HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 01/14/1972January 14, 1.972
Adjourned.Special,Meeting of the Petaluma Planning Commission,.
was held . on January-14 197.2 at 7:30 p .,m.' in the Council • Chambers;
City Hall, Petaluma, Cali,fornia.
PRESENT: Comm. Ba.1shaw, Cerini., Daly, Sehmelz,•Waters.
ABSENT: None,
STAFF -' Richard-D. Anderson, Assistant" 'lanner
CONSID'ERATION. OF.,ADOPTTON OF .THt•ENVIORNMENTAL.DES_TGN PLAN. FOR
THE CITY OF •PETALOMA" (Continued.)
Upori.adjour-nment•of, the Commission Meetfng,:January - 12, 1972.the
Commission completed -dis,cuasion of the-plan the Page '13, however,
due_to'. some -quest ions, *they referred to '.items, on Page 2 and Page ,ll.
PAGE 2 Delete .t
Ye last_,sentence on- the.first paragraph "It
is .made clear "'that' property outside the Plan area can
be also,devel.oped if'the Plan is suit.ab.ly amended..'
PAGE 11 Under, "Needs,and'Potential Areas for Development." the
first paragraph,. the.last.line,, delete. "central and
western portion of the City "., add. " area'-west of the
Freeway. so: the last line should "..,'. years be..
locate d.in.the.area.west of the.Freeway."
The continued their consideration of- the balance
of the plan.
PAGE 17• . On the first .paragraph, delete •the second starting
with "the -area bounded.by Lakeville,Highway, Jefferson.
St-'reet the..fair grounds and the freeway; "'`.
On.the second paragraph, delete everything. after the
second sentence starting . wi:t`h the sentence stating "The
Lakeville Highway land,is to'ground water..,."
until` the end ,of ,the paragraph . '
PAGE .27 Under ", Mobile :Home ", delete the four , sentences, begin -
ning with- "However, the fixed i.nvestment..:..." ending
with • ".::.need to the, time permit.ted." sentence.
Under :"Industrial Uses" `delet-e tie first sentence:.
"Projecti.ons.indicate....."
PAGE '28 On th'e top paragraph, the second sentence should read .
"Th red.uce's. the effective industrial zon ing , in. the
f strip to about 223 Deleted "still in
exc "esa of %the total projected for 'the Petaluma area."
=2-
January 14 ., 1 9'7 2
PAGE "29_Y Delete•the title "CIRCULATION ".
Capitalize. " THE.GREENBELT PARK
Delete the.second sentence "Th.e.park strip on
the preliminary Environmental Design Plan. followed' -the
north - edge , of the, proposed hospital site • but. did . not
incorporate residential development. further 'north . "
The third sentence stating. "T.he Plan now shows a- larger .
area in residential•use to the north.; " - word
now •and change the .word larger to. large.
End .,the •.paragraph•. ,the sentence stating ' "West of
McDowell- Boulevard., long- range and regional considera-
tions are taken into . account`.."
Begin a new heading entitled " CI,RCULATION ";
The paragrapht.after that should.read " There will continue
to be.a need "for better ,connections'between -the east and
west. sides of•:.th:e .City.. A' connection: nee t.o .;be °extended
fr om North McDowell-. Boulevard to Petaluma Boulevard The
.. most. economic route- i -q.to underpass the, freeway - and cros
the railroad grade at the po where the freeway is
elevated over the tracks. This - link between -east and
west .will . in all .Probability -be built.. in the .•next t .
fif years- rather than. in the fir.st:. strategic planni
period but it is .,necessary .to plan. for the . connection
noW ., It Then comes "`A New Interchange "..
PAGE'32 The second „p,a.ragraph, second sentence,- insert .the.word
"suffi:cient to read "At the same:;t.me,.it is.isolated.
from the, west 'by- the lack of sufficient cross town links,
PAGE *736. The, top paragraph, delete,the .last. four, sentences. with
the ,sentence begi- nning "If • it become clear beyond.
On. °the bottom paragraph, second.sentence,,, the -
word "parkway "'to " park " in the. -sentence- that says
VV.4.south of . Casa Grande Road, - t1ie parkway _wil l modify
the..... ".
PAGE :3'8 First paragraph, third sentence, change -the sentence
fr.om', "Areas which are_sla -ted to become urban in the
.near will need to be Petaluma so that
maximum - local control can be established and to.relieve
the, County of making urban development decisions.. to
read= "Areas which, are slated to become urban in. the near
futu will -as , sur•e,that maximum local control can be
estahlished. " Delete 'the balance o.f t e sentence.. .
0
- 3
January ,14 , 197 2
PAGE _'38 Delete - 'Item #1 "Annex : as - much !of the area. within the
greenbelt, park as feasible." Change the.balance.of
the numbers- to corxesp'ond ,
PAGE :39 Item #4 ( 3 per ,the preceding• renumbering") at the
top of.page 3 9 should be °changed by deleting the words
"Classfy: all ": at the of the sentence.and
11 in,. t e agric•ult r'al ' zone.. .pro ide that such lan
in the'middle of the,sentence to read: " The major
undeveloped _parcels- between•,the existing subdivided
areas . and the; greenbelt will '.onl_y - be urbanized through
the .Pl • Unit Development ox 'the Planned Community
District process.and ,in.'accordance with the development
control,methodology"set forth in- Appendix A,"
Delete 'Item #5 under "The Greenbelt .P .
Delete Item 46 under " The ' Greenbelt .Park .
PAGE 42 Item #2'under " Low Density Residentia.l.Areas
"Areas where 'sewers are not practicable: should - be zoned
for , very loco -denslty..al.so . " should be changed to read.
"Areas where sewers are not pra6tica should be zoned
f or agricultu
PAGE 43 Item #3 at the top of the page should be zoned.for
6,000 to 10,000 squaxe..." should be- changed to read
".,, should be zoned for approximately 10,0'00 square ..t"
Item ##4, the words "in any o,f the above described areas,"
should be deleted . from the beginning the . sentence• and " .
the. words " where topographic conditions make i ,desirable"
should_:be added after the words "should be encouraged"
.so Item 44 should read " Cluster subdivisions with equiva
I ent overall densities should,be encouraged where.the -•
topographic conditions ma ke.i�t desirable - n .ord6r to
nrhvide varied tvpe of i ving environmehts and. broade
r
vDes than is now
Pet•aluin
PAGE 44 Item #'1 the..words - ''but shall provide public access to
water should be -added .added to Item #1.
PAGE Item. #2 - (a) should be deleted..
PAGE Item #3 Delete the last 3 sentences be "If the.
amount ' of -land within .,.." to t.he.end-.of the.paragraph,
APPENDIX "A Under ".B" the last sentence.
PAGE 2
PAGE 5 Item B, second.sentence, the word "e liminated" should
be changed "to, "rejected ". The: sentence shall read:.
"Tho e not conforming would -be rejected ,"
• -4-
January 14, 1972
APPENDIX A
PAGE 5 Item "B" a fter Note Delete the second sentence. Insert
"'The developer this time , has ,th.e right, to request 'a
review.of his rejection by the Planniiig- CommiGsion.:
.Item D Add. ".'The same right of review of rejectons''by•
the,Planning Commission shall be as "B" above,'
This completed consideration of the,En:vlronmental Design Plan Text.
A motion'was� introduced by Comm, Balshaw, seconded by Comm. Daly,
that the land areas at Ely Road, f Casa Grande Road•, . and McDowell
Boul evard and other undeveloped areas.on the west side of,Ely -Road
north of East Wa ,Street , shown on.. t`he plan as Urban Low
Residential be designated as Planned Resi.dent Motion passed
unanimously:
A to'adopt a resolution of,the- Planning.Commission recommend-
ing-the adoption of` an. ,Environmental Design Plan for the City of.
Petaluma (including Map and - but exdluding-Appendix A which. shall
be forwa ded separate document to the City.Council) was;.intro-
duced by , Comm. S6hmel7- seconded By . Comm. Daly .and . pass by the
following vote
AYESc. Comm. Balshaw, - Cerifi - , Daly, .Schmelz_, Waters, .
NOES : , None
ADJOURNMENT There being no further- business to come before the
Commission, th:e meeting,was adjourned.
Chairman
ATTEST:
Secretary