HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 07/25/1949Appl.ica, for permit to construct ne
id as p,er p1an at '856 6th Street.
0
Tranted.
Ayes: Sale'Zj, Zhoernake-r, Ha`t DeLuca.
No e s�: None
Absent: . O lm- sated .
Appl.i.cat-Ion. f or, periirit to construct 'a w.@,-r e.-
house at Bridge Stre and River*
G r an t e d.
Ayes. Shaemaker, Hatch DeLqca.
Noes: None
Absent:. Olmsted.,
KEN GOLIN
C.. S. PHILLIPS
0
Application to construct a one s -store - DR. M.. L. NEILSENI
building at 210 Fourth Street.
Granted,..
Ay e s: Safes, Shoemaker, Hatch, DeLuc"�a*
Noes: None
Absent: Olmste
Appli to construat a residence, as per HALTER THOMPSON
- olAns at 8th Ai G Stree.ts.
Gran ted.
Ayes; Sales, Sh Hatch., D'eLuca-i.
.Noeisl None
Absent : Olmsted,.
'There belfig no further 'business. to come before - the meeting, the
meet ink; was adjourned,
Sec _Commission,
72
Chbi-irman
July 25, 1949,
Ab sent Gomm Olmsted.
Advising,:' Mr. Henry Ross. .
'
R,egular Meeting. Council Chambevs:, City Hall..
Present Comini,ssionors Sales, He(tch., $Iioerlaker, DeLuca,
The minutes of the spe,qial. meet: ng . h6 ld July 14, are t.o he
__
prepaied and distributed to Y the Comdaissioners.
Request-s in a letter to the Gommisis IVIR,; .1-LAL , SHOT NI14GH
as to whether a second story
c 6 n b e b u and used as 'an apartment by
the members of the family now qwning�:.the
d'welling. This apartment is to have,, an
butls.ida entrance The location is i1o",rth
Fair and ,Sonoma Avenue'_.
.Mr S.choenrigh, is to be advised by letter
that the proposed aonst °ruc�ti on does not
.meet x th the, R -.1 z:,oning for this ,area.
u
Application to construct; bleachers and
utility building., While there ,seem's, to
be some discrepancy in the .me a uremerits
of the property line_ s., the app li cat.ibn
was Pranged in view o:f the limited amount
of spad the fact that there are, no
`adjoining residences.
Ayes,:- Sales,. Shoemaker, DeLucxa<.
Noe s • None
Absent Olmsted and Hatch.
Application to construct a x 9 plahoizse
and a 17 x 8 sleeping room . at, 561 Central.
No action was taken and,. i•t w,as s:ugge�ted
that City Engineer • confer with_ appl ,c,arrt,
making, sur;ge,s -ions .a's to pl:an`'that will
c:omp.ly,, if possible, with building code.
App lic.a,t. .on, t °o construct a new sheet met',al
factory At 615 lWa Stne
Granted as it is not considered an
obnoxious business.
Ales:. Shoemaker, Sales, Hatch, DeLuca.
Noe s,: None
Absent Olmsted.
Application to conduct' an auto wrecking;
bus,lneses -4 ?.�10 112 Main `Sere °et.
,Denied as this is the wrong zone for this
type of' - business. Auto wrecking only per-
mitted in M zone drith "use p.ermit ",,
Ayes;' Sales, Shoemaker, Hatch,. DeLuca.
Noe s: None
Absent: Olmst ed.
r .
s�tructnaneadditlionstoaanlexisto to on=
Fo.r
lding
at North End of Water Stre:et:,
Granted
Ayes,: Sales, Shoemaker,, Ha,tc,h, `DeLuca.
Noe S;: None
Absent: Glmsted `
A. letter re from Mr D. S,. BO u r
ing that this church had purchased tyro
lots located on 6th Srtre:et north of Nh1 .
and asking written approval. of site for
construction of a church building.
73
PETALUMA HIGH SCHOOL
,, HARRY' 'VVAF �NER
PRIDE OF •PETALUT &A
FROODWR STOVE CO,.
JOHN TURI:NI
VOGENSEN :CONST•R;UCTLON
C,.OhIP ANY
tat= CHURCH OP JESUS CHRIST
of LATTEii- DAY SAINTS
View
(Continued on Page 7th )
- July 25,__l949_
FIRST -PUBLIC HEARING QN BAKER STRFEt';,EXTENSION.
P Comm -issioners Sales, Hatch-; DeLuca,, Shoemaker
Absent: CormtsissIoner Olm;st:ed
Ad•is City Attorney Brooks,, Henry Ross., Lohn F.icklin-.
7.7.4"
- Chairman 3 _ale:s explained, tO, those pnes . ent- ,the t plan lines.."
and asked, of t hose "present if there were any quest ions or objeztiona..
owner asked several, questions MR JAC VAN
A property X� CA AUGH
as I to how the plan originated and by who se
dire c,urve, as shown on, map we-re .p lanned - .
151r. Cavanaugh also 'qu : estione d fi gure s and,
mea,surement Mr. Ross, upon exwrftinPLti-ori of
the map, said there seemed to be an error-of
- F.
2 8 f t'. 6t'. ' Mr, Cavanaugh further asked if tb
Plaftning Commission had- considered if t raf f i c
warrant - the propos,ed ,extension of the street,
.and d not straig,h.t. li.ri.es cbzt less - th'--an
carved lines. -Mr. CaVanaugh stat that -he
does not. approve the plan as presented. He
would recommend a d'i-P,ec line. Direc•tion -of
bi-:section. of his property 'is th C avanaugh
e question,
not, the bi-s.ect;i,dn itself. M r .
further stated that 'he does not believe -.that
the lino are a direct following- of ' Lines a,
Z by Hahn, ` Campbell & Atsoclates.
12 Spring Str'ee , .(Property Owner) also asked, MR. RAMEY CHANEY
if the 'traffic on the- street in question
. i , nerit.s, the prop,o,s.ed ext.ensi-ion,,' and .WIr. .DeLuca
QxpIained that a traffic survey showed that
a great deal of traffic could be taken care
of with this extension. Mr. Chaney gated
that he: objects. if his taxe would b,,b rained
&e,d
on account of the two frontages' thatirwoul-a
re -. to his property on. the extension of
the -prop.o,sed ext
14.7 Douglas Street (Property Owiior) stated K-R.. NELSON ASBELL
that the ' pro - po&ed-exten , sion is satisfactory
to him providing ther.6 won't b,e any cost 'to
the property owner, that the C ..move his
garage,, that the City stand the co.-S ;of im-
provement of the street, and compeftsat' the
property. owner f or reasonable l Value of property.
Mr. Asbell'further stated, that . he might 'be
interested in 'buying the VVick house and
swinging it around onto hits vaa,aint lot.
Mr. MiTner s'tated, that he objects to the
. proposed plan lines of .:street ext:en- - si on
if he Ls to be ass :f or' higher v
and do e.s not p,articularly. care to see the
.street go thro.ag
g h. (Property Owner)
124 'N,. Upham (Property O asked if
MIR.: JOE MILNER
,Mf? VIC ROSSOTTI
dl�
7U,
their lot �jecomes a. ' corner lot by reason of
the proposed extension, would, asse•ssment.s
be rained, and if plan lines are. acde'pt,4ble,
how l ong b -..'ore work - could be started. Mr..
:ef
,Sales °explained 'that after plan line .is.
accepted by City-, Action mu st --'� place
I p. c
within two years or all plans are automat-
ically Mr. Ro wishes it
known that they are planning, to build and
are concerned with the location of garage
and driveway. - They could adapt their pl ans
to A, 651 1o' t., but could not Use the plans
they now have If new street goes through
they want the garage on rear of 1ot,. It
not, thety want, it in another pos,itloq.
There being no further queistims or statements from those preaent,
Chfiirman Mr. S,al, concluded the hearing, at 4: -P - iv -
ATTEST,:,
S.ec',r Cbrnmi'ss16ii Chairman-