HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda 8.A-Attch03 06/21/20040
ENGINEER'S REPORT
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE .DISTRICTS
ANNUAL ASSESSMENTS
CITY OF PETALUMA
Prepared under the direction of:
Graig Spaulding, City Engineer
Submitted:
June 21, 2004
E A
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT 1972 .
Y
• The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City Council.
Dated: , 2004 Craig,Spaulding
City Engineer
City of Petaluma
County of Sonoma, CA
By
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagrams
thereto attached, was filed with me on the day of 1 2004,
Gayle Petersen
City Clerk
City of Petaluma
County of Sonoma, CA
B
I HEREBY CERTIFY that-the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagrams
thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of the City of Petaluma California, on the
day of , 2004.
Gayle Petersen
City Clerk
• City of Petaluma
County of Sonoma, CA
:A
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment and Assessment Diagrams
thereto attached, was filed with the County Auditor of the County of Sonoma on the -
day of , 2004.
Gayle Petersen
City Clerk
City of Petaluma
County of Sonoma, CA
a
•
LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
ENGINEER'S REPORT
CITY OF PETALUMA
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
FISCAL YEAR 2004 -05
•
Thomas Hargis, Director of Engineering and Engineer of Work for all of the Landscape Assessment Districts, as
listed in Exhibit A attached City of Petaluma, Sonoma County, California, makes this report, as directed by the
City Council, Resolution No. , N.C.S., pursuant to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways Code
(Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972).
The. improvements and maintenance which are the subject of this report are briefly described in Exhibit B. The
plans and specifications referred to in Exhibit C are on file and are included in this report by reference.
The annual assessment costs are summarized in Exhibit D by each district listed in Exhibit A. Included in the
summarized costs are the annual assessment by parcel.
The basis of allocation of assessments are described in Exhibit E for each district listed in Exhibit A.
The assessment rolls for each district described in Exhibit A are listed in Exhibit E. These rolls will be submitted
to the Sonoma County Auditor - Controller for inclusion in the FY 04 -05 tax roll and billed with the FY 04 -05
property tax and other assessments..
•
LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
ENGINEER'S REPORT
EXHIBIT C
CITY OF PETALUMA
FISCAL YEAR 2004 -05
PLANS AND, SPECIFICATIONS FOR DISTRICTS LISTED IN EXHIBIT A,
THOUGH BOUND SEPARATELY, ARE FILED AS APART OF THESE RECORDS
r�
•
EXHIBIT D
CITY OF PETALUMA
FISCAL YEAR 2004 -05
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT COSTS
The assessment district costs and assessments to be determined by City Council at the July 12, 2004 City
Council meeting.
•
•
• LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ENGINEER'S REPORT
EXHIBIT E
FY 2004 -05
BASIS OF ALLOCATION ASSESSMENTS
All benefits of the improvements are special benefits to land within the districts. General benefits to the
public are nominal or non - existent.
Allocation of Assessments
The annual maintenance costs and reserves were estimated and incidental administrative expenses added
to yield to total annual cost. This.cost was then prorated as determined at formation, to the lots in each
district, so that each lot will share in the annual landscape maintenance expen_ ses,,prorated equally among
the single family lots. In the Sonoma Glen Landscape Assessment District, the assessments for the
townhome lots are calculated at 66% of the single family lots. The number of lots for each district is
shown on the next page.
Annual Indexing Factor
For certain Landscape Assessment Districts, in any year the assessments shall not be deemed to have been
increased if the amount of the increase is not more that the percentage of increase in the U.S.
® Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Prices Indexes, Pacific Cities and the U.S.
City Average, San Francisco - Oakland -San Jose from February 1 to February 1.
•
LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ENGINEER'S REPORT
•
EXHIBIT E
Continued
# of Single
# of Townhome
Total
Family Lots
Lots
# of Lots
Casa Del Oro
151
151
Sycamore. , Heights
45
45
Village,Meadows
79
79
Village East
71
71
Spring Meadows
78
78
Shelter Hills Village
110
110
Meadow Park
177
177
Anna's Meadows
74
74
Adobe Creek
326
326
St James Estates
19
19
Park Place 5
82
82
Glenbrook
83
83
Fairway Meadows
41
41
Country Club Estates
75
75
Sonoma Glen
303
142
445
Mountain Valley *
180
180
Kingsmill
117
117
Cader Farms
177
177
Westridge 4
167
167
Hillview Oaks
30
30
Corona Ranch **
0
74
74
Crane Glen
21
21
Tatum
3
3,
Judith Court
24
24
Sequoia Estates
9
9
Graystone Creek
160
160
Liberty Farms
44
44
Americana
1.00
100
Kingsfield
14
14
Magnolia Terrace
12
12
Wisteria
28
.28
Woodside Village
59
59
Twin Creeks
40
40
Corona Creek 11
40
40
Cross.Creek -
200
200
McNear Landing
185
185
Willow Glen.
236
236
Westview. Estates
42
42
Turnbridge
78
78
Stoneridge
19
19
Lansdowne
97
97
Totals
3
216
4,012
* For these assessments, all lots are considered single
**
family lots.
These;lots are apartment housing
i
• LANDSCAPE ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS ENGINEER'S REPORT
EXHIBIT F
CITY OF PETALUMA
FISCAL YEAR 2004 -05
ASSESSMENT ROLLS:
The annual assessment rolls of each Landscape Assessment District listed in Exhibit A are on file with the
City Clerk.
0