HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 07/23/19525
load from the 2-03' home's might require 'excessive `.chlorinatron S'etier Plant
acid he said thatt
-was Imperative that
C Speclficatzoris be follored and that
the City inspect the line dir! ng. constructiono
u '5 After a d�scussi'on, lt. eras decided that a letter. should ;be addressed to the
Sonoma County Pl`ann�ng. Comin'ss�on recoirmiendng ghat " a ' n no instance should the w
distance heteen .cuurbs• =Ue less than 36• ft," on a ''50 ft "street acid no -less: than'
1 Q ft, Y�et�,een curb, on streets '1?avin ; a w d th of 60, ;ft, , '
r ` , _ a -
It eras; also aug ested 7that,„ if possible, the SubcU 7- A' e o `to k coirrply
v th the City, Bu ldzng Code Elec:trlcal Code and' Plumbingr.,ode - the end'.:that;;.
as
an vrhenathose;.propekies: may be annexed" to , the City xof Petialurna�
posssb hty of sib stc dard construction vrill he'elun nated,
Itc vas decded'�.th3at a Metter' ,should be� addressed to the City Council pointing.
t of the` fac f that a request. vrould Ue made fox* sewer connection ,privz eges to
extend to .:the Novak Subdz�sion and that it:would throw an excessive 'load on the
present facilities •.of the bbWer disposal `plant which..a.s operating at full s
- capacity at .the present tame.
The C.ommi`sseri' - recommended that:• the adciitzonal 'burden; on -the City face lines
be'. denied aazd that ariy future requests. outside :sevrer connections..: also ; be
denied untlh sucl ,"time•; as `the disposa1' plant has:, been en
largedt to the extent
that � t' can, ;ade�qu'otely .serve not: only -.:the present City requirement's, _but< and
iacihtes to be annexed.
I'hEre being nothing further - -to come ' efor -e the Conmuss" the' meeting twas' adjourned:.
6 �a r 71
Bpi G i
r a .v
Secretary Plaizri ng ,C' had±man
* =.2- 1952
a
The regalar.=meeting of'the Planning Commass on was held W dnesd'' July 23, 1952,
at 7 3b p. m;: in the C:oune .l -Chambers;: City :Ha17:
Present Coirmiis.s or ers. Dicicerson, ,Elphiek, Schoen ngh & Xlrule
Absent: C'oitai,as -
C_ ty= Officials' Presents Tura Baird ti
The mzmutes of .the last 're °gulag ;meeting of: Jul 3, " and the: special .rrieeting of
'July 16;, were approved a"s` varittOn`. : 'l
A Metter from the`General Contractors' Association CORRESPUNDENO
statzn that, PIr'' ?Ham.`Sehoeningh had ; been appointed a
ei ar, ex - officio menber of the Cojp4sgi:on from July ,
'' ! 1952 to December 31, 1952;; �1as ;read.:
' A letter from ,Cohn Fcklin' Cityan'ager of Harij2sd;z PE RCIu1E1ER
ZONING =
�.
R A
was read: It concerned perimeter zoning and he urged
f
�t dl ng, State
the City of Petaluma .to loin J.n ,sponsors
- ,legislation. regarding p g
erimeter izonir ..
After =discussing "matter, the Commission decided 'to
recommend to the 'City„ Council that they take suitable
•
action .as far•Yas -thee League of California Cities' =is concerned.
They felt that the ='pr should' •be- encouraged as far as
the long range picture is = concerned. However; they, .felt
— th'at the present close cooperation that exstsa between the
• ' City Planning Comma sson and the County Planning; Commission
should -be 'aggressively pursued';
' °" Corssioner,' Schoeningh said that it. had been called ZQNINGr ORDITINCE
to his' attention that' the suggested additions to the Yanges in
r Zoning Ordinance. caned ,for off street parking facilities:
M but made no vmenton of access to the :parking space.. He
suggested that > the ord' nance . be ,• amended ,to , provid`e `for
, -
ro er access
It arki n areas. It bras discussed as. I to 11 proper. p g
nether - ,it •should. be specifically stated in the: ordinanee,�, u -
`suc as 20 'ft. driveways or 30` ft, driuetivays .or what;:
would be groper: -
The Commission Am scussed•the matuter and decided -it t should
be turned over to TvI Wise to determine what procedure
should be .fo11 owed with r- espect, to driveways whether it
should spelled out "n -the, ordinance, for" whether pit 'should
be' left to the Public Works 'Department and ,the 't olice Deg.'
partment to ,determine -G he proper access to. •ozf .- street par -k-
ng .facihte's. ;
�.
It was: ,also' .decided -that changes in ,the Zoiv ng Ordinance' '
which had previously -been discussed°should : be forwarded
advice
to 'T�tiro. 1Nise `for his
:� ---.� 'and draft .of ossible
p
legzslation';to change ther ordinance,
k ±special meeting.will:•be held to take action on the. Zoning
I cng es when the information is= received.
ha
p,
There :being nothing further °'to come. before the Commission, the:: ^meeting was
adjourned. at 8.20
_ ,p; F
ecretary Planning `C;`o ='scion- ,
; ChaJx qn
ugustrl3, 1952
The regular:•meeting of the : Planning C'ommission was 'heldednesd'a_y, august: 13;, °1952`,
in the Council Chambers`, City Hall.
Present Comrc ss oners Dickerson, Elphick • Sehoeningh .& .•Kinne
bsenti Comm sinner Byce =
X officio I i; ors, Pre'seri�,: Mfr-. Hain Schoenangh
Planning Consultant: ..lr, Yse
City' Officials Present Ira ;Baird .Brooks, I r. `Prank, ColuncJ:. an Adams;
Councilman '3rown .and .Qouftdi n Shoemaker '
I,,
7 F; The minutes of the previous - meeting were approve "d as written.
P. Mr � iise informed: the :Commission, that he feJ.t the OFF ET=T _ PARF�'IP1G. REPQRT ;.
�{
section of •the proposed amendment with reference. to' -
Commercial estab3shments •should. be, deleted. He felt _
a I��
that a71 other s.ug ,es.'t_ions , 1ere, very •legitimate are
quzrements since they attract large masses ; of people;.'
!
Who stay more than one hours