Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 12/03/1957r / DECEMBER 3, Regular meeting of the Planning;. Commission held , on the 3rd day, of December, 1957 at 7..30. °.'clock P. m. ii the Council Chambers, 'C City Hall, Petaluma, California, Present Commissioners Dean;, .Ellis, Margpj. . 1VIcCausland and Parsons- ' Absence: None; City Officials° Cf) .r En s nee r Fussell Ingram a=nd City Attorney Edouard Robert. y " _ . APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mnuites from tlae rneeti.ng. of November 19 1957 were,approyed as recorded. _PUR LTC HEARING Poehlmann Hatchery This ;being the time and place for the :public, hearing on the rezoning, application. #2752. of f Poehlmann Hatcherys 620 Mairi, to :rezone parcel #6 1:62 =5; located af; 15 Kent Street from an R� 3 to a C- 2 zone, Chairman Dean called for expressions f rom the appli±cante Mr. Clay Thompson was present ;representing the Poehlmann Katcher 1VIr Thom son .stated that. the- ur ose y p p.p of the rezoning w °a dg , k they could utilize the building on this property', which had been Vacant ` for several years„ b'y _installing, 4. or 5 incubators to_ rai e turkeys° All .the .building would. be rewired - in order to operate these incubators. - le further' stated that there would only be .two people working there during fhe daytime and, there would be no noise n 'onne.'ction with the proposed use of the building. 1Vlr Ro J Russ, .3 Dent Street, spoke stating that re lived adjacent to- the building on this property r . and hewas no,t necessarily objecting to th_e. rezon.- ing, but was obj'ecti'ng to the use of this building J. •inasmuch, as, the had been 3 fires in it and from. its present- a ppe ar ance: he was of the gpinon that it was "a. fire hazard. The City °'Eng.t 6r Chairman. Dean 'a'ssured Mr Russ .that ,complete j inspec -tion Would be made by the',Fi ' Department and the,Buildmg ln9pector,to determine It the building was safe ; and i Wou'ld have to. be ,in, com r pliance with the; fire,, building and electrical codes 4 „ before the build could, be u`sede Mr,. Lew -Evans 9 422.,K S�reet spoke in favor of, the re on - ing,, ;stating ,that his property, backs, up to. ;this pr operFty and one wall of the DECEMBER 3 1::957 - p age 2 ` P,oehlmannn Hatcher - continued : .. _ y a... building in. , :- _,g _ gest:on is one Wall' of his garage, ; Ho further stated that i.n, "his opinion thei building was atrac r'ally,.s�ound..arid he hard no objection to :the r'ezoriing' this 'pr .party. There being: no further • questions or objecti:ons! . _ Resolution No 72 recommending to 'the City Council that' Lod 6 162 - 5', :located:at 15 Kent Street, be rezoned. from an R- 3 to :a C -,2 zone,, was introduced by Comnmis_sioner Margolis, seconded by Coirimi.s.sioner Ellis and: unani'mou ly passed by:.all members present.. PETALUMA JUNK CQa_ L _ . D%sc nssi regarding the ai)peara.nce. of the Petaluma Junk Coo . at. - 5 - 21 Wilso Street was the next item ,of: business on the agenda. , Mn Charles e ers, Was � resent re resentin the Pet y P P g aluma Junk Co The resolution_ orl mall ranting the g Yg us';e, permit. on May 14, 1951 for the establashmerit' of a Junk company at 5'21 Wilson Sttee:t, subject to , - the following condition. "All junk not housed, will be, kept 15o fto f Sto and will be fenced ar. screened. at any time at, the request:of the Planning Comma?ssion'_asrid as to their require . men ' s read by the Caerko Cha rms :n Dean pointed out that the Comma.s'saon, hs.d record of a; prior'.Qomplai -nt i 195,246 Mr. Meyers stated that their ,position was 'the same as stated::at the fast . mee.ti.n'g''of.-the; Conami:ss on on N'oVember 19th, that is, i,t was -th opi nion th no junk could:'be seen from Wilson Street and that they would be - Willing to. cons trUd � -fence at the rear of -their- - pr.emises when. construction of the Armory was Std fted. � g herein it whs . A general d, scussion,followed'vy determined ,that in view' ,the.:faet that other ,j.inlc compan -es `within the''City were t equ red Lto fence theik area' because. of the campaign started by the Cft C.ounci.l to clean uP' and .straighten. up the, - t6. wh, the Petaluma, Junk Co should .completenly fend their junk yard. The following motion was, then, made, seconded "a:nd,.unariimou'sly pgLssed by " all member's presenfe `That', the .cond t�.on as proui.ded. in a .re.sohit :on = = granted by the previous Planning Comm, ssion on May 1, ,1:9:51 ;be+ com- plied with in the DECEMBER 3,• 195,7 • PETALUIVIA, , - � . s U'NK CO J , . o " following respect.. That the junk yard .lbcated contrail "ed on W l :son Street, be, fenced and /or screened completely i.nview: of the fet that .fhe .Planning Co.,mi_ssion :find's .ghat the siauat °ion is s that' the area does' rrequ screening for the benefit of the surrounding area_° The applicant �• . g .: shall as y: to the onfer with "the City Enginee usual height, type, etc,, , of fences used and whicha conform with the established precedelito Chairman Dean instructed lVlro Meyers_ to contact the City Engineer a "s- to, the type of fence to be installed.° After a.`br i'ef discussion ,as to the time vithi.z vylach the. fence should be completed, it was unanimously" decided that the fence should' be completed. by April 1,' 19.580 GLEN CLARK . Variance application #'28'61 of Glen Clark, - 416 . Melvin, to allow a . =1 .foot side ,yard on a, cornier lot = instead of .10 feet required to construct a carport iii' -li.ne with exi sting- garage at 416 MelvinjStreet„ R =l zone . was. next consideed. Public .heari :ng on this `matter was set for Decem- ber 17, 1 °9--5,`7 at'7.. .;'cloak p m, in the Council ' ` Chambers of the Q 41 all. BILLBOARDS ;:: that the - . City A �ision.of o s State Di Hi hwa de "sired to g ,. -. _.,y _ landscape the freeway Within the City., limits e but could` not do SoUfttfl.thei City, had adopted an. appt'priat'e . billboard ojrchnan;ce, and. that he' had been ,. 1 i nstructed by the Coui cil. to prepare the pr. ..,per _ e; is a 1 g mi`s'- sign for their. appbov4-l recommendations - before anyiiftal action would b&*taken,'by.-t1?emo . He; 'stated that he had prepared an outline, -a copy of which w:as submitted to :each member of:.the Commission, of. What an, or dm s arice of thi type " sYiould :cover _ He 'then ex pained in detail each item listed in the - outline.: A eneral- discussion ., ante coa rolltn llboards should be -pre a ed in. g. P._ P n substantially the 'sam'e foram as outlined and detailed , by ,the City Attorney The City Attorney as . dir.ected to px epare an ord%na n Vv ce: regrilatirig billboards and submit ame to t - s . hem for th ei r P.pprbv�l and recommendation to the City Councils ADJOURNMENT There' being. no fi rtl er .business to ,come before the m2eting9 the ;meeting,was ad'jo I nod..