HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 01/23/1949M
on
V
area bouftded, by and Third, Straet!s• and the
City LimIts', stating, tha t it should b e all
Q"1,. It. was Hahn , opinion that such zoning
would. le ave the area open t!6 junk. development
which would 'be most detrimental to the adjoin-
ing
R-1 areas..
Council Shoem-ker asked if the p�,etitions.
d . eriied, at the zoning
plan heardrigs -of. the
Commission are t, mo o, t the Council,. Hahn
�
advised that all the Rertinent dat,a be f
nis] the Council along with Gommi,ssion
reaommendati.ons.
mee - 1 -5' 0 P-M
_ee;t ng adJourneed -
.0
I
Regular M.ee 4JV5 00 - P . TA
1_7
January L. 1949
Clouncil Chamber s.
Present: P-Sul Sal_'s. Eugene -DaLix,ca, Mtathilda Olmsted.
Absent. Leigh 'Shoemaker`., Thurs Hatch.,
advisi , Henry Ross, Lohn Ficklin.
W#,A
am
The minutes were read, but not approved 'because the members present,
at the previ:ous meeting were absent at this.meet'ing.
Salez Report on County Planning C.ommi,ssiont
(1) It is the general 'poli,cy of the County
Cdmmissibn to ask deed restrictions against
fur subdivision .of :lots in subdivisions
coming before -said Commission.
(2) The C.ounty Commi,s•ion asks for 50 right
of way.
The, ti Subdivision is far enough
dist.ant from Petaluma so that septic tanks
there will. not 'affect Peta:lwna,.
.COUNTY PLANNING
COTAMIS&I
Septic, Tank dti followed. It. was SEPTIC T A-INK
pointed ' out by theCity Manager that septic
i h p
t fr om rom a publ c _,"ealth standpoint are'
d
never satisfactory for a, concentrated pop-
ul. at i on. A water supply problem ;will arise
unless groups of pupul.at.ion are provided
with primary dd,gester for zewage, because;
unde r ground rground water streams' are, poisoned. Subdividers should., at least, be'reqqired
to install sanitary drainage systems to
connect later to _ The Commis
d to. aontinupi�!s policy '�'Of Opp
s eptic tanks With i-n. an area three miles from
the city limi'tz, since County -he,alt,11- problems
will affact •ataluma, citdzen.s if -in. no other
way than - through • C ouhty_ t axes
,b 'W
OVeller Hbpj' ins re p re sen by Garl Wallin
asked re,connslder_at ion- of Commission action
on a proposed apartraent
g groj�p, a
219 K,,e,-1-l_.e' Str&et, so that the buildertmay
be allowed 85 square feet less thah- the
1.500 'square feet r6qui-red, Af ter careful
- study,. the decision was
IVELIER HOPKINS
Thi:s request is grante the fact
thnot the CommIssion, plans to make that :s!
t ion of the proposed zoning ordinance which,
1 -50,
rs,ets, b -tq., f t. requirement more
Lehi.ent as. to the square foot requirel2len't
Thi change in the propos ordinance is
deemed neces due to the fact that the
R-3 area is comp9s,ed chiefly of small lots
already lready develop�ed and a 1500 sq.' ft. require-
ment would be too high f or Petaluma.
Zoning Ordinance chang-e is made, as follows:
Section 5031 is changed to read "1250 square
fe�et for each f amily unit in any multiple
fte gr oup dwelling or auto court.`" in-
st of "'fifteen hundred `(1500) square feet
for each family 'unit et
Vote S>al,es ye DeLuca,, yes; Olmsted, yes.
ZONING ORDITNTANC8
M
Application for steps and a porch, for a S. S. PECK
- building at 7th and 'C Streets :eras denied
u application was
the that the app
on grb-nds
inappropriate for the wor being done.
A".
-s,
As reported b Ren y R os s, the applic ant
y r
is remodeling, a duplex .-into a-triplex with-
out g building - permit and in an R2 zone.
Cha.- irman Sales exp�a.lined that Peck's violation
was not wilful or conscious *as he (Pec;k), seemed
to, be under the impres that someone el,s,e
was getting the permit for him,.
Denial was on the fol,lowling vote.
Sales,, yes; DeLuca, ye83, Olm`8ted yes.
Carl Wallin asked Advice as to possibility CA13L i 7 tALLIN .
of adding to. the Ca�rnpfire, Hut in such manner
a to cover 48,% of - the area in an R-1, zone.
He wafs told that the CoiTffnissIon. had the power
to-z a "us p permit" and that since the
GTripTi-re Hut jr4equiras lass space Tor the usual
;activities which mak& a. back , yard *a necessity
in an R-1, zone the use permit will be granted
when application is made.
Girl VV asks if parking spac& 'xa.s re- CARL, VVALLIIT
io-dental b
au lred for a medc wilding in an
A'-3 zone He was in-formed that it Is: and
'space is determined
. M ,
that the extent of such
,
ithat some study would
by th�e, Commission, but s
be; required before the spacie for any such
area can be breci,sly given,.
M
Carl Wallin asks if 1Q'O% of the. ar4&a &An be
covered in retbde.1ing in a C-1 area.. He ;vas
told, that this is allowed. Re. als'o asked if
- 6 d and was informed
p ar'ki'ng space - *as reqyuir
that it was th6, opinion of those present that
such wa's not necessary but further study, of
2
-
A t'he area and plan uas necessary wh en more in-
f o rmat ion was available to �the Commis.sdon as
t, ocation of the proposed remodeling work.
Meeting r•e.ce.ss to be reconvened at the
call of the ae�cretLary upon notice 'f rom the
chalrri°ah.
I
.CARL WALLIN
MEETING RECESSED
A.PTEST:
Secretary Planning Cormmis�s Chairman
January 27,_ 1949
Recessed N,loeting of January 23,, 1949 convened January 27, 1949
at call of the secretary on order of the chairman.
MI
Present:: Paul Sale s, Thurston Hatch, Mathilda Olmsted.
Ab,,s I�q&ene. DeLuca,, Leigh Shoemaker
Adti1szIng: 'Lohn Ficklin Claude Ne i s'e,
Zoning Plan' changes approved as f ollows: ZONING PLAN
Sec tion 5.1.5 Rest 'homes, doctors, offices,
clinics for the treatment of human
ailmen;ts, and prof es,sional offices
provided that a - u . se permit -shall
f 1:rs be secured in each case,,
1 by Hatch, Second by Olmsted.
Vote: Sal,e,s, yes; Hatch, yes; Olmsted, yes.
Section. 11 'Nion.-�cionforming us
11.1 Continuation inuation .
Ti. 11 TrFe 7 lawful - use of land or
building existing on I the effective
date of this ordinance and-not con-
forminal to the r'egulatjons for the
distrlcrt in which. it is located may
be c,,c)ntinued
gem en c
-Enlar t ReStruction and
Alt e.r at i on
i l - T �,
- 2 The nqnconforming use of land or.
building shall riot be increased, en-
jarg,ed, moyed,, recons'trqcted or struct-
urally altered unless a use permit is
f irst s.ecur 'in each case..
11-22 Ordinary maintenance :,'and repair
may be made providing 'that, such work
doe not exceed f ifteen (15) percent
of the appraised. value in any one 1)`
MI