Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Commission Minutes 10/20/1970i• .1 A. G. E - N D A ' PETALUMA, PLANNING, COMMISSI�A1 OCTOBER 20, 1970 REGULAR MEET,I_NG #'7, FISCAL YEAR COiJT.dCIL CHAMBERS, 7:30 -0`' CLOCK �P,:M,. CITY HALL PE!TALUM CALIFORNIA 'Brunn ROLL ,;:CALL: Comm. e r_HOod_Watiers Perry_Stanley STAFFS William C. Mcri.vern,, Director of Planning.. "Andy" ,Anderson.; *As,sistant P'lanneer. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ap roval.' of..minutes for October � 1-970. I VALLEY GREEN #4. Request filed. 'by Valley. Green Company for a -EXTENSION OF - :time ektens•ion on the yapProval of the Tenta- TIME. RES. 26 - t ye Mai for 'Valley G eeh Unit #4. ('Located off Cr•inella TAYLOR &'MAZZA, INC. 'Continuation of. public hearing to consider an P;RE'ZONING ; appl cat on , filed by 'n" =T Corporation to pre - 0 zone •°A.P'.17 .040 -18: from an "A" Zone to: an a�Se�D R; -P4 1500 -1= 6,0100 Zone to become effective upon annexation to the-city : , The area is lo- ..ca.ted on -the easterly s} de of Old Lakeville Highway, b�etw:e'en Casa Grande CAMI:LLE ENTERPRISES, Application filed. by Camille - ;Enterprises to RE20MNG rezone 601 D "' :Street (A: 8- 201-1) from an ,Z °14T70 000. (.single fami'ly) Zone to an R -2 -3000 (- two ' :family.re§iden.tia'l) .Zone. ADJOURNMENT .1 TAYLOR & MA2 ZA., INC.. of the, public hearing to consider Con;tinu,atio n P P,F ZONING - Z15 -70 a ap, ca1.` 7��i1ed.by,,M -T Corpo "ration to pre- 040 18 from, an, "A" . Zone to an 0 T� : R -4- 150.0, and R -1 6,,;000 Zone (to become effective • upon arinexation.ao.the�cty;) was. held at this time. The area under coas'kder"ation is lo cated along the - southerhy ;side. of Casa Grande Road, ' easterly of .,01,d Lakev 11 .IUghway and on the northerly side of F,xates Road, containing ap- proximately 56! acres._ Mr.. McCivern ,gave a sum ma'ry of the ,staff. report which is part. of the permane file.,, The I Planning Director stated R= M"15 (multi., residential zoning i_s requested: fo . the northerly and . southerly 7 acres (_ 'S acres ..in all) and R- 1 - :6,.GbD (single. family) zoning. for the area of approximately 41 acres .Eying between 2* • area's, :requested ".for R -M -- 150'0 zoning•, In ; ,reviewing, 'the surrounding area, Mr. McGivern informed tfie ".Commission the ; area to the west, . on „the opposite .side_ of 'old Lakeville Hig.hway,. is proposed k for,: development as a, mobilehome park.. The ar-.e'a� to , lthe:.;,northeast will. `be developed w i fh A combined Tjunl6r- Senlor, High School. Much of th =e narrat °ive in the;., staff report relates to the i � - p nd� other services., required for school - . rob , .a _ October '20,, „197U f Regular .meeting of ' the Petaluma Planning Commission was _held on October 2'0, 1970, at 730 :o'clock :p.m in the Council, Chambers, City Hall, W etaluma:j Californ , ! _ PRESENT:. Comm. .Hood,. 'Kate_rs, Perry; Stanley. ABSENT: Gomm. Br,.unner. S TAFF: ' r h.. `C.. McG. ve'r:n, Di.rector.!of Planning. "And - Y Anderson,, Assi Planning Director. MINUTE FOR _ .Approval of `:the'minutes for- October 6, 1970, ` OCT... 6, 1970 was held otrer 'urtiT the next. to check on'.the accuracy, sof. P?aragraph 3, on Page 2, . of the minutes., VALLEY GREEN ##4' The Commiss,on considered the .;request filed by EXTENSION OF- ' ,,. Valley +Green Company for a time' ektension on T11 RE"S,. 26 -70" • the approval .rof.:thef ve map' for Valley i Green Unit #4 :(located off Crinella Drive:),. . Mr. P ,stated ..the .request is in order and the,.subdivision qualifies for the extension re- quested;. Res. U2 approv an extension of °one. year within which, to file the final map for Valley Green # 4,,: , wa introduced `by Comm. Perry seconded by Comm ,Wafters j and approved ' by all memo `rs present. TAYLOR & MA2 ZA., INC.. of the, public hearing to consider Con;tinu,atio n P P,F ZONING - Z15 -70 a ap, ca1.` 7��i1ed.by,,M -T Corpo "ration to pre- 040 18 from, an, "A" . Zone to an 0 T� : R -4- 150.0, and R -1 6,,;000 Zone (to become effective • upon arinexation.ao.the�cty;) was. held at this time. The area under coas'kder"ation is lo cated along the - southerhy ;side. of Casa Grande Road, ' easterly of .,01,d Lakev 11 .IUghway and on the northerly side of F,xates Road, containing ap- proximately 56! acres._ Mr.. McCivern ,gave a sum ma'ry of the ,staff. report which is part. of the permane file.,, The I Planning Director stated R= M"15 (multi., residential zoning i_s requested: fo . the northerly and . southerly 7 acres (_ 'S acres ..in all) and R- 1 - :6,.GbD (single. family) zoning. for the area of approximately 41 acres .Eying between 2* • area's, :requested ".for R -M -- 150'0 zoning•, In ; ,reviewing, 'the surrounding area, Mr. McGivern informed tfie ".Commission the ; area to the west, . on „the opposite .side_ of 'old Lakeville Hig.hway,. is proposed k for,: development as a, mobilehome park.. The ar-.e'a� to , lthe:.;,northeast will. `be developed w i fh A combined Tjunl6r- Senlor, High School. Much of th =e narrat °ive in the;., staff report relates to the i � - p nd� other services., required for school - . rob , .a _ na -nn ng Commission Minutes = .Oct. 20,,. .197'0 1' the ro�osed� p_ p development Mr. McGiverp read a letter i. recei wed, '; from the 012 d, Adobe School Dis,tric.t. Mr.. Dean .Magowan, ;Secr.etary'of the Old Adobe Union Board,. ,stated the District ahead ex er School is already :iencing a student population, greater - than! ability of.the District t0, house them. on._srngle ..sessions'.w rurthermore, the let,ker. expressed. concer - n. abo.ut.. a possible dis- regard .,for._ ecology and 'the ready, access to the east side appropriate :to ..the population :involved: In summation;,. Kr. AdGi,vern stated the. staff feels i;f' adequate c.on.trols mandate upon proces- sang of tentative maps .arid the. issuance .of buiad ing permits to limit °.the, number ,o:f new residentzial units, consistent with good parameters of develop - - men't, th.e pr.ezon'i:ng. should be looked upon .favor - ably. Sp'eaking,in opposition t© the.prezoning was Mr `D.oniz 1713 :C'ook, Kearney .Street. It was her, feeling if "a Junior /Senior. High School will not be .'built for two years ,., the .annexation should be held-up; Chairman Stanley explained the issue before the 'Commission wa a p'rezoning rather than. a , cues-tion. ;of., arinexation. , Mr.' frank Thomas,., .President -of the ;Eas' Petaluma Civi Association, .complimented; the staff's :re- port and requested, the Commission,to show the same type of restraint-as the C ouncil , did until such time as_ more facts .are -in for. _corisi derati on by the 'Planning. Director, Qlty_.`Manager., and Mayor, . ...r.elative to ' t,his prezonrrig application. Speaaking in favor of tlze prezoning was John King.` (During one- .point.of. the..meef ng` 1r.. King stated he represented the owners of .property) , nor King . stressed, the ci°ty''s .,f n - Acial. situation; °a•nd..stated amotatorium on build -ing will.not..,help the economy „o`f .the community„ Be emphasized the city, `sh6 Id not only lookI. at :the..smal'1 problem of schools,. but look at the dotal economy the city; . `. - Mr. : Jack L . representi,nq, the firm of Mazza Taylor.,.outlined the building program for .the: de- ve`lopment. Both Mr.. L'eue and .Mr;: K" ng In ;. 't'he,Commission the_deve"lopment would take from,- three to five' years . to_ complete; ° . Mr. Lbue ex- pres,sed.. a. desIre..to :develop the southern section `of the ,parce'll under a Planned .Uni-t :Development proposal;. 2- 1' Planning 'Commission l�inu,tes - Oct. 20, 19.70 a _ s� , all c>nv f,r -om the floor f o: those Iq ,�.i,shin_ spea ,: Chairman Stan -ley closed_ the public ar:inq.- After further discussion, the. Commi§sijon '1e ected to. defer action on the reque sited pr zoning: until November � 1;7 , 1 7 0 in order to give them more time to study the over- -: 411,effect.of the development.. The.motion was made by, .Comm. .Rood,., seconded by Comm. Perry, and passed by .all memk�er :. present. CAINII -LL "E ENTERPRISES Chairman Stan ey. opens t e pu is hearing to Z14 TO consider the rez:onitig application filed by Camille Ente'rpr.ises to . e;zone 601 "'D" Street from an. R- 1-6,0''00 (single; family)' zone t an „ R -2' -3000 (two- family':): residentia =l zone o' The st °af reporti, presented. by..Mr'. Anderson, stated the a,pplicant._ proposes :;to. apply for a' lot split, to create 3 .lots and..build 3 duplexes if the re- quested - rezoning. is granted .: However, the site ` does not have sufficient width along,.either "D" - Street or Sixth 'Street 'to.provide for a 70 foot e corner lot width ( and I tw& 5 0. foot lots') as „ required by the Subdivision O.;rdi.°nance. There- fore maximum numb of two lots would be, pos,sib.le on .the. s�.te: T, he >subject site is - adjacent to an R- 2- 3 :.000 . zoning district. In view of the fact 'that no more than two lots. could be .created .bv - subdivision and other " justtific o for rez nq. w determined, the: .:;staff recommended that the requested re- ` z,oninq ,be., forwarded to the. City dbuiac11 with' a recommendation . for 'approva1,4 Testimony in „ opposition to the rez.on ng 'was, given by, Mr.. James Davenport, 619 "D" .Street. It. was his -feeling the rezoning: would be out of character of.lthe general, area: He stated most ,. of the `R=2 -30'00 zone,.surkounding this area is' de'v6l -oped .w.ith sing -le; fam 1y home�s,.`and it .is unh6ces,sary to establish a higher density fo the .area.. Sweak`inq. -. for .:the rezoni nq was Norman Rollins., Realtor and Mt. T i m Knuthson,, the applicant .'(representing 1 ) , „ Knuthson . Vista :ted the duplexes -,, orenfted toward "D" Street, would ..have; thie..4ppea,r4nce of single f,amil homes. „ The rentals ,Wo.tild be - located to. the rear.,, with privat access from Sixth Street. ;Chairman .Stanley clpse_d,,,.the public hearing. - RIA4ginq Commission minutes .- Oct. 2'0, 11970 Res , Z14- m 70 recoe,nding the rezoning to the City Council,. was introduced by:Comm. Waters, seconded, by Comm.. Hood,,,. passed by the following vqte,: AYE , SLc .-.Waters,,, Hood, Stanley. ABSENT: Brunner. NO: Perry CORRESPNDENCE 'Mr. McGivernI California R( 'Board p i'nclu would requirf the - Regiona proposals wh.' wastes. Cite to, review th comments for resolution. - SONOMA COUNTY REFERRALS Rollins Garrison Assoc, service s to m File: 5419. read_a_letter received from the gional Water Quality Control in I g:a tentative resolution which cities..and countries.to notify. Board of the filing of development ch. may. involve the discharge of es and countries, were requested tentative `resolution and forward incorp6ration in a final tentative - use ,permit .for a gasoline cdted at 34,38 Petaluma` Blvd. No. The staff report recommended that the Commi,ssion forward a letter to the Sonoma County Board'of Zoning Adjustments recommending the use permit. not ,be.granted. The staff felt the.proposed commercial use would not be appropriate in this. area which is designated,for low density residential R' development on the,.'etaIuma Area General . Plan. Furthermore, the proposed service station would increase the traffic hazard around the intersections of Corona Road'and Ski.IlmAn.Lane-with Petaluma Boulevard North,. The Commission was in, generaL agreement. with the staff' recommendation. A. .'motion.,, t lett"Or to the Board o oning, . tment!s, recommend use" permit not be granted, was introd-luded_by Comm,. Waters, seconded by Comm. Perry, and pa by the following vote: AYES: Hood , Pe'rxy, Waters. Commt..,,'Stanley abstained be- cause he felt he .did _not know.eftoug'h "about the proposal to Vote on R .1 d bert McCuIlach - use perm f or . a "T kennel to be - 1 o 0`date�d at.' 36TF = Blv'd. South. File The Commls:sion cOnside. ed the s taf f to I orwaj6 Board Zonin4 Adjusti propo§al . ed the subject referral and request- .a letter to the Sonoma County-'" ents indicating no .comment to the Robert J. Dowds - use-1pejrmit.for:a mobile ho I me to house persons employed on premises at x,54 Liberty Road. File: 5409. The. Commission indi.cated-no opposition to the requested use permit and directed the.staff to forward a letter to.the.Sonoma County Board.of.Z Adjustments as indicated. ADJOURN14.gNT There being no business ' . come before the Com- mis themeeting was adjourned. ATTEST: '12 -/Y�� .• 1