Consideration of the Final Map -for the ,proposed . Miwok Manor Subdivision consisting of­ 103 lots fpr . single faintly: units to 'be .located on; N. Ely Blvd,, near ';Monroe Street. C. - ` Casa de Arroyo, Unit :l ' l;o Sine Design_ Review consideration for plex units . Site, Design Review/ to be constructed In Casa' de Arroyo Unit .l , • Final 'Map: located on Lakeville- Highway between Casa Grande.. Road `and the e^xten_son of •Narth McDowell Blvd: •21. Final Subdivision -Map approval for Casa de Unit 4l.. D Alderwoo :d_ Subdivision Final Subdivision Map,:• Final 'Subdivision Map approval for Alderwood - Sub-••• division located on Ely Blvd,,. and Washington. St. VICTOR'NAGEL- Site lDesign Review o,a series of fences. to o be f_ berg �, Site Design Review cons trusted at 125,0 Lind Lane. PETALUMA '•CITY;PLANNING,.COMMISS JU NE 15 AGENDA. ' MARK _HAUN (D; &M AUTOMOTIVE .:. _ L Public .Hedtingl_ to evaluate they Environmental REPAIR E I ' "Q;, EVALUATION %' `. Impact. Questionnaire ?for a -> proposed automotive USE'PERMIT; repair shop located in a C.H Highway' Commercial' }' District:. - 2. , Publ c Hea,'rng td. ider a Use Permit', app,le:aa:.ion; for the pr:o,:je.ct located, at. 210 F Street: JEFF PETERSON -E . Public Hearng...to evaluate:- Environmental. 'EVALUATION /USE PERMIT: u Impact° Questionnaire, for a prop`ose'd 'of fice `suppl:y Warehouse and wholesale es`tabl shm&it, to be. located at 3,06 'Petaluma Blvd North.. 2. Public. Hea'r1ng. to consider a Use Permit Appl'ica -tfon for the project: ADJOURNMENT;:_ WILLIAMS' & AGUIRRE'= Walt Williams, deve1o:pe,r for the.propos;ed Miwok Manor SITE DESIGN ,REVIEW / Subdivision, stated- the" 'f ' igures: submitted for the FINAL MAPS residential allotments last year 'were realistic. We would' to build a. two bedroom model with two bathrooms that wild -,, .be ti e' lowest cost -hou`se in the city:: He did -not want to`build. twenty single- family M I.• N U 7 PETALUMA CITYP.,LANNING COMMISSION JUNE 15,• SP-ECI ^ t MEETING" 1 P.M. CITY CO a CITY.-HALL PETALUMA,.'CALIFORNIA .PRESENT: Comm. dja1y, - Harbe.sbnt, Head, Popp Wright ( *Arrived '7 .r :;35 . ABSENT, Comm. Bond, Horcza STAFFS:'. Ronald: F.' Hall, .Planning Dire&tor -- , APPROVAL OF MINUTES: None.• CORRESPONDENCE: ":Mr. Hall indicated that the -request-by Ken 'Zamvil to appea'1 parcel map conditions for <a proposed two lot split at: 82'5".Bod'ega Avenue would've brought back to the Commiss•ion for further eonsidera- tion.. Also, the staff is "working with the. app•licant,,, -Saverio Di Tomaso', to ,,.. _ consider a four lo.t - %li r. lo`a property s t for c.ted at 835 p j Bodega Avenue,._ An appeal, will J possibly be carried to the 'City Council to require a 43 -foot half street width section. r CONSENT CALENDAR Item, B., �Willi:ams' & Aguirre,, was removed from-the Con - €' '•' " `I sent Calendar. The motion was mad Comm. Head, seconded by Comm. Pounanimously. , a • D. Motion was carried. ' ," to approve Items A C nd `` .Agenda Item A. Manuel..Pacheco,. Negative,Deelarat on and Site Design Res.. 5.x463 approving a four-plex to be - located at 4 -9 1 Kent_uaky Stre`et:, Agenda Item C. Casa - de. Arroyo Unit 1, a Subdivision Map:, Res:. 24 -77. ' Si e .Design :Res. 5.454 for duplex units in Casa de Arroyo 'Unit 1 located on'Lakeville ' Highway between Casa Grande Road and the extension of N. :McDowell °Blvd. Agenda Item D. Alder-wood Subdivision, approval of .'Final. Sub'd'ivision Map., Res. 2,5 -77, locatea..on Ely Blvd'. an'd East Wash- . ngton Stree.;t. WILLIAMS' & AGUIRRE'= Walt Williams, deve1o:pe,r for the.propos;ed Miwok Manor SITE DESIGN ,REVIEW / Subdivision, stated- the" 'f ' igures: submitted for the FINAL MAPS residential allotments last year 'were realistic. We would' to build a. two bedroom model with two bathrooms that wild -,, .be ti e' lowest cost -hou`se in the city:: He did -not want to`build. twenty single- family -2- Petaluma City Planning Commission Minutes, June 15, 1977' WILLIAMS & AGUIRRE- low cost ! that might not sell. He preferred SITE DES=IGN ,REVIEW /` ., going with 5,0 houses with.: one model and diligently'_ `• • FINAL MAP:,• trying. to sell the one 'model. 'He did port agree to (Continued), building+ 2,0 houses that 4tight' riot 'sell. :-.,Mr. Williams stated, - ,smaller houses are - not:aelling ;on-,'the. market. The price of this house-would possibly be in the 5 mid $40,000.. The person that needs this house•can`t::a- fford'it the person that can afford the house- doesn't want:.it•. Comm.. Head suggested he 'b,uild- one' house and see: if, the market.,, would s=upport: this "house•and -the remaining 19 ic:ould be,. ;on .an order - basis,; Comm. Popp ,stated the should•be cautious in their determination as - we do - not want'•a:blight..are'a. where houses will not sell: Mr. Williams stated whatever price the house- sells for' he would -build as many of this, model as p,oss Vle. Comm. Wright. explained that •the developer wanted to build thei first 50 'un `ts and,'thi.s 'would enable him to determine what the - 'market wo:uld''be'.' on thi particillar °model home. Mr.. Will "ams stated that wit the frst,.50 hous there will 'be ,a, co=uple of: smaller models, within the f,ifty.. Realistically,, we would build on all the .lots at one time.,, and an completing the 5',0 houses before the - rains,. Comm. Wr gh,t..stat`ed we could.,diave a question_ here -n thee. , integrity of the allotment system -,a the allotment was governed by the , proposed ' low cost housing: Mr: Williams stated the allotments were as requested. and he did not know points 'were given :for low . cos=t housing. Cr should be given so a developer would know are given for:.ow cost housing' projects,. Builder=s have'. no 'control on -the, - price, of houses: Mr. Hall. stated that there' possibly is .no rigid condition where "a; developer would have to buld••all, the homes , at one time.: It is the, intent -tha-t there.would "be '20 -low., prriced "homes at the, end of construction. Mr. Williams co guarantee to tr and - mmentedhomewould sell these homes He .did like the going.�up and be it is bad for the country; the problem is - nobody is -at. to do. anything , about - - it. , We �will� build, ;fhe •model and will, bui - ld as many as we, can sell. Comm. Popp moved • to approve -•the - s "i•te - design fqr , the .,p ;rgposed "subdivision .with •conditions ;of approval as :recommended by the staff and concurred with the; - - by Arehite "ctural and Site ;Design, Review Committee .w 'th the. following• changes: Condition, l . should .be reworded,-to read,: The applicant? shall con ;s!truct a fourth distinct housing model• -for which points, were originally awarded through-the allotment ,procedurer. Three ('3) different exterior treatments of, this model .shall be indicated. _on = plans' -and submitted' :to . th:e -Planning .Director. for' review . . • and .app`roval prior' to -the fiss.uance =of •the: last' fifty (50) building permits. Condition 2 should, be'._r'.eworded to ;read: All three (3) var,i- atiofts, of .Plan ;2 shall be,imp.roued with an additional roof gable over the left front, extension. of the building. Condition T A - minimum of. (20.) single- family, two (2) bedroom;, lower "c.os:t housing units.'shall- be constructed..aa proposed -by 'the, app "licants during the �- -allotment.,pro,cedure and -- as•requi "ted by Condition #8" the Tenta=tive_ Subdivi- sion Map. ' Th "e :applicant shall provide "proof' of' �sal:ea.price - and' buyer' upon sale of;, each ; ot.said units,.. The sale . price ;of said units. shall .be ad'j`usted to reflect the past ra=te of inflation and significant casts adde d t 0 the •develop -- .. ment -by the' '.City. "The,establ rate ;shall b °e determined by interpolating the q4atterly rate;.of ; inflation as established for single- f=amily residences in. the Bay t Area by the Bank of .America in. their: publication entitled Cost Study Standar- -'ds for Sing -le- Family Residences in the San Francisco. Area Signi- ficant. costs • added • to- th& by •the City shal be totalled and included, in the sale's price •of each.-lower cost- .hous•ing unit as ,follows: -2- Petaluma City Planning Commission- Mfnutes, J I une .15,, 1977 WILLIAMS & AGUIRRE, Cost-O'f _,maspnry wa required by City :(minus) cost of AD S DESIGN'REVIEW/ fencin g -or d P o s. ed by -the applicants :for. the FI14AL ' same area as .-V Ijthe� masonry.: (plus) Cost of well (.Continue improvements, not including the cost -;o.f well site land` dedication which .would , - - ,have been required_.iy;Se 22.7.1301.4,'oaf the Subdivision Ordinance (divided by) 103 Housing Units.,. Provide after the: ,construct on .50 uriits' 'if 20 1 units are not sold the developer should -come 7back to the Planning Commiss1onJor review. The motion was seconded ,by Comm.,,,,Da:l, _Y, AYES 5 NOES 0 ABSENT Comm.;Poppm ved recommend ap proval of the Final Map for the Manor Subdivision to the , City. -'Council. *: The• motion, was 'seconde4 by Comm. Daly.' AYES .5 NOES 0 ABSENT 2 _VICTOR NAGEL� Thi's item was withdrawn by the • •applicant. SITE DESIGN-REVIEW: MARK HAUN (D-& '14t.; 'Hall - explained the '.request by Mark Haun to allow AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR)- f6r a`h,.engine repair and rebuilding, transmission E.I.,Q.J.EVALUATION), repair,-tune-.ups, suspension .repair and brake workshop, USE PERMIT: to be located at F " S tPAe t . The 97.1' x 2 00.0' site -is by two structures, Tomasini Plumbing and the subject structure." The building ,is of corrugated tin construction and access;�to the property would from Petaluma Blvd,. South or Second Street. There will be f ive . p'A r king spaces located' at the tear of the building. The Public Hearing 'to -,consider 'the Environmental.Im0adt Questionnaire was opened­ -No 'comments -were - ,off ered -f rom, the audi and the Public: Hearing was tio­seA: Comm. Head moved to direcr Planning, Piret�tor to,prepar I 6 post a Negative Declaration 'for 'the - projett;. The _ was seconded by � H ' I AYES 5 NOES 0 ABSENT 2 The Public Hearing, was opened to .con the, Use -Permit. No comments were offered frob•thEi au'dieii, c6 and the.Public Hearing w closed; Mri Haun explained.the-heater and,gas - pi . peshad been removed:and the sheet rock and ,electric a 1 pariel to installed. (Comm. Popp mbv&d grant the Use Permit to allow f6fan-engine repair and rebuilding transmission repair, tune-ups, suspension repair and brake work- shop..... The mation was seconded by Comm. Daly. �• -AY ES_ 5 NOES 0 ABSENT 2 -3- Petaluma City Plannin'g,-Commis.slon Min"utes, Juhe.l'5 1977 JEFF PETER 1 'h' ell' r. Paterson foan. ,SOY -,- E,. 1 . Q � 'Mr Hall,.exp al t e reques t by EVALUATION/USE, TtRM office ,supply wa . : 1­;ind'-w - a holes' le: establishment . to be" locatea at -30,0 Petaltmd Blvd,. North.• The 3 square-fooi building be used' as a ",dild wholesale, dis`t- ributi*on point - for statio'n ry, And offi .9'u es. pl e The Public Hearing was opened to' consider the Impact'Question- naire— No 'comments were °of f e.r f rom the • audienc&-a`nd the, Public Hearin& closed., Comm. Harb'prson moved to direct the Pldfttif-ji -prepare and p ost , a g E�irectbr o� Negative Declaration for the proje-ct. The motion was seconded'by Comm. Daly., AYES 5 NOES 0 ABSENT 2 The Rublic Hearing was opened-to consider Permit,. No comments were offered frJqqthe,audience -and the Publit, 'ffedfing was. closed:: Comm. Daly moyed•to grant' Use Permit tol allow for, an- Supply Ware- house and les'ale - Establishment,. The motion was seconded by "Comm'. 'Popp, AYES 5 NOES 0 :ABSENT 2 AD 'There being no further business, the. meeting adj ourned at .8;,15 P..,m;