HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 96-102 04/15/1996 Y
r~
Resolution No. gfi-~ ~2 N C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
I
z GRANTING 1997 ALLOCATIONS
3
4 WHEREAS, the City Council adopted a residential growth management system and established
5 the procedure for granting the allocation pool on a yearly basis with Ordinance 1716 N.C.S.
6 (Municipal CodeChapter 17.26); and
7
8 WHEREAS, interested developers and/or property owners filed their Notice of Intent to Develop
9 forms in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 1716 N.C.S. and these, in combination
to with reservations made the previous year and regulatory obligations for smaller in-fill projects,.
I I comprise the total number of allocation requests for 1997; and
p2
13 WHEREAS, the total number of allocation requests equa1s304 traits; and
14
u WHEREAS, the 1997 allocation pool was set at 304 allocations; and
t6
17 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that granting allocations does not constitute a project
I S pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 1506], and, therefore, no
19 environmental action is necessary at this time;
20
21 NOW, THEREFORE,. BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council grants the 1997 allocations as
22 described below based on the findings that follow:
24 Project Name Allocations Granted
25 Cross Creek 80*
26 Willow Glen 75
27 Woodside Village 59
28 Luxhorn/Gatti 35
29 ~ Fullerton 10
30 Reserved for in-fill 45**
31 Total 304
32
33 Reservations for 1998
34 Cross Creek 59
35 Willow Glen 75
36 Total 134
37
~8 * Previously reserved.
39 Minimum amount required by ordinance to be reserved for exempt in-ftll development.
40
41
d2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED tharthe City Council makes the following Endings in support of
43 its 1997 allocations:
a4
a5 Findines
a~
4~ 1. The number of 1997 allocations granted is consistent with the provisions of the
a8 Residential Growth Management System (Municipal Code Chapter 17.26) and the
49 applicable goals, objectives; policies and programs of the 1987-2005 Petaluma General
50 Ylan.
Nes. No.,.96..:?.~_?.....,.,. n.cs. Page 1 of 2
1
2 2. The decision to grant 1997 allocations as specified is not detrimental to the public health,
3 safety, or welfare when viewed in context. of the City's overall growth rate, adequacy of
a public facilities, and subsequent environmental review procedures to which each project
5 is subjected.
6
7 3. There is no known need for secondary ("special") allocations in the foreseeable future.
8
9 4. There is no compelling reason to deny allocations to any project.
to
11
12
13 c/alloms/jcm
Under the power and authority conferred upon this. Council by the Charter of said City.
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (~i~~4 meeting form
on the .....15th-...-..-.- day of ...-......_ARril ls_96., by the
following vote: ,G
(h Attorney
AYES: Maguire, Hamilton, Stompe, Read, Shea, Vice Mayor Barlas, Mayor Hilligoss
NOES: None
ABSENT: None ~7QC=-~ ~ •,~p
ATTEST: ........................._..-.-..---~--..-~~~1>'-~`-`...t~-..-----~---... `~-.V!<:......... ...C1..E?'~.
City Clerk Mayor G
Council File
cn io~as a~x ru,.96.-1?2-.---. n'-cs- Page 2 of 2