Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 2.D 05/03/20044 • C1TY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA AGENDA B ILL Agenda Title Meeting Date: Resolution Authorizing the Police Department to Accept a Traffic May 3, 2004 Safety Grant From the California Office of Traffic Safety for a Driving Impaired Restraint Enforcement (DIRE) Project in the Meeting Time ® 3:00 PM Amount of $37,720.00 ❑ 7:00 PM Category (check one) ® Consent Calendar ❑ Public Bearing ❑ New Business ❑ Unfinished Business ❑ Presentation Department Direr or: Contact Person Phone Number Police Department Chief Steve Hood Sgt. .im o 778 -4596 Cost of Proposal Account Number $37,720.00 4080 -51240 Amount Budgeted 0 Name of Fund: Overtime Contract Attachments to Agenda Packet Item A. Staff Report B. Resolution C. Grant Packet Summary Statement The Petaluma Police Department applied for and was approved. for a Driving Impaired Restraint Enforcement (DIRE) Project from the, California Office of Traffic Safety . (OTS) in the amount of $37,720.00. The ,grant requires no matching funds. The grant funds will be used to improve enforcement and education efforts to specifically reduce DUI collisions ,and increase seatbelt compliance. This project will provide equipment to enhance the traffic safety efforts already underway in the City of Petaluma. Recommended City Council Action /Suggested Motion Adopt a resolution authorizing acceptance of the California Office of Traffic Safety Grants funds. Revipmed bv Finance Director: Reviewe t c Approve Approvedby City M anager : Date: Date: To a Date: Revision # and Date Revised': File Code: # y �► tit CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA MAY'3, 2004 AGENDA REPORT FOR Resolution Authorizing the Police Department to Accept a'Traffic Safety Grant From the California Office of Traffic Safety for a D riving: Impaired Restraint Enforcement (DIRE) Project in the Amount of $37,720.00 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Petaluma Police Departnient applied for and was approved for a Driving Impaired Restraint Enforcement (DIRE) Project from the California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) in the amount of $37,720.00. The grant° requires no matching funds. The grant funds will be used to improve enforcement and education efforts to specifically reduce DUI collisions and increase seatbelt compliance. This project will provide equipment to enhance the traffic safety efforts already underway in the City of Petaluma. 2. BACKGROUND The City of Petaluma has experienced a growth in population of '13% between 1996 and 2001 (48,569 vs. 55,900) causing steady increases m.traffic and higher levels of congestion on its 157 -mile roadway system. Collision rates have increased and the City of Petaluma rankings have declined and not improved. Speed continues to be the number one cause of traffic collisions in the City of Petaluma. The Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California Berkeley, conducted Traffic Safety Evaluations in 1996 .and in 2000. The analysis identified three primary problem areas. The primary problem areas are Driving Under the Influence, Hazardous Traffic Violation Enforcement and Suspended/Unlicensed Driver` Enforcement. The analysis identified that increased enforcement of speed related violations was needed to increase traffic safety. Along with other programs currently in use and with this new proposal we will attempt to correct the three primary problems identified. Collision Rankings for 2001 . support our effort to improve traffic safety in the City of Petaluma. The City of Petaluma is ranked 23" out: of 92 cities for total fatal and injury collisions for comparable cities based on vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The City of Petalumais:ranked 12 out of 92 cities for alcohol - related collisions based on VMT. Based on population, the City of Petaluma is ranked 19 out of 92 cities for alcohol - related collisions. For collisions where the driver `had been drinking alcohol and is under 21 years of age, the City of Petaluma ranked 2 nd out 92 for VMT and population. Many of the Department's attempts to reduce the rate of collisions are illustrated within the preceding Problem Statement. Additionally, the following is a summary of the efforts made by our department to deal with the problem: 1. The Department has established internal recognition systems that identify Officers who contribute significantly toward Traffic Safety goals. 2. The Department has re- aligned records management functions and implemented computer programs that enhance data compilation while reducing the amount of time Traffic Officers must spend on such tasks; thereby increasing the time spent on traffic enforcement. 93. The Department has implemented policies and provided training, on existing alcohol and traffic related operations to all patrol personnel. 4. The, Department has created public safety presentations that have been shared with Department personnel and are utilized in public presentations on a regular basis. 5. The Department has developed partnerships with the City Traffic Engineering Department. Both Departments' hold monthly meetings to discuss traffic related issues. 6. The Traffic Unit participates in the Sonoma County Avoid Campaign and is on the Steering Committee. The Traffic Unit hosted the first ever Sonoma County Avoid Checkpoint and will host the Labor Day Operation. .. 7. The Traffic Unit conducts between 6 and 12 Sobriety and,Driver's License Checkpoints a year. 8. The Traffic Unit participates in the bi= annual Seat Belt Campaigns. The Traffic Unit is consistently performing public presentations, utilizing the media, placing traffic safety slogans on local business electronic message boards and organizing school traffic' safety events, such as, Every 15 Minutes. 3. ALTERNATIVES Not approve resolution. 4. FINANCIAL IMPACTS The total project,cost of $37 ;720.00 will be funded from the California Office of Traffic Safety grant. The project prays fotpersonnel overtime to conduct enforcement and educational efforts, new equipment and media material. CONCLUSION :, The use of the California Office of Traffic Safety money to fund this Driving Impaired Restraint Enforcement (DIRE) Project is appropriate. Using funds. in this manner will enable an improved level of traffic safetyto the City'of Petaluma, without impacting on -duty job demands: 6. OUTCOMES OR PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS THAT WILL IDENTIFY SUCCESS" OR.COMPLETION: The grant has'mutually agreed upon objectives that must be completed. The, objectives are primarily • focused on improving enforcement and education efforts to specifically reduce DUI collisions and increase seatbelt compliance. The Office of Traffic Safety also evaluates our performance by on -site visits and the'review of our progress reports. 7. RECOMMENDATION Adopt resolution authorizing acceptance of the, California Office of Traffic Safety Grant funds'. The Petaluma Police Department Traffic Unit will, under the supervision of Serge_ant Tim Lyons, manage the grant. g1foims /2003 agenda bill J R.esolu.tion..No. N.C.S. of "the City of Petaluma, California Resolution AuthorizingthePolice Department to Accept a'Traffic Safety Grant From the California Office of Traffic Safety for a Driving Impaired Restraint Enforcement (DIRE) Project in the Amount of $37,720.00 WHEREAS, the City of Petaluma, Police Department desires to undertake a certain project designated Driving Impaired Restraint.Enforcement (DIRE) Project io'be funded in from funds made available through the California Office of Traffic Safety; and WHEREAS, the City Manager of the City of Petaluma is authorized, on its behalf to submit the attached proposal to the California Office of' Traff'c Safety and .is authorized to sign and approve on behalf of the City of Petaluma the attached. Grant Award Agreement, including any extensions or amendments thereof; and WHEREAS, the applicant agrees to the requirements, for said project (including and amendment thereof) under the program and the funding terms and conditions of the California Office of Traffic Safety; and NOW, THEREFORE, `BE IT RESOLVED, that any liability arising out of the performance of this grant Award Agreement, including civil, _court actions for damages; shall be the responsibility of the grant recipient and the authorizing agency. The State of California and the Office of Traffic Safety disclaim responsibility for any such liability. • BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that ant funds. received shall not be used to supplant expenditures �' pP p control by this body. Under the AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ATTEST: and authority conferred upon this Council by the Charter, of said City. I hereby certify the foregoing''Resolution was introduced l and. Council of the City of Petaluma at a Regular meeting on,, 2001, by the following vote: City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney Mayor Resolution No. NCS • State of California ''���Jf,- Business; Transportation &•Housing Agency `�= °� . -• PROJECT NUMBER, s • , pia OFFICE OF TR FFIC SALTY AI,0442 GRANT AGREEMENT PAGE 1 (To be completed by`applicant Agency) 1. PROJECT TITLE DRIVING IMPAIRED AND RESTRAINT ENFORCEMENT (D.I.RX) PROJECT 2. NAME OF APPLICANT AGENCY A. PROJECT PERIOD Month — Day - Year Fro October 1, 2002 3. • AGENCY UNIT TO HANDLE PR07ECT PETALUMA POLICE DEPARTMEN.T`TRAFFIC'UNIT To: Sept. 30, 2003 5. PROJECT DESCRIPTION (S ummariz e the;project :plan covering the objectives, method of procedures, evaluation, and end product in approximately 100 words. 'Space is limited to; 11 lines.) The primary goal of this projectwill be to improve enforcement and education efforts, to specifically reduce alcohol related=fatal and injury collisions and to raise ourseaf belt - compliance. rate. This project will combine an enforcement I component with educational and awareness campaigns. The objectives will include the following: 1. Conducting DUI Checkpoints and Saturation patrols throughout- the grant`per od. 2: Conducting seat belt and child restraint enforcement. operations throughout the •grant period. 3. Conducting.-anti -DUI and seat belt safety presentations to local schools. The prof ect will attempt- to raise the awareness, of the general public regarding the' issues associated with and driving, reduce, alcohol- related traffic collisions and increase the number of UI arrests. This project will provide equipment and personnel overtime funds to enhance the traffic safety forts already underway in the City of Petaluma. 6. -FEDERAL FUNDS ALLOCATED UN DER. THIS AGRERMENTSHALL NOT EXCEED: $ 37,720.00 7. APPROVAL SIGNATURES A: PROJECT DIRECTOR B. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL OF APPLICANT AGENCY NAME: Thomas Simms .. PHONE:(7:07) 778 -4370 • NAME:, Michael'Bierman PH O NE : (707) 778 -4345 TITLE: Interim Police Chief FAx: (707) 778 -441.9 TITLE: City ,Manager FAR: (707) 778 -4419 ADDRESS:: Petaluma Police'Department. ADDRESS; City of Petaluma 969 PetalumaBlvd North "P.O. Box 61 Petaluma.. California, 949,52 Petaluma. California.94953 police @ci.petaluma.ca.us ' E= MAIL :, citymanager @ci. petaluma.ca.us ` ►� 20 3 �,.� \`tr��I.�,al�i :1'j�o g 21-03 (Signature) ( ' ate) (Signature) (Date) C. FISCAL ORACCOUNTING OFFICIAL D. OFFICE AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE PAYMENTS NAME ..BM Thomas " THONE :.(707) 778 -4352 NAME: Finance Department TITLE: Finance Director FAx;. (707) 77.8 - 4428 ADDRESS City of Petaluma Finance Department ADDRESS;; City of Petaluma P.O. Box 61 PO. Box 61 Petaluma, Calif6nmia 94953. Petaluma, California 94953 E-MAIL: finance &i.petaluma.ca us ht y►-- P IZ 0, Q 3 (Signature) (Date) OTS -38 (Rev. 11/99) SCHEDULE A PROJECT No: AL0442 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 1 I BACKGROUND A. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS Petaluma is located along the U.S.. 101 corridor, approximately 35 miles north of San Francisco. The city covers_ 15 square miles and has been growing slowly by annexing adjacent sections of unincorporated Sonoma County. The November 1998 election established an Urban Growth Boundary to deter sprawl development. Petaluma has a current reported resident population of 56,000 and is growing at an annual rate of less than 2 %. Over the last decade the city has .changed from a bedroom community (daytime, population lower than permanent population) to a center of light industry and telecommuting activity with a 10% to 20% higher daytime population. The current daytiTne population is between 65,000 and 70,000. Our.Historic Downtown is easily accessible for pedestrians and - vehicles. The telecommunications industry has several major businesses in Petaluma, these include: Cisco, Alcatel, and Nokia. Petaluma has become the hub of what is called, "Telecom Valley ". This increase has created the need for more housing, and more overall traffic around theses business parks. Santa Rosa Junior College's Petaluma Campus is also a major-generator of local and commuter traffic; it draws students from as far as Santa' Rosa. The college's annual enrollment is currently 50,000 and rising rapidly, though not all of these are full-time students. Just outside our city limits is one, of only two major U.S. Coast Guard Training Facilities. The base is under an expansion because of increased priorities for the Coast Guard. B. STREET AND HIGHWAYS Petaluma has 157 miles of paved roadway and currently has 47 traffic signals. U.S. Route 101 runs north and south and splits.the city with the older part of town on the west side and newer homes, shopping centers and business parks on the east. side. The north end of town contains an auto mall and.a complex of factory outlet stores. State.Route 116 enters Petaluma from the southeast comer and traverses the city for about 1.5 miles as Lakeville.Highway.until it joins U.S. 101 northbound.. On the west side, the older streets' are generally narrow and discontinuous with a- number of angled intersections. Providing adequate marked bicycle lanes on narrow streets .is. a challenge. On the east side, the newer streets are wider, built to post -World War 11 suburban; design standards Which limit access to heavily traveled roadways- from the residential areas but also focus traffic onto those arterials. The city is also experimenting with traffic circles, roundabouts and hybrid traffic circles as speed reductions measures. Currently there are-four circles .and at least five more have been planned. OTS -38b . {Fey 10/99) SCHEDULE A ) PR03ECT No:. AI0442 PROJECT DESCRIPTION C. OPERATING DEPARTMENTS PAGE 2 The Petaluma Police. Department is comprised of two divisions — Patrol and Administrative Services. A Captain commands each Division. Within the Patrol Division there are two sections with a Lieutenant responsible for each:. Each section (Platoon A and Platoon B) is comprised of four teams and each team is assigned a Sergeant and four Officers. Each Platoon also has a K -9 attached to their 1600 — 0300 shift. There is a Street Crimes Unit that has working days that align with Platoon.B. The Street Crimes Unit.is comprised of two Officers and one Sergeant. The Sergeant also oversees :Officers' assigned to two local Task Force Operations.- There is a Traffic Unit that 'has working days throughout the week. Since January '2002, the first unit s . ergeant has supervised the Traffic Unit. The Traffic Unit has three Police Motorcycle Officers, a STOP Officer and a Community Service Officer assigned to Administrative Services is divided into three sections: • Administrative, which includes Recruitment, Investigations (One Sergeant and. five Detectives), a Domestic Violence Unit and Support.functions • Community Oriented Policing and Problem Solving' (COPPS), which includes crime prevention, school age drug prevention.(D.A.R.E.), the Reserve Community Service Officer (RCSO) program and. Public Information responsibilities • Dispatch and Records In summary, the Petaluma Police Department has 71 sworn personnel positions (Chief,..',?, Captains, 3 Lieutenants, 11 Sergeants 34 general Patrol Officers, 3, Traffic Officers, 6 Detectives 7. support staff including`task force assignments and,4 vacancies). There ,are 31.5 non -sworn positions, which consist of Dispatchers, Records Technicians, Community Service Officers, Parking Officers, ; Property Technicians and two managers. With,the staffing.;of swom at 1.3 per 1,000 populations, it is important for the Department. to remain fully staffed. D. EXISTING SYSTEMS Currently, the City of Petaluma has a Traffic Unit with, four officers and one non - sworn• officer. The Traffic Unit has a DUI Checkpoint Trailer and SMART / Message,Board Trailer that assist in our prevention and enforcement efforts. We have eightAlco- Senor PAS Devices that are spread out among 60 officers working patrol or specialty assignments, such as Traffic. For this project, t .City of Petaluma will. deploy the additional PAS. Devices to patrol personnel to increase the number of alcohol detection devices in the field. OTS -38b (Rev 10/99) SCHEDULE A' PROJECT NO: AL0442 WK PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 3 Our DU Checkpoint operations typically. involve 10 officers, not including support personnel. One operation will involve checkpoints at two separate high traffic volume locations, over an 8 -hour period. For this project, the City of Petaluma will use the overtime funds to continue. Sobriety Checkpoints and Saturation patrols. When enforcement efforts do occur on.. a routine basis, DUI arrests increase and overall collisions decrease. The Traffic Unit has also implemented Hand' =held DUI Investigation equipment that should decrease the amount of time to complete an investigation. and :put officers back in the field quicker. Our Department, currently is,on the Steering Committee for the local Avoid the 13 Campaign._ We have hosted on Checkpoint and participate in all the operations: The Petaluma Police Department increased. DUI .arrests from, year 2001 totals of 213 to 338 in 2002, a 59 % increase. The department increased the iissuance of Moving and Misdemeanor citations from year 2001 totals of 3941 to 6511 in 2002, a.,65% increase. The department issued 706 seat belt citations in 2002, compared to 206 in 2001. In 2002 our lotal traffic collisions decrease`by 7 % from 2001 totals of 1143 to 1059. The Police Department wants to use its existing resources and personnel to continue increase traffic safety. The City of Petaluma's.seat compliance rate has steadily increased from the high 70's in 1994 to 87 % last year. Our rate is still lower that similar sized cites with 90 % compliance rates. For this project, the City of Petaluma's Traffic Unit will increase education efforts to increase the compliance rate and participate in annual seat*belt enforcement campaigns; PROBLEM STATEMENT The City of Petaluma has experienced a growth in population of 13 % between 1996 and 2001 (48,569 vs. 55, 900) causing . steady increases -in traffic and higher levels of congestion on its 157 -mile roadway system. Collision rates have increased and the City of Petaluma rankings have declined,and not improved. Speed continues to be the number one cause of traffic collisions in the City of Petaluma. The Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California Berkeley, conducted Traffic Safety Evaluations in 1996 and in 2000. The analysis identified three primary problem areas. The primary problem areas are.Driving Under the Influence,. Hazardous Traffic Violation Enforcement and Suspended/Unlicensed Driver Enforcement. The analysis identified that increased enforcement of speedrelated violations was needed to increase traffic safety. Along with other programs currently in use and with th's new proposal we will attempt to correct the three primary problems identified. Collision Rankings for 2001 support our effort to improve traffic safety in the City of Petaluma. The City of Petaluma is ranked 23 out of 92 cities for total fatal and injury:collisions for comparable cities based on vehicle miles traveled (VMT),.. The City of Petaluma is ranked 12 out' of 92 cities for alcohol- related collisions based on VMT'. Based on population, the City of Petaluma is ranked 19 out of 92 cities for age, the City of Petaluma ranked'2 .out 92 for VMT and population. alcohol-related collisions. For collisions where the driver p haLbe n drinking alcohol and is under 21 years of g ion. ATTEMPTS TO SOLVE THEPROBLEM Many of the Department.' -s atteinpts to reduce the rate of collisions are illustrated within the preceding oblem Statement. Additionally; the following is a summary of the efforts made by our department to deal th the problem: OTS -38b (Rev 10/99) SCHEDULE A PROJECT No: AL0442. I PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 4 - 1. The Department has established internal recognition systems that identify Officers who contribute significantly toward Traffic Safety goals. 2. . The Department has re- aligned records management functions and implemented computer - programs that enhance -data compilation while reducing the amount of time Traffic Officers mustspend on. such tasks; thereby increasing: the time spent on traffic enforcement. 3. The Department has implemented policies and provided training on existing alcohol and traffic related operations to all:patrol personnel: 4. The Department has created public safety presentations that have been shared wtli Department personnel and are utilized in public presentations on a regular basis. 5. The Department has developed partnerships with the City Traffic EngineeringDepartment. Both Departments hold monthly meetings to discuss traffio related issues. 6. The Traffic Unit participates in 'the Sonoma County Avoid :Campaign and is on the Steering. Committee. The Traffic Unit hostedthe first.ever Sonoma County Avoid Checkpoint and will host the Labor Day Operation. 7. The Traffic Unit conducts between 6-and 12 Sobriety and Driver's License Checkpoints a year. 8. The Traffic Unit.participates in the bi- annual Seat Belt Campaigns. 9. The Traffic Unit is consistently performing public presentations, utilizing the media; placing traffic safety slogans on local,business electronic message boards and organizing school traffic safety events, such as, Every 15 Minutes. PROJECT GOALS 1. To purchase alcohol detection equipment and educational material by December 31, 2003..` 2. To decrease total of DUI related collisions by 20% from the 2002 base year total of 58 to 47 by September 30, 2005. 3. To decrease total `alcohol related fatal and injury collisions by 1 % from the 2002 base year total of 13 to 10 by September 30, 2005. 4. To increase seatbelt compliance by 4 % from the 2002 base `year rate of 87% to '91 % o by September 30, 2005. 5. To increase DUI arrests by 10% from the 2002 base year total of 328 to 360 by September 30, PROJECT OBJECTIVES 1. To conduct a press conference or other: media event by November 15, 2003 to kick off or' publicize the grant. OTS will be notified at least two weeks in advance of the kick off event. 2. To develop and produce for distribution educational /promotional items in support of project objectives that will coincide with the Thanksgiving/Christmas season (November 15, 2003 and November 15,: 2004). 3. To purchase.new, DUI detection equipment by December 31, 2003. 4. To conduct. 12 D.U.I. Checkpoints and 12 DUI'Saturation.patrolsby September 30,,2005. 5. To send 10 Patrol Officers to the POST approved DUI Recognition and Enforcement_ School by September 30, 2005. 6. To conduct an annual "High School Seat Belt Challenge" including all four high schools by September-.3 2005. - 7. To conduct 4, Seat Belt Safety Awareness Checkpoints by September 30, 2005. OTS -38b (Rev 10/99) SC14EDULE' PROJECT No: AL0442 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 5 To participate in the annual Seat Belt Enforcement Campaigns. in May and November of each year. 9. To conduct 12 educational 'presentations to the community, with 75% of the presentations targeting the Hispanic population by September 30, 2005. 10. To e -mail or fax all press releases or media advisories /alerts to our Regional Coordinator for approval in advance of their release. 11. To use the following language in all press materials: "Funding for this program was provided by a grant from the California Office of TrafficSafety through the Business, Transportation & Housing Agency." 12. To submit print clips by 9am to our Regional Coordinator and the Public Information Officer, via e =mail at pio(a.ots.ca.�ov or fax at (916) 262 -2960 (e -mail preferred). All clips should include publication name and date the article was published: 13. To fax OTS (916) 262- 2960, at least two weeks in advance, a short description of any new traffic safety event or program. Address the fax to the OTS Public 'Information Officer'and our Regional Coordinator. 14. To measure the grant's impact on crime by tracking 'non- traffic - related arrests that initiate. from DUI checkpoints and/or, other 'grant ..supported activities or operations: Some of the crime statistics to be collected include narcotic arrests; .confiscated weapons, stolen vehicles recovered, criminal misdemeanor arrests, criminal felony arrests, ,and felony warrant arrests. 15. To encourage local media to highly publicize specific enforcement efforts targeting impaired driving and report the results of these efforts. 16. To meet with newspaper editorial. boards to promote traffic safety articles. 17. To convince the media to report seat belt, usage as part of every collision. METHOD OF PROCEDURE Phase 1 — Program Preparation (.October 1, 2003 — December 31, 2003) During this phase we will acquire necessary persormel, procedures and equipment. Develop a strong community awareness campaign through local newspapers, radio stations, city newsletter and other available media, informing, the public of our efforts, in combination with the Office of Traffic Safety to create a safety traffic environment in' our city. The community will be advised of our goals and objectives and,solicited to become -involved in-reducing the °problems: ;In addition, processes will be put into place to provide current enforcemenflocation information. to the media, specifically targeting. the commuter audience: 'This community, awareness campaign will be developed prior to November 15, 2003 to enhance its impact prior to'the'2003 Holiday season. We will develop responsibilities of each program member and.Traffic Officers as, they relate to the project. We will procure all material and equipment. Computer and procedural modifications necessary to facilitate data collection and project reports.will be identified and. implemented. OTS -38b (Rev 10/99) SCHEDULE -A PROJECT NO: AL0442 DESCRIPTION PAGE 6 Phase 2 — (October 1, 2002 — December 31, 2003) During this phase we will participate in the Seat Belt Campaign and Holiday Sobriety Checkpoint Campaigns. Phase 3 — (January 1, 2003- throughout Project Period) During this phase we will begin using the equipment and start the data collection. We will also-start our series of public safety presentations related to alcohol related collisions and seat belt safety. We will provide, public information through specially prepared literature and public service announcements on traffic safety and occupant protection. An appropriate portion of the releases will target Hispanic and commuter audiences. We will prepare, public service announcements to coincide with specific statewide traffic safety programs, holidays and other, times drivers need to be aware of increased hazards or priorities. . Phase . 4 — Data Gathering & Analysis (Throughout Project Period) Statistical data relating to the project goals and objectives will be collected, analyzed, and incorp into Quarterly Performance Reports. Quarterly Reports for the quarter ending September 30th will include year - to -date comparisons of goals and objectives. The `Quarterly Evaluation Data Form — Schedule C form will be completed each quarter and submitted as part of the Quarterly Performance Report. These reports will'compare actual project accomplishments with the planned accomplishments. They will include information concerning changes .made by the ,Project Director in planning and gumdi#g the project efforts.. The Traffic Sergeant will utilize all departmerit. data devices to effectively monitor and evaluateAhe program.; These will include,' but are not ;limited to Records 1Vlanagement System data, Dispatch data, statistical tracking devices designed, specifically for thi's project, by Traffic Unit-:members and the Department's existing Collision software,' program that effectively utilizes GIS software. The Traffic Unit Sergeant who.will deploy project personnel to maintain program effectiveness will maintain close supervision of the project and project personnel. The Petaluma Police Department also. encourages ideas from - all, employees. The Traffic Unit personnel will be expected to provide suggestions for: improvement_through the project period. Phase 5 — Final Report and Executive Summary (September 30, 2005) Begin the Final Report and Executive Summary in accordance with OTS.req ' rements specified in the Program Manual, Chapter 7. Both will be submitted to OTS within 60 days after the grant ends. OTS -38b (Rev 10/99) SCHEDULE A PROJECT'NO: AL0442 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PAGE 7 ITHOD-OF EVALUATION Using the data compiled, the project manager. will evaluate: (1) how well the stated project goals(s)' and objectives were accomplished; (2).if all the activities outlined . in the Method of procedures were performed in accordance.with the grant agreement; and (3) was the project cost effective? STATEMENT OF INTENT We have considered the continuing costs of this Driving Impaired and Restraint Enforcement (D.I.R.E.) Project and it is the intent of the City ofPeialuma.to absorb the entire:cost of this project after the. expiration. OTS -38b (Rev 10/99) SCHEDULE A -1 PROJECT No:: AL0442 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT STATEMENT Explain what type of priority this project has in your, jurisdiction. The City Council of Petaluma, on behalf of the citizens of Petaluma, has established Traffic* Safety as a priority. The Petaluma Police Department launched a comprehensive Traffic Safety Program in 1997 and has :identified several necessary components that will aid in acquiring an enhanced level of Traffic Safety_ in Petaluma. The funds shown `below illustrate the City's commitment to Traffic Safety. The command'staff at the Petaluma Police Department is dedicated to this effort and.fully intends to meet the goals and objectives of thisproject. A resolution will be obtained. from City Council concerning this specific prograni,and a copy will be furnished to O.T.S. upon`receipt. AGENCY ,CONTRIBUTION — Explain what services or funds are, being contributed by your agency in support of this project. The City of Petaluma will provide services necessary 'for coordinator, supervision administratiowand evaluation of this project. The contribution will be as follows: CONTRIBUTED ITEM % FY -1 FY -2 FY -3 Traffic Administrative Review 1 500 500 Traffic Sergeant 10 1,000 1,000 Police C.S.O. - 15 5,150 5,1.50 Vehicle Operation and Maintenance 20 2,500 2,500 Trailer . use and equipment maintenance 100 200 200 PAS Calibration equipment maintenance 100 100' 100 STOP Officer Tow Hearings 10 1,500 1,500 Total Agency Contribution $1.0,950.00 $10;950.00 OTS -38c (Rev 10/99) SCHEDULE B PAGE 1. DETAILED' " PROJECT N O. AL0442 A. COST CATEGORY FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATES. TOTAL COST TO PROJECT . 'FY -1 10 -01 -03 09 -30 -04 FY -2 10 -01 -04 09- 03 -05 FY -3 FY -4 PERSONNEL COSTS Positions`and Salaries Officer Overtime 476 hours;@ $59:83 per�hour $14,240,00 $14,240.00 $28,480.00 Categ Sub - Total„ . ;$14 $14;240.00 .$0.001, $0.001 $28,480.00 B. TRAVEL EXPENSE PTS Seminar $1.,000.00 $1,000:00 $2,000.00 0.00 Category Sub' - Total. $1,000:00 $1,000:00 $0:00 $0:00 $2,000.00 C. CONTRACTUAL- SERVICES _ N/A GategAry Sub -Total $0.001 $0.001 $0.001 $0.001 $0.00 OTS -38d (Rev. 10199) SCHEDULE- B PAGt2 DETAILED BUDGET ESTIMATE PROJECT No. AL0442 COST CATEGORY FISCAL YEAR.ESTITqATES TOTAL COST TO PROJECT FY -1 10-01-03 0973 1 0-04 FY-2 10-01-04 09-, 03-05 FY-3 FY-4 D. NON- EXPENDABLE . PROP ERTY. Category Sub Total $0.00j 0.061 $0.00 $0.00 E. OTHER DIRECT COSTS 5 PAS,Devices @395040 ea. Printing Educational Material Promotional Iterfis $4,750.06' 73,0.06 500-00 730.00 500.00 $4,750 00 1,490.00 1pom Category Sub -Total '$5,98 0.00 $1;210.00 $0.001 $0.00 $7,240.00 F. INDIRECT COSTS $0. 00 Category Sub-Total $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0 '$0.00 $0A PROJECT TOTALI - $21, - 120.00] $16,470.00 OOF w 001, 50.00. OTS-38e (fRev:10/99) STATEOF CALIFORNIA e' OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY ACCEPTANCE OF' CONDITIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS OTS 73'3 (Rev 4/98) ; ACCEPTANCE OF CONDITIOINS ANY ORGANIZATION'NAINE Page 1 of :2 The following are included herein and constitute apart of this Agreement: OTS =3'$ Page 1 Schedule A Project Description Schedule A -] Administrative Support:& Contribution Schedule B Detailed Budget,Estimate Schedule.13-1: Budget Narrative. Schedule C Quarterly Evaluation Data OTS -33 Acceptance of Conditions and Certifications :STD..21 Drug -Free Workplace, Certification 0 TERMS AND CONDITIONS It -is understood and agreedby the Project Director and. Authorizing ;'Official that any'grant received as,a result of this..Agreement is subject to all federal and state regulations governing grants and to those controls expressedin the C'alifomia'Traffc Grant Program Manuals which include; but. are not limited to: (a) Quarterly Performance Reports and Reimbursement Claims must be submitted by the Project Director to the Office of Traffic Safety by January 31, April 30, July,M,:and.October 31', duringeach year of project:operation; (b) OTS will withhold or disallow grantpayments, reduce or,terrrnnate `grant fiinds; and/or deny'f iture granttwiding.anytime a grantee fails to comply with any term or condition . of th'e.grantcontract or program.guidelines (Volume ^II Chapter 3.9). This may include, but is not limited to, "the following:` . Failure to submit acceptable and timely reimbursement claims; • Failure to submit acceptable and timely .quarterlyperformance and • Failure to submit an acceptable and timely Schedule C °(Quarterly Evaluation Data,(OTS -38g) (c) If, during the term of the grani°award,,federal. _funds become reduced or OTS may immediately terminate or reduce the grant award upon written - notice to th'e =project director. (d) By October '31, "continuing "projects must submit- aiSepterriber 30 claim:and,a w_ ntten:justificati'on',to support carrying forward prior . y ear unexpended funds. September 36 claims and written.justificatons, supportmg carrying.forward " of prior year unexpended ' funds submitted after November 30, will "not be processed. The.prior claim (i.e., June 30 ) ' will be considered the year-end claim in order to close out thefederal fiscal year ending September 30. In prior year unexpended funds will be deobligated and allocated to new projects. (e) All documentation required to request;a projegf;reyision (i.e., aime extensions, budget cafe gory;changes; and etc.).must be submitted to OTS prior to the.effective date of change(s). For'example >OTS will notconsider a request- fora ,gr.4' period aime extension unless all necessary paperwork is submitted prior to the existing grant,termination date. 'P.riorapproval is required for all project revisions (Volume II, Chapter 3.8). ` No alteration or variation of the terms of this Agreement.shall'be valid'unless'made;in wntmg,an&signed by the parties hereto, and no oral . understanding or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on'any of the parties hereto. GENERAL CERTIFICATIONS II. EOUAL OPPORTUNITY ASSURANCE Pursuant to the requirements of Title VI provisions of the Civil Rights Act;of 1964; the certifying applicantacting through its chief administrative officer, desiring wavail itself of. the benefits of Chapter 1 Title 23, United States Code, and.as;a condition to obtaining the approval of the Secretary of Transportation and Govemor of California, of any highway safety' projects as provided. for in Title 23, United States Code, Section) 65(a), hereby gives!its assurance that All provisions of Equal Opportunity Assurance.with regard to the Highway . Safety Program will be complied with fully:, III. MINORITY ANDtWOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (a) "`P61ic It is'the policyof the Office of Traffic,Safety and the. certifying applicant that minority and women business enterprises as defined in 49 CFR Part 23 shall have "the maximum opportunity to participate; in; the performance - of' contracts financed in whole or in part with Federal under this agreement. Consequently, the MWBE requirements of 49 CFR Part 23 apply to this agreement." (b) "MWBE Obligation ;The, certifying applicant or its contractor agrees to ensureithatminorityand'women business enterprisesaas defined in 49 CFRPart 23 liave the.maximum.opportunity to;participafe in the performance:of, contracts! and subcontracts °financed in whole or in "part with Federal funds provided under, this agreement. In llis,regard the certifying applicant and "all contractors shall take all necessary and reasonable steps m, accordance with 49 CFR Part'23 to ensure that;minority and women businesssenterprises have the maximum; opportunity to•compete.forand perform'confracts. The certifying applicant and its contractors shall not discriminate on the basis of race, col or,:national origin,, or sex in the award.and performance of DOT assisted contracts." SECTION 504, REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973 Pursuant to Section.504 of'the Rehabilitation Act of'1973,;no qualified handicapped person shall, because of a cerhfying applicant's facilities are inaccessible;to or unusab]'e'by, handicapped persons; be:denied the benefits of,.be excluded from; participation in, or otherwise be subjected to discriinination. under any program or activity funded under the Highway'Safety Act of 1966(U.S. Code, Title Section 23, Section -402 et. seq -.). Page 2 of 2 V. HATCH ACT All•employees?of this certifying applicant, whose principal employment is-fn connection with,,any Highway Safety Projectfinanced in whole or in part by loans,�or grants under the Highway Safety Act of 1966 have been made'aware of the provisions of Section 12(a) of the Hatch Act [5.U.S.C. 118k(a)j. . VI. , NON- DUPLICATION OF GRANT FUND °EXPENDITURE The certifying applicant has no ongoing or completed projects under agreement with TOPICS,.CCCJ (I EAA), HEW orother Federal fund sources, which duplicate or overlap >anywork contemplated or described in this Traffic Safety Project. It is agreedthat;anypending or proposed request;for other Federal grant fundswhich would duplicate or overlap work under this Traffic Safety, Project, will' be; revised to exclude any such duplication of grant fund' expenditures. . It is understood that any,such;duplication of Federal fund;expendituresaubsequen_ tly determined by audit will''be subject to recovery by the . Office of Traffic Safety: VIL LOBBYING,RESTRICTIONS The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that% (a)*, No Federal appropriated funds have been paid 1 0 - T will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned to any person for influencing.or attempting influence officer oremployee,of any - agency, a Member of.Congress, an ;officer or employee of Congress or an employee of a Member of CongressJn connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making.of'anyFederal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, -and the +extension continuation, renewal, 'amendment, or modification of "any,Federal contract, grant; loan, or cooperative agreement. b If any funds; other the Federal a ro n Yed furids'havejbeen paid will be paid to any person,for'influencing or attempting,to nfluence an officer or em to ee of an y Pa g_ enc a Member'of Congress, 'an,officeror employee of Congress or an,employee of a member of Congress n connection with gr this Federal contract.: loan, or cooperative agreement,; the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form -LLL Disclosure Forimto Report C Lobbying' ; in accordance with its instructions. (a) The undersigned shall requireahat theilanguage of this certification.be included in t} a award documents forall sub- awards;at all, tiers (includingsubcontracts, sub - grants, and contracts under grants; loans and-cooperative agreements) and thatalhsub= recipients shall certify and disclose:accordingly. Submission of t is certi a ateri ' presentation of fact uponvIiicli x6liance was placed When transaction was�made or entered into. This certification is a material re e is a prerequisite „for making or entering info it istransaction' imposed by Section 062. Title 11 34, U.S. Code Any person who fails to fle�the.required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000.and not more6than $100,000 for each failure. VIII. RECYCLING At intervals designated bytheState, contractor shall certify in writing, under penalty of perjury the minimum, if.not'exact, percentage:of. recycled content, of rnaterials,.goods or supplies offered orproducts:used in the,performance of the contract, pursuant to the•r`equirementsof PublicContract.Code Section 10223. Contractor may certify that the product contains zero recycled content. ,Definitions of recycled content are containedJn Public Contract Code. Sections 12161 and 12260. CERTIFICATION We, the officials named below, herebyswear that= -we are duly'authorizedlegally, to bind the contractor or grant recipient toAhe ;above described . conditions;and certifications. Executed on the date and in the county below, and .is made under penalty of perjury under the`lawsof the State, of California. PRow&I)rRF. TOR'CNAMF DATE EXECUTED EXECUTED INITHE COUNTY OF AUTRIZING'OFFICIAL'S HO S1GNA T TU . t TITLE AUTHORIZING.OFFICiALi s NAME