HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06/05/1952k
:
bt n Ma Y9;;`
A speci`a1 meetingox the Planning `CommTssiori wa`s held at 7 00 p CMay 19, 1952,
„ an' ahe _ C:ouncil Chambers; City Halh for the :purpose .of taking action! to cor- recf..
the. resolution of ;the. Planning Compiss on regarding the variance:requested•.,by
H,r,.-.C, Hazlett; ':. .
Present=
Corimv ssioner 'Byce Sch
on,' oen n'gh & ,Kinne?
Absent.: Commissioner ;Klphick
A special mee`�ing was called' to• cori.ect ttie
the variance resolutZOn H,. C o H_ AZLKTT '
of 'the• .Planning .Commiss on 're.gardling * ,
reque ted by`H. "C :Hazlett;;. inasmuch as the .applicant''
mended` "his -app lioa tioii4® r , .
A �'resol ztibn', recommend ng that, the . amended ` application off', .
H C, .Hazlett; for a 15 ft,„ .setback 'on.Ga7.land Street, on his
P
property on the s- outheast corner of Keller and Galland
Streets' `be granted by: the City 'Council was introduced by
Comma ssoner 'George Di ekerson and'_:s ecode_d, by Coif ssonex'
U'incent' Schoeiingh ° >'
Ay'esi " Comm issioner Byce, D. ckereon, Schoen ngh &' Krone
'Noes,: None
Commissioner El hick
Absent p r
vr
Mr.. E�alhn Baas present ,_representing 'his client, PQr, Hazlett
IA' and' filed a" plot plan for the application vaZth a, 15 ft„ set--
on, 'Galland Street., t .
-
�7 There being, ,no uhing, further to come before the Comuu Sion, 'the meeting was;
Tv
q k ^ poi adjourned. r b
.,
,
ecretary lannng Co ssion hairmari ;. „'
r'
r June :5:' . _ 1 52
3-
The. regular ” reetng of'_ the .Planning Corrm�`sson was iheld June k5, ,1952; ' at 7,:30 pm.
in' the Council P-tambers, City Ha110
y
.. A � " 1
Pr`esent's Comm? signers' Byce;, Dickerson, Klphick, ,Schoeningh& Krone
Ab "sent: :None :
EX- offioio Members: Present '® C'olin...
C ty Officials .P'resent's Councilmen Brown:. Norwrood & S`chwobeda 'Mr„ Frank' 'M+ , Bi -ppks
'Mro `Baird ®
The, m� notes, cif the last regular `neetng and.' the last ;special meeting vaere approved
as,
r
This being the time and place for the ;second and ;final R;ZONING r Public Hearing °'
publxc hear ng' by the ;Pl ;n g Commission on the.`applcation
for• rezon of •the x -2b portion ,of the,: area;- bounded by' :
a - IN k bstern,,Aveh- e, 1.bw .rd and Baker ts to the southeasterly
end of Baker Street along Lhe property.�lnes which continue
into "A'.'! Street to Howard Streets Chairman If1nne called for
�
comments from the,;assembly® <
Commissioner Dickerson sltated that he Yiad talked, vas thr
Mre.lFoot4�rho expressed :ob�ectiom tof tYe' the
first hearing and since: he .f ailed appear at tYie second
in he, assumed he ;}aad no ob sections.
J �.:
r '
Slnce there v�ere no objections, ar'motign' was; introducedsby, 4 <
a
_ ed by :
Commissioner Elphick <
r Cornmzssoner Dickerson .rand second
r rw reeommending the above amendment,:,to the Zona.ng Cr finance. ; ,
A es • ' `ComrnY » ssiorier By" ' , = p ,
" Y. ce Dickerson El hick Schoeningh & Kinne
Noes . Isone, 6
Absent: None
a
"A le was read f`rom..P?1rs, •Mooney in which
-, she. thanked REPORTS &CORRESPONDENCE
the rCominisson zfor their action on her ,applcation for
r
\
Corssoner 13yce presented :the Commission wi th copies of
his report on Recommendations concerning the Annexation
Fee. Chaarman Krone publicly thanked 'h1m for, the time; and 1 m .
5 effort spent in coinpil�ng :and preparirig the 'report.
A 1'e =tter. from the: Cltizen� s Committee3 on Off. Street OFF STREET PARKITVG
Parking was read This matter was deferred until a <
later meeting due �'to the lack ' of - time.`"
f
The m� notes of the Bay;;Area' ,Planning C'omml ssioner� BAY AREA PLATJNING COI�tIISSIONERS::
— f Corimu ttee meet1,n of APr� l 2;54, were discussed and�it
COMM. _
etas the ..op� n on of `tithe Planning Commission that Petaluma
` � • should take an active
Part i
n the: organization regard7;ess r?
of ;whether'or not the remasnder p Sonoma County
participatesa
n N
d 0 inion -
p` s' from the City Attorney tconcerning' the ,Ehm 'T' 6
Lutheran CYiur ;ch `1)r. Patterson aril Murray Gow matters ,.
were reeeaved andrg�ven to the clerk for filing for
la't`er referenced
N6` taken as the' opinioi s were merely for
' the in o the `Commission®
k A °resolution : ;recoic�endng that the City Council cause .,a ' STATE'SUBDIUISION ACT {'
map to be prepared' and ,filed? w1 tT the' of the
Planning Commz scion of, Sonoma County covering; the'
P 9
terrs.t6r adjacent to:�and w thin 3 rules of':1the N
boundaries of the ,City and `accompany the "same w� h 'a
:1
request= to Inspect and ;make reconunendatzons concerning
` -_•-
a ). subd
the .map° or ,'maps of. pr_,oposed ; vJ_s`iori s wit q ,san
h nd
territory ad'j acent toa but outside of^ the c of
.
Petaluma tivas- 'introduced by Gommi ssionerrf Byce Sand
s . z
seconded by 'Commissioner Dickerson,
C
f Ayes • Commissioner Byce Dickers; ;on Elphick� Sbhobnirigh �c''Kinner
Noesi ,None :.
Aibsent..s None» 4 5
1
• ; M 1
t 1
4 � ati �_y , A me'morAhdum° from the CityAttorney r eg ard rig lot' front= LOT FRONTAGE
s ir :1 k`y age was, ,read'. However it was decided thata, action on
this matterould`be° deferredt'untl, a,later meeting as
It wi],1 require consierable; discussion,
; d _
, S, " - .. - q. ram • g,
A = second report from. the Clt E neer ' regarcLtng ` •; N ANNEXATION f
Y h
street drainage and the condition :�of the street improve
merits was
• After examining the map. of the proposed annexatzon, a •f`
s M „ , motion was° made by igot nis - ion Byce and seconded- by
„ a u: Cominl sinner, ding
�ElphiekBrecormneriato the Cit�r Council
' that favorable action b'e� taken ,on the a and
�
ti g'
* calhn their.• attention to the fact that there are
4 N �•
1 � ' defi'ciericies:• the approaches' t6. the subdiv
Ayes Commissioner `Byte,, Dickers "on Elphick Schoeningh & K1nne;
Noes None' ` � w ; - �'
AbsentP1one t F
A Council Committee composed _ of 1�
r.
• Brown, 'Mr. Narood ANNEXATION FEES
fir'. Schwobeda, NIr. Frank and Mr, `Brooks_ met ith,ahe s S
Cow scion to` discuss 'the recommended yannexation
{
After ad scuss on; the ; conclusion. eras reached that. there.: y
should be an',anne atiorr' fee , of X30' per ., 6. or X15,0 per` '
acre, wha chewer zs. - the; greater amount, `on a1 unimproved `: E
land within the Ci. y or- at they option of the City, Council, ;
real prgperty of 'equal , or greater °value in lieu bf the - fee.: r^
Improved``property being „ brought rithsn the City span Ar
they sum °4of5, per,•lot providing .the X25 sewe connection
`been paid, 2
n cur ¢V , : ,-' . Y` •{ � K ,.l '_ i - ... - _,,
� j The; fees, should be depositedi� In a.- Capital Optlay Fund as
if pvio
reusly ° recommended:
N fi
E 4
}
Payment ora deed to the land accepted ,in lieu of` the 'fee w
.b de ,
sh ould e ma previous.,'to the, th sub table
r annexation v+n
provisions made for refund in the, `event, the.'annexation_ a
1s not completedr within 6 omonths „, • _ _
A motion' was made by Comma ssoner and seconded
n r
bg' Commissioner wee adopting, the . amend'ed recommendaton
aril wlth the' .understanding that the recommendation to: the
Council ,would` beN transmitted by,.” the Committee from the ` } F
p k Councllo''
Ayes C;ommYss over a `Di`c ersom kip h�.ck :Sc oen%ngh' &` `Kinn
Byc ., k h . e" '.
N s• None. -
oe. ka
Absent 'None;'` k
Y
A: motion was ,made `by Commiss2oner'Dlckerson, and COUNTRY CLUB °HEIGHTS'
4
` b Comm sszoner-$choen ngli:that the: bounty Planning SUBDIVISION' o� Z -
Commisson lie advsed tYu Commission' favored the t: • i °
teritatve, map; as presented and referred the same; o' the City
~' Engineer for his comments,
Ayes Commissioner ice, Dickerson, Elphick; ScYioeningh & $1nnne
Noes None. s
I j Absent None= 'L
a� s There be rio`thiri further` to wide before the Co
a mmission ,.' the meet= was, a ourned:. '
g
g
t
ecretary aniung ommissY on. e Chairman