Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 9.A-Attch01 06/21/2004D RAFT RE SOLUTION NO. N.C.S. DENYING A , ;REQUEST ,FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP,FOR THE_ PAULA LANE SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT 431 PAULA LANE, AT THE CORNER OF PAULA LANE AND SUNSET DRIVE, APN 019- 080 -009 & 01.0 WHEREAS, an application was filed by Mission Valley Properties for an amendment to the General Plan Land Use Map to redesignate two contiguous parcels, approximately 11.22 acres from Rural (0.0 -0.5 du/ac) to Suburban (0.6 -2:0 du/ac) to allow the development of 21 single- family residential units; and WHEREAS, by extension, denying "the request for a General Plan Amendment, therefore making moot the application requests for prezoning, tentative subdivision map, and annexation. WHEREAS; the Planning Commission held a duly noticed published hearing on November 12 2003, January 13th, 2004 and February 24 2004, and considered all written and verbal communications before rendering its decision for denial to the City Council; and • WHEREAS, all reports and recommendations from the Planning Commission were forwarded to - the City Council; and amendment It 7 2004 all verbal to consider this u; _y al communications before rendering its decision; 'and ent to the General Plan Petaluma City Council hereby NOW THEREFORE DE I.T RE a Land Use Map to change the denies the re ue ted amendm, designations as outlined above based upon the following findings: P NI 'n 1. That the proposed amendment is not deemed to be in the public interest to provide for orderly development of appropriate residential uses. The proposed density of the proiect.is note n keeping with the surrounding land use designations. 2 th r est . of the p o osed Gen qn e ral Plan Amendment is not consistent and compatible with 'Ge Plan and any implementation programs that may be affected.' T e.al . , an. Amendment to Suburban is not appropriate due to the propose 3 h d General Plan. propose d in density, inconsistency with the feathering/urban separator polices }n ;the existing •General Plan, coordination with the General Plan update ;impacts ' increased traffic, insufficient infrastructure, � � land ° issues related to drainages and potential impacts to an existing wildlife corridor. ail , ATTACHMENT 1 ADOPTED this AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: day of 2004, by the following vote: Mayor; APPROVED AS TO FORM: City-Clerk City Attorney sAcc -city council\reolutions \paula lane gen plan amend reso 0 • 0