HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 07/19/1977F _� __
REGULAR MEETING JULY. 19.,, 1977
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS' 7:30 P.M..
CITY HALL PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA
The Planning Commission encourages app icants an-their, representative to be
availab at - the !meetzn' _ to - answer quest�i:ons, .s,o that no :agenda items need
'.be defe=rred to a later date,'�du . a lack of p'ertinentt information. "
PLEDGE'AALLEG•IANCE TO THE FLAG
ROLL CALL: Comm Harberson :,.•. Head Horciza .• Lavin
Shearer ; • . Waite '". Wright
- STAFF:. '. Ronald F:= Hall,, .P, arming: Director
APPROVAL-:OF M, NUTES :,
`CORRESPONDENCE:
' . CONSENT °CALENDAR
MAREE S'
�MEAGHERS~ S >te: Design Review..•of' a sngle dwelling to, be
located at `61'5 'E - Street.
DAN JONES E'; h.Q t Evaluation and Site Design Review• for a proposed
warehouse ".to "be - "locate "d 61V`the`southwest'corner of
:Dynamic Street and" 'Transport Way.
LAWRENCE SEAL- E.;T,.Q:...' 1= ..."•Rublic Hearing.. evaluate- , :the.Environmental Impact
EVALUATION /VARIANCE Questsonna -ire .'for" ar "proposed' Automotive Repair Shop
"USE - PERMIT: - to -be 'located` at-326f, Street.`
2:. Public Hearing to consider a•variance request to
allow for a rearyard setback 'to zero feet.
. 3. : Hearing; to , consider a Use Permit' application.
'for the' project..
KRAGEN -AUTO' SUPPLY= r,. Public Hea-ring, to ° evaluate .:the Env1ronmental Impact
E ".-I..Q- % .::Questionnaire for' a. , proposed auto 'supp'ly store to
REZONING'FROM C -N and _;be 'located at - the� northeast corner"of *Ldkeville and
M-L' - to "C =H '(HIGHWAY . .... East Washington' Street..
COMMERC'I9L) /SITE DESIGN 2, public Hear,ing..to consider. an app::dAcation to rezone
:REVIEW;= „ . r'th `property from. C �4 .and M =L -.to - C -'H , (Highway Commercial)
3 • Site Design Review of the: proposed project.
PETAEUMA �CTTY. PLANNING= ,COMMIS
--ION :TRULY 19, 1977
.AGENDA
,
WAVER = "I IECKHEFER --
lo,. "Ph'bl c .Hea -j" g.:,to ' yal_cape,.,�he:.4Envir,onmental mpa ;ci
"Eo "1.Qm ' EVALUATION/
Q es- t-ionna Vie. to�.:a; proposed °aho,gpsiig" center° to be
USE. PERMIT. /;SITE
located at the northwes,t''�corner7 d'f Lakeville Street
DESIGN REVIEW:
and =East • Washington Street.,.
2a., "Public Hedging -to, consider ,a; Use,.. Permit application
for °the.•project.
3. Site Design Rev ,116w of-'the, proposed : center,:
ROBERT; Po. HAGER- -.
1: Public °Het =ring _,t.o evalua•te, V.ironmental' Tcripa.ct
,... E ,ALUATION/
E: i Q
Quest gnnai e• for .propo`�;ed eo' ia1 rehab ":Ili:+ anon.
USE; PERMIT /SITE
facility ° to '4'e - located at 501 Petlt'ina - Blvd : S,
"DESIGN.'REVIEW":
,
2a: Public Hearing to consider .a Use. Permit application
for the project.
3. S1 Design review of'-: the p''roposed prof ec't -.
PLANNKY'RESTDENTIAL
Public Hearing-to consider the adequacy -of the draft
- 'SUBDTVIS'IONS-EAST QFi-
E.I,,tR prepared by�Del'.Davis- Assoc a.tes -.f,or the
ELY BLVD S- DRAFT•.
re -s den't.ia;1 > „prezoning.. of - -233 • a'cres- .1otated east of Ely;
"Ee;I R., EVAhUATTON:•
BItd South.
SONOMA- COUNTY :REFERRAL-
Expanded :initial study regarding an ;application for, the
QTJARKY :P12ODUCTS,. INC. / -*
rezonln`g of 42' aces . fr;om the -existitg 'A -1 (pximary
REZONING /USE,, PERMIT:.
a:gr. cuftuxa.l) 'distri'ct zone to a proposed M -2 (heavy
industrial) .:zone, and'."u's& permLt a.ppuoval, to allow f'
�.
a...newtton-s t.e a- halt..batch. plant an'd continued upgra ding..
of .the_. ex-is ting•quarry .opera•tion on .the subject property .
19 21 -10 and 1'1; 1.9F- 22 -12 and 27) .
GOMMYTTEE, ,•
Histo re &.`Cultural Pr;eserv:ation'.Committee:
REPRESENTATIVES'.
M I N U T E S ' •
PETALUMA CITY - PLANNING COMMISS11ON
REGULAR R - MEETING,
CITY-COUNCIL'CHAMBERS, CITY HALL
PRESENT Comm•. Head,, Lavin,, Shearer, Waite,
JULY 'I'9, 1977
T:3,0 P.M.
RETA-I]UMA, CALIFORNIA
ABSENT::� Comm. - Harber son, HoT Wright
I
,STAFF: Ronald F. Hall, P-lanning Director'
Fred E.. Tarr; Associate Planner
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: The minutes of the,meetitg of July 6, 1977, were
approved as submitted,.
CORRESP None.
Mr. Ha"ll, introduced and welcomed the Planning
Commi'ssIoners..
-1-
It the abs . ence of Wright and -Vice Chairman
'Hor�qiz&,, Commissioner - Head was unanimously elected
Acting. Chairman.
QONSENV-CALENDAR
The motion was made hy °Comm., Shearer, seconded by Comm.
Lavin to -approve' Items 1 and 2.. Motion was carried
unanimously.,
Agenda Item #1
Marees,.Meagher's;,'Sitq Design Res. 5.474, approving a
single family dwelling to be located, at 615 "E" Street,
family
with Con d ition 46 added to read: The parking space
abutting "' Street pha,11 be, deleted and replaced with
lah
Agenda Item. #-2.
Dan Jones,, Negative Declarat±b and Site Design Res.
5-475 approving warehouse to'be located-at the south-
west corner of Dynamic Street and,'Transport Way,. with
the f olloVing -m0di Ica ion&:
Condition I should 'be reworded. to. read: Lava Rock
shall ,b& used to cover the office sect-ion roofing.
Condition: 2 - The second sentence should be reworded
to read: Parking spa'c'e - numbers I and 8 shall be-ade-
qtately screened 'with laAdscaping material.
-1-
PETALUMA, CITY PLANNING COMMISSION-MINUTES, JULY, 19,, 1977
LAWRENCE BEAL-E.I.'Qw Mr. Hall expl ined the request of Lawrence J., Beal to,-'
EVALUA,T'ION,/V.kR�,1-.AN(ft-`/` consider an automotive buil-diAg''in- an M-L.,'Light
USE'PERMIT:; Industrial District, and to allow a reduction in the
required rear yard setback f2rom 25 f eet. to 0 feet for .
property located near the, intersection-of East "D" and
Lakeville Streets: The site is -triangular in shape with 3 f eet of f rontage
on,a One -w ay service Yoad which runs parallel to Lakeville Street: on the West
side-of the, main NWPRR tracks;, and is 4c,ces,sible via this one-lane road leading
fr Street 'southeast to Jefferson Street and Lakeville Street, A • 6-fo,ot
screen f ence, is, required along, the rear propetty line on each, side of the build.-
.ing, and 3-1/2:f.o6t high screening in,the 'front . setback areas.
The.Public Hea ' ring'.to the Environmental Impact Que�stionnaire was opened,.
Mr. 1�411 indic -ghat a berm would be located, along the frPfttag6 road:. Traf`-
fic flow, on, "D` Stxeet could create- a traffic pr6iblem, particularly if traffic
is generated. onto the :frontage ioad,and.access to the property - from Jefferson
, Strbet will not: be permitted.
Bob Koenitzer, representing Mr., Beal, stated this 'business- would be a'lo.w traf -
I ic generator - with four to eight cus'tomefs a day d4ld approximately, three employees.
He does not foresee -a need for.a traffic : stuay.:fo,r the. project.. He deemed the,
berm-requirement unnecessary asit would only collect debris and,paper.. Mr. Tarr
explaine there, is d, 3 -112 foot screerf 11 ftg- re%uiremeht f or any park lot. having
f ive , spaces, or more,. The a is to make the area more attractive. There
sh6tild be some: screen, between. the cars and the •S'treet�and t . his 'berm would work
in conjunction with.. the 100 year storm e1eVat Comm. SheA irl'aicated...:she
liked-the idea of a landscaped berm as, it would soften the area. , She questioned
the .width of the one-way frontage road,.- `Mr: Hall explained: that, two cars could'
pass but it would - be & tight situation: A limited traffic study would indicate.
the potential conflict of vehicles attempting access to the site;. Mr..Koenit�zer,
anticipat the daily-averagebf clients s and. customers using the frontage road
would. be 20 vehicl:es.. The Public 'fteldrinjz was closed.
Comm. Waite moved to direct the Planning Director to p.repar,e and post a Negative
Declaration based on the -finding, that the use.,w.ou riot generate enough traffic
to cause an adverse environmental impact; The motion.was seconded by Comm.
;Shearer.
AYES - 14 NOES 0 ABSENT 3
The Public Hearing toc6n.side 'a variance'reques.t. to allow for a rear yard set-
back to zero feet for `the project was open,ned•.., No comments we�ge.�of,,f6red from
the audience, -and the public hearing was cl6sed..'
Comm Waite moved to.grant the varla ce! based on the f our flndihRs- indicated
R ,
in 'the. staff report., 'The motion was seconded by C6mm. Lavin.
AYES 4 NOES 0 ABSENT 3 •
la
�4
PETALUMA,CI -TY PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES,' JULY 19, 1 977
LAWRENCE, .BEAL- E.I,.Q. Comm. Waite. questioned if the 3. 'lt2 foot berm or screen.
EVALUATION /VARIANCE/ ing is a x equirement of the Zoning Ordinance. Mr: Tarr
USE PERMIT explained screening - is required and could consist of-a
; (Continued) : combination of a berm and landscaping... The.Pub`lc..Hear-
ing was opened to.consider...the'Use Permit. Mr. Koenitzer
stated'the 3 -1/2 foot berm with.planted shrubs growing
,above the required height could cause -a sight problem if they are. not:. maintained.
He suggested a 1 -foot berm with appropriate - landscaping as a means of screening..
Mr,. Koen tier felt that Condition ;K gives the'Flood Control Agency permission
to do as they want and as such could up, with :str ngent:- restrictions. - ..None
of th'e- •e.ther properties along 'Lakeville have. this 10 0 year. .flood berm in front
of their,. property. He questioned what the Sonoma County Faood Control.'s..plans
were fob, this area? -Mr. Hall stated if the "applicant 'feels the berm is in con-
flict with the requirements:of' the Sonoma .County Flood Control, an appeal could
be made] ,to, the City Council to Ynodify this condition,. The Public Hearing was
closed.
'Comm. Shearer moved to grant the Use Permit, ta allow for an automotive.
shop subject to conditions 'recommended by staff except that the 3 -1/2 -foot high
screening could be •a combination of berm and landscaping.
AYES 4 NOES 0 ABSENT 3
I
KRAGEN AUTO: SUPPLY- Mr. Hall exp'lawined. : reques=t of William, Elliott-,.- rep-
E.I.Q. EVALUATION/ resen'ting•the'K-ragen Auto Supply Store to - rezone -the
REZONING :,FROM C -N. site : f -r.om Neighborhood Commercial and.Light Industrial
AND.M -LfPTO C -H to Highwdy" Commercial for a, auto supply,store
(H•IGHWAY° COMMERCIAL) /. to be located at northeast corner of East Washington
SITE DESIGN REVIEW,: and. Lakev "lle_..S;tr:eeta, The .21 -foot high structure - -con -
tains 4, - square, feet of floor area and covers 24. per -
, cent; .of the: s1te The Zoning Ordinance-requires a' ten -foot
setback, for the 'rear,. yard, but the applicant. indicate'd';a zero ! yard setback. Access
to the site is provided via East Washington and Lakevi Streets.. <:
The Public Hearing was o,pened•to consider Environmental Impact Ques .-tionnaire.,
Victor DeCarli: that cars a;pproaching site from the west on East'-Wash"
ington could create •a tr entering the,proper.ty from Eas't.`Washington
as the street narrows at this, po,i:nt,.' 'Hall explained that the.pair o"f. double
lines on East Wash ngton,'Street should deter-eastbo;und motorists from entering
the property: Bill Soberane`s expre'ssed°_ :c'oncern on the ,effect the rezoning would
have on 'his. property and if hi's taxes. - °would be increased. Mr. Hall stat °ed -_":tax
.. at the most would, be very the commercial uses are already
there. Taxes could,,, increase,, however:; - based on normal appreciation. Tom' :.Hargis,
Assistant City'Engneer, commented that existing striping of. a set of double
double yellow 'lines -,on East Washington. should make it impossible to.
..a .left turn on ,.to the site,.,, 'tie legal-: :movement would,.. be 'to' make a left turn at
Lakeville Street. Motorists cannot exit the property,at Washington Street and.
make a left turn movement. Ron Evans, associated with Lucky'Stores, stated the
M91a
s
PETALUMA .'CITYIPLANNING,COMMIS'SION MINUTES, JULY 19 1977
-
,
KRAGEN AUTO. SUPPLY= property would a 6- foot.:11 gh block wall around' the
EVALUATION'/ rear and interior' side of - the - property which, would tapet"
Qat'
REZONING FROM - C -N to 3 ;feet the' entrance way He suggested a 'Right ..
AND °M -L TO C =H Turn Only:" sign b "e- post'ed: at East. Washing" -
(HIGHWAY.COMMERCIAL)/ ton Street. Dra2nage; plans will be _.drawn .up for the....po
SITE DESIGN REVIEW j ect win-. which° dtainage will not,. -be channeled - onro;
(Continued') :: adjacent pro'p'er °ties':® The hours -of: the store w .lY� be from
9: 00 to 9: 00 on weekdays, and 9:0 to 5 V) , on weekends . '
B'asIca.11y there: will be an estimated 1000:'ous'tomers per
week and an average of from 7' to "8 -carts per hour added to the present .traf°fic ..
Ample on -site ,parking will be' provided,.
The Public Hearing. was closed.. =
Comm. Waite, moved tb direct the 'Planning Dir °et.,tor, 'to prepare and post, a Negative
Declaration for, the project.. The motion -, was seconded by Comm. Shearer:
AYES 4 NOES " ' ABSENT 3
An application to rezone an approximate 17,850 square "foot area, 1oda,ted ;at "Lake-
.ville and East Washington Street from C -N and M-L to C -H (Highway .Commercial)
for an auto supply :store was briefly reviewed:
The ,Public Hearing was opened to the proposed C -H ('Highway Commercial)
•
rezoning: No' comments were offered from the audience and the. .Public Hearing'
was closed,
Comm. Waite moved to recomzriei d approvatl , of the.°requ'ested C -H (Highway Commercial)
rezoning to the City Council with specific findings. The motion, was, seconded by
Comm. 'Lavin.,
AYES 4 NOES 0' ABSENT 3
The -,site design considerations for - project were •discusse'd. ; ° Comm-:.Lavin moved
to_ approve the site design f'o the proposed - .auto. supply :store with conditions of
approval as recommended by the staff and concurred with the -Architectural and
Site Design Review- Committee with the following change;
Condition -# 6 should' 'be reworded to read- Two (2') additional fifteen (15) gallon
Ginnamomum 'Ca_mphora tr ; ,'ees sha be planted in area's' indicated. on Ekxh bit A.
'The "motion was seconded by Comm. Waite:.
AYES ..4. 'NOES; • 0 ABSENT 3'
WAL'TE'R KIECKHEFER. Comm_. 'Waite . moved that consideration of the' Walter
E'.I.iQi EVALUATI`ON,/ . `' Kieckhefer project be continued to t!l e Planning. Com-
USE PERMIT/SITE mission Meeting "of August 16, 1977 'The ,motion was
DESIGN'REV_IEW,: seconded by 'Comm. Lavin and carried unanimou -91y, '
=4- -
PETALUM(1 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION.MINtJTES, JULY 19, 197'7
A br1ef. recess •wa 'taken°.
Mr._ Roenitzerasked permission to show the discrepancy
in the parking space requirements of the Beal project
and the Kragen' Store, He explained the
Zoning Ordnance• one parking space for every
AQ0 ;square feet "of building space for auto garages.
Mr., Koenitzer` requested the °Commission to direct the
i s`taff `to review' the Zoning. Ordinance and make revisions
i, as needed partieularl "y deaYing eait_h king requirements.,
Y Mt, Hall s.tated 'that the parking requirements -have not
often been.challenged by the applicants If should
occur direction be.given :the, to
reevaluate the requirements "R Comm Head asked.;that.the
request be ha'ld over until, the new members of the Com-
mission had an-opportxnity to become more familiar with
the Zoning Ordinance,
ROBERT PJ, M Mr , HAGER- 11" explained re:quest'by Robert Hager represent -
Mr , �Ha
E..I- Q E g the Sonoma - County Alcoholism Services to locate..a non -
USE PERMIT /SITE residential : - a=lcoholism :'treatment center - at:501 Petaluma
DESIGN REVIEW: `B'lvd. South;- The °b.uild'ing is currently in"use-as_a....mult,i-
family resid'ence:�and has a small warehouse in the rear yard.
The bottom p9r.t1on: of the building is being used as..'a rental
unit for two, families and they will continue :to be:`residents of the property_. This
could make the parking and. traffic problem more severe..- Eight parking•spaces will
be neces.'sary for the pr- oposed use ;arid" only four on -site spaces are proposed.... Ade-
quate parking could possibly be obt.anned expanding the parking lot into.the area,
coverbofthe existing si :warehouse , or ' by"leas ng space for employee parking within
eet
e:. Access to the -pro is by way of "G" Street, 'A letter
had been. received, from Agnes, :"Tuttle..saying :she did not object' to the proposed
alcoholim center but did object to`•th'e' lack. of parking.
The Public Hearing was opened to consider the Environmental 'Impact
Bob 'Hager stated the- two apar;tments - Ion:':the - ground floor are occupied by.
people , who -ar'e aware that the: ,on —site parking -is for clients of the center - .only.
'More off - street parking could possibly be made'aValable in the immediate area.:
"Thel center is funded on a 90 /,10 basisthorugh the Alcoholic Act, Senate Bill
9 rom, State .Funds and 10% ;f.rom County matching futds:,
Comm,. Shearer stated there is ,presently a traffic problem in the area. and the four
additional .parking spaces will. not be' adequate, Mr, Hager 'comment'ed the.center
wi_ll clients from, parking : - on Petaluma Blvd., and encourage them "to park
on -site 'and on "G'' and ltd Streets;. Comm,- Waite indicated, ;that the warehouse and
apartments were rented by the owner :_the property - and would' not be.under the
control.of the center.' Mr. Hall stated is available parking'on the- . s't_re'et.
and •flier&. will possibly be a higher of street parking available': due
•; to the.limited usage in the area 'He suggested the. staff evaluate and review the
parking situation and that the Commission, adopt a contingency clause for the pro -
ject The Pulilic °,Hearing was closed.
PETALUMA CITY 'PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, - JULY..I'9, 197`7
ROBERT P. HAGER- Comm. Lavin, moved to direct the Plann:ing..Di .ector to pre-
E.1.Q. EVALUATION/ pare and post; a 'Nega.tive Declaration, for the pro:fect and'
USE'PERMIT /S1TE. that the parking situation be evaluated, by Planning.
ntinued
Staff. . The motion was seconded by Comm, Waite, 11. (Co
AYES 4, NOES 0 ABSENT. :' ''3
The Public, Hearing was opened to consid,6v'the U .t'.� Comm..`Waite,...s uggested
that due to the: residential us:e ,of the .a two .year review on the. usage .
of the project be made. Mr. Hager' stated the_ hours, of: the center,-.:would be from 8:06. a-.m; to. 5: 00 p.m.' Monday - through Friday, _ and. There would`.,be AA'.,Meetings• in
the evenings Comm. Waite moved to `grants the Use 'Perm •t to. for a social
rehabilitation facility subject .to- the condition that - the. Use - permit: shall. be
,r'evie by the Planning Commission following the f'ir'st. and - second year. of o'ccu -'
panty relevant to access, parking,, and use con's'iderations, The: motion was
seconded by Comm., "Lavin..
AYES` 3, NOES 0 : ABSTAIN' 1 ABSENT:: - .3
'Comm. Shearer expressed: concern that. the parking'- was inadequate - ands: that.. the re-
quirement for foqr additional, parking. spaces was` - not suf fic ent. Comm. Lavin
moved to apprave the site design fox t,he.px°oposed project with conditions of
approval. as recommended by the staff and. conc..urred ,with by the A - chitecutral
& S'it'e Design, 'Review Committee with-the-following addition:
'thre'e (3). anonths following the' nal date! ,of occupancy, the
Planning ,staff shall review the parking situation And report .!any
negative impacts to. the 'Kann n;g Commission,,,
AYES. 4' NOES 0: ABSENT 3
PLANNED RESIDENTIAL Mr, Tarr explained that an, evaluation of'..the,'Draft Eft-
SUBDIVISIONS-EAST OF OF v.ironmental"Impact ; as, prepared'. by'Del
ELY BLVD iS, =DRAFT to be ;made concerning,•the pro.po'sed, pr'ezoning _233
-
E,.I,.R.. EVALUATION: acres, . from , .County' Agriculture- Zoning, to'Cty:Residential_
Zoning, for' land.s`,:1•ocated along the ' t -of Ely :Blvd.,.
South, and also .f''or: a 44 acre parcel of land which lieS'
between the project area and Casa` Gr° 04e'' Road. The first- year's allotments would.
provide for 276 single - f=amily" units. and--16 duplex unit "s for the :1,9��7 - 78' - construe
'lion year. The informational document was rev'ewed. various individuals and-, .
comments' were received from the° State, :- R'egi;onal, County and .focal.• levels;
The 'Public _Hearing wasp ' opened to, .consider- the Environmental Impact R'epo,rt r.` Mr , .
Tarr :indicated that th& Federal Aviation Administration expr- ess6d: concern over,
any residential area that may b,e? 'b'uilt which is to 'be -• Located -- in..: the,
area or bordering• an airp'or;t 'd I uec to the- potentiAl problems 'which. ca=n- involve
flight safety and a 'r-.craft noise-4 - '.Mr;.: Dav s. s`tated General Plan.
residential usage near the airport; The air ort is es' of concern un r.e'1a.tion s ,
g P P'
to the airport are safety, naise;.and- - ,:land use. planning.,
PLANNED RESIDENTIAL Edward .Pack ;. Edward Pack_. Associa . t`es.,..`Acoustical_.` Consult
=
SUBDIVISIONS -EAST OF ants, : :hired" by. the" elevela,pers and - .involved - in- an- - inde=
ELY BLVD:. S DRAFT 'p noase.study involving the proposed subdivision,
E.I.R. EVALUATION
� { stated, the ep
fornia Dar�.tmen.t_ of Aeronautics is._.con- _
(Continued) : cerne'd._,abott ther;,nose , surrounding 'airports, .. The. CNEL..
(.Community Noise - .Equivalent Level) :measurement:.. scale
(peculiar-, to California) is,: used;.._ 'In the EIR_and_ in
the response from the FAA' and the - California. Department-of Aeronautics'..no• ref -
erence was made to their owrr.stand`atds :. -. - ,60 - Db is the :reco.mmended.maximum:..for.
certain residential- uses. The - _ Ca.'iiforn a. of Aeronautics.. uses: 70 - -Db
as the °threshold . "Therefore there - is no se problem; , based -:_on __these °.:two.. - stand-
ard_s Hei .indicated. thee- is' no rrois:e .pro'blem. actor. ding -Ito..s ate _ standards- and
no:.nolse mitigation measures are necessary. `Mr._Pack preserited-numerous.statis-
tic_s taken from civilian type (a irpor s indicating that - ground. ai•tcraft accidents
rarely, take place,
Van Iogan; of -f•fel F h hcia , btated .the. indicated there musa.-be:a._ 200
clear fl ght' area,. Present, regulation -.of FAA indicates that the
be shutdown. This discussion be made. a,- part,. of _the ',EIR. showing_ .lt.- is. a
'subs'tandard operatiQn,�. , He fel -t' t.he; word`ing.- "clear- - zone ", is misleading in_ the
report and should say "approach zone,. ", He also indicated that the existing run -
way length will allow , for single propelier� aireraf-t only,_'-
Mr.. Pack' stated - the FAA had received - a- copy of_ the, proposed 'Skyraneh_Approach
�- .... .
Zone Plan twhich ind'irated there shoud nat ',be any height. ,obstr.uc,tions - within a
certain area of the p'1•an but the FAA Office; in Burlingame had returned a memo
which indicated that they had no wit 'h: - obstruct- ion':ciearance. -
Lucy Webb; realtor, 'stated• the= •aIrpott is on 'the market to be sold to include
the land•and buildings.'_
Del Davis of Del Davis & Assocates,,,.stated the Plan indicates
residential development near the I difficult to predict
where an ,air c=rash might occur. The` main- concern - in the EIR is the potential
for airplane crasheg,,, where the risk -much greater in it clear zone; however,
hazard can also be found .outside - the - flar;ed cone:. The glide pattern is - under
FAA control. The, land use is ,a local concer,n'. and. the FAA expects the. local
agency to handle this., H.e further indicated that the Alderwood Noise Study was
used for: referenee.:to indicate there .no-'noise: problem;
Comm. Shearer moved that the Draft E:I,R. for the Planned Res_- id Subd'iv -
sions located east of Ely Blvd,... continued' to ; July , 2:6, 1977 at 4:00 p.m,
The motion was` seconded 'by Comm. Waiter
AYES 4 NOES 0 ABSENT, 3
-7-
PETALUMA �CITT PLANNING COMMIS.SION. MINUTES, JULY 19 1.97;7
sc)NOMA, COUNTY REFERRAL- Mr, Gray explalnd,d that- -an. applicatio for. rezoning of
iQUARRY.PRODUCTS, INC.% .42 Acres f rom' County 7 A=l, (Agricultural .District`) to
REZONING /USE' PERMIT- f County, .M =2 (Hdavy. bistrict)
and a Permit
a Allow, f 6.jc an asphalt plant and fid - e x p anded
.pprova to. . . - - .1 1- - 11
us,e of the Petalu.ma"Reick Quarry located.aldkng the -,s.outh.
Side of P.etalumA-.Blvd'., So uth-had been refer'red, to t:he, from the ,Sonoma County
fl
Planning-Department for review because of ;' its , its locat n, and .general proximity to.
the City.,
Mrs. Majors, 18: Way,; ,questioned the' proposed,zoning And, if, It would b 6,
for 4 heavy "industrial area. Mr,. Gray stated. the C I ounty M . -2 - :zbning,. is the only
zoning that will permit ,'a plant, subh as`' this to operat&i -- A'ne'sident living - south
of the pr objected., to t - d ust- - an t and oil' odors fxbm t,he� plant.
Mr., Walt Bemis sitated the new , plant - has - .t6`abide by str`ic�t Ba-y,,Aik , - Quality 'St
ands. -'The ignition and, exhaust will be discharged internally:. Mr. Hall stated.
that objections to this pro;pogal-sh6uld be directed to the ouht
r-.,e C. Y.
the County's 14 conditions 6f 'ap regard ng'the . Permit were p resente d
l
by John .Graham :f rom the Sonoma -1 County Planning pepartadditional
ment4 An - coi i,
diti-on wa-s added by the City which pertains to annexation of the property to_.
the City.
Mr. Keti, K slo-f-f Quarry Products s that within the next two
intent is to remove the old equi m ,
gide the hill and replace it
with smaller", ,portable
e - =The ridge; .will be 50 feet, hi, - er -`h
t an the
batch plant' which should reduce the: noise `Ievel.,
Comm. Shearer moved. to e ndorse t-h e - ,re,z o n i n g of 42. acres, from Country , 4-1.. to
County 9=2 And a Use Permit to, allow fozrc leased opetatiloh of a tempoiary.
asphalt batch-plant. and ex-panded production with the 14., conditions as
r.edommended, "by the Sonoma'County Planning Department and the six conditions
a-s-recommended by the City of.. Petaluma-
.The motion was seconded by Comm.
AYES . 3s NOES I ABSENT' �3
ADJOURNMENT*l The
meeting was , adjourned to Tuesday, July 26, 1977 at,.
4,, p ijii.
Attest —' /f ':
A tape transcript of the meet i
,.available ,.avallable at the Planning Department Office:.
W
( --N
00