Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 05/29/1961May 29,, 1961 • Adjourned meeting of the Petaluma City- '.Planning C ommission ' held on the - 29th, day of .May, 1961 - a h hou 7:30; o p, it., i the Council Chambers CI HkIL P etaluma, the Ci Cal ifornia, Present: Commissioners, Ellis., Gibbs, Stanle Stinson, Popp, Absent- Commissloner Sanderson, Lane* 'C Staff: City Engineer ,A'lf'ed J, Roberts *Commissioner Lape;:entered the Council Chambers at 7:40 The minutes of the. meetLng of May 1 1 96,l were , approved as mailed out. DANMAR DtV The Planning Commission, mission, conducted,a,public hearing, Ing: for Use Permit. Application No. 14864 filed by Danmar Developmeht,Co. (Dan; F. Tocchtni) 108 Post Street, Petaluma, California, to construct apartments on A,. P.. 8-; 48-41ocated . on the south- west corner of "D" Street', an El: d Rose Drive,,. in I&U-'zone, A staff report was pre sent6d:and-thel Chairtnan, called for,expo . f 'h fl n Tom t- e floor There was no. TO. c ressi _p sition expressed. The Commission noted, that the site buffered f ro 'the adj acent, residential neighborhood orithree4 sides by roads. Also., 1t;1s.a large, evelopment and can, therefore, be deve ed.and:landscaped to be compat --je-Vith.the neighborhood, it, wai anoted that an existing 4pattmpnt building fa ces' ceg�'the. a proposed development on :El Rose Drive and . the ,adjbtni 9 COunty.area permits mitts The proposed dev616 p Mont Wou-ld*'thereforebe well. ,suited for , this µsite.,'!Rd!;so,lUrtion. in -arit g ,the use permit, was introduced by timson and seconded by -C-9 M ioner Stanley, and was passed unanimously by all Members, present, subject to the: conditions listed in the Use Permit. FRED AND.FRANCESAAWTHORNE, PUBLIC HEARING, YA`R_IA NCE. -FILE NO. V7 =6 'The Planning� tbmin.issio.n conducted a public hearin�&­fpr Ya Applic ..44, r Application; ati6n' 4 filed by Fred & Frances Hawthorne, 9'Hal$py Avenue, Petaluma, California, 'to Subdivide A., Parcel 8.- 256-50, located at 8 Halsey Avenue, Into two 50 foot wide 'substandard lotS, in an R -1 zone. A staff' re� b ' P, 0 was, presented and the Chairman called for expression ,front 'the floor. There x , was no opposition e - res'4ed. Afavorable. , report , was, .read from the - City, Engineer, Resolution V - 7 - 6 recommending that the City Co uncil .1.1 grant this ' with restrictio n that. � s tructures erected q variance reque, st,, �h the on the proposed.16 COMIj m m , comp with the inimu :setbac and yard . of:. the. Zoning Ordinance,, was introduced by CQrnmissioner) Stanley and seconded by Commis- Stoner Gibbs, and was; 'passed unanimously b all - preg y ent. AQ,JOU'RNMENT. Thel further 'business to come before the Comm th&,meetIng*as ad JPU * rned.