The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes 06/20/1967June 2.0 , 19 :67' Regular meeting of the. Pet:al'uma .Ci.ty.Planning Commission held on June 20, - 1967, at 7:55 6 clock p.m. in the Council - Chambers, City Hall, Petaltana, California. PRESENT: Commissioners Popp, Styles ,,.Stanley., ABSEPT:I Commissioner B;attag,`lia. STAFF - Robert .E,. Byrd, .: D,irector .of . Paannirig e Gary Graham, :Planning.;Technici.an,. MINUTES: The minutes for the meeting•of June..-5th & 6th were approved JUNE --as submitted. 5 & 6 REGIONAL P'la'nning Di�re,ctor. Robert "E. • Byrd informed - the - Commission PLAN that a meeting will •be held- in 'the - near future regarding the proposals contained the AB'AG Preliminary Regional = Plan. The .plans encompass. the nine &ay Area Counties. AMARAL Chairman•Stanley - opened the - public hearing regarding the USE 'PERMI',T - ruse . permit' application filed -by Manuel Amaral. to allow, a. FILE U5 -67 warehous'e,& sales yard in a C -H (Highway Commercial); Zone to be located at 4070 Petaluma Boulevard'North. A favorable report. was submitted by- 'Planne'r` (made part of the -per- - manent, 'file' Mr., -Byrd stated, that the use conforms with the projections -- of ''the• Petaluma Area General "Plan, the; site • has••excellent:arres "s:, etc: The unfavorable aspect being that- sewer -& "wat service - are -, n ot ;- readily available to the site. ' No. objections were voiced! and Resolution U 5 -67, ap- proving the - . use permit with: •the °conditions as stated in the � la wtroduced b Comm: Styles seconded b y` ne± Popp-and P assed GEORGEDES Chairman Stanley° opened , the - :public heari ng regarding the USE PERMIT- p t application - filed:by A. John George'des, to allow use ermi FILE U7 67 - a mobile home park , &•mobile home °:sales on` property known .as A:.P. #'7 =422 -7 &,- a• portion Of A,.P,':. #7 - 422 - 5 ('approximate® ly 17 acres lying °.between U :iS; 10:1- Freeway and Stony Point Road - 'and° on the> southeasterly • side of Denman: Road') . In his report, the, Planner stated that the site has good and safe access:; • the• proposed use is compati•b e- with, the immediate area 'and that - proper - landscaping and• fencing of the site will Tnsure a- fair - environment.: for ° 'home living. 'Mr-:, •By,rd "stated further that in,wiew of the fact that the ar - is alread r i mar i ly "devel Highway Comm • uses an' � d •there does � - not - - , - seem "to b:e, adequate demand in the forseeab'le• future ,for--limited industrial development in the. area, it •might be feasib,le review the .. entire area to as- cer , - ta n`��whether • a zoning; • change - tight be in order for this region.:: 'There were -- object % ons. - :vo ic:ed. A motion., recom- mending :- approval • • o�f , th6� us.6 °permit with - the - conditions - out lined by' •the - P.i'anner in his report - (made rt "of the _ per manent ,, ile,): -was-introduced. by Comm; ° Poppy,, seconded by Comm: �S.tyles and passed. ' P'lanni:ng `Commi io on Minutes June 2 0 19'6''7 4 EAST, PARK ;` � _ _ entative maps' for East Park <= The Commission revrewed -the "t UNIT. 4 Subdivi:sion Unit 4,..filed by.. Wes .Bailey. Mr'. Byrd read FILE 12 -6.7 his report ..ar d that .tof the Ci -ty ..Enginder - each noting ' w several. conditions,. that must.:be, ;complied : with, ; Res . 12 -67 approving ,the. tenta;t vel "ma p ..- wi th, - the as stated ,. in the reports-; -.was introduced by: Comm:. • Styles.," seconded . by. Gommw. _. Popp - .arid pascsed,. CREERSIDE - ' The:'C.ommis's;%on : reveaed' , the' tentative- map of - 'Creeksi ; de. MANOR Manor Subdiwision,':Unit'3, f iled°: by' ,Condiiotti:` Mr - -"`Byrd UNIT. 3 '. ` '.presented ,his report" and: °a �l'etter•. from .the City :Engineer'. FILE 13 =67 Res;. '1,3,6,`7,,_ ,approving the tentative' map. for - Creeks de Manor ' Unit 3,; ith the -1 co iditl.ons as stated in .'the. Planner & .w , Enginder's'reportstl, was introduced by Commissioner Popp, seconded by Comm:. Styles'° .and passed;. - GREENBRIAR ' The: C,ommis�si' n..: re'viewed the. tentat- ve, map ' for Greenbrlar UNIT 2, ; Subdivisioh,; Un 2`,:. filed by . QA ntas._-Dev.elo,pment - ;Corpora - FILE 14; - -6.7' :° t'on;: In his report, Mn Byrd` =stated. - that the' lots fal'1 ,.. :short 'of'. the 6 ;•0'0 0 sq . . f t ' area _but was ` o'f the opinion . that • ', y ._ . retain - a °variance °cou-ld, . be g•ran.ted,: provided:' the, ° com`- �ple:te control over' the' d`es can and . spe;ci ficat, on o f the homes, for be, located onr 'these - logs'.. , Mr. =Byrd also read a • report from° the:`:City. Engineer listing " several cond'i'tions F •` which be complied w,itlir:. At this'. time, Mr: 'Ron Smp- __ - kins re resePt n Eas�.Park- SubdYVisioh; Art . . ° P g N Condiott' re resentin Creekside Manor,'both the. - thepGreenbr ar , SitbdwisionSwex'eeallow�ed small,er , subdiv -sion'-,maDs wo:uad submi :ttedx -b_y them,, requestin smallerr' to ° si:zeg. Mr'. '::Rob,'ertT:O °'.N,eil, ,representing Green:- briar • Subdivision, "- stated' that the pr.ginal ;.subdi.vson map had` speci,fi0d. 6 - 'Z0 0 :sq. ;f t`. lots- but t�he.ir plans had been revised to- allow f.or. the construction of a bridge to cross .:the' Wash %ngfon :Creek ;, thUS reducing' the area ; left for sub - di:,v d Mr,: °' Condi6tt i reiterated " that; thi's was no greater hardsh "ip to the Greenbrwar `subdivider than for the others ... since tfiey too 'h'ad to,.biz ld bridges,, etc.. A' dis Fre ma p "as ' resented;; .was .introduced b, - Comm. :P.o , approving P P y ppa and seconded by °Comm„ -Styles., 'FIRST ,! The Commission` reviewed the%..plans; submi teed by the First. SOUTHERN. Southern" Baptist Church tq const.ruct-. an, educational building ;BAPTI3,T. to ':be"lo'cate:d their° church- site on`•the coiner of Eas "D "' CHURCH - Street & Vallej Street: In 'hiss report .,, the Planner stated SITE; DESIGN 'that "the , proposed structure' with all the` setback, height,, and coverage; regulations and'.recommended site design approval with;. the condition', that a, landscape buffer be planted along the `property li ° °nes :that,' adjoin existing" resi- 'church's;',propos denti.al use, and if the al to; acquire, add" tionaI .prop'erty for 'parking does",not;, mater-i. l -ize' ;(so that pa-r - bp sit �g ex i�s king are, -can b, - us y , pd, for gµ tkf i g ry$ a V f' ApR YbIPnq park S34 '_ hM44 , pN .M a•tiK R$ v SW, TFGb'W.. M@ F +B ' C.'Bi, Planning Commi.ssion...Nnute's June 20, 19'6 ANDERSON Mr Byrd s.tated . a: ;had ,been . s.ubmitted by Earl USE PERMIT Rm. ;Andersen ; : to. -renew°Use P ermit Ul3 -6�6 for another year® FILE U8 -67 Said permit alZOwed_'mulitple :dwea' °lings.•.in..:a transitional R -1 -6 000 - Zone at Willson Street. (A - :P. 7-091-6). The Planner said. -t no conditions.-.h-ad .changed in the area .and: recommended the ",permit,, be :renewed. .Res; U8 =67; grant- ing a veax' extens; :on .:was; ntr_oduced Comm. Popp, seconded, Comm. Styles.; and passed. PETERSON The Commission reviewed the Variancb-appli,cati°on filed .by VARIANCE George° Peterson to -allow .a..0', ft,:_sideyard & .0 ftm rearyard FILE V7 -67 setback for.° a - proposed, new str- uc•ture. :to -be located at 421 -.2nd Street; hn"his reports the .Planner stated that a hardship exists to :justify °the proposed• variance in that 'ard h . depth ..,and' area, that the p li- the si i s substandard cant proposes 'to utilize a -hk; resistive firewal'l the property line° where° no: setbacks °are provided, and recommended approval,of the'variance with - the condition 1-k Y�I��X�C��X��ZZ� that all. .re.commendations '°'s °te °•design: - review' be com- plied- with. Re ;. V7 -6'T, approving the variance with the conditions - -° as stated .by t`he .Planne`r., was introduced by ? .. Comm. S'ayIes, seconded by, Comm.. ' Popp; -mod passed® PETERSON The Commission reviewed -the %l•site. - plans submitted =by Leonard SITE Car- ro1.1•, for - the - proposed •structure ,to. be located at 421 -2nd DESIGN ,of.. -site design 'review St - .. °Mr. • Byrd recommended approval . with 4the - condition �'tha- t- curb' - cut'. be limited to 35 ft. in wrdth and that -area along .-the:--property line surround- ng the'propose'd parking facility be landscaped with liquid amber street trees, planted` 10 - fto -on cente 'A motion, approving site design - recommended by Planner, was intr.odueed by CommO Popp, seconded :,by. Comma S tyles , and - D!R.LEONI The Commission reviewed.the: variance request;s by VARIANCE Dr., Leoni to allow a 5 ft•m .. rear -yard setback for a new medi- V8 -6!7 cal building to be: .at 1:114. "B''_' Street and 5 less Parking sp aces ' as required 'by =the Ordinance for medical of- fire facilities., In his report, : the Planner recommended approval the °var:ance_ property lying adjacent to the rear portion -.of the site where the ; proposed bri ding is to be locatbd too. steep to allow development directly. adjacent to this• property 'and that the topography of, the, s1-te' restricts the pos'si1331,rty, of providing' adequate number °of spaces i n, relationship to they floor, area o the proposed structure,.,. Mr. Byrd ''recommended approval of the variances wit the condition as in his report, made; art of the erman ent file Mr .Manuel: cautioned the ili :of utilizing "B'" Street Comms s;s. on about the poss ib t y for parking if an adequate number-of parking spaces are not =:4- 0 Plarinlincr 'Comm - issi ' on:, Minutes. , June 2'0 1967 provided .for thig new .:structure, or any other new buildings to be located In this a�'ea Richard.Lieb., architect, was :Present on behalf of Dr-,, .'Leoni-and stated that in his opinion Ihg v6uld be - no toblet,,.si I nce Dr. park P - Leoni has no associates in the - .building..alre.ady' - const-ruc�tted.:on.the site, thereby I ' .1 - utilizing 'a minimum number , cif - spates.. After further consi- deratioft it was recommended.:th&t, the matter be postponed the next regular meetinq, unti QdUGqd by rZOMM ADJOURNMENT There being �ftb further `busIhess _t before the Commission-, the-me'eting was adjourned® .4 'C lerk Chairman -5-