Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 96-243 08/05/1996>~ Resolution No. 96-243 NC.S. of the City of Petaluma, California t 3 4 APPROVAL OF A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PAMELA 5 PLACE II DEVELOPMENT AP No.'s 019-201-010, O] 1, 012, 017, and 018 6 7 WHEREAS, an Initial Study was prepared and the results oP the study indicated that the 8 proposed Pamela Place II Development, as mitigated, will not cause any significant 9 adverse environmental impacts; and, 10 11 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Petaluma held a noticed public t2 hearing on July 9, 1996 on the. subject application, heard testimony and concluded that t3 the tlndings and conditions for the project were adequate and recommended to the City t4 CounciLapproval of the proposed development; and t5 16 WHEREAS, all reports and communications to the Planning Commission were t7 forwarded to the City Council; and 18 t9 WHEREAS, the City Counci] held a publichearing on this project on August 5, 1996 and 20 considered all written and verbal communications concerning potential environmental 21 impacts resulting from the project before rendering it decision; 22 z3 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council approves the Mitigated 24 Negative Declaration subject to the following findings and mitigation measures: 25 26 Environmental Findines 27 28 1. An Initial Study has been prepared and properly noticed for Pamela Place II in 29 accordance with CEQA and local guidelines. 30 2. Based on the Initial Study and comments received, potential impacts could be avoided 3 t or reduced to a level of insignificance by the application of mitigation measures. 32 There is no substantial evidence that the Pamela Place II proposed development. as 33 mitigated, would have a significant impact on the environment. 34 3. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has been incorporated into the June 4, 1996 Initial 35 Study/Negative Declaration as an attachment and will ensure compliance with all 36 required Mitigatiar Measures. 37 4. Although not considered to be significant under the analysis of the Sunny Slope 38 Annexation FEIR, the project will have a cumulative impact to wildlife resources as 39 defined in the Fish and Game code, and therefore is subject to the required Fish and 4o Game filing fees. 4t 5. The project is not located on a site listed on any Hazardous Waste Site List compiled 42 by the State pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. 43 6. The Planning Commission reviewed the .lone 4, 1996 Initial Study/Negative 44 Declaration and considered the comments before makinga decision onthe project. RCS. yo 96-243 .._.. n.as. Page 1 of 2 1 7. T7te City Council finds that the potential grading and drainage impacts resulting from 2 the Pamela Place II subdivision will be adequately mitigated through modification of 3, the proposed grading plan to direct future drainage, to the extent feasible, towards the a proposed public street. This requirement ensures that the storm drain system will be 5 maintained to City Standards and continue to provide drainage according to the design 6 plan. The installation of grading and drainage improvements desighed to City and 7 Sonoma County Water Agency standards will also reduce potential site disturbance 8 impacts to less than significant. 9 8. The City Council finds that the potential impacts to Plant Life (i.e. Tree Removal) will to be adequately mitigated through: the implementation of tree protection .measures for II those trees to be retained on the property; arid, the replacement. of any tree 6 inch in I2 diameter or greater with two new 15 gallon trees of an appropriate species approved by 13 Planning Department staff. I4 9. The Ciry Council finds that the potential aesthetic impacts resulting from the proposed 15 development will be adequately mitigated through the establishment of architectural 16 design standards for application to lot-specific development proposals and ~ 7 administrative SPARC review of design plans for Lots 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 aiid full SPARC i 8 review of design plans for Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4. t9 20 Mitigation Measures: 21 22 1. All Mitigation and Monitoring Measures contained in the June 4, 1996 Mitigation 23 Monitoring Program for Paiitela Place II (attached as EXHIBIT A), shall be 2a incorporated into the PUD Development Plan and the Improvement Plans for the 25 Final Subdivision Map as applicable. 26 27 28 pamres/vsl 2~ Under the powerand authority conferred upon this Council by the Chatter of said City REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the Approved as to Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) QA~atrtt[ar>-xQ[3f~aitm) meeting form on the _5.L11 ................ day of ..........k).SA~'.l!&t.............................-'-.., 19.16.., by the following. vote: _.....--'-'--\-J ..................... City Attorney AYES: Maguire, Hamilton, Read, Vice Mayor Stomps, Mayor llilligoss NOES: None ABSENT: Barlas, She ATTEST : ..................... ...... ...: ... ..... Los=a-.w...~..........--... ity Clerk ' (buocil Fila.._.__._.. .................. CA I0~85 - Res. NO....9.6''~4'........: N.QS. EL~I~IBI a MONITORING MONITORING PLAN FOR PAMELA PLACE 11 CD 6~ tP C~ z C~ Mitigation Measure Method of Monitoring Verifying Dept. Ttme of :- [nit.' compliance Date': EARTH I. Lined drainage ditches or alternative engineering techniques shall be City shall review and Engineering Building incorporated mto~the grading~plan,in order to capture runoff and reduce approved grading plans permit potenhaLfor`erosion'problems on~cut andfill slopes. prior [o issuance of any issuance permits 2. An erosiomcontrol plan shall,be submitted as a component of the City shall review and Engineering Building subdivisionimprovementpIans and shall be approved by tlieCity prior to approve plansprior to .Permit [he commencement of any construction. issuance of.~a Building Issuance P,ermiP 3. Alt lots shall be subject to administrative SPARC.approvatofgrading Plans shall be submitted and Planning Building plans,:for review of compliance with the SPARC adopted PUD reviewed prior to issuance Permit standards. Plans'stibmitted for approval shall includedetailed grading of 66ilding~permits Issuance- plans in conformance with the SPARC approved plans and project 'conditions. AIR I. Motorized equipment operated during construction activities shall be Cityshall inspect Public Works Project properly maintained and muffled to minimize smoke and other air construction activities (Engineering) Construction emissions and:[he equipmen[!shall beshut down when not is use. The project siteshaltbe watered'down as necessaryto prevent dustgeneration during grading and construction activity. Tarps shall be utilized to contain soil and debris materials stored nn [he site and in open [rucks during transport to and from [he site. 2. Prior ro issuance of building permits, all homes designed with fireplace City shall review and Building Building units shall beet City specifications for reduction of emissions, as approve plans Permit specified under City Ordinance' 1881 N.C.S. issuance 3. All grading and or other major dust generating activities shall be City shall inspect Public Works Project conducted during non-windy periods. construction activities (Engineering) construction fir. FP C.~ Z WATER 1. The improvement plans submitted for ¢;inal. Map approval shall include a) City shall review and Engineering a) Building provisioh.for stotm.water runoff management, in conformance with City approve plan Permit Ordinance provisions and Engineering,Departmenbspecifica[ions. No lot Issuance to lot surface drainage shall be pennitfed. The drainage plans shall b) City shall inspect b) Project includeprovisions for installation ofpennanenPSignsat drop inlets tothe public storm drain system, which prohibit the deposit or hazardous construction construction material into the. system. 2. Grading plans submitted for SPARC approval of the Tentative.Map and a) City shall review and Planning a) Building PUD Development Plan shall reflect all proposed graded swales, in approve plan Permit conformance with 'the construction recommendations of a geo[echnical Issuance engineer, particularly where proposed slopes exceed 4:I gradients. , b) City shall-inspect b) Project construction construction 3. The project shall besubjec[ [o payment of Storm Drainage Impact Fees City shall collect fee Building Prior ro as specified in City Resolution prior to occupancy of each new unit occupancy constructed. of un it PLANT 1. All trees shown on the Tentative Map dated 5/20/96 to be retained shall a) Ciry shall review and Planning a) Prior [o be protected through .[lie cohstruction phase of the project. A tree approve plan issuance of protection plan showing details regarding the installation of protective grading fencing; .root protection and follow-up recovery methods such as b) City stiall inspec[ peiniit mulching.. and watering schedule shall be submitted as part of the , improvement plans for [he Final Map. construction b) Project constmction 2. Landscape plans for the subdivision right-of--way shall reflect use of a) City shall review and Planning and a) prior to water conserving and native plan materials. Plans shall be included in approve plan and collect Parks and building the submittal for SPARC approval of the Tentative Map and PUD Plari, bond Recreation pemtit and shall conform to City standards for street tree installation. All public area landscaping shall be i~istalled prior [o acceptance of the public b) City shall inspect improvements or bonded for 100% of the cost of materials and b) project installation, with..implementation [o occur on a lot by lot basis. A 10% constmction constmction maintenance bond shall be retained'by the City for a minimum of one year following installation of the required' landscape improvements, as maintenance security during the establishment period. C.~ z G'~ Mitigation Measure Method of Monifonng i Verifying Dept. r' Time of Init.:! compliance Date.: 3. The written Development Standards' shall identify all proposed lots City shall review and Planning Prior to containing existing ~trees~ to be preserved and shall reference '[he approve standards Building mitigationmeasure number 1 above. Permit NOISE 1. All City-au[honzed;gradmg;and construction activity shall be limited ro City shall inspect project Planning, Priorto and the hours between 7:00 a m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday-through' Prida}S Engineering and during except [lilt indoor work may beconducted oh Saturdaysprdvidednoise Building construction level"s generated are acceptable to nearby- residents. No construction work shall be=.pennittedion City recognized holidays, and Sundays. The developer shalldesignate:a construction managemenYperson~responsi6le for responding. fo any complaints generated regarding excessive ,noise during constn(ctiom. A telephone number for contacting'the designated individual shall be conspicuously .posted a[ the construction' site. 'The responsible authority shall determine the cause of noise complaints received and inipl8men[ reasonablemeasures to resolve the issues. City staff shall monitor complaints received and take reasonable steps to resolve issues~in a timelymanneras they arise, including enforcement of abatement procedures to bring violations into conformance with City General Plan and Zoning Ordinance Performance standards. LIGHT/GLARE I. Plans submitted fot' SPARC approval of tlig Tentative Map and PUD a) Ciry' shall review and Planning and a) prior to Development Plan shall incorporate lighting. plans, which. reflect the approve plan Engineering building location and design of all. proposed street lights, and~.any other exterior permit subdivision IigFiting proposed.. Lighting shall be designed~to~prevenbthe b) Gity-shallinspect intrusion of direct glare onto adjacenri residential properties. Standard , " City street light fixtures shall be utilized unless otherwise approved by con sttvction b) project SPARC and City staff. consttuction 2. Plans submitted for administrative approval of individual Vot a) City shall review and Planning a) prior to development shall include provisions [o avoid vehicular lighting impacts approve plan building to bedroom areas and other light-sensitive living areas of proposed permit homes. Development plans for lots proposed at street intersections or in b) City shall inspect b) project other potentially light-sensitive locations shall incorporate architectural or landscape design features to screen interior living space for headlight construction construction glare. •~o ,, i;~ C.~ z TRANSPORTATION L The proposed hammer-head [urnai•ound'for the new public street shall be a) City shall review and Engineering a) priorto redesigned to, proyide.a typical public street cul-de-sac and planter strip approve plan building and sidewalk areas on both sides of the proposed street. b) City shall inspect permit construction b) project construction 2. 7~he projgctsponsoE sfiall.be responsible for payment of all applicable City shall collect-fee Building-and. priorto special development. fees, :including Traffic Mitigation Fees. Engineering issuance of building permit PUBLIC SERVICES I. The project sponsor shall be responsible. for payment of all applicable City shall collect fee Building and Prior to special development fees, including Community Facilities Development Engineering issuance of fees, Park and Recreation Land ImprovemenfFees,..and School Facilities Building Fees. Fees shall be calculated and paid as specified by City Resolution. permit 2. All safety recommendations of [he Police Department, including City shall review and Building, Police priorto specifications for property addressing and incorporation of residential approve plans issuance of secw~ity measures shall be~detailed in.the:.proposed written Development Building Standards priorto SPARC approval of the PUD Development Plan, and Permit reFlected on plans subtiiitted for approval of lot=specific development permits. UTILITIES 1. The proposed project shall be subject to imposition of all applicable City shall collect fee Building and priorto special development fees, including .Sewer and Water Connection fees, Engineering issuance of and Storm Drainage Impact Fees. Fees shall be calculated and paid as Building specified by City Resolution. Permit CULTURAL RESOURCES 1. Should archaeological deposits be encountered during the grading or City shall inspect Public Works, project construction of the homes, work in the immediate vicinity of the find construction Building Construction should halt, and a qualified archaeologist should be retained to evaluate the finds. Mitigation Measures as prescribed by the archaeologist should be undertaken prior [o resumption of construction activities.