Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 05/06/196471ijet g ti I'S r 70030 . *I PRESENTI� ABSENT 'STAFF May 6, 1964 meeting of the Petaluma Planning Commission held on May 6 1964 ov�lock p.m. In the Council Chambers,, City Hall, Petaluma., Calif. tommissioners Cavanagh, Popp, Richards (Mrs. Richards entered the Council Chambers at 7,40) Stanley, Gatewood. None 'Robert E. Byrd, Director - of Planning OTHER OFFICIALS, Robert H. Meyer, City Manager APPROVAL OF MINUTES The mlnut for the meetings for April I and April 15 1964 were as submitt,td. approved CORRESPONDENCE - Mr. Byrd read correspondence received from the County Planning Qbmmlssion relative to a use peimlt applidation'filed with the 0 ' ounty by Marie M. Andersoh for a nic 'eetA'il­�-3alq�s store to be lo- B ted at 1"975 Old Adobe Road, P stated that a fi .Id Id tripjfndfcated this area to be shown as residential on the Peta- luma Area General Plan and, therefore, permitting a use as requested might encourage expansioh other comm6rciaR enterprises in the area. A motion wa s , Int.roduced by Comm. Popp, seconded by Comm. Stanley and passed - iir , .animo - tisly,' l e4�.iestin'c y requesting the­C6iifit * t6 denhy the permit on the basis that It conflicts with the projected zoning for the area. REZONING, N. C. JOHNSON, I �5 LINDBERG LANE FILE z8-6 'Public hearing was opened the rezoning application filed by N. C. Johnson - toi re'zone A.P. 7,­471-3 12 % 5 1, indbe r6 Lane) from an R-1-6000 Zone to -7i4 R-1-6000 Planned Unit DeVe1opme-rit. In the staff report (made part ,loaf the permanent file)' the Pla-nn . er ; outlined both favorable and �nfav6�rable aspects to the ,requested':e6z6hlng. -In es.sence, the re- port sta that, although_ . the site in I -quest I 1'6xi can best be utilized through planned unit development because of : the odd-shaped parce.l. and its close proximity to the freeway, " it was Mr. ByrVs opinion that the plan as priesented ProPoses'94 dwelling units, nearly three times the projected 'density standards 'and advised reducing the number of units -to 650 _W. Mike ke Joell, Mr. Johnson, and Mr Johnson,. both reiterated the reasons for the I.e. . the odd- shaped lot, proximity to freeway., etrc. As to redubing the density to 65, Mr. Johnson' Droc,sed..cd,to give a run dowh of square footage to the proposed R-2-3000 and multiple unite as presented on the plan and pointed out that In each*case thin lot'!§ize would be greater than the minimum footage r`e'quif ln-reply Mr. Byrd stated that this as- ..ppct of the request was not Involved since the neighborhood Is entirely zoned for i -2- P6000 and felt that by allowing double density for the pa the,Commission would be liberal. It was agreed by all parties concerned,to continue the hearing at the next meeting or at such time as a solution to the density problem Is solved. A motion to continue the'hearfrig at a later date, was introdu'ced by Comm. Stanley, seconded yComm. Popp 'and unan'Imously passed. Planning C6mmisslon Meeting May 61, 196L D. FER7_ACCA & A �,: 1lAR1ANCE,,_E1LE V19a6 he Commis ravlewed va application filed by N. D. Ferzacca & Associates to allow one parking .space per unit and a 4 ft. sideyard for a dista�nce of approxi'mately .50" re construction of a 7 unit aparti ' 6n'111- building to be located at 219 Bodega Avenue. Mr. Byrd pr t esened A favorable staff report (made part of the permanent file). As to the reduction on the required off street parking spaces,, Mr. Byrd ,meat i6ned that the area Indicated for"an Inc hosed play area could be ut f 8 or off street parking but f irst- priority should be given to a safe play area for the chil r zac children. Mr. Fee was present and p gave a brl,tf resume of the proposed plans for the apartments. Mrs. Barne t., owner of the property next, 'to the site,, asked Mr. Fer- zacca que ' l t stlors veative o the approach to tyre w e property. M. Ferro zacca anseredto her sat stated she had no objections to. the var reqaest. Res. %f19-641, n Ing the variance,, was Introducedj by Comm. Rlnsba-gds, secorided by Comm. Popp, and passed by all members p�re8ent subject to 'he condltl( that no further variance be grante& In the co�Istructfon of the new apartments. CHRIS KNUDSEN, ':IIARIANOE, FILE NO. V20-6` Z4 Y Variance a I pplication filed by 1 11hris Knudsen to allow a 3 ft. sideyard instead of'14 ft.. and 80 sq. f - t. ' overcoverage for the proposed dwel- lin ', A g to be! at 6 Ba ke r Court, was reviewed. In his staff P..eport (ma8c pant, of the permanent file) the Planner pointed out that tht smal isting lets (3,200 sq. f Is Impractical to build upon WLfthout ad,dl.tional coverage and 3 ft. set1back must be granted to allow a usikbia garage to be constiructed. (thl?, original home on the lot eras condemned and demolished) Mri Knudsen was in. the audience. No objecti i ons were voliced, whereupon,, V20-64, granting the vari- ance was 11 by Comm. Stanicy, §eczjnded by Comm. Cavanagh and passed by Pall members present sdb to the condition that, no further variances to granted In the construct ion 'of the proposed dwelling unit. MRS. MILDRED McNEIL VARIAIVCL, "ILE 61) The Commission. reviewed variance - application'filled by the Hansen Agen- cy (represlenting Mrs. McNeil) to allow excess lot coverage, I ft. side- yard and 6* ft.. separation between the dwelling and proposed addition to the garage. The Planner presentad the staff report, (made part of the permanent file) In which he recommended its denial. Mr. Don Uhr, Hansen the Hanse Agency, . was present and outlined the practical difficul- ty which in the va,riance request.. (existing garage too small for todaY cars). The Commission felt that sincp. the 6 ft. addition is - very minor in nature it would not adversely affect the neighborhood. Res 22- 1 , introduced by Comm. Stanley, , V� grant'l g the variance was introdu seconded by Comm. Cavanagh and passed by all members present sdbject to the conAltion that no further variances shall be granted in the develo,pment of the site. -2- Planning - .C'ommisslo, n Meet tig May 6, 1 96,E TI,ON Or THE, PETALUMA, AREA GENE'�RAL PLAN TO !NC.L.UDE A NEW Chaflrrmah Gat ewo6d 6pene _' he OdlbIicw hearing 're mod'ifications to the Petalux is xfic siding_ pi6�6sed near' major street and fre eway r" ercro5'flng) o ._ I.n h1t staff •r°ep0Y t the Planner outlined the following m6d fioat, ions to the General Plano. Relocate the new �r��s;��� prP�p�r�ed to �rntersect Lakeville highway, ad- jacent to t,he east t de 6f � he ��akes;ii � l� Interchange to the area where against the freeway. Indfl- cat e .,.rig ` aria cwoK ie t fl �f the view street with the proposed Faf an Relocate the K - & 1 =1 2- � ray.1 gh.b �ehood shopping center indicat�c a, {i6ftg the "props sea to the change in the se flow - "-, br.o E d - th-e - Ser l.ce and. `thoroughfare Commercial de <si gnat ior + of the 'Lakeville interchange to fill t, tie: vo'ld created by the relocation of the new street. Mr. %rrd fu t_her stilt"" i t.:hat I YRe . propo - sed Son6ma Mt. Road Freeway I.nte .an "g a �sv th '�i ernt Gen__eY& ' PlAh is' not: acceptable to - 'the - State DIVislt6n of "flighwayg "btit. - that arc 6drd .ng to Mrs Dean Lar- son ,� .Plandie,r 'WIt.h t,.h6 `; t,ay 6b..of H1 "gbw -dY the proposed new alb - 1 1rveet aria f�cecwa,y �1wre r Ir�g hay any ;xcellent. chance of ac- ep.tance by - flndIcAtion on the Petaluma °ea Cxenera.I . Plaa: _A _ "first,. S�te� t 6Y_d_�Td •reaue3�� ing its acceptance by the •Starve' The _t 't hie -n thd - pubIIc to express their opinioet reg t'din':g the hi6dxf ons 8.� prdposed'o .. 'Mr. Fielding Lane and Mr. G-ei -wI(ck Company, expressed concern because �k�_ �h iw on t.he Grehieta l P? an bisects the Ger wi k proper ty and tl at t, .4i ;hied ��ia`.a � go - on r�ecoTd as being opposed to ifr o By��., �� of ;e� trha� kie pa c�po�ed "mod - fIcat.ions as outlined would orifly ;ffe °�'. t die t reet i s�errc GId* Adoaad to tr°eet and that the` pr.epod strreetricl bisect t; Fie Gerri& property was al- ready pflaL�� �r�ief Plan was adopted. However, it was the consensus of - ojg h3.6h t fiat "exery consideration be given the Ger°wiok Company wh6l this mdtt&f 'is A motion w as made by Comm. Stanley-„ ae6onded b' G'6irim Pbpp,._- t",hat the modif`�icnat,ion be accepted as Presented by the- E'�,a nner - - acrd iia-ssed by the fol lowirng votte Ayes' 4; Noes-. l &o al e e�fut I6h f6 ma r6so Lill 'b:e exec'uted at the next meeting) Mr. . Howaf'd. Heg:�dhi' �irtiinerzteci on the success of the General Plan to da, A brief" h &ldi t the Central Business Di'sti� ic_:.t very�sus out.lyirng she pp.ing � en�t ers Issue. .J {� - GENE_RAIL REV; EW OE ZONING 0,kDI�NANCE - Pore - .Byr°d reviewed several proposed s i . di pan e Including a new defini..tiorn of o m acc:e s :ry tructu ;9 ,a a.I d�yard dimensio -rig, lot, coverage, and zoning sci edul:e ttgo.l a eifle,ht f�;P -'aft R I -91000 Zone. Following a brief d`isdus- s ior�, p b:I i'� hea. °ing for . _both the trop sed modification - to the Pet. *1 1611 at th g r � g g :field o n�May 19, 1964- `s e Genprafi Plan and thy. Zonln Or�dfnance �.ras. eduled fora �e. ne�e� re u�a� meeti�� to be ADJOURNMENT! ! the Chairman closed the meet lr?�g