HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 6.B-Attch01 05/17/2004•
•
•
DRAFT: RESOLUTION NO. N.C.S.
DENYING A REQUEST FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE, GENERAL PLAN
LAND USE MAP FOR THE PAULA LANE SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 431
PAULA LANE, AT THE CORNER OF PAULA LANE ANID SUNSET DRIVE,
APN 019- 080 -009 & 010
WHEREAS, an application was fiiled by Mission Valley Properties for an amendment to
the General Plan - ; Land, Use Map 'to redesignate two contiguous parcels approximately
11.22 acres from Rural (0.0 =0 5 du/ac) to ;Suburban (0:6 -2.0 du/ac) to allow the
development of 2.1 single- family residential units; and
WHEREAS, by extension, denyirig. the request for a General Plan. Amendment, therefore
making - moot the application requests for prezoning, tentative subdivision map, and
annexation.
WHEREAS, the . Planning Commission held a duly noticed published, hearing on
November 12 2003, January 13 2004 . and February 24th, 2004, and considered all
written and verbal communications. before rendering its decision for denial to the City
Council; and
WHEREAS, all reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission were
forwarded to the City Council; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to consider this
amendment on May 17, 2004, and - considered all written and - Verbal communications
before rendering its decision; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Petaluma City Council hereby
denies the requested amendment to the General' Plan Land Use Map to change the
designations as outlined above based'upon the following findings:
1. That the proposed amendment is not deemed to be in; the public interest to provide
for orderly development of ;appropriate residential uses. The proposed density of
the-project is not in keeping with the surrounding land use designations.
2. That the proposed General. Plan. Amendment is not consistent and compatible with
the rest of the General Plan and any implementation programs that may be
affected.
3. The proposed .General Plan Amendment to Suburban is not appropriate due to the
proposed :increase in density, inconsistency with the feathering/urban separator
polices in the existing General Plan, coordination with the; General Plan update
and impacts and issues related to increased traffic, insufficient infrastructure,
drainage; and potential impacts to an existing wildlife corridor.
ATTACHMENT 1
ADOPTED this
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
day of 2004, by the:following vote-
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Clerk City Attorney
s:\cc7city:pouncil\reolutions\paula. lane g en plan amend reso
.zl: