Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 08/04/1964RUjust 49 196b 3 � ,Aegulai meeting, of the Petaluma City Planning Commission convened at 7 0 30 1 7, p.m. on Augus-t ' 0 clock 49 1964 in the Council Chambers., City Hall, Callfo'rnia. PRE SENT;: Commissioners Gans- Popp,. Stanley., Gatewood. ABSENT; Comm is s Richards STAFF Robert E.' Byrd., D , ireet,or of P'lann-!'ftg ommiss1oner Gans enter'ed'the Council Chambers at 7055. APPROVAL OF MINUTES, ® the-minute5 for the­meetings of July 79 15 and 21 w0r& appt as submitted. CORRESPONDENCE Mr. Byrd fead.correspondence from the Sonoma County Planning Commis® sion re"lativ'e' to the following items: Use Permit Application filed for a mobl.le home' park south of Petaluma and a use pe I rmit f I 1'ed f or a used car' lot at 2602 Pet. Blvd. No. The -�_Plahnef'inf6tmed th,e,Co that both in 'accord with the Ma Plan. AW Notice- was *also received of the public hearin,g schedu led by the Count ty forl'-miodification to the Petaluma Area G Plan to Include a new stre'et:'and overc . rossing'. Correspondl,enc'e was also received relative to d ata from the Sonoma County Industrial Board and Local For- mat ion Agency. SIGNAL; OIL COMPANY USE PERMIT FILE. PUBLIC HEARING ✓ Chairman Gate'wood opened ed the public hearing for use permit applica- tion filed by Slgna,l 0.11 Company"to construct a service station locat- ed at 301 South McDowell Blvd. The Planner pre'sented a favorable staff r'eporf'which was made `part of the permanent file. No objections were voiced from the aud fenc wheretpon'Res. U granting the use permit .9 � eras introduced by Comm. Sta'h ey. seconded by Comm. Popp and passed 'unanimously s'ubj:ec.t,. to the tc6nd.,,i stated in the Planner's rep6rt.; Design review fo r thia''g't6,p,6sed.c'onstiruction was also approved. 16; AN/R-1-10 ZONE TC AN. R-1mb000 ZUNI, FUL3L.14- MAKINU, r-LLr LI-5 Public hearing was opened by Chairman Ga re zoning the parcel � north of A.P'o 136 -09 ®16 (Marie Converse'propefty-) to 'Ely' Road f rom an R ® ­ zohe , to an R-1-600& zone initiated by, the Planning Comm mission.. No o - p ., p , o:sItion was voiced' from the public where upon Res . Z•13;.64 ..'rec to the Council propos ed, rezoning . was intro® ,ddqed I by I Comm. Popp-, seconded-.by Comm. Stanley and passed by all member's' present o, REZONE A,.P. 1" 36'09-16 (MARIE CONVERSE PROPERTY) FROM AN R-1-10,000 Ch airman Gatewood opened the pu'blic,hear,ing for the above rezoning. -I- 1 • P,Varin,in t;ommisSioYi Meetlncg, August , .49 1964 GREENBkIAR SUBDIVISION, TENTATIVE MAP., FILE 35 °6 J .3f The Planner gave a brief recap of the prior action taken regarding this or°opertyo namely, that an application was received some time a go from Steve Cope requesting the above rne.oning with the ultimate a :Im oI° applying fob a use pesrmit to allow a mobile home park for the; site. Due to lack of an architectural control ordinance, the Commission was „�°eluctant to zone 25' acres for multiple dwellings arad re jected� the request. -The C.ommi,ssion d a to initiate the rezoning at 'uch time as some type of control had been established. Due to' rack of public support an arch'itectural control ordinance_. wB not be forthcoming i'n the near .futur°e and the Commission felt obligated to initiated the original 'rezon'i;ng request at this time. Howeve6 Mr Art Hdn's;en tel'e.phoned on August 3rd saying that the .app is n.t had withdrawn. the application reque t'ing the R -M 0, the Planner . then red ommend that the z�on ng of said parcel be he l,d over un it the next regular .meet-ing. The following objections were voiced regarding th'e 'R ®M m1500 zoning'. 'Mr. Nolte, Consulting Engineer for the proposed Park Subdivision (by letter read by �.he Plan® ner)o Ha rold Cutl,er°9 attorney fo the est;at of ` John Gutermute� and Mm. Mar.no Crinel,.la., subdivider° of several, subdivisions in the area. (Their main objection was to allowing a -mob I1e home park i_n the area). The Commission-d' ,e.c,ided, to continue . public hearing for the above mentioned rezoning.until August 18 1964"0 The Commi'sslon reviewed the. tentative map for . Greenbriar Subdivision . filed by Sarles, Br'e:lJe & Race for Qantas Devel-opement Co. The Plan- ner read reports Fr om.the Sonoma County flood Control Engineer, 'and the Director of'Publ'i.c. storks and also his staff report. Said reports (made part of the resoYution) listed' Vairious conditions which must be complied with. Two representatives from the Engineering firer;:sta��ed they could forsee no problems in meeting, tho'se' conditions listed.. Comm. G .,aril inquired as to improvement plans. for the street to the end of the''subdivision adjacent to McDowell Park. Mr. Byrd informed the Commis�jioner that ,provis.ions had been made :for the street along the easterfy bound -ary of th park. Reso Z5u64 said tentative map sub ject to compl >iance,with those conditions listed in the reports, was' int roduced by Comm. Stanley, seconded `by :Comm. Gans and passed unanimously. EAST PARK SUBDIVISION TENTATI IVE MAP s FILE. 36X64 "The Commission reviewed the tentative map submitted by Wesley Ba Land Company for the tentative map for East Park Subdivision. The Planne=r read the` reports submitted by the Sonoma County Fl ood Control District and the City Engineer and his own staff reports. (Said. re- ports being ma'd.e_- ,part'of the 'Permanent f11.e). Mr. Byrd stated that two different 's zb'divi.sioh designs were submitted. and recommended apm P in o "n ova of thelone indicating the back -up treatment along East Wash- g Stre "et.7 Mro Simpkins (Geo. Nolte En inquired about the ex- tent t of . t . 'e, mpT.otreents that would"be required by - the developer along P g if the back-up treatment - plan is approved (ex- pr:- essi'ng pa•rti :c_ul'ar concern with .regar°d to paving the street). u " u P'4 i ng Commi s's i s =l- Mee t Ir g Aiigus:t. '4` .196 1/0 biro.. Byrd replaed that these provisions would have to be worked out with the City Cauncil and City Engineer but that all efforts will be made;to exp'e.ditd :the matter. Commissioner Gans inquired about sewer service .to t;lie area,. Mr. Simpkins infoi°med the Commission that pians been_ mad'e' f o same o Mr 6 - .B'ai l:ey was in the audience Res. 36m649* a pproving• the - tentative map sub j6 ct to condit ions ' Listed in the'above Mentioned ; r.epo -ts. was introduced by Comm. Gans., seconded by Comm,. .Popp and passed unan imously'. BUENOS NOCHE.S FINAL MAP : not domp';lete and was deleted from the agenda. - REVISED LAND USE PLAN FOR RIVER PARK SUBDIVISION The Commission reviewed. the .r evi'sed land use ' of the tentative map for River Park Subdivision. The staff repoi°t• ,wi ass read by Mr. Byrd .recom- mending, approval of same with the exe.luslbn'of.the area indicated for ka a service station, --r'esta,urant and marina since these are not permit" �D ted. uses in a Planned Uni.t.- Development and i^ezoriing of the area to Highway: Commercial :must init`ia -Comm;' Gans inquired of Mr. Fear® on. rep "resenting th6 River Park Subdivision, whether the formation of an assessment district was contemplated. Mt. Fearon gave a nega® t.i'e response A motA -on -rds made. by Comm. Gans. seconded by Comm. Popp, approving sa sand u -se plan pi th the c out- lined in the staff report which were made part of the permanent filed HAKON HANSEN VARIANCE FILE V29761 Application a variance to allow a substandard lot size of approxim matel'y, 5 9 7.00 sq. f,t loc at 80 Madison Str filed by Ha kon Hansen .was ;revi'ewed.' Mr. Bysd gave an oral - re.port stating that the lot* meets the minimum ti Ath and "depth req;ui�.r.emeA's (Said lot is part of a- lot split i'nVol.ving the rear portion of . .trio deep parcels facing v � or Payf an St'ree't } . -Mr o Hansen was present ". n the and i'enc.e. , Res o V29 °649 gra "rating the var;ia nce, was Tht , ;odueed ' by Comm. Gans, seconded by Comm. Stanley and pa;sse.d unanimously subject to the condition that If the shed ex'ist'-ing on the rear`pprt'ion, is. in violation' of the set- back requirements, 1t."be removed to t'he proper setback location or demolished. / RENAME `KAZEN COURT `� y The Commission'wa_s of the opinion that the name "Kazen Court" might be confused with "Cadet Cour°t. George Kazen' was in the audience and was of the opih : -on that 'the re wAS not"enough:'simii,arity in the two names't:o warrant A�"cl tinge,. The Commission requested the Planning Dffiedtor',to, -ge<t aii..opinion from the .Fire Department regarding the mat:tero REVIEW STREET NAMES FOR ATLANTIC & PACIFIC BUILDING CORPORATION WAS HELD OVER UNTIL A LATER MEETING. Coil YSSTONER GANS �dA S WELCOMED AS A:MEMBER TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. ADJOURNMENT There being no further busine'ss to come before ,the Commiss'lion, the rrieeting was ad,o srned,. �3