Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 08/17/1954A; • ACJtI�bS.� 1�, 195�a .. A regular meeting ug $he Pl a,m qt Hall Petit Luma ing r ssion was °held . on the ^ 17th day of A t. , 39 54 4 thy -10om be , Calif o .a :Press t:. C6 Seiler., Forster, :Elmore; and ;T' _' tea , , Bigelow � $ . �a:�a Aonffil,Gd "`�q• Baird, Director of Public forks and City Engineer Absent ssimners Li erso?a �atses� aza ' Ci$ `3ff$'c� Thero bol ;ho o r-re one g omissions., `the a nutes o vi f the previous m were app roved, as' submitted. Th6 f3tst :mAtter to come "bef'o the , co .esic was 'the 1954 Northi-9est e=tiom. 1radam, had been .sent to a.17: parti es 3:acluded in the am g tfpn request opinions on s :d tc ti .h ` Present egad opposed were J ©.Cilardi Mn OL - -� agreeable .. �. �o�sen end ® .:�nh�ne Present and �,.: ; • I . �id��'r�m,����� °sue " E®, rya & �se opposit:L on was re- ceived from Fenk Dohoghp and Benedettif taritt'en 'approval t'rc , 'Gehrke 5 �3 censt ®s Pasf ozi and Goff. o Thole .op > ®sed to, the annexation stated reasons hick n4uded possible NCRTI ST • B°I(�tiT sever end i4ater problems, as well l a$: "the additional tax rate. `The 'opinion of C11 commissioners ;present sari be zuraned up by the statement made 'by Coam.sdioner Forster g. fis nce, -It� is the vsy of our hove . _- t .to go.al.ong, more or , leis, with our neighborm :mad since a rns�jox°i tai des °esi ;�Yanex(Al I beliOV6 that , fi 'revised ;map should be ;sub® and J. Gil4r o Weque it, to: the o lginal .peti ichfO -to gent nritted to the; Cotuacdl deletgn only �exa2t Tien 'Benedetti this onA s e Rio ® ert i 3' cent : bo•th , edet .. sad J. Mardi and fa l yin g Ad- °b► - , a test St. 1l, be., personally is pted bBforG' being included in the annex& ' � Seri The t'di si.� d w11. 0 a, a map: . exc3:udixrg S 9 9 a w A ' public hearing with regard to the [variance Application R. E &L by° E. R: Bell to cons tftdt on lots 'T;dth less then : isqared . 609° frontaga €dad not qonfqxm ing the m1nim= lot- depth, 'peas set for 'September 7 1954. pub aria ; or H °S chos n3n f's Sid Yard Vav an'ce. 1�:€ 'he� .g _ � en comtehd6d.. Schoen= - r h g e plain d that all pl eas, had been started before the latest reg lations for side, yard had been established. the building In question ud.1 l 31a on the Original Prop line, wee, feet (10 -had b H. SCHOEN3NGH purchased from, Doctor a adjacent proper ty oer� to comply Frith. the previous ordinance. When the new ordinance Bate into 'affect' , 'Dr. 'Mine refused to sell another two feet (2®) to make the necessary five. foot (52) side yard. There 'being n objectiox s, s, roso1 on approving this vakiance was introduced by TalamAntes, seconded by ;Forster$ aid passed by s , uneMmous' vote of the commissioners present. sh Plat Proposed Patt6m,, prepared -by R� �otagoa 1ot foot a� the es, � was left nth the; V=wias for their appr e Thera, 66nmienced the first- public heating of "' two for the approval: of the Hester Stet and, Highmay Plano fir. Baird : N e�].�aed t this -is the, same plan .ch was jAudied by % t s° T & D , a comdttea and Corr too ae t City ADIM41. Th ply en ables one to go to or from center , of torn and be able to stay on major city strewbeJ not having to touch for. streets. Ther were no <ob j'ecUms fro the audience at this. `time. The sg6ond meeting - was scheduled for Septmdmr D' 19:50 There being no fu 'bugsneaa to eme before the eqmdesion., the meets was actJdurned un 1 70 p'em@ on September 7, '1951io ,