Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 03/23/1964March 23, 1964 Special meeting of the Petaluma City Planning Commiss1on held on March 239 1964 at 12015 o'clock P-m. In the Council Chambers, City Hall, Peta- 1 California.. • Commi,,s8ionerz Cavanagh., Richards, Stanley. ABSENT.- Commfvsionerz Gatewood, Popp. STAFF-. ;Robert E. Byrd, Director of Planning., APPROVAL OF MINUTES - the minute's for the meetings of Feb. 18, 26 and March 4.,. 196 4., were approveA 'at submitted,. GOLDEN EAULE MILLING COMPANY., USE PERMIT FILE U6,- Public hearing was hel,d on a use permit 'application filed by the Golden Eagle Mill-ing Company - to' allow minor m�od1ficat to a non-conforming Industrial use in a Cl Zone., lbdat'ed, Alt .2 Petld'l,uma Boulevard North (for the construction of two clusters of's . torage bins). Mr. Byrd pre- sented a favorable staff report based upon the fact that the addition of .these bins, constitutes aminor addition to the non-conforming use and will not. affect the projected, -life of the st r ructue. Said report was made part I �,of the permanent file. No O'bj, . ections were voiced,. Mr. Dolph Hill. was present and clarif-f-ed the extent of the ,proposed construction. Res.- U6-64., granting the use permit, was introftbed�­by Comm. Stanley,, seconded by Comm. Richards and pas unanimously with the following , conditions ,, . (1) No variances or exceptions shall be granted in the lo- cation of-the proposed bins on the _ site. an d (2) a ;11 regulations of the Uniform Building Code shall be complied with In the construction of said project. "'STUART Cut. VARIANCE, FILE NO. V11-6 Var fance application filed -by Stuart Curtis to altow a 17 ft. rear yard setback 1:6�tead of. required 20 - ft. located at 15 Alma Court was re- viewed. The Planner presented a favor.able' staff *report (made part of the - permanent f I le) .- 'No objections were -voiced regarding the request,, whereupon Res. V11-64 granting the variande't, was Introduced by Comm° Richards 'seconded.by Comm* Stanley and p�is'sed unanimously subject to y I the condition that no further va or exceptions be granted in the developmeht of the parcel. FORTNER SUBDIVISION. NO 2 " FINAL . W. APPROVAL, FILE RES. ;2o �6 The Cbmmis,tion reviewed the -final map for Fortner Subdivision No-.: 2. The Planner read a report from City Engfneer stating-that the nap is cor- rect and complies w4th al.1 requirements 6f.t the law,.' The.-Planne,r .concur - red with the City, Englneer°s report, _x;rher.edpon Res.-­2,Q-64.., _eCLomrpending ,a pproval of sand map, t.o the I, ,CouncT.'was introduced -, I'b:,y,�.',PoMm. Stan- ley, seconded by Comm. Richards, and pass unanimoMslY`6 . MAGNMIA MAN OR 5U aD:IVISLION' 9 REVISED TENTATIVE MAP, F ILE RES. 21-6 _ The l, anner read a r from the City Enig,ineer relative to t Ile revised tent;at.ive'map f or Maghol i.a Manor Subdivision. vi Several exceptions to the subdivision, brd1nance .- were , listed in the report. Mr. Byrd recommended A a ova I I o . f the rev, , ised tentative map with the condition that the front yards of Lot.s. 1 4, 1,5, and 16 be located on the cul-de-sac and that. Lot p 16 be redesigned to have Its frontage on the cul-de-sac. Res. 21-64, I6 - March 23, 1 9 6 4 recommend,ing to the City Council,, the apTiroVal of said rsevised tentative map with tihe conditions outlined by the Planner, ,was introduced by Core missioner: seconded by Comm. Stanley, and passed unani-mously. DESIGN REVIEW WAS GRANTED FOR THE FOLLOWING- (I) ,Apartments to be. constructed at 416 - 6th Street (Pioneer, Hatchery property) by Fortne,r Bros,'' Motion was introduced ,by Comm. Stanley, seconded by Comm. Richards and passed , , , unanimously. Mr6 Huff, 624'- `F" Street and Mr. Warner 'X. Brewer, 4.14 - 6th Street (residents of the area) reviewed :`the plans also and expressed. their approval. (2) ;Apartments to be constructed at 410 Keller Street by More- land & La ill The motion was Introduced by Comm. Richards seconded by CbMM. and passed unanimously. NOTE , o In, brief report relative to the above apartments, Mr. Byrd ret,onimended in both. casts that low pItched roofs be utilized ln'�tead of the proposed flat roofs as indicated on the plans. ADJOURNMENT -2-