Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 11/01/1955November ,1, 1955 R,egular,.meet,i „ng off t'h.e 'Planning Commission ;held on t „ he f.i�rst ay. of Novembe.r;,, 1955, at 7:30 o'clock p.m., 'Counca1 'Chambeirs, C ty`�Hall; Petaluma, Ca 1 if orn;ia . Pre entt Commissioners Bi,gelow,SRobfog.e;laylor and Dicke'rson.: Absent: and Ta 1 amant e s . City Official's: Ci =ty Manager Ed. ,Frank and City Engineer. 'Russsejl W. Ingram. Guests: Leonard Knittel, Resident Planner. APPROVAL- OF MINUTES The minutes of October 18, 1 were approved as record.ed. REZONING OF "U” DISTRICTS This being the time and place set for the public hearing on p.arce'1s annexed to the City of Peta® f BEN WOODWORTH ANNEXATION luma since July'7, 1954,; to 'be ree ne,d; From r.U” to "R_l` Novak Annexation //3 -Parcel 1 „ Kr e sky Anne xatI on # °1 Mino,gue Annexation #1 Park. Lane Est ,a •e,s Annexation 1955 NorthW st Ah' exat i on From 't U" to "C - VI Novak Annexation #'3- Pa'rce l Z, Chairman Dickerson called for expressions in favor of rezoning.. None were heard. Then upon calling for expre sslons;: i oppos; t i on, -tqr'. D o . H,. Reeser, of 2,14'1 Magnolia Avenue, who recently purchased p:roperty that was .included In the " 1955 Nor=thwest Annexat i onI"; addressed' the' Comm. s s`i:on protesting the rezoning of his property to res 0 denti'al as h,e desired t :o have same remain as presently zoned. Relative to hi.s concern r`e0 ga= rding_ the effect rezoning,would have on his tax rat.,e,, Mr. Frank was called. upon. and exm, plained that his 'tax rate would not be i= n'e'reased�, due to residential, zoning- as the tax rate is basic. I.t ,Jas : further •explained- to: Mr. Reeser that the; procedure of rezon -ing is a l.ega.l matter in compliance with the Zoning Ordinance an that an R71 d.ist,ract is the type of .zoning for? h i :s 'v i c.i n° ty.. As� no . other .c,ommeftts were voiced, Resolution #40 reporting findings and, recommendat;Ions with respect: to _propo.s,ed ;amend- ments to'Zoning Ordinance #340'VCS by rezoning from I IU' t zones or disari;c-ts to other specified zonets or districts, int'r'oduc,ed b,y Commissi.oner Taylor and seconded by Commissioner Sal lees, was unan -imously passed by a,l l me.mb,ers pre,s Map of Ben Woodworth a- nnexa'tion was presented for cons,ide rati' . Said area' contains 30105 acres and is situated north and' adjacent to Cedar-Grove Park.. Letter, dated Oct. 2 5,1955,. i , County P Commission in; r -e,ply from' Sonoma, Coun - to comments requ'e,s,t,e as ,read, which. , advI , szed that the recent. r.e,zonin•g by. the. ;C'iay of the, Woodworth p;ropgrty estab'l shed" a precedent for the, future zoning in the : area, and that. t-he . annexation, will have 'no material :effect on the on the 'Sonoma County Mast e;r Plan "Of . Land'- `Use o Mn, WoodwortYiwas present ' an spoke - in" beha if o;f th s: app.l cat'i on,, �f o 11' wh tch Ie so hi t ton "• appnoving annexation of uni`nha�bite�d t'e *rrIto.ry to the City of Petaluma, "to be knlown a juge;ii wer t:h: Annexation" ,, A of : r o d'uc =e'd by CommI 's s i o °ei StLlIes and 'secori4ed `by CoinrrIis i.one,r Tay°l.or° . was unanimously, pa_ssedd by all members p °resent AM-STONE SUBDIVISION NO The `final ma; of Amstone• �Subd1vi's'ion. NO . P 1,. was pr°e ® . sent.ed for, the., Commission,o;s,',study Let.t.ens dated November, 1, 1955 from the C t. . - EngIne.er be constructed 'b • the t�h�e rm ov�ement., tl a�t will: were r.ea�d one ` 1 i,'s t-i•n e cert.`ifyi that theJfnal�map;dr, and the other is in conformity with, the. tent`a:t:ive :map. Fol,lowitng a br1 review , the map, R;eso1`ution #1�2; approv;ing 4 - - - , fina`1 map of Ams'tone S"ubd v "ision- l i.fttrod,, r by Commi'sz oner Taylor and seconded Gommi.s S4one,r ;Elmore, wars ° Jyo passed. by a "1 ",1 members present ADJOURNMENT The -re being no further business to c,om,e before " the me,e',ting, the, meeting was ad jo irnedo 1 44 i