HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 11/05/1963November 5. 1963
- e . gulr 'a meeting of the Petaluma City Planning Coinmission held on Nov. 5.
63 at 7030 0" P-m- tn'the Council Chambers City Hall,, Petaluma.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES -'them'ln'utes for the meeting of Oct. 159 1963 were
approved as submitted.
CORRESPONDENCE - The Plann6r Informed' C'bimtission that final certifi- V
cation had bei8h . received frbmAhe State Fin , ance Department accepting our
population'e.stimate of 16,275,,'
REZONING A.P. #7-361-5 FROMR-1-6000 to R-M-li5009 , FILE NO. Z1�2�62
.PUBLIC HEAR
Public heArIng for ij
rezn'lhg"A..P.'#7-361-5'fi~om an R-1-6000 zone or dis
M -
trict to an R--1 9 500' zone" 6i,"dl_�ft t �i
ricas'held at this time. The Plan*
ner presented the staff f - f,40 - (made 'a p4r't - 6f 'the permanent f i I e) . Mr.
Byrd informed 'the C6famis that*Mr. Gossag6had contacted him regarding
this rezoning. In View of 'th'e1'fddtthaW'pr4(j 'to adoption of Zoning Or-
dInanc'e 662 N.C.S. the ar.6d, was �zoned foe multiple' dwellIngs it wa's Mr.
Gossa,gi�°s opi nion that this action _ should 'be initiated by the Planning
Commission. A check by - the P'Ianner•subsequent,ljr revealed that on Jan. 5,,
1960 the Planning Commission _fecbihmended the - - rezoning of said property
from an Unclassified Zone to a'n'R-3 Zone iin.de! - r Zoning Ordinance 340 NX.S.
This resolution was forwarded to the Council where It was submitted and
f,11'ed and no further Action 'was''ta'ken." No pro-tests were voiced from the,
oudience whereupon R ' eis : 212.;�63'recommendlno to the City Council that A.P.
7 -361-5 be rezoned from R-1'6000' to" R:LM �l '- was Introduced b ru
y Cok.
500' "
"Stanley, seconded Comm. P6pp and pa§s,ed_ I by all members present 's-abbe .-t
to conditions stated fn'"Exhib,it A" made part of Res. 212-630
PUBL HEARING TO ADD. BARBER SHOPS AND BEAUTY PARLORS TO THE LIST OF PER,-
MITTED USES IN A C-N AND C-CIONE,
In view of the fact that the*abbir6 mentl6n',ed uses were inadvertently omit-
ted.from the C-N and C-C Zone by our Con'su,_1tants'at the time of the adap-
tion of Zoning Ordinance 662'N.,.*C '"Mr. Byrd recommended that said uses
9
be added. No obji�ctions we're irb � . ,ced. Re 190 adding barbez shops
and beauty parlors to'thc' li'§t 6f perrnftt6d7 'use's established for the C-N
and C.-C Distrldts, was 'Introduced Comm Cavanagh, seconded by Comm.
Gatewood and unanimously passed by all members present.
OF JESUS CHRIST LATTER DAY SAINTS
ING 9
Public hearing to allow c.ofist'ruction"of a church by Church of Jesus Christ.
Latter Day Saints to at''745 Nbrt,h'_Web§ter'Street In an R-1-6000
zone was held'at , 'th,it'time. Seii6r�,T i� . i ire s of the church we-re
present In the audiehc'e". Mr. Byrd prd&ent&d a favorable staff report.
('Made part of the i)e,i°manent 'fl lh the fact that no protests
Were voiced regardino prop6sied U__Se,, Ruse U16-639 grantA.ng the use per-
mit, wa's inVroduc.,6dby'Comm. Popp seconded by Comm. Stanley, and passed
b all members present.
. 1 -
7
Planning Commission Minutes for Nov. 5,1963 contvd.
Ak._ ALLAN FORSY & H. B. CLYDE, JR,., VARIANCE., 415 - 4th STREET. v
Variance application filed by the above named applicants, to allow a. lot
59 L
split which will create two lots of 0,06 sq. ft. each located at -
41-�
' - 4th
Street, was reviewed. In his staff rep6tt'the Planne-r stated that the lot
Is divided by two separate'"'IAnd fiseEft' &s And not saleable unless subdi-
vided as proposed. Mr. - Clydii'wa. spr&s6nt in the audience. No protests
were voiced*. Res. V29-63, geantfng th`e,'-'VVa-r I ante request, was introduced
by Comm. Stanley seconded . by .Comin Gatbwood and passed unanimotusly by all
members present subject - to the condit1on that no further varlances or ex-
ceptions shall be granted in the development of either of the proposed sub-
standard lots.
SSUE OF
- 62
V110-62 FILED BY C. J. RUE GGE
Re of Use Perry it U39 C. "J.. Ru'egge to construct, a building
for wholesale & ' fetdil 'sal&s ofaut,bin6b1le_ parts located at 527 East Wash-
Ington Street via`s'reviewed. T Plai that since the adoptic),.�
of Zoning Ordinafice 662- 'N.C., S. S. .§'al"d proposed operation is not, a permitted
or conditional use' in the 'C'_'N'Zone. Chailrman.St�hley expressed the opinioza
that the Commission was morall"'bbligdted to reissue the permit. Mrs.
y
Florence Tarchini., 182 Edith St6a_et voiced the: complaint that the conditions
setforth In the original' usepermlt" (U25-60) had never been compl e with.
- (,Specifically the c6hsti°uctfonof a six foot solid fence). Mr. Vic DeCarl!
fallu're to comply with said conditl In 0
ISO expressed'concern'r'egarding the a (Cori
Oufther discussion b the Com,mi'ssion and Mrs. Tarchini indIcated -a
Mime limit was desirable rega,r°dl construction of the fence In question.
Re.s. U17-63, granting the reissue (based on 6onditions 'Listed !.-,I the_; use
permit) was Introduced by Comm. Popp, seconded by Comm.'Gatewood and passed
by the following vote: Ayes.- Comm. Cavanagh, CTat*ewood, Popp, Lleb.
Noes Comm. Stanley.
V28-63, granting the re-Issue of V10'62 to allow 0 ft, rear yard Instead
of required 5 ft. for the cohtt�r,ubtlon of the, above mentioned building pro-
posed for 5,227 East Washington St're6t was 1nt.rod.uced by Comm. Gatewood,
seconded by Comm. Stanley and,.'pas members present subject to th
condition stated in the original variance pe
APPROVAL OF STREET NAMES-FOR PETALUMA GARDENS SUBDIVISION.
A motion was introduced.by Comm; Pop-, seconded by Comm,. Stanley,, & passed
Popp,
unanimously that the collector *s't'reets for Petaluma Ciardens Subdivision 'be
given names pertain.lhg to trees and'the other-streets be named after states.
T - he subdivider and engdn f
eer will rece. notification of the Comirl
a
011 ice
P,r ova I
- the
Woes:
building., A mot.46n giving architectural
was Introduce'd by Comm. Popp, sec
follow1ng vote: Ayes: Comm. Cavanagh,
None; Abstaining. Liebe
approval
by Comm.
Gatewood,
ed for the pror.,osed
and landscape ap-
Stanley, and passed
Popp, Stanley. .
ADJOURNMENT