HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 96-124 05/20/1996 Resolution No. 96-124 NC.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
1
2
3 APPROVAL OF THE PLANNED UNIT DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
4 FOR THE MAXWELL RESIDENTIAL PROJECT LOCATED ON A 19.61 ACRE
5 PARCEL ON THE EAST SIDE OF "D" STREET AT WINDSOR DRIVE;
6 AP No. 019-120-045 &046
7
8 WHEREAS, the project site has been rezoned to Planned Unit District by Ordinance No.
9 2013 N.C.S.; and
to
11 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing regarding this
1z project on March 26, 1996, and. considered and forwarded a recommendation to the City
13 Council to conditionally approve a Planned Unit Development Plan for the Maxwell
14 residential project; and
15
16 WHEREAS, the City Council has found that the requirements of the California
17 Environmental Quality Act have (ieen satisfied through the preparation bf an Initial Study
is which indicates that the proposed project, as mitigated through the adoption of a
19 Mitigated Negative Declazation pursuant to Resolution No. 9g-~ 21 N.C.S., will not
20 result in significant environmental impacts, and that no further environmental review is
21 necessary.
22
23 WHEREAS, the City Council has adopted Ordinance No. 2013 N.C.S. rezoning the
2a Maxwell site to Planned Unit District..
25
26 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby conditionally
z7 approves the Planned Unit Development Plan as reflected in the Development Plan
zs including: architecture, landscaping, and written development standards considered by the
29 Planning Commission on March 26, 1996; all on file wrath the City of Petaluma Plamm~g
3o Department, pursuant to Section 19A-504 of Zoning Ordinance 1072 N.C.S., as amended
31 based on the following findings and subject to the following conditions:
32
33 Findings for Aanroval of the PUD Develoament Plan:
34
35 1. The proposed Maxwell Residential PUD Development Plan, as conditioned, results
36 in a more desirable use ofthe land and a better physical environment than would be
37 possible under any single zoning district by allowing the establishment of larger
38 single family lots with substantial open space area, including a portion.. of the Kelly
39 Creek comdor at and/or near the City's Urban Limit Line.
40
al 2. The. establishment of annon-development pazcel to preclude further development
42 over a portion of the site (Kelly Creek Open Space corridor) is consistent with
43 General Plan policies regarding the preservation of designated Open Space; and
4a the configuration of buildable lot azeas combined with non-development easements
as and building setback lines is consistent with policies in the General Plan regarding
a6 the preservation of the scenic beauty of the Western hills as well as the policies
47 regarding density reduction in proximity to the Urban Limit Line.
as
49 3. The Development Plan for the proposed development, as conditioned, presents a
50 unified and organized arrangement of building envelopes, utilities, and landscaping
51 which are appropriate in relation to the natural hillside and improvements on
sz nearby properties.
Res. ~o.....,96-1,24...., ncs. Oage 1 of 3
1
2 4. The natural and scenic qualities of the site are protected, with adequate available
3 public and private spaces, including open space easements as proposed and
4 conditioned, for the Unit Development Plan.
5
6 5. The development of the Maxwell property in the manner proposed by the
7 applicant, and as conditioned by the City to provide vehicle and pedestrian access
8 including a public path and sidewalk adjacent to "D" Street, will not be detrimental
9 to the public welfaze, will be in the best interest of the City, and will be in keeping
to with the general intent and spirit of the General Plan of the City of Petaluma and
11 its applicability to the Sunny Slope Annexation area.
12
13 6. The vehicle and pedestrian circulation pattern of the. proposed Planned Unit
la Development Plan has been reviewed in the context of the traffic capacity on "D"
15 Street, neazby developed properties and the potential development of adjacent
16 properties and, has been designed to be compatible with the circulation patterns,
17 needs, and carrying capacity.
18
19 7. The proposed PUD Development Plan has complied with the requirements of
20 CEQA pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, through the
21 preparation and certification of the FEIR for the Sunny Slope Annexation and the
22 subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration prepazed and adopted (Resolution
23 No. N.C.S.) by the City Council for this project which addresses the
24 potential environmental impacts associated with its development, and no further
25 environmental analysis is necessary.
26
27 Conditions for the PUD Develoament Plan:
28
29 1. All requirements from the City Planning Department shall be complied with,
30 including:
31
32 a. All mitigation and monitoring measures of the Mitigated Negative
33 Declaration (Resolution No. 96-121 N.C.S.) adopted for this project shall
34 be enforced, as applicable, with all components of the PUD Development
35 Plan, including but not limited to, the PUD Development Plan (site plan),
36 the PUD Landscaping and Fencing Plan, and the Development Guidelines.
37 b. All conditions of the Tentative Subdivision Map (Resolution
3a No. 9,-1 .SN.C.S.) adopted for this project shall be enforced, as
39 applicable, with .all components of the PUD .Development Plan, including
ao but not limited to, the PUD Development Plan (site plan), the PUD
al Landscaping and Fencing Plan, and the Development Guidelines.
az c. All aspects of the PUD Development Plan, including but not limited to, the
43 PUD Development Plan (site plan), the PUD Landscaping and Fencing
as Plan, and the Development Guidelines shall be reviewed and approved by
45 SPARC, and amended accordingly, subject to staff review and approval
46 priorto Final Map approval.
47 d. A full scale reproducible copy of the PUD Development Plan, Landscaping
as and Fencing Plan and a final copy of the Development Guidelines as
a9 approved by SPARC shall be submitted to the Planning Department,
so subject to staff review and approval prior to Final Map approval.
51 e. Development ofall public and private improvements for Phases 1 and 2 of
52 this PUD Development plan, including but not limited to, the PUD
Page 2 of 3
1 Development Plan (site plan), the PUD Landscaping and Fencing Plan, and
2 the Development Guidelines must comply with all applicable mitigation and
3 monitoring measures of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (Resolution
a No. 96-121 N.C.S.), and all applicable conditions of the PUD
5 Development Plan and Tentative Subdivision Map.
6 f Development of the residential lots within Phases 1 and 2 of this PUD
7 Development Plan shall comply with all provisions of the Development
8 Guidelines on file with the City of Petaluma, subject to staff review and
9 approval.
to g. The applicants/developers shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the
11 City or any of its boards, commission, agents, officers, and employees from
1z any claim, action or proceeding against the City, its boards, commission,
13 agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void, or annul, the
la approval of the project when such claim or action is brought within the
15 time period provided for in applicable State and/or local statutes. The City
16 shall promptly notify the applicants/developers of any such claim, action, or
17 proceeding. The City shall coordinate in the defense. Nothing contained in
18 this condition shall prohibit the City from participating in a defense of any
19 claim, action, or proceeding if the City bears its own attorney's fees and
20 costs, and the City defends the action in good faith.
21
22 2. All requirements from the City Building Division shall be complied with, including:
23
za a. Grading plans must be certified when completed to indicate compliance
z5 with approved plans and will be required foroccupancy.
26 b. Certify finish floor elevation before occupancy.
27 c. Any holding tank required for elevations ,above 160 feet must meet
28 Engineering Department design requirements.
29 d. Where ground slopes greater than 1 on 10, foundations shall be stepped per
3o Uniform Building Code 2907(c).
31 e. Soils with expansion index greater than 20 requires special design
32 foundation per Uniform Building Code 2904(b).
33 f. All roofing shall be "B" rated of better per Ordinance No. 1744/1988.
34 g. Driveway gradient shall comply with ordinance No. 1533/1982.
35 h. Responsible party to sign plans.
36 i. Submit soils report to verify foundation design.
37 j. Plans must show compliance to 1994 UBC, UPC, UMC, and 1993 NEC.
38 Plans must also show compliance to current Title 24 Energy Code.
39 k. Provide structural calculations for all non-conventional design items.
40
41 MAXPUD/hg24/word6
42
Under the power and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved asap
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) kACdpRRtY4E4tjC1&~ meeting form
on the ._20Yh...-°_.... daY of ...--'---....lYlaY------....---"---......._......., 19..9&., by the
following vote:
City Attorney
AYES: Maguire, Hamilton, Stompe, Read, Shea, -Vice Mayor Barlas, Mayor Hilligoss
NOES: None
ABSENT: No ~ _ ~ '
ATTEST: v~~~. .!/.t"~
City Clerk Mayor
Council File '
cn io-as w:,-vu_9.5.c1.24___.. recs- Page 3 oP 3