HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06/23/1977PE-T U N MA, CITY PLANNING"tOMMIS,SION JUNE 23, 1977
ADJOURNED' - MEETING ;;- 5:00 P.M.
" CITY •COUNCIL• "CHAMBERS, CITY HALL PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA
PRESENT' Comm. Daly, Harberson.; H'ead,•Wrghtj
ABSENT l `Comm'. Horcza, ' Popp'
STAFF': Ronald F. Hall., Planning Direc . , tox
Fred E'. Tarr, kssociate=Pl'anner'
APPROVAL! MINUTE$': None
ENVIRONMENTAL Mr. - Hall - explained that when th6 actual proposed document
DE`S'IGN"P,LAN was first brought before the .Commission it was called ,
(1977 1984) the Environmental D'es- gm Plan (197 °1984.) . Since the
4.
(cont ' d)r format was changed by the Task ''Force Committee,, ,,he ,name:
was,also changed to Int.ermedlate Range General . Plan
(1977 -- 1984). The EDP-is actually the growth management
strategy . It. dictates- ,the: direction an'd amount, 'of- grow;th will take .place in
the'next =` years.. We' feel it should carry the name -that was - carried in the pas,
so as. 'no`t to create 'confusion[.
After a Jb.rief discuss-lon' It was- the consensus o•f the 'Commission= that the document
be entitled the Environmental°,Design Plan (19-77'- 19.84)'
ENVIRONMENTAL •'DES;LGN PLAN. (19771-1- 98.4 )
The following : comments :and recommendations',,.were .mad'e:.to- the Environmental Design
Plan
Page '2, ,Item 2 '(3rd sentence) ., Delete will :`be annexed .to Petaluma in a manner
that wl -1 assume that maximum _local control can be
e stab 1isbed
Changed to, read - s. .Areas which are slated to become urban
in the future shoul -d_ be stud led . _for._fut.ur,e annexation_
Page 2 Item 2'a (2nd sen,tence')'3 .-..:'Delete .:: ,beyond ", the- greenbelt
Page 5 °, Item, ld Gomm . „Daly rstat'ed the City should take the-position to
support.low' and moderate 'income housing•. Comm. Head
stated he-was-not in, ;favor of an increase. in the tax
base .
Delete:: Item lid ind:lamend to read: • The City shall
take an- active - roll ri providing SenorC.itizen and
lowland :•moderate income housingm -
h
2
• _r
•� �,�, ;yam
_ . !^ . <� _ i c• . is , ' :, �,
v -.
PETAI*UMA
"CITY ''PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES- '.:J,UNE 23 107
Page�'•9;
Item D': h Delete entire_7 item which relates to" mobHe` home p'atks,
et e.
` Page .10
B.a:: Comm. Head. stated that the' `WES'T !Sector would be, more
appropriate;fo.r,convenience °'services -•and :food;-markets.
More emphasis should. be put on having some of these
.. . _
. _..aft '
convenience ser.'vices .: tte w.es't sid_e;; this would ''be
one way of eliminating the.traffic,p;roblem•;
Delete second sentence = wh ch .reads, `! Although 'the're.
;ap,pears to .-be � a Tack of 1 markets' and other -con -
venience ,services to adegiiat provide .for ,the eastern
population,; tfiose,unimproved lands which are' designated
for neighbor hood'commercial'us - es on EDP ° should fulfull
this` 'deficency
Add: the; above sentence to C: River Section.-
Page 1.0
•G >: River Sector _ Janie Warman Re' development?.Program,
- requested' that the following.items,'of Redevelopment. Goals
and Objectives be included- -in: the. EDP;:
Add :.. Develop, a.. marketing•,,:stra'tegy ; w i th ap.p•ropriate
economic pr .whereby downtown° Petaluma �s. 'ab`le' "
_t0 increaS;e_ retaoil sales -and seryi Seq.
Page 11,
'G,:e. Dele•te. from first senaenc'e in conjunction with downtown: -
businesses. >
Comm -. Wright expressed concern. for the pxeservation;;•of the
airport;. It is jiust• the right- size airport for, a town
a'his-s •ze. The Commission agreed that they 'would 'like
to have the airport .remain., buts:• not -.be expanded. ' COMM.
W, "right them. suggested .the `following: -
Page 15,
Greenbelt & Linear Parks- - •Ch'ange_.parag -r -aph 3 to read: The a1igriment of the
greenbelt = p'arku should: riot be nf;luen.cgJ.:by the fact .,that
residential;, development has, extended, beyond, ,Ely 'Road.
The .Petaluma Skyranch_ d;espte the proximity of
development., should, not be.•`.re'located. Appr.opriat uses_
.:_., in .the flight payth; .such as• a'. go f .cours_e and other-'forms
. .
Of lopem space.. shpuld `br developed to the •north -and south
:.
and. the aT'gnment of the ,greenbe'lt remain as previously
Fred. Schram., Chamber._of Commerce stated we are• tr°ying
cure industry to Petaluma and. tan' iof. indu_'str es that
have priva•t:e ;planes, 'have..medium. twins which this airport
can accommodate.. It'wo�l'
;.• d seenr� natu_ra'l that we retain
this airport,. • We are the only •place -in the bray area now
left with any major land-masses commercial and
2
• _r
PETALUMA: CITY "PLANNING •- CONfNfIS�SION ..:MIN.UTEr;;..,JUNE 23,, 1977
and industrial development.
Comm. Wright' d d.not: thought of a .
developer p:;roposing -:to. develop property within. the
gr,eercbelt . area..... Comm._ Har-.b:er- -s'on 'stated it should
be made clear that a ,developer will. ,have to dedicate
{
some - °:land to preserve -the aesthet -ics in the area.
Page 15, _Greenbelt Policies-
Change...paragraph• -1 to 'read: Whenever a development is
t
proposed on :property- adjacent : -to the -_area dear :gnatea.
for H g:re,enbelt._., the. developer should., be required to
dedicat'e.land or`.a private greenbelt in satisfa'c;tion of
the -'open space acid park% dedication.
Comm. moved to
direct the Planning- Director.. to - prepare and post a N'ega.tive
Hat ,brson
_ 0 n on the proposed Environmental Design.. Plan - (197 1984) - based - _ :upon the
conclusions of the E,.I'.Q.
and - the; -assessment.;. The. motion•. was seconded by
Comm. Daly.
AYES 4
NOES 0 ABSENT 2
LAND:USE•'MAP AMENDMENTS
age: Items- 5 -6,. 7 , � �8�
- Comm.. Harberson recommended these items be deleted.
,
Page ; "2, Item 11
- Comm:`Head stated the. proposed freeway•on -ramp fo:r
Rainier Avenue is not. f* -at this time:® Fred
Tarr stated we. need a basis.to'•- establish rationale
f;or;dedica.t on but that the- on- ramp°coul:d be placed
on -the updated General Plan.,
Recommended- - Item...1:1 be deleted..
Page 2, htem 12 ..•.;
-. -. Comm., ,,Wright d d. no:t•: favor, :the proposal for low cost
``housing rat-Eas�t. Wash - .ngton - -andw Ely Blvd N; he felt it
..would not . 'convenient for a!Senior Citizens-complex.
Mary Lou 'Lousalot, stated . the.px6per,ty is for sale .as
.:the, church. -does not propose to ° build a cho.ol at.
this location. Mr.. Tarr stated 'there is a developer
_ who is interesvted. in this property and •is in the process
of: obtai.ning •HUD funding a proj ect:.
'Et was consensus that the proposed Urban High
- Density Res'ident'ial °remain.
Page 4, Item 3'8°
-. Comm. Vr :ght,,suggested-.tha..t. a! school tie, planned - for the
I Street, Sunnyslope Avenue - and - -S;unnyslope Road area.
I
Mr. Hall explained that - -i.n order to justify a school
statistically, 800 homes -are needed'. I was felt that
another school in this area-would not- be.necessary,., c.
until the EDP was amended to provide for more''hoines<
Recommended this item remain,Suhur,ban -Low Residential__.
The Planning Commission 'also added a forty -third (43) change to indicate the pro-
posed Chileno Valley area Regional Park.
Comm- ..Harbersoh .moved to recommend. to the City-Council the adoption-of the
Environmental'. Design Plan,-( - 1977-1984),..Text.with changes and Land Use Map as
amended... ,Tl e� _motion was seconded by Gomm- Head,.
AXES 4 NOES r 0 ABSENT 2 s
ADJOURNMENT - 'There being no, further business.,-:the
dt` 6:30 p .-m
i