HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 4.A 05/03/2004MAY 0 3 2904 pt A o-1
CITY OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA
AGENDA BILL
AgendiVile: Discussion and Possible Action Amending — Meeting. Date: May 3, 2004
,
Resolution 2004-.028 N-C.S to reduce transient occuparicyfees at
the Turning Basin to $20.00 per day year round. Meeting Time: Z 3:00 PM
❑ 7:00 PM
Category (check one): ❑ , Consent Cale dar Public Heari ng ❑ New Business
Z Unfinished Business ❑ Presentation
Departmen
Director:
FConact,Person:
Phone Number:
an
City Mager
Michael Bierman
Michael Bierman
778-4345
Cost of Proposal:
Account Number:
Amount Budgeted n/a
Name of f Fund:
Attachments to Agenda Packet item.."
1. Resolution 2,002414 N.C.S. setfing,'fees for city services.
2. Resolution 2002-410 N.C.S. amending Resolution 2002-114, reducing transient occupancy fees at
Turning Basin to $15.00 per day year round.
3. Resolution 2004-028 N.C.S.-apptoVing,update of cost of services fee; schedule.
4., Draft Resolution to amend Resolution ion 2004-028 N.C.S. to reduce transient occupancy fees at the
. Turning Basin to $20;00 per day year round,
Summary Statement. The City contracted with Revenue and
I Cost Specialists in 2001 to provide a "Cost
&
of Service- Study" for the City. This study provided' detailed information: 7on.each of the services that the
City provides and the- cost of provid ing,that. . particular service. As a result of that study, the City Council
approved a -schedule on Ju'ly 5, 2002 (Re solution 2009-114 N.C.S.) that an increase in
mooring and transient occupancy fees at the 'Turning Basin. As the, result of public testimony that followed
in August ,, and ; September, Resolution 20 0 was adopted on 21, 2002 amending the transient
an
occupey'fees to $15.00 per day year round.
The Cost Study adopted on July 15, 2002 provided the City the ability to update the cost of
services on an annual basis, based ;on the cost of providing that service. The City Council approved the
.
updated fee structure on Mar ch 1,.2004 with fees to go into effect May 1, 2004. The transient occupancy
fee was scheduled to increase to $30. At the April 19, 2004 Council meeting, it was again requested by
Council and the community that the transient occupancy fees remain at a lower level.
Qn April 26, 2004.,:a meeting was held with representatives of the, Petaluma Yacht Club and City staff to
explore optionsrelate,d, to the transient occupancy fee increase. It was agreed that the fees, which are used
for maintenance and upgrades to the City facilities :at the Turning Basin, could be charged at $2 0.00 instead
-
of the $30.00 approved ,on March 1, 2004. Staff will continue to work with the Yacht Club to explore
alternative methods of collection of the mooring and transient occupancy fees.
The monthly mooripg fee rates remain unchanged.
Recommended CityEouncil Action /Suggested Motion: Approve resolution amending Turning Basin
Mooring Fees at, $20,0:0 per day year round, to take effect immediately, with all other provisions of
Resolution 20'64-028 to feindifi unchanged.
Rev' wed WIT-inAncebirecton
Reviewed by City Attorney:
Date:
AvprR v Citv Manager:
Date:
Date
Resolution No. `2002 -114 N.C.S.
of the City of Petaluma, California
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF'THE CITY OF PETALUNIA,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING A SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHANGES FOR CITY
SERVICES AND REPEALING PREVIOUSLY .ADOPTED AND CONFLICTING FEES
AND CHARGES FOR SUCH.SERVICES'.
WI1EREAS, the City Council of the °City of. Petaluma ( "City ") has previously
established fees and charges for City services, with the intent of recovering the City's actual and
reasonable costs to provide such services; and
WHEREAS, the.Cty engaged Revenue .and Cost Specialists, LLC, to analyze whether
the existing fees and charges serve to recover the City's full costs of providing such services to
the extent the City may lawfully recover such costs; and
WIIEREAS, Revenue. and .Cost Specialists, LLC have prepared a report entitled "Cost of
Services Study for the City of Petaluma" dated January 12, 2002 ( "Cost Report"), which report is
incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, the Cost Report identifies the actual costs that'the City incurs in providing
certain City services; and
• WHEREAS., the Cost Report recommends revising many of the existing fees and
charges"previously established by the City to recover full, lawfully- recoverable costs incurred
by the City in providing City services; 'and
WHEREAS, the fees and charges set forth in the schedule of fees and charges adopted
by this resolution do not violate Article XIII D of the California Constitution, pursuant to
Apartment Association of Los Angeles County v. City of Los Angeles. (2001) 24 Cal. 4th 830.
WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 50076, fees that do not
exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service or regulatory activity for which the fees are
charged and which are; notlevied for general revenue purposes are not special taxes as defined in
Article 3.5 of the Government Code; and
•
WHEREAS, in, accordance with Government Code Section 66014, local agency fees for:
zoning variances „ 'use permits, building inspections_, building permits,, filing and processing
applications and petitions' filed with the local agency formation commission or conducting
proceedings filed under the Cortese-Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985 .
(Government Code §: 56000 et. seq.), processing maps under the Subdivision Map Act
(Government Code ,§ 66410 et seq.), or planning services shall not exceed the estimated
reasonable cost:of providing the service for which the fee is charged; and
Resolution No. 2002 -114 N.C.S.
WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 65104, fees to support the
work of planning agencies shall not exceed the reasonable cost of providing the service for
which the fee is charged and
WHEREAS, in accordance. with Government Code Section 65456, legislative bodies
may, ado tin- a specific plan, im ose a specific plan fee u on persons seeking
y' p p p p p p p p. g
governmental approvals which are required to be consistent with the specific -lan, and such fees
shall, in the aggregate defray but not exceed the cost of preparation, .adoption and administration
of the specific plan; and
WHEREAS' in accordance with Government Code Section 65909.5; reasonable city fees
for the processing of use permits, zone variances, or zone changes shall not exceed the, amount
reasonably required to administer the. processing of such permits, zone variances or changes; and
W>EiEREAS, in accordance with Government Code Section 66451.2, reasonable local
agency fees for the processing of tentative final and parcel maps shall not exceed the amount
reasonably required by the agency; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Health. and Safety Code Section 17951, city governing
bodies may prescribe, fees for permits, certificates or other documents required or authorized
concerning implementation and enforcement of the California Building Standards. Code, and
such fee.s,shall not exceed the amount reasonably required to administer or process those permits,
certificates or other forms or documents, and shall not be levied for general` revenue purposes;
and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Health - and, S afety Code Section 19132.3,, city governing
bodies may adopt fees for filing building permit applications, and such fees shall not .exceed the
amount reasonably required for the local enforcement agency to issue such perrruts, and shall not
be.levied for general revenue purposes; and
WHEREAS, 'in accordance with Health and Safety Code Section 19852, city governing
bodies may prescribe such fees as will pay the expenses incurred by the building' department i'n
maintaining the official copy of the plans of buildings for which building permits have been
issued, but such -fees shall. not exceed the amount reasonably required in maintaining the official
copy of the plans for which building permits have been issued; and
WJEIEREAS, fees adopted pursuant to Govern ment Code Sections 66014, 65:104, 65456,
65909.5, and 66451.2,' and Health and Safety Code Sections 1'7951, 19132.3, and 19852, are to
be imposed pursuant to Section 66016 of the Government Code, which imposes certain
procedural requirements; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Government Code 66016, the Cost Report was
available for public review and comment for ten days prior to the public hearing at which this
Resolution was adopted; and
Resolution No. 2002414 N.C.S.
WHEREAS, 10 days advance notice of the public hearing, at which this Resolution was
• adopted was given by publication in accordance with Section 6062a, of the Government Code;
- and
FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the City. Council of the City of Petaluma finds as follows:
A. The purpose of 'the fees and charges set forth in Section 3 of this Resolution is to
recover up to the full, .lawfully recoverable costs incurred by the City in providing
various City services, and such fees and charges hot j levied for general revenue
purposes.
B. After consideration of the Cost Report, the testimony received at this noticed
public hearing, the agenda report, the background- documents to the agenda report,
and all correspondence received (together, "Record"), the City Council of the City
of Petaluma: approves and adopts "the Cost Report.
C. Adoption, of the fees and charges set forth in this Resolution is intended to recover
costs necessary to maintain such services within the City, The City currently
provides development related services to project applicants, and the fees set forth
in this Resolution will be used to maintain c- urrent service levels. As such, such
fees as they relate to provision of development related services within the City are
• not a "project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act or
C.E.Q.A. (Public Resources Code § 21080(b)(8)(D)).
D. In adopting the fees set forth in this Resolution, the City Council of the City of
Petaluma �is exercising ;its powers under Article XI', Section 5 of the California
Constitution.
E. The Record establishes that the costs; listed in the Cost. Report as those incurred by
the City in providing City services are reasonable estimates of the cost of
providing such services, and that the. revisions recommended in the Cost Report to
existing fees for such services are necessary to recover the reasonable, estimated
cost ; of providing such services in accordance with the analyses contained in the
Cost Report.
•
Resolution No. 2002° -114 N.C:S.
AD OPTION OF FEES
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Petaluma does resolve as follows:
Section 1. Fee Schedule Adoption. The following schedule of fees and charges set forth
in Section 3 of this Resolution are hereby directed to be; computed by and applied by the various
City departments, :and to be collected by the City Finance Department for the herein listed
special services when provided by the, City or its designated contractors.
Section .2. Separate Fee for Each Process. All fees set by this resolution are for each
identified process; additional fees shall be required for each additional process or service that is,
requested or required: Where fees are indicated on a per unit of measurement basis the The 'is for
each identified unit or Portion thereof within the indicated: ranges of such units,
A. Added:Fees. and Refunds. Where additional fees need to be charged and collected for
completed staff work,, or where a refund `of excess deposited monies'is due, and where
such charge or refund in ten dollars ($ or less, a charge or refund need not be
made„ _pursuant to. California Government 'Code Sections 29373.1 and 29375. -1 and
amendments thereto.
B. Deposits Plus Staff Time and Materials. This means that the, applicants will be; billed
for the full cost of processing the application, based on staff time and materials over
and above the amount of the deposit: 'Staff hourly rate shall be fully burdened..and be
determined by regular work rates established by the City of Petaluma Finance
Director for the given fiscal year(s) in which the application is processed. For
applications requesting multiple entitlements the deposit shall be the sum of the
individual amounts. The Community Development Director shall have the authority
to modify or waive staff time and material costs when circumstances warrant.
C. Flat-Fee Applications. This is an application fee that does not include ,staff time and
materials.
D. Full Cost Recovery Applications. 'This includes a deposit amount and the actual costs
of the staff time and required materials.
Section I. Special Service Fees. The following fees shall be charged and collected for
the following enumerated services:
•
Resolution No. 2002- 1.14'N.C.S.
•
Exhibit Excerpt
RELEASEOF'WILDLIFE FROM TRAP ON PRIVATE $25
PROPERTY
NUISANCE WILDLIFE RESPONSE TO EUTHANIZE $50
ON PRIVATE PROEPRTY
SURRENDED ANIMAL PICKED UP BY ANIMAL $25
CONTROL OFFICER
ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER'TR'ANSPORTATON - During °Business Hours -- $50'
OF'INJURBD ANIMAL TO VETERINARIAN After Business Hours -- $75
ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER ASSIST ANIMAL $50 per hour with one hour minimum
OWNER
TURNING BASIN SERVICES:
MOORING FEES
RECREATIONAL SWIMMING"
FITNESS SWIMMING
SWIM LESSONS
PRIV.PARTY POOL RENTAL
SWIM TEAM POOL RENTAL
SPEC.EVENT -CRAFT FAIRE
ADULT SPORTS
RECREATION /CONTRACT PROGRAMS
SENIOR PROGRAMS7TOURS
YOUTH PROGRAMS
PRE - SCHOOL PROGRAMS
TEEN PROGRAMS
PARK PICNIC RENTAL
PRIVATE BALLFIELD RENTAL -SHORT TERM
PRIVATE BALL'FIELD:RENTAL -LONG TERM
BOYS & GIRLS CLU&SUPPORT
COMMUNITY'CENTER;ROOM RENTAL:
NONPROFIT - NO FEES:
ASSEMBLY ROOM
ACTIVITY ROOM
KITCHEN — FLAT'FEE
MEETING ROOMS A -D
1 %z MEETING ROOM
CONFERNCE ROOM #2
October through March $4 per foot
April through September -- $8 per foot
Transient -- $30 daily fee
12 years and under -- $1.00
13 years through 54 years -- $2.00
55 and older $ 1.50
Each lap swim session -- $5.00
Water Pitness.Class;(11 sessions) -- $40.00
$36 per 2.week session
Per 50 people forfirsthour -- $50:00
Per 50 people for each,, additional'hour -- $40.00
$2,000 per
$145 perbooth
Softball -_ $625:00 per team
Volleyball --:$235.0 pef1eam
Basketball,=_: 5- 95.00 per team
Fee is 60% City 40% Instructor
$20.00 for newsletter per year
$2.00 unit.,cost
Camp'$unshine,— .per week — 5 days /.week -- $90.00
Tiny Tots— 2 yr. , olds_— per,month —1 day /week -_ $2100
Tiny Tots - 3 yr. olds — per — 2 days /week -- $84.00
Tiny Tots — .4•yr: olds'— per month— 3 days /week ,- $125.00
Youth Employment Permit -- $0
Gym Session (Each] - -.'$0
Driver's Education. Class -- $90:00.
Babysitting Class -- $35.00 .
Per 1001people,forthe first two hours -- $50.00
Per 100 people for each, additional hour in excess of 2 hours -
$50.00
$40.00 per`day
Little League -:per member -- $4.00
Soccer — per member -- $6.00
Girl's Softball— per member -- $6.00
$5.00 per month per member
$45
$20
$100
$30
$20
$20
Resolution, No. ,2002 -i N: N.C.S. 10
Resolution No. 2002 -170 N.C.S.
of the City Of Petaluma California
AMENDING RESOLUTION 2002 -114 N.C.S.
RELATING TO THE. ESTABLISHMENT OF
FEES FOR'MOORING SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Petaluma ( "City ") has previously
established fees and charges for City services, with the intent of recovering the City's actual and
reasonable costs to provide such services; and,
WHEREAS, the City - wishes to revise fees for mooring services from the present
schedule as adopted in Resolution No. 2002 -114 N.C. S.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Petaluma -does resolve to revise
the Mooring and Transient Occupancy fees for the Turning Basin to the following:
•
Mooring Fees:
October through March -- $3.00 per foot
April through September -- $4.50 per foot
Transient Occupancy Fees:
$15.00 per day year round
Under4be power'and authority conferred upon this: Council by the Charte of said City
REFERENCE: Council of City of Pet lama at OC ober� r introduced and adopted by the Approved as to
g ) (Adjourned),( Special meetin
.... .. ..................... day'of ............. ,.....
20
on the , .0, by the
following vote:
ity Attorney
AYES: Cader- Thompson, Vice Mayor Healy, Maguire, Moynihan, O'Brien, Mayor Thompson, Torliatt
NOES: None
SA BSENT: None
ATTEST: ......... 4 L;,4--je ...............
City Clerks Mayor
Council File ... ...........................
Res. No. ....:..�b 62 ; 1�IO........N.C.S.
Resolution No,. 028 N.C.S.
of the City of Petaluma Californa.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY, OF PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA,
ESTABLISHING, A SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES FOR CITY SERVICES
AND REPEALING'PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED AND CONFLICTING
FEES AND CHARGES' FOR SUCH SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Petaluma ( "City ") has previously
established fees and charges 'for City services; with the intent df recovering the City's actual and
reasonable costs to provide. such services; and,
WHEREAS, the City engaged Revenue arid, Cost. Specialists, LLC, to analyze whether
the existing fees and charges, serve to recover. the City's full. costs of_.providing such services to
the extent the City may lawfully recover such costs; and,
WHEREAS, Revenue, and, Cost Specialists, LLChave prepared a report entitled ``Cost of
Services Study for the City of Petaluma" dated;January 11, 2002 ( "Cost Report"), which report is
incorporated by reference as though fully set forth.herein; and,
WHEREAS, Revenue and Cost Specialists; LLC` have updated the Cost Report (Cost
Report Revised) with current costs consistent with the City of Petaluma, Fiscal.. Year 2003 -2004
Adopted Budget; and,
WHEREAS, the Cost Report Revised identifies the actual costs that the City incurs in
providing certain City service s;, aid,
WHEREAS, the Cost Report. Revised recommends. revising many of the existing fees
and charges previously established by the City to recover the full,, lawfully - recoverable costs
incurred by the, City in providing City services; and,
WHEREAS, the fees and charges set forth in the schedule of fees and charges adopted
by this resolution do not violate Article XIH .D of the .California Constitution pursuant to
Apartment Association of Los Angeles Count) v. City of Los Angeles (200 1) 24 Cal. _4th 830; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code §5007:6; fees that do not exceed the
reasonable cost .of providing the service or regulatory activity for which the fees `are charged and
which are not levied for general revenue purposes are not special taxes as defined in Article 3.5
of the Govenu7zent Code; ,and,
• WHEREAS, m accordance with Government, Code §66014, local agency fees for:
zoning variances, use permits, building inspections, building permits, filing and processing
applications and petitions filed with the local agency formation commission or conducting
Resolution No. 2004 -028 N.C.S.
proceedings filed under the Cortese -Knox Local Government Reorganization Act of 1985
(Government Code §5600,0 et seq.), processing neaps under the Subdivision Map Act
(Goveinnient Code §66410 et seg.), or plaiming services shall not exceed the estimated
reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged; and
WHEREAS in accordance with Government Code §65104, fees to support the work of
planning agencies shall not exceed thereasonable cost I of providing the service for which-the fee
is charged; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code §65456, legislative bodies may, after
adopting a specific plan, impose a specific plan fee upon persons :seeking governmental I
approvals which are - required to be consistent' with, the specific plan, and such fees shall, in the
aggregate, defray but not exceed the cost of preparation, adoption and administration of the
specific.plan; and,
WHEREAS ;'in accordance withi Government Code §65909.5, reasonable city fees for
the processing: of, use permits, zone variances, or zone changes shall not exceed the amount
reasonably required to administer the processing of such permits, zone 'variances or changes;
and
WHEREAS; in accordance with Government Code §6645.1.2, reasonable `local agency'
fees for the, processing of tentative, final and shall not exceed the amount reasonably
required by the agency; and,
WHEREAS, in;accordance. with Health and Safety Code §1795 city governing bodies
may prescribe fees- for permits, certificates or other documents required or authorized. concerning
implementation land enforcement of the California Building 'Standards Code,..and such fees shall
not exceed the amount reasonably "required to administer or process those permits, certificates or
other forms or documents, and shall not be levied for general revenue purposes; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Health and 'Safety Code §1'9 city governi g
bodies may adopt fees for filiiig building permit applications, and such fees shall not exceed the
amount, reasonably°required for the: local, enforcement agency to issue such permits, and shall not
be levied for general revenue purposes; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with Health, and Safety Code §`19852, city governing bodies
may prescribe such fees as will pay the expenses incurred 'by the building department in
maintaining the official copy of the plans of buildings for which building permits have been
issued, but .such fees shall not exceed the amount reasonably required 'in maintaining the official
copy of the .plans for which building permits have been issued; and,
WHEREAS, fees adopted pursuant to Government Code §660'14, 65104,, 6`5456,
65909.5, and 66451.2, and Health acid. Safety Code §1.7951, 19132.3, and 19.852, are, to be.
imposed pursuant to §66016 of the, Goveniment Code, which imposes certain procedural
requirements; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Government Code §66016, the Cost Report Revised
was available for public review and comment for ten days prior to the public hearing at which
this Resolution was adopted; and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code §66016, at least 14 days prior to the
public hearing at which this resolution was adopted, notice 'of the time and place of the hearing
was mailed to eligible interested parties who filed written requests with the City for mailed
notice of meetings or new or increased fees or service charges; and,
WHEREAS, 10 days advance notice of the public hearing at which this Resolution was
adopted was given by publication in accordance with §`6062a of the Government Code; and,
FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Petaluma finds as follows:
A. The purpose of the fees and charges set forth in 'Section 4 of this Resolution is to
recover up to the full, lawfully recoverable costs incurred by the City in providing
various City services, and such fees and charges not levied for general revenue
purposes.
B. After consideration of the Cost Report Revised the testimony received at this
noticed public hearing, the agenda report, the background documents to the
• agenda report, and all correspondence received (together, "Record "), the City
Council of the City of Petaluma approves and adopts the Cost Report Revised.
C.. Adoption of the fees and ;charges set forth in this Resolution is intended to recover
costs necessary to maintain such services within the City. The City currently
provides. the services listed in this resolution, and the fees set forth in this
Resolution will be used to maintain current service levels. As such, such fees as
they relate to provision of development related services within the City are not a
"project" within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act or
C.E.Q.A. (Public Resources Code §21080(b)(8)(D)).
D. In adopting the fees set forth in this Resolution, the City Council of the City of
Petaluma is exercising its powers under Article XI, Section 5 of the California
Constitution.
E. The Record establishes that the costs listed in the Cost Report Revised as those
incurred by the City in providing City services are reasonable estimates of the
cost of providing such services, and that the revisions recommended in the Cost
Report Revised to existing fees for such services are necessary to recover the
reasonable,, estimated cost of providing such services in accordance with the
analyses contained iii the Cost Report Revised.
•
no, 1...:i -- Xl„ 11)11n.r»,Q rt r c - Psup. I
ADOPTION OF FEES
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Petaluma does resolve as follows:
Section 1. Fee .Schedule Adoption. The fee schedule (Exhibit A) lists fees and charges set
forth are _hereby directed to be computed by and. applied by the various City departments
and to be collected by the City Finance Department for the herein listed special services
when provided by the City or its designated contractors.
Section 2. Separate Fee for Each Process. All fees set by this resolution are for each
identified process; additional fees shall be required for each additional process or service
that is requested or required. Where fees are ,indicated on a per -unit of measurement
basis, the fee is for each identified unit or portion thereof within the 'indicated ranges of
such units.
A. Added Fees and Refunds. Where additional fees need to be charged and collected for
completed staff work, or where a refund of excess deposited monies is due, and Where
such charge or refund is ten dollars ($10:00) or less, a charge or refund need not be
made, pursuant to California Government Code §29373.1 and 29375.1 and
amendments thereto.
B. Deposits Plus Staff Time and Material's. 'This means that the applicants will be billed
f o r the ull cost of processing the application based on staff time (ilicluding City
retained consultants) and materials over and above the amount of the. deposit. Staff'
hourly rates shall be fully burdened and be determined by regular, work rates
established by the City of Petaluma Finance Director for the given -fiscal year(s) in
which the application is processed. For applications requesting multiple entitlements,
the deposit shall be the sum of the individual amounts. The Community Development
Director shall have the authority to modify or waive staff time and material costs
when circumstances warrant.
C. Flat Fee Applications. This is an application fee that does not include staff time and
materials.
D. Full Cost Recovery Applications. This includes a deposit amount and the. actual costs
of the staff time and required materials.
Section 3. Annual. Cost Increases. The ° Finance Director shall increase fees as set forth in
Section 4 on July 15t' of each year by the increase in the Consumer Price Index — All Items
Index (San Francisco- Oalcland -San Jose).
Section 4. Special Service Fees. The fee schedule, as set forth in Exhibit A, shall be
char and collected for the following enumerated services as indicated on Exhibit A.
Section S. Interpretations, This Resolution may be interpreted by the several City
department heads in consultation. with the City Manager and, should there be a conflict
between two fees, then the lower in dollar amount of the two shall be applied.
r
Section 6. Use of Fees Revenue. The revenues raised by payment of the fees and charges
established by this Resolution shall be used to fund the estimated reasonable cost of
providing the services for which the fees are charged, and the revenues from such fees
and charges shall not be used for general revenue purposes.
Section 7. Subsequent Analysis and Revision of the Fees. The fees and charges set herein
are adopted and implemented by the City Council in reliance on the Record identified
above. The City may continue to conduct further 'study and analysis to, determine whether
the fees and charges for City services should be.revised. When additional information is
available, the City Council may review the fees and charges to determine that the
amounts do not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the services for which
the fees and charges are charged.
Section 8. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become effective immediately. In
accordance with Government Code §66017, the fees and charges established herein shall
be effective 60 days from the effective date of this Resolution.
Section 9. Repealer._The 'se fees and charges shall supersede the corresponding fees
previously established and adopted by the City Council. All resolutions and other actions
of the City Council in conflict with the contents of this Resolution are hereby repealed.
• Section 10. Severability. The individual fees and charges set forth in Section 4 of this
Resolution and all portions of this Resolution are severable. Should any of the fees or
charges or any portion of thi's Resolution be adjudged to be invalid and unenforceable by
a body of competent jurisdiction, then the remaining fees, charges and /or Resolution
portions shall be and continue in full force and effect, except as to those fees, charges,
and/or Resolution portions that have been adjudged invalid. The City Council of the City
of Petaluma hereby declares that it would L have adopted each of the fees and charges set
forth in Section 3 of this Resolution, and this Resolution and each section, subsection,
clause, sentence, phrase and other portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that one or
more of the fees, charges, or sections, subsections, clauses, sentences, phrases or other
portions of this Resolution maybe held invalid or unconstitutional.
Under the power and authority conferred upon. this Coun by the Charter of said City
REFERENCE: I hereby certify the foregoing Resolution was introduced and .adopted by the Approved as to.
Council of the City of Petaluma at a (Regular) (Adjourned) (Special) meeting
o ° n the Ii.:. . ... day of M- a- ;oh ......................... .....:... s ........ ........ ........ :., 20.OQ -, by the following vote: ....... .........P- rL
....................
ity Attorney
AYES: Mayor Glass Harris; Healy, Torliatt
W S: Vice Mayor Moynihan
ABSENT: O'Brien, Thomps n
ATTEST: .......... ............................... ...... :.:... ...............................
City C erk
Council File .... ..............:................
Res. No. ...... 20.04- .02.8........N:C:S:
�_.. ....... ...............................
Mayor
CITY OF PETALUMA
FEES LISTING
Exhibit Excerpt
., ,..- �,.. ... �. v t _ .�.. ..� .--'� „, • .<,e. �-,z z . e. ,�.;, J; _ �.>'r'_ `�,z -_- r'x� :,s >i s ;,. _� - .-- -c a -� s;::
1 _ 5 : . -.
C:OMMU'NITY:.D
......
_3
ENCROACHMENT - TREES, DUMPSTERS /SCAFFOLDING - $40
PUBLIC NOTICE -PUBLIC HEARING
$250 depost plus actual cost of notice, staff time and materials that exceed
„ . .. _ . v k ... _. c-- : _ . .� . .:' ..'... o �1 a � ;U .:. - �
�' - ,rt..,,a
- �� _F - �i:t - x_ .. -�� � - ^ �� e '.. A Y' �.� Y_ `�
L� ' - �1 Y -!•:
-�
y .�_ --
.u.
.s N
TELECOMMUNICATIONS REMOVAL AGREEMENT
$5,780
.-. .� ".. _ F A _..F. ,t. t..M1r -f-. :a .._ ;. �K.v. ^. +� _.
- $- - :;lass 'i}?.'�'-e
!k,✓ a . ' -�', 5�.,�. _
�c•.
+,.J�^' _._,T r '� .a `�'�.i.� +..-�. i�P » -ti?� ;:.�.4t - <'L _
= �?a i .,'`�?;` .s - =: � w a - 't- 6.z'. .t �, r
'{I{��S'�T`v�'^�
?_i° S^�`v! '1t zt. i v.S..cL- F..'e.YV�'.: n3.,_'�" -2.. �• 'S 4a�"T'n�x�� ���6Ysi°l
.4 ��_ .r ... .. w. �_u. ..:
F. -Y.'.v
�F.�L � � {? �r�s.� ri •- i- GGu'a� r .e_ ��1' ., st __. __—�__ _
u
RIGHT OF WAY ABANDONMENT
$1,000 plus: staff time and materials - -
ECORDS MANAGEMENT (PLANNING ,St ENGINEERING),
MITIGATION MONITORING Based on full cost recovery (deposit plus )staff time and materials) and required
as a condition of approval of every , application requiring mitigation monitoring.
The Community Development Director shall determine the amount of the initial
deposit based on the nature and scope of mitigation
s't..
'c
_ DM . ISTR T : E FEES ,wy. _�� .� � t �,� �•, � , a � s �
October through March - $4.00 per foot
MOORING FEES April through September -- $8.00 per foot
Transient - $30.00 per day
v.:: s - ... s 'r - tr .. a , ,.. , .. . • � , , � r r . _'�.c'� ..: °" l x .z y 5 ;_ ' ; to �� - :.- �L:+rr't - >. >� `�`..e� `T.�a{';� 5 '�.._
r�-
t
�.,�.�.._�;.�� s...__.._.:..�x-.. C c.a"�= "� b'.,."� � -tea` ', „� ?,a- _ 5t�,''Z- � y ,�' ';'" �����_ S �_.a; v fi �2� �• �,.j3; �ar � .x-. _ v. �� a
PARKING ENFORCENI'ENT � $40
BOOKING FEE RESTITUTION
SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT -MAJOR
$55 - Residential
$275 - Commercial
0
Fxhihit A Racnli itinn No )noA -n9A N r, C
Cost of booking fee plus $225
•
RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 2004-028 N.C.S.
RELATING TO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FEES .FOR MOORING
SERVICES
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Petaluma ( ".City ") has previously
established fees and charges for City services, with the `intent of recovering the City's actual and
reasonable costs to provide such services; and,
WHEREAS, the City wishes to revise fees for mooring services from the present
schedule as adopted in Resolution No. 2004 -028 N.C.S.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Petaluma does hereby resolve to
revise, effective inunediately, the Mooring and Transie
to the following: nt Occupancy fees for the Turning Basin
•
Mooring Fees
October through March -- $4.00 per foot
April through September — 8.00 per foot
Transient Occupancy Fees
$20.00 per day year round
•