HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 01/07/1964lvieetl.rig #1b,
Piscal Year 1Vb.;
Jan,. 7, 06�
Re"gu,tar meeting of the Petaluma City Plann,ing: Commis.s.1on held on Jan.
a 7.30 O'clock P".'m in the,
Council Chambers, City Hall, Peta-
1
.9
I tima, Ca1: i or n' I a
PRE'SENT. Comm. Cavanagh., Popp., Stanley, G'atewoodo
ABSENT, None
Robert E Byrd,, Di r. of . Planning
Robert H: Meyer, City Manager
APPROVAL "OF MINUTES - the minutes for the meeting of Dec. 13 and 17
were Approved as submitted.
CORRESPONDENCE - th6.P'la. advised the Commission of an application
bef.afe the Sonoma County Department for their meeting of Janu-
ary 16, for a dog k6hne,1 housing 30 doqs (more 'or le'ss) on Thompson
Lane. M,r,. Byrd agafn*expres,aed the -need for better liason between the
County Pillanni,ng Dept,. And our Planning Dept',. (this Item'came to the
Plinnerv's attent ion `from ,,a source other than the County's notification).
Mr. Mathews., residing next' to the proposed operation, voiced his oppo-
sition to this r6q.u'est. Mr. Brod also , a resident in the area,
concurre with Mr6Mathews. A motion was in,t'roduCed by Comm. Popp,,
seconded!"`tby Comm. Stanl',ey'and pa-s'sed u that the Planner write
a letter to the Sonoma.County Planning, Department recommending denial
to be sent to Mr. Dean)
of said use permit (copy
SCHUMAN LANE - MAGNOLIA AVENUE REZONING FROM AN R-1 -6000 ZONE TO AN
ZONE, PUBLIC HFA-RlNG,, FILE NO._l
.Public h'e"aring for the proposed rezoning of portion of the Schuman Lane-
Magnol la I Avenue area initiated' jointly, by Dr'. Mohrman and the Planning
Commissip.n, was held at this time. Mr. Byrd , presented a lengthy staff
report Qnade part of• the permanent f,ile') which listed the justification
for the p6ropos rez.on-ing. ..Chairman ,Oat I ewo od invited anyone from the
audiencel''to speak. Those speaking in favor,' of the rezoning were-Dr.
Mohrman, Ernie 'Waters., Manual Amaral, Mr'. Rosasco spoke in opposition
t'o the r zohing.. ft. was hilt opinion that it woulld retard the growth
In said A�reaCand a,, hardship .dn those who have bought property for
developme'nt with the added jot req,uir'ement.. Donald Goodnight asked the
Commission how. -new;1"y annexed would be: affected by this, rezon-
. i , ng,.,,, The Director Informed him than aftneked terrltory auto ' ma ' t I c a.l ly
y
came I - ht 61' t , c ity with. An' R1-�10,.000 �de`s Ion but tha
-
-�Gomrri1s1v1on,, an ,A party could request a more iappropriate
q
.q y
Zonttna,; No; u-r were ratse'd �)Re's. Z1-64, recorrimendin to
17 - .11 __ 1 . I - t. 9
ng of s"al mentioned Intro duced
hei I ritit the vzll by Cotm., Popp,, s'econded Comm. Stanley And passed by mbers present
REZONING AoP;, 7 m1a12 19 FILED BY JAMES OBERG- FROM AN M-L ZONE TO A C-H
. ,Pub.11t; hearing for the pposed,re�:zonlng o:f A..P. 7-4 12-1 filed by James
. * 0 d by Chairma Ga
Ob 1
g,,, 'f an �'L a n ta aC-H Zone, was opene n tewood.
The Plann6r, gave ' a f�avora staff :report' whi;ch was made part of the per-
01-1 miner; ,
1 1, V_ " ' e -
' f-11e ' Thos S J, in fav6r of the rezoning were Robert New�l i
'Ave �sent,fhg, t-hg:!Uniloh� 011t_Cipmpany who It interested In construction, a
-
s: : ery ce s in
; the &�rOa Mr. Oberg,., Ernie Waters and M6 Amaral. s he
jjj�
IM
Jan. 7, 1964
Commlsstoners were also of the opinion that the rezoning to Highway Come
leroda1 is Justlf led. Will,iam Lars.on I'nquired whether the Highway Com-
'Zone In this area would be confined to 40 acre's as discussed
Irl� the formit,16n of the General Plan. Mr. Byrd informed him that
additional Highway Commercial zoning ma y e b. requ ested as the need arises.
Res, 2244 recommending to the City Counc-11 the rezoning of the, above
ment,Loned area,,
'sed all wa introduc,ed by Comm Stanley, seconded by Comm. Cava-
J r'. , presen
nagh., was pas
RES. 1-64 (REPEALING RES. 196) RES. 2064 ESTABLISHMENT OF AN R-1 -8000 zoNE.
Re s 1-64 ropeal'in.g Res. .19,6 .(which est,a,bl,ishe an R-1-8000 Zone but
n pu'bl-Ic hOLriiig had not been published 'as required by law) was
i,ntrod-uded by Comm. S,tanf6y, seconded by Comm,. Popp and passed by all
members present. The PLanner' then 'restated the objectives of the prom
posed addition of the 1800o Z:bne a:s outll in the staff report pre-
sented a!t the Dec. 17, 1963 Planning Commis's'ion meet.ing. No objections
were voided whereupon Re amending Zoning Ordinance 662 N.C.S. to
include 'said R'-i-B000 zo eras introduced by Comm. Popp, seconded by
Cbmm. St!dnley and passed by all members present.
1 .
-ART HANSiN, VARIANCE, 150 BELLE VIEW AVENUE, FILE -NO. V-1-6
The Planner presented the staff relative t'o variance application
filed by'''Art Hansen t . o.allow a, 4,620 sq,. ft. lot and a 42.6 ft. width
for property known as 150 Belle Vfew Avenue. In view of the fact that
the proposed lot split Is actually the adjustment of a lot line over
wh,l ph, a structure pee,sently is 1". and that said adjustment would
tr p�rpvlde a standard'sidey4rd setback for the existing structure and place
I't entirely on on,e,parcel and since no object ions :were voiced from the
atd,lencej9' Res. Vl,-64
approving the varl was introduced by Comm.
Stanley,, seconded by Cavanagh and passed unanimously subject
to the condition. :6nditio that no further variances be granted in developin'g the
lot.
RICHARD, S . L I E.B I
ION FROM PETALUn4 CITY
It was the unanimous. opinion of the C.ommissioners that a formal reso-
lution be pre,plared regarld4ng the reslghatlltrl of Richard Sw Lleb from
the , Planing �,Comm'i,s Ion in appreclati,6n for his faithful service on the
Commi S's f'on- E'lec of a new chairman and vice-chairman will take
plac e;:. at. the ''nest, re meeting on January 21, 1964-
ADJOURNMENT'
T h - b "
Fe,' ethg
me
b 's
no ti r, � e, r d Iness
ddJPur,n!ed1 -
to come before the Commission., the