HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 11/30/1956/6� /
r�0 195
A •
ec al TvleFtiYr, o the P ;° nnin C'oinms s oTa Aaa held can �`rz�Y a , November 30 "
x.9`56, a:`t 5.o O o P.m. in the Counfil Gham.bers, City %aL :�,, Petaluma, Califor
Present: Comzryss_zoners i3, Car lsona Elmore., Heppa_ IRobf,ogel, Salley
and Taylor.
Absent ,': None
City Off icials ; City At;t � 3 ' y Edou r ..R� 't and City Manager Ed. -rank.
SHEIL OIL .0O3 IV�'.r N
Chair man �;a �,� sated tha "IL; a special meeting had
b 0-I ca led for' °the pu p -;se .of rccons del ng the us e
pe?'mit app] s atlLon #8555 555 or t he She'll Oi mpan
..
{�a � p�
d.
v':7 VU "lUl nl_.y112C�.ry O. I:A'a•��5� �llJ ,sC�K.eo lr �nr�J �✓1 U� :ti� a
� e,- � a :t om a . e 'ri � a� � >at on a t the n rr t ne � s t c or e�° of
East utia sh i ?I1 gar . Pe r °an Str eet s (Petersen p :per °ty} ..
C-1 z,ona. Cha.Lrman Taylor asked for expressions, from
t j re res-�i�tat " �,_5 present of the She�Ll Oil Company:
The .sra — ted t?rat t��ey had not,ri rsg f~ar "tYiea' to, add.
c
Chairman., a �� r then _ ske<A, r.ox° expo ~essions from -Lhe
'Goml i,asi oner s as to whether Or not 'a public hea.rT "inn-
?rug? :s YIP.d;e, : :aY'y and if she :y would like t o Vote or T112
use periy'iit airpl U ,ation at t 1risk 'time. Commissioner
Heyward stated that inasmuch as . he was in the same
type of b"vrsI_.ne,,' s,, would like to be excused from
`•
vot in He ;s on 1 ey t nos chiair on the - Planning
Cc�mrr�i son s. Comrnlss ones° Salle.,s reviewed the previous
actions of the Planning CcaiTmi ;lion and the City
Cou "ICiL Vn 't >Y'j z espeCt tc the rezoning of this pr operty'.
The r e c�luti n was tnzn rote ~o :duL ed by Comrna :ssion,e °
Reba ogee acrd " - see :_�ided 1�y Commi s,si..oner Elmore, Chair-
man T. y?.or expl��nk�d 1 -- h . tA�e. resolution had been
ma.ie, ut to deny the use permit and that a" 11 yes 9e ;rote.
wot Id deny +J1 use permit .and a tenor' ,rote `would grant
the use: per mgt Cbmm ,ssioner Brown asked who had
made' out the r•'e so]aution and wlgy had it been made ou t
to de'riy the use permit, The Clerk stated. that she
had made; out the resolution filling in only the
r. easQ r fo ° the u =se perni.t Chairman Taylor stated
that he had filled', in the work le dehy t$ , .further
expla: nlFr�g that .he- Y ad first inserted the fiord
° agr°anted ye but at the suggestion. of Commiss ;loner°
Rcboel,ho° lntrodu.oed t_he resolution,, changed the
� e1 � to Ts
word to deny In answer Commissioner Brown
question as. "to why Commission Robfogel suggested the
reso'Lution be rnadie out to deny the: u .permit.. Com®
, ate. �ha� he was cppose"d to
r�i sioner Rob %oge . st
g- antin °g this use permit as a service station on this
prope would be detl- i;.riental. to the health, s afety ,
,..�
pea morals caomf Ort and general welf 'of persons
,residing or working In the neighborhood of° such pro -
posed. use or be detrimental or injurious to property
and improvements in" the neighbOrhood off to the general
welfare of ..the Cite, and for thi=s .reason intr oduced
NOVEMBER 30 1556 page 2
OIL, CONPANY the Pesolqtibn denying thez use permit. Commissio
6nt! d. B r own Eftarted'that if it could be proved that a
sernrica station on th
-is property 'would 'be detrimental
bl welfa e etc.,�eiwould
to the publi ic he�alth,,_ safety, wel fare, 6,e
support.*thi�� M,-nial of this use e he
rmit othe rwise,
fblt 'that a service - station , 'On' th s property Was not
dotrime . ntal ,, . as stated bY'Co mmis� thu og6l.,, was
iatt "ice station of the" fact tl - hote were "other s.ery . s
Me - a �x towns town 'in A. re"O ntekl:at6 0 that t6 s had
allowed them in ;re.sidental areas,. -Commissioner Brown
also pointed" out that' -since the resolution had.. been
made Out to' deny ,the use - permit,.,�'commissioner
Heywardis VOto� �cofA I nteA as denying the use
t' mAn Tayl r stated that 'if' Commissioner
perm ChdiY� 0
Brown prefe ) the'resolution could be c hanged and
be filled in that 'the ,use permit be granted Co Mmi�
s-�oner stated that it was a 11 Brown right Am to
, ' ght with, h
go , ahead. and - vote on the ,'reseluti6n is.
Resolution, NOL. Za-56 denying the usepermit was then
voted upon, and was passed by the following vote:
Ayes Qormnissipiller's Cqrl8on Elmore, Heyward*'
Robf el and Taylor , ,6 ,
L g
Noe .Cotatdssio ' rfera 'Brown and Salles.,
Absent None.,
'line, o vote , by Commissioner Heyward is
cOnsideted an. aye - vbte,
ZhAitbtan T ay -
lor to 'the representatives , of
.- -
the, Shell 01.1 Gompany that their ap f Or -a
use permit "'had been d and they had the
privilege ofappealing City Council Within
five , days = , and the City Council would set a date_ for
a hearing' and they , would, be.notified. He
further stated ,that. the Planning Commission would
also notif be n ie, d of the public hearing - date and they
.,.,, -'- t
wduld submit'a report of theirreasonsor -I
the or haves repre's,6ntative, present their - at the
hearing. The City Council s all'then render
decisiOn" within 6.0. days after the filing of the
, appeal..,
AD I S 'There being no further to come before the
meeting the, meeting was adjpUrreda