Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 10/04/1951W. The location of the proposed site would be matbly°'ha , If way between. East D and East TVashington Street. After` consideration, the c*ler*k was asked to inform_• the Council that �the Planning Commission recommends that they utilize, the facili ties'of Kenilworth Park -in such a gray that it would not impair, the, use of it for ariy future building site and subOec,t to the approval of the,Board of Fire Underwriters; also, - provi - 1 the State FL2x Board. will release the 9 property. A letter was read from 1st. 'Lt. Robert F. Nichol.q regarding. the' acquisition of 2 acres f or the'con- structi of an, :armory and, vehicle storage spa:ce. The, Commission felt that information.- . should be. obtained before a decision could be reached..' They 14r, Marshall- to contact It. Nichols 1for- further information, NATIONAL GUARD ARLDRY -o further business to-come before the Commission t - meeting -was -was. There b 0 b eing n tI adjourned at 9­50: p.m., to September 27 'at 7:30 P P Mss­n, UHairman Secretary fanning CM - o October 4., The regular ; meeting s held Qctober 4 1951 'at _ of the Planning Cbnrn±s,si6n wa 4:30 p.m.. in' the Council Chambers, City Hall...' Present­: Cbmmission6r Byce, Dickerson; Elphick Absent,: Commissioner S - c -9 hoenin h'& K - Ex Present'. Mr. Vogensen "City Officials Present: 16% Mar',hO_I Mro Neis Mr. Brooks the Chamber' of Comer bPP sTl PAR-KING A-letter from ce with an Cached` letter f rom, Howard Fox., Manager -of Hotel Petaluma regarding off street truck parking c a and its 6-ffect on hotel business was read and filed., Lti Nichols of the National. Guard Was. present to NATIONAL GUAF6.. ARMORY SITE discuss the site nth the Commission. He gave a r - b f e t- of the histor of th bri ef �r por -,y e National Guard ­ - .1n. Petaluma its need's for &��'armQry* He "fur- 'Pe:.be ' , blueprints and a. photograph of !the type of - niched art6i7fto which. Petaluma vp.u-1d be entitled. The St ate, would constt uct;the, builIding if �the -land i7ere provided by the :City. - o County. The 'funds w ould '9 1 A ll, come f rom Federal Government an - - the Nation al Guar- Treasury A full time dian Would be d me custo 7llr provided to care for the buildi and A cyclone fence. Would. enclose the ax-e-d for security of- ' equji-pment. Landscaping would be provided probably within a, year I s time. tl 4 IAf IJ a y I� Iyi i4 6 Local co ntr actors, would be: a llowed to 'bid on. the: project and the contract would, be to the lowest ibidd6r. The :b ilding, would- reinforced steel and would consist. - .of a large assembly room, a class, rooms, a supply, room, a locker room, men °and women's rest ; rooms., a kitchen and tiro offices;. The ',.kitchen facilities and assembly room would be- available to the public for civic affairs;, dances; banquetO etc'. There, w u-ld be a, .small fee:: for the: use of` the armory, probably, around :$25 plus a fee to thpAustodi°an :for his services after' such gather • ing "s:e . A priority system would be set up by the Adjutant General for the use of the armory. National Guard and Armed Forces Would have, first rating, then, cisic organizations and clubs 9 etc,. The' Commission assured Lt. ;Nic'hols that, they are verb= . _. interested and anxious to see the armory built in Petaluma and will give the, choicerof A site their consideration at the earliest -date possible.; -hey asked that. „the. selection. of an armory sites be given, publicity, , a_ nd agreed to adjourn the .meeting to October at 7 p,.m•6 i.n order to discuss the site :w;th all interested Parties, The, tentative map of McDowell Village was presented . MC 'DMIl VIL- LADE and studied, . The sanitary sewer out Lindberg Lane was discussed; `The subdivider-.- proposes° an $". line but -1t was. °pointed out that if additional land were subdivided • in that area, another '8" :line - vmuld. have to be laid along, the presently proposed line It was the, .opinion,`of the. Commission, and P'ir. Blackwell that it would be: :much more advisable to lay a 15" line anal- both, the subdivider and. the City would �- .share the cost. However, no decision, was reached and iVir. Blackueell, informed the Commission that unless A, decision was reached by the City before they acre ready to install `the 8" - line. ; , which would °probably be I ess than days from this date, they would go ahead as originally planned with the 8'-' line, It was the decision of the Commission-Ahat a.letter b.e.directed to the, City Council asking their consider aton`to: participating in constructing a larger trunk line sewer to the present subdivision under consider— ation, with a view toward .future subdivisions connecting tb: the trunk line e The tentative map': of V ]Sage :wa'- approved .subject to the deletion of the i5. ft. setback on all Iots " Application -f or , a use permit for an antique. shop at 522 =3rd Street'. The ;definition of ,an antique shop was; -d scussed and the following denclusioft reached VILLIAM KEPHART 4 . "An. antique :shop is a business which handles used articles which 'become more valuable- with_ age instead of being, depreciated ttereby� 'and does not tr-adea in hardwaxe, appliances or plumbing goods. Nothing will be displayed openly, outside the building, on the street, sidewalk, or in `the yard." • •A..'resolution was introduced by`Comiiissioner Dickerson - and seconded by Corrnnissioner: Elphick approving. the • application of Tdr. Keph'ar t, incorporating the definition Of, an, antique shop in the resolution: ® . Ayes: Commissioner 'Byce,`Elphick, Dickerson Noes • - None Absent, :l_, Commissioner Schoeningh & - Kinne A mot on,was made_'by Commissioner Byce and•seconded ANTIQUE SHOP by Commissioner ETphick, acceptipg, the above. definition of an antique shop .as a_ matter, of policy for -future use by''the Commission. Ayes >c C,ommssoner Byce, Elphck, Dickerson Noes::. None: Absent': Commissioner Schoenngh & Kinne `Mr Walla vras prese seeking . reformation on LEON L. WALLACE bu ding a econd home on his, lot at $33 B Str•ee;t T , in an• R' -2 -cone;- He said, he wished. to build_ a 3 room" house to; the 'rear :of. the present house on the -lot; K � it would be f or . himself, and, his wife and the front j t home would 'be, used for' :r,ental purposes; He considered; building a duplex r (vnli c� is allowed in an= R -2 zone), but_ decided' against it since 'his wife teaches piano and ;he, thought it would disturb tenants In the other `half .of . a duplex He. is,, therefore, as ng permission to abuild, the home to the rear of the ,lot. The Chi missy on asked that he discuss• the building of• the - home,;!with his, neighbors - and get their reaction and that the_'' appear at 'the next meeting, or •send' their expressions to•, the` Commission- and the problem Vould be discussed at that dime,,, If there are no objections:.from. the neighbor ing property owners,, - the application :might be ,granted by a variance or re They asked Mr'. Wall to again be: at that time. TuZr; Carl Wallin, was present to ask the .opinion of CARL WALL -N ' the Commission .rega_rd.ing a lot on ;Nob :fall T errace .and Hayes Street - Extension. Hey stated that there, is a 2Q ft,.easement.to the rear- of'_ the property and _�- asked about side 'line 'setbacks, .since the lot presumably— is' Bordered by 2 streets and an easement, „ y The Comms,sio �f -n informed h� that if Hayes Street Extension is not. dedicated, it would be considered an , • interior, lot and 10% of the -lot width would° be required - a_�, •,.� on' , side line, setbacks,, orenot Hayes Street x ensiontis a d b e e�stabhstre whet °her Th ,. cited, street, 11 'of ' PACIFIC 'Mi . Neis asked the opinion the Commission 'TELEPHONE regarding 'the; black topped � surfaced ,area behind &c TET,EGRAPH COMPANY the new telephone building. They wish to park. company trucks there .at night and wondered if it were permissible, .., Mr, Brooks stated that any use could be made of ... the property which was ;incidental to the use of the land ands that he felt trucks could there;.- 14r. Neis presented. a plot plan of a, garage which . MR ERVIN WACIER Mr." Wakcer -' 201 Webster Street'; wished'" to build " on the ;.property ine on Bassett Street. A variance would be required and since Webster. & Bassett .Street intersection is a very bad corner, the. Commission felt. uch a request should be denied because it would create a: definite hazard. ` There being no furtYier business to come before the. Commiss 9 the meeting was adjourned to ThursdayJ, October 11, at°7:30 p,m _ I k ecr ary - Plan.nzng- Commiss o . . Chairman October ll', 1951 T he adjourne -d meeting Comm the Planning Counssion arras held October 11,. '1951, at 7;30 p.m, in the Council Chambers, City Hall. Present; Comru:'ssioner Byce, Dickerson,. Elph ck� Sbhoeningh & Kinne Absent: None Ex- officio Presents YIr. Vogensen City Officials Fres;ent': Mr:: 'IL- Irshall & 11r. Neis The minutes of the October :1L, meeting wrere corrected as follows: Page _193 TON L. :VII LLACE 3rd paragraph. LEON L. WALLACE The sentence .!'If there no objections from the neighboring property owners., the5 application *might be granted 'by 'a variance o :rezoning." was' stricken from the records,. The. miiittes, 'were approved with the above correction. " Tlze final map of : ItiIcDowell V 11 age tivas ;presented and IVIC- DOV ELL VILLAGE - discussed.' IViro BlacldVell was presento I:rir,.'Marshall. reported that nothing had, been worked ' out 'on" the proposed 15'' seVrer line. He statea . that iU funds mght:be available from the acquisition and. imprdvement fund and" emergency fund. " The Council , was in .favor"° of the 15" line if funds were available, " Drainage was discussed and it, Was establ shed that the �subdivis on would have adequate .drainage.