Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 12/16/1958DECEMBER 16, 1958 Regula,.t Meeting; of the Petalufna. City Plannf-ng� Cori, ssi'on - Tuesday., December 16. x'958 y ahforna: ,a _ p 'fp the Council Chamber �,� Ci , ' 'All,- Peta�'lt�ma C 7 X30 0 ,clock . � ��o mo ROLL CALL Present° .Commissioners Ellis, Popp,. ;Stirnson,, Tibbetts and Dean Absenfa Commissioners Margolis and .Parsons, City Officials- City Manager Ed'Frank' a'nd: Plana' rig.LDirectb;r Richard Coleman. PUBLIC HE;AkW' DRo DAVID A. $IS FILE NO. V4 58 #6221 fi °led, b ..Dro D.avrd A o Sisler', 925 Mrd hearng, on variance- application g P pbhc This bean the time and ace for the dlefie'ld for a variance from the; , required' 20 ft. s'e.tback'from 'tbe 'road Tight- of -way"to 6 ft: back from 'the :road p ` Haven D F p �y _ right of =wuay on Lot #S1 ;r La C'resta Subdi�i.sion, R ='1 zone Chair man Dean Balled. for ex ressiohs from the floors Dro. Sister was resent ,but he'd ;nothing further to add, No expression -s weRre' heard in opposition to the " var aneea, The - staff report was then prPsex ; ted. by the Planning 4 Drecto.r a , a copy of which was, submitted., and. filed. Mr. Coleman, pointed-out the prop:erty"in question on the .reap , and detailed the land use in the area. He. stated that. a check of the records: since 1,9'O 'i dica.ted there has be . en vair antes ,granted. in this 'sub . antes which were bu�i d�sometime� - - ckwari -� u�s'es In this .subdivision with setba _ ago when ou'r zoning or i�nance was not 'so ,` strict. p. A y pP icant a eneral, disc ussion After a ;review of the lams submitted b the a g was held and the property was described as being located at the end -of. Haven Drive with the side of the lot, .cone guotas'to a, 40 ft easement, for, the purpose of extend'in °g, the., street ° The applicant °proposes to construct hiss house 2Ofte_ back from the existing cal -de sac and the 9 arage 6' ft. ,back from the above mentioned easement. The variance would actualk apply `to the garage only< Dr-.'o ..Si sl'er pointed, out that, if and when Haven Drove v -as extended and the street: wa-s constructed "in,, the' center of the easement9 his garage° would then `actually be 16 1L from the street, "pauemento The .Planning Director sta,ted."that inasmuch a.s Dr. Sisley its budding his house in `the center of two .lots h of just one,..it. wa.-s, his , recoinrnendation that the variance nc ude the provision that Lots. 51 and, , 52:be, combinedAn. order that it could be considered 4s one lot, The :Commi_ss on' being in agreement, the: foTlowing,Was added to the resolution ";For the purposes of determining setback requirements„ it is. found that Lots ; 51 and 52 are in one ownership and, therefore, to be treated,, in ,applying the zoning ordinance as ,one tote ,. A:t`the conclusion of the discussion it was 'determined that'this variance apples to a special hype of .land will not deprive anyone of h sy property rights or -be .d nuisance 'to the neighborhood ° and. it will allow the owne,`r to: use this property to. DECEMBER 16,, '1 Page 21 b DR. DAVID-A. .SISLE - continued, its best advantage, Whereupon, Resolution No 'V4 -58:, recornmendii g to the was .introduced ,b C'omrriissio "ne�pStimson seconded" Sisley be granted Cr Council that the variaa.nce a lication of Dr David A y , _nded by Commissioner Tibbetts . and unani- mous'ly passed'by al:l netnbers preseftt ANTHONY J', CONT , Variance app'li,catioii #6302 filed 'by A J% Conti, 5' 8, Me-fvin,, r e °questing; q sessor s P�..rce:]. , #6- 292 - R l zone was ,nett �consid : r centre , a 10 fro front a�d� setback instead -of required 2© ft. on Lot #8,, Brainerd A (A,�s' ),. , e ed Thepubl he °eying on :this variance appl. ca -liyon was' set: for the next meeting; to be held, Tuesday;, January 6 195:90 G. W'.. LANE - FI NO. 027 -5-8 Use Permit application, lication #6310 filed by G, e pp W o Lane 200- 4th Street, .to operate a, private pa'rk'ing, lot at 119' Keller St :C­2. zone,, was next consider.ede Mr}_ Thomas Le Lane wars present on behalf of his fathe Ms's �applicatfono The staff report;:ura.s given `by the .Plannin g Director,: a copy of which. was submitted' ' - �and,fi ..eda,. Mr. Coleman pointed oast, that the Public Works„ Department recom- mended this parking lot be surfaced with either an armor coat or plant -rnix to g., y stance of 4.feet.be maintained between the ears -tin fire hydrant and the entry d` mize the spree m. of loo dirt an roc on the C1, street, a di. g rive,;' a the sidewalk -,:be improved to its full 12; foot width according, to C:i y s,tandardsa After a 'revi'ew of the `sketch of the parking lci stibinitted by e applcarit a : t; brief discussion was :held Wherein. M_ Lane stated that the °aboy. e recomn enda -- bons were acceptable Whereupn :, 9 _ g g J Resolution No U27 58 �antmthe� Use ol'low.ing conditions was introduced b. Comrriissioner E 1l1 s, t sub nd to Y e, f mrnissioner Popp and unanimously d by, all members; seconded'. b Co prelsen'to 1.0 Lot shall; be surfaced with either an ar mor coat, or plant mix;, „ 20, A d stgnc:e of 4 feet shall be mai`ntaiined.,'betWeen, :the existing fire y - and. the entry, drive; and 3e The sidewalk shd'il be i rx proved; to its fix1L 12' foot width, ac'cozdin_g to, C� `ty standa�rdso STAFF RE POR The following, staff -re orts were given b Planning Director 'Richard Coleman: .p g y Our Bake p s "f eld la t F rda December '12th la C t s ane er cent was approved" d " rove , .y.9 - .. P g g P� - . ate for the' urban o y . �g : Edw d.Frank, _ who appeared before the. cornmi,te:e as the City's; representative.p gave a" brief' resume' of:,the :mee;tingo I - 'DECEMBE`.R 1, 1958 Page, 3 ST AFF REPORTS - continued The Planning Director attended a .special meeting of the Santa .Rosa Planning 11 Commission last week during which they intery-iewed. a number of planning; . con8dlta'nts for a s; frrii]a -x t. _ p q - e� of 'these yp g= e of snare, ]an for 'Santa Roswao On contsultan'ts was ,Laxxy Livingston. ° KENI- LVJORTH RECREATION OUILDI_'NG w A brief discussion was held regarding the recent criticism given. the ;plan prepared fox 'the "location of the .I<enlwo,rih Recreation• buldingo , Pt was' pointed out that the Planning Department had had "nothi.ng to do with• thilsp bu_ -'ld- ing. or its plans .and, that Mr,, . f'Cole,Aaft or the Planning Gomjnissi�on, had not been consulted regarding the btildi'ng -or the, proposed home site of the Fair-' g,round'Managen, Therefore an criticism directed to `the Planning Director y � ' or ;the Planning Commission. , was without basic M n'G .r Johi bbs,..6 Rio V:ista:_`Wa� :;state 9 4 ay ,.stated that' to the_ loca'1 news- paper, °the F:t `ai Board Comm _ss :on `has had a ma plan for '19 years and, hei - wondered, if Fa ,copy of this master plan had ever, been. filed with the City, ADJOURN ME NT ° There being no further business to come before the meetn . the rneetin g: _ g . _. g. w. asp adjourned. o 0