HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 07/21/1964�r
July 21, 1964
ftegula'.r meeting of the Planning Commission held on July 21 1964
at 7 0,30 ovclock ,p',ms in the Council, Chambers,, City Hall Petaluma,
Ca.1 i f'orn is o
- PRESENT: Commissioners Cavanagh, Popp Stanley.
ASSENT,: Commissioners R Gatewood
STAFF Robes -t Eo. Byrd, Dir. of P ng
CORRES °PONDENCE
.35
Mr. Byrd read correspondence received from the City Clerk with regard /
to Res. 32-64 approved. by the Planning Commission which indicated the ✓
precise location for the major street and freeway overcrossingo The
letter went on to say that Mr, Crinella had a.ppea-red before the Coun-
cil opposing the Caulfield Lane Realignment route and stated the rea-
sons for his objection. ' In light of the ',above.., the Council referred
the matter back to the Planning CommIss.on for further study.
The Planner informed the Commission of two applications submitted to
t.he'Sonoma County P1ann'i:ng Department§ one for a used car lot, 26.02
Pet. Blvd. North and the other a use permit for a deluxe mobile home
court, 5303 Redwood Highway South. Both a�ppaications will be proces-
sed on August 6 1964 The Planner jAas r�'equesaed to make a field
-" survey and report his f'indi'ngs to the Commission.
SHELL OIL CO., USE PERMIT, .FILE UI2 =64
�.
J
c./ ,
Vice - Chairman Cavanagh opened the hearing for use permit ap-
plicatian f .ihed by the She; Oil Co:. to construct a service station
in a C -C Zone pro posed.t.o'be located_ at 409 & 421 Washington Street
and 140 Howard Street. The Planner presented a lengthy staff report
(made ,part of the permanent file) 1 i st ing both favorable and unfa-
vorable aspects regardi the proposed a , e but made no recommenda-
tion because. the present owner is an emp>oyee in his department
Mr. Cavanagh invited the public to speak., either in opposition, or in
favor for the applica.ti.on. No opposition was voiced. Mr. Dan Chrism
topoulos, She.11 Oil Co.- representative, showed the Commission a mode
of the building t.o be. constructed. Mr. John King al7so spoke .in favor
of the applicant stating thattwo older homes will be demolished so
In a sense this is'a form of urban-renewal. Res. U12 -64 granting
the use permit subject to the conditions stated in, the Plariner °s re-
. Port. and made 'part of the resolution., was introduced by 'Comm.- Stanley
seconded by Comm. Popp, and passed unanimously.
SIDE OF LIBERTY STREEjr BETWEEN, OAK .�
Public hearing was opened for the above mentioned rezoning Mr. Byrd
presented the staff report (made part Of the permanent file). On
�Febo 49. 1964, the Commission passed "Res, Z - wh- I ch recommended that
the above -mentiloned area be zoned to an R -1 -6000 di strict.. Because
the property owners appealed the decision to the City Council the
-1-
July 21., 1964 Minutes (Cont9d)
matter was referred back.to Planning Commission. Since the
,propetty owners did not approve the ' R-1- 6;000 'zoning, the only al-
ternative Is to zone it R-M-1,500 (which is the zoning of the area
adjacent to these, parcels). No opposition . wa's voiced., whereupon
Res. Z41-64, recommending the R ' -M-1500 zoning to the Council was
introduced by Comm.'Stanley, seconded by Comm. Popp and passed
unanimously.
ATLANTIC & PACIFIC BUILDING CORPORATION, TENTATIVE MAP APPROVAL,
FILE 34-64,
The Commission reviewed the tentative map filed by Atlantic & Paci-
fic Building Corporat.lon proposed to be located between McDowell
Blvd. the Freeway, adjacent to Monte Vista Subd. I & 20 The
Planner read correspondence from the Sonoma .County Flood Control
Distr!"ct and the City Engineer, both listing their requirements.
Res. 34-64, approving the tentative map subject to those conditions,
setfo r'th in the letters from the So. Go. Flood! Control and the
City Engineer, nginee'r, and in addition that street trees be planted on each
lot within the subdiv1slon. was introduced - by Comm. Popp., seconded
by C omm. Stanley, and_ passed unanimously by all members present.
Note: the above subdivision Is Included fn the Lakeville Annexation.
MICHAEL AARONSON, USE PERMIT RENEWAL. U13-64
The Commission considered the request by Micha ei Aaronson to renew
Use Permit U-11-63, t,o allow a delu'x mobil home court to be located
on A.P. 7-391-4 (formerly issued to Mrs..Lucy Webb). Mr. Aaronson
V' was present and Informed the Commission that work would start on
the court in the near f�utu've. Res. U13-64, granting an extension
of one year, was introduced by Comm. Stanley, se Comm. Popp
and passed unanimously >sub ject to the cond1tions setforth on the
original use permit.
RUSSELL PALLO, VARIANCE, FILE v28,
The C6mmiss•on.appnoved
setback f'or a home to be
duced`by Comm., Stanley,
1 proved). Mr. Byrd gave
house is 20 fl. Prom the
to the city.
Var lance V28-,64, t a 11 ow a 15. f t - frontyard
c,ons t ' tucted- at 301- Grant Avenue Intro-
seconded by Comm... Popp,, and unanimously ap-
an o , ral report stating that actually the
sidewalk but 5 ft. Is an easement belonging
_1
DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR PROPOSED SHELL SERVICE STATION
Pra.1 approval was given
Station., introduced by
approved unanimously.
0
to the design - review for the Shell Service
Comm. Stanley,.,,,s:econded by Comm. Popp,, and
RECOMMENDATION 'FOR ESTABLISHING ZONING D.ISTR,ICTS FOR A.P.136-09 -i6
The I.
,., CommsS1 O'n AugLust 4, 1964 a,s the date for the public hearing
to r elbbhst6er the 'zoning for the 'Marie Converse property. Mr. Steve
Cope' and Mr. McCarthy were present and stated they still intended to
3-1
-2-
"u
r July.21, 1964 (Minutes cont'd).
construct a - mobi l e home park on the site If the
approved and a use pe.r,mit obtained. (The matter
adoption of an architectural control section to
but the possibility of such an amendment is not
near fut ure).
a
il
R -1 -1500 zoning is
was delayed pending
the zoning ordinance
contemplated in the
RECONSIDERATION OF THE CAULFIELIa- REALIGNMENT ROUTE
On July 7 1964, the Planning Commission recommended the Caulfield
Lane Realignment route as the precise location for the major street
and freeway overc.ross ng. In view of the-fact that Mr. Crinella,
ownerlof the Monte Vista Subdivisi (effected by this route) ob-
,ected to this choice at the Council meeting.' the matter was .refer -
red back to the Commission. Mr. Crine.11a was present and reiterated
that the route would conflict with p;lan,s on f_ ile for the Monte Vista
Subd.� #3 and would also involve considerable cost for engineering.,
.redes.igning, etc. An oral resolution repealing Res. 32 -64, was in-
troduced by Comm, Stanley, seconded by Comm, Popp and'pass.ed unani-
mousl .. The Commission w J'l pass a, formal re.:soluti on recommending
Plan B" (the Caulfield Lane route) at the next Commission meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no.further business to come before the Commission, the
meeting was ad,journede
137
-3