Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 12/06/1951Deceiver, .1951 2 0-4 4 The regular meeting of `the Plann rig: Comm1 ssonr was held December 6, 1951, s ' -- at -4 :'30 'p.m.- in the Council• Chambers, City''HaLl 3 1, S Present• Commissioners;Pickerson; Elphick and +Krone Absent• �. Corissigner Byce and .Schoenngh r ., Ex;_officio, Present :y .142re. TTogensei= , City Officials Present. ll'!r ® , Aleir' hall and .Mr Neil The minutes of the previous 'meeting wiJi- approved as w_rittene 1 public hearing was. held on `'the. - rezon ng : of the PUBLIC- HEARING ". ZONING .CHANGE pro ert bounded E lisp Street - Westera Avenue P y', • ' Fair Street - and Baker `S,' et fron an .R =2 zb_ ne to an • R- 3,' zone`. 'There were no com�rients or objections and the matter . was: tabled until the next public hearing , h will _. be :held `December 20 i p resent 1�4asselh -and Mr. Lihaebeck re we:`to A IM. MASSELLI : again discuss the' request of. ` 1r,. Masselli; to build aI -ocery store ,on the sorrier of,•Dast,'!D" and Payran Street. The pasty action by °the 'Comma sson' `on the matter was eviewed: and, Mr. 11asselli yias'. unformed that. iio decision r could bez reached unless .a formal application for °rezoning r ° �• , is received. They; indicated that they would., not act (•' favorably on 'spot: zoni would, consider rezoning of the southwesterly 'side of Payraii Street`• f _ i East Wash= ington Street` to, East., "D" Street if the property 'osmers in that' area :are, ri favor of rezonng i:. 1 . Mr. Uarsl all and Mr.. Neis offered their services: ;in help- ing:fl�r. MasselI i prepare 'a petition for rezoning. This petition would show the "uses: which, would automatically;,be allowed if the area .were, rezoned F' 14ir Bil'bro� s reque t to';buzld a duplex on `G Str..eet RICHARD ,E: I3IhBRQ;' F. - between °6th &,:7th Stree "ts was; dscusseda, ;Thererere :.• no objections sinc.e that area is zoned R- :and he•was. 7formed. _that ,favorable : action would be- taken on. his,_ . • . application at,the special meeting Decefnber' provided -.he ,paid the $h10: filing fee requirede` I' • Cor_respondence 'from Poultry'Producers to the Cit• COPELAND" STREET- ABANDON mft' - . y __ Council regarding: the abandormnent' ;of the dead' n .. OF portion, of 1Copeland, Street :was re :ad and discussed, but no decision -was reached', ` The Comm ssion ws 'l . look over the - pro erty 'and give an opinion- "at their �- p nelct regular meeting. C - ` l r Ham Schoeningh ..appeared at a prey -Lous meeting; REZ ONING OP .PROPERTY ON, , �. p _ to ask the' o in�on :of the Comm sion regardirig're- HIGH`AND UPHAM STREETS ' zoning, of property, on High and Upham Street to R.:3. It + -'tivas : again discussed: a:nd those members of =the CommissiOn present: .felt.that. favorable consideration' vvquld be given to; a'. rez oning`. if, formal applcstion is ' made. J „ Vii• ... .r "� ! Mre• ATeis informed the Commission -that ;a home:' s SET BACK f1 : -_ being built on, the' corner of Baker.. and Tui ti,' ` which 14ppeaxs1'to. be- in violation of the - - on n.g, L 0rainancee It is :not in violation, -as .the curb ne is: the: property i n I.Me ' s'etback on. Baker Street is in line .with 'the ,adjacent properties" and ' on ,Tunz,,. the setback is. °more` -than the; average ; setback:: m ..the. - block. There ? being,no further business toy come' the Commission, the meeting' was adjoUrned at `5.50 p.me i �/./�1// L/C �'. • W � -. �{Y tJ'�✓ . ._ _ � X1 • . . ecret✓aty Planning Commission hairman December, -1951 A s , i & of the P- Tanning Commission was; held December'`7, lj5a, at. T .30 p m in the : Council Chambers City H all; r Present: Com�iissoners'DZCkersory Elphck, $choeri�ngh and Krone _ Absent :'. Commissigner Byce t : City Officials Present:Lr.''MarshallT r Thus being, t time and'' place "set: forfa: publ c ,2ZLIA�d J:; `PATTERSON hearing on -'the application of William: J. Patterson, 215..- 12;t1. Street; * ,for .a 'variance fo construct ''one bedroom and bath within , ft. l� ; in' of - the . property line on the northerly _side of the present d�relling and 5 . ft . 6 in. •.on the. wresterly - ."side - of . `the dwelling, ; Chairman Dann called 'for comments 'from the Mr..John °Lounibos, represEnting Mr. R ' 'S. Currens� _ 101 'Grossland stated that Mr'.; Currens. objected ' to the :granting of a variance since- he is an adjoining, property i.owner and. he felt that ;the ,pro- :posed improvement'would depreciate the.- :valu "e' of his •,,property .and would::great7,y . inj - and �d'amage., the i.se and enjojmeint ;of his living roora, and patio.. He •stated' further, that the tion to. *l , ,Patt ;. ' 'ad erson' s. home would Great" -a , precedent in that . tz. "might allow in the future;, additions •to• buildings which tivould' destroy the artistry of, •the res'ideritial '.area that 'e-%±s ;ts.' there.' 'Lounbos suggested ' that -the" Commz sion vevr the f ,�� • m, i proposed addition : from: - Alr. '"Cur living • room in order ' . s , to understand his point; of view before :making a decision., y Mr., Curyens 51vt 1 is in tY e'.rear' of his house. and a patio yvhich� is easterly ;from the rear f' the. fiome • of htr Patterson® F e