HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 05/01/1952•' }. i s ' ) , � - ;) _ 4 x +� tT ; ` � • ° -: � : . ;
Ayes : y Corrnmzssioner Byce, Dickerson, Sch'oeningh & Krone T
Noes' None d v; 4
---� Absent' Comm? ssioner Elphick.,
" 4,• The clerk. nsatructed, 'to inform the Council that z
'�� the Commission Precomrnended that the` requasement H of
I
+ M' final map be orm.tted.� _ `
m There being no ".further business tos come before . the Comte ssa on the' Tmeeting vras
Pd j ou_ reed " at 1a 5 - Po mo
t
ecretary Planning Pbtffis si 6h r` haarivan
•*, ;». i.
, May 1, 1952
The °regular meeting Hof the Planning' Commission was held h2ay 1,1952 at 'y7:30 p.m,
in 'the Council Chamberd Ci H all
-y.
1 4
Present "Comets stoner Byce, -. Dickerson, Elphsck, Schoezingh •& Kinrie
Absent None, r 5
Ex officio TIerribers 'Press
nt T's C0 ] 11
City Officials; :Present• at Policy. Discussion Mr. °Ba�rcl; Mr. Brooks,Air;,, t Frank
- ,.the . Tast regular meeting were approved at written. ; t4
e before, trier .Commission ask n tifor DR., DAVID T: JONES
Dr.:Jones rappear d g ry
information regarding secure ng a use peat "t' to con -
duet a doctor's office at 26 `B Streeto It was point
out 'by 'the Co�iras ss on that a cond�Mon of the'> use;
perrtri t if granted, .would; be that act uate parking,
space off the, street bb,,prpyided for ,Dro Jones needs,
y Y
andt.hat :of 'his patients,
He said, that hl's practice is ,Iim� red and he could. ~L
provide 2 or 3 parlczng spaces WriiCI he would be
` adequate 'kfor `his' needs�0
M ®, Cr tchfield 4pp!16Ation for -a ;'use ',permi t' EP Tut. CRITCF FFIEI�'D =
which was granted at the• meeting was,rev?ewed
After a :discussion; a - motion was'`'made by C.onm ssloner
nded by
Byce; and seco Comtn Schoeningh amending
u s the conditions'
'6_ the us.e pexrrizt as follows "
r
Manufacturing' operations -'of ;a "• nature that produce loud r ^'
noises will be permitted from 8.00 a.mo to 30
Trucks will ,not be a`116w6d to hold up traffic by back
° � i ng' into the buildinng, `but wall go in, head, first, then '
pass; through the building• and turn Faround anti.: come back:
{, through in_ to °the street head 'first.,. ti
9
e I -
i t
° ,''• , `' Ayes: Gomm�ssioner,:Byce -`, Dickersori� : ,llphick; ,Schoen ngYi� Kwine
Noes: None
Absent: None
4
A ,memo .was read,•.from the::City It was .I WEICOME, SIGNS
_.
�;
•�erect�on4o�f :aims on th they vrouldr favor
p e north aria south
g
_. ends of t>flym;provz�dang they comply �ya7 th `;all local `.
ordinances and,'the Division , f High�ay's.'xrequre
�� menu Some members; of ; the - , Comma son •felt•_that. =
r
o defii� to sites e a decision w
I _
sho d be establas ed efor 1 }
„4j x could be reached, However, °they . faile,d,� to reach ;a
a dec sa.on`-on� any recommendation C y C cil
a • ion to the it oun 9 t
action was �ddferred 'until: a later time, r
. ' r s s J Fi,
Councilman Adams was present as a Committee member to SUBSIDIZING SUBDIVISIONS
1 Ai_ - - -
discuss subsi d2> rig , o L
i . .
A motlori was made by Commissioner S.choenngh, sand.
° seconded ` t Coirml ssonerr+B�ce that. the Council be' S !
by
r
informed that. the Commiss:z on d-id not feel it. arras within;
. p of p involving experidltures ,
their rov>_nce 'to dictate.. olca.es
of money.o
-.. Ayes i Commissioner. `Byce�' D1ckersori; Elpl i cl , SchoeningY , Ki.nn
r Noes: one „
y , Absent None'
memo 'from the C1ty Engineer ° was read concerning hJFAHIINT APdNE$ATION
the.fannea.ation He: stated that the; annexation would :
be of na d`etr ment'to the C1ty
- <
After `d> scussarg the: proposed• annexation; the tClerk
F . vras > nstructed °to address a letter to the City Council
Stat n that the Plannzn Corrmn.ssion felt
g g�> that the :.area . „
- :should be consderecll. for T annexata grit. by. the Gounci 1'm- ;
I� �I. }eJlix all 1 1 - °.. e .. •" } a.
;Mr; ;Gow appeared before the i6
- :,- . o - _mm>_ssion fo nfo --
mat on concern n a variance to bw l'd a e l ort r on G �
MURRY G '
.,.. g -'P
his ,lot ' on. Coady 'Cour -to It would 'be bu Llt on, 'the
.p ro ert p .ma line and wo uld Have a T> re :wal - ' The° ad
` - , Join%ng property owners, '�Ir. &'�. „Mrs. ? ;�ightman, have {, . „„ `�I t` =� '., a -..: L � -.' ��:''`
no o'bJect ons' to the plan; ' He' said ,that 1-fr he i.s „ o � '
t g ,not E'allvred to :build the carport it wi11: be eeessary f ~ v
+ for ha mr to se11 his .' hone' as . he has; two rears and ,must
,have space for :both of them.. - "'' :� j <<
aBoth Mr. Dickerson and Mr. Schoenin�h expressed the:
opi neon that they did not„ that 'Mr. should
be. sd'en ed the �fu11' ;izse 'of "the ;property: "when the . ? =TM "`
neighbors:.a±e mutually agreed;.upon ;the proposed I a
bu>_ld'a.n
L overage iruld'Abe practically .52� including the �
and c
carport. $`
a
9 k�1 Byce saa d that h_e felt that there would be `
r pro �s f_rom all
over the, clay and that he could
.snot favor 'a variance at ; the resent '.time,o'
T P s
a
fi `,Mz'. Krone” stated that he .would 'lake Ito ref ta ±nr•
Ir4 from :voting i.f `the variance was, applZ ed for.
• , fi' , 1. '' . -
All -- ; members have examined` the property with the
}
p y 2
exception of (rs; 'El • hidk and 'fir, ce® "The agreed
to look over the property at their e,arizest c.orr
:'venience and..zf:. necessary, a special meeting grill be
called to -take, action on'the variance:*-x
Dates for ublic heari_ s H: A. R & L. A Di�:EES
., rovere set far
rezoning p
A plicaton fo
„yry p a d, Jun 5, ;:in .the v .
1 , an e -7.3�
Council GYiambers, C'sty rH,al e. at p.m® w
referred to tY e Com3niss von ROSENELOOM
The Rr ^osenbloom Annexation.
b y ,the Cou_ncll was �g -Ven. to the Ci En ineer
'for.
atudy, - 3 tY g
" It Baas decided ;that ,a policy of having use perms s'� POLICY ,PROGRAM
w' ;variances and rezoning applications, processed' m A'
ahrough the De p Public4orks before..gos ii
artment o . -
before the; Planning Commission. be r,es and the,
e_ e
Comm ss onxwould not take' jac'tion until a formal apph
x z•
cation. ,ha`s `been iiiad'e,
•
It• was also agreed 'that the i'ndi�v� dual members of the
Commission would not. discuss any action on the variance
use pernn,ts, or rezone ng :° applications before', such ;mere
De artment of Public �dorks and
s
procesed through the p
Y
formal app] z cation :be made, y
- - T e o
hy felt that some .sort Hof policy
g I n C1t� County
rela s o ve t w inning and
tzon shoul`d f rmilated
' re
fi ��,w '��;pl•' `
i�! 'It; ,eras the feeling of
'he Commission that the .fringe
w3
area of a. 2 to -a3 mile radius surrouncU ng
s he
.i Y A ;
. � � , . `a x
t city"
�., n . and under
c ' for- mane nth cit '::zo
should ,be n: y
' r
uniform: bidldirig, electric and plumb) ng codes;o N ,.
It eras also agreed, that a unform'roacl :.policy. through
out ;Sonoma County should be established. L y
Plinnin
K p y
Commission mee n next Tuesda vuhich the Cit
Mr. inne was selected to'act ass okesman at'the Count
g g y, s:
Plarin�ng ;Gomrru asion ,ls' e xpected to- attend. Mr. Frank
ti�as :'asked, to invite' I��r Kennedy arid. Mr, Lyttle and,,:
the.:inatt'er of: pohcy on City _'C:ounty relations, control a
. . °•: 3 -
•areas and,.bwlding. regulations; vri11: be discussed.`
The subject of fees.for ubdivisions or annexations was
_.. .
discussed asici Commissn ones .Byce was requested to prepare
a s� of procedure as. carried, .out by' „various ,cities }
'throughout the Staten
.1
reminded' the Comma ssi on of a joint - meeting of`
Po -`' y the City Co :auncil, 'Board ,of Education and, Recreation
1 Gomm s s cions whicbi i 'scheduled for MMay 12,
Planning
1952,,
b
There bein nor further ,busines "s to; come. before the" Commission the meetri
.s. g
:was ad 7 ourned',. at 11:00
Secretary Plannlnsx Co ssion r halrman
,
I �
E S` The re ular meet2 gf the'Planrun Commission was:; held' Thvrscla M 15 1952
g g y� ''
-the Council,:Chamers;,Y City
Present Commissioners ce; `Dickerson, °lphcl &•. Schoer�i '
:Absent° Commissioner lime y
E„ officio ., em ers Presah Colin
„
City Officials;;Present �[r. Baasd
The minutes of Aprll 1 28, '1952; vrere' approved as �artteno
The minutes of May a' 1'952; were approved with, the zollowing correction.
Pa e 22 first ara a h' sec
I
s ' 7,; _.. p gr p and sentence should, be correcte,'d 'to read that if f
,necessary, a special; meeting �rould .be held to °determine the attitude
;Commission° toward.' an,. application for, a variance,
Tha s ` the `time and place set for Ap7 dlic PUBLIC HARING
`hearing on the ;rezoning 'of the R-2 :portion of the Rezoning
r' V lar'ea"bounced . by . bJestern Avenue, Hoyrrd and Bak =er " wz
Streets to the southeasterly end of `Baker Street
ZOr *t along thepropeFrty' lnesrhlch continue into '!A". k
:Street to, Howard Street ;vice hairmAft D x z ~
�- �d
called fora comments',fram the assemoly, l
°ackerson n
Mr... Dougla Foot, 2Q9'Baker Str'eet� eras +p resent and
`,F'hras 'opposedl to `'R-3 uses' -iii ,that areao �'
,
There, being no onef else present to offer comments;,. 4
:'Vice•= chairman.D ckersori announced thA next
hearing :would �be held June 5; - ;at 7 ..30 p,'n?. iri 'ahe ,
i
Council Chariib`ers,,
:A copy of 'the, Freeway Agreement be ween ,ahe.'State C013RESPONDENCE
and'ahe, City of ,'Petaluma =eras :xeceived and giuen t:o
the clerk . for filing:- a
Also tread eras a :letter from the,, Darin f County Planning
' Comm fission stating tthat cop ythelt 'Siubdi "
> a y� o v sion�.
Ordinance would; be °orUVarded,4upon its completion.
„
Ulce= chairman Dickerson asked ' for an a ress`on �IITRRAY'G0�`� u
,. ,
from.. Commissioner Elphlck;aconcernzn I�r..Go�a S,%
a w
�� � I w regiies,t� regarding ,a varidrice since -.s: .?'vas the' oilly,
P 7 i.
Commissioner� who had . not -,prev ioiusly .expressed •Ian
opinion. ;She stated° :that ,she Wool "d 3ike° to re'serve's z . w
'her opinion until such tim_ a as; 'a, rmal :;application 9
presen"ted. ..
.r
n��,,. I ii I �;if r : . •. J ru .. ..