Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 3.C 09/13/2004I t CITY OF PETALUMAXALIFORNIA C AGENDA B ILL Se ptember 1 3, Agenda Vile Reso t City i eriter ,' l lO�Ieeting Date: e: September 13; 2004 . , ut into an agreement With NTDSt chler of Aub urn Cahfornia, to g ,, prov ide " . de archtecturah services for a , Petaluma Swim Complex. Meeting Time Z 3:00 PM ❑ 7:00 PM Cate�ory (check one) ® C`onsea�t Calendar ❑ Public ,Rearing ❑ New Business Unfinished Business ❑ keesentation (Department IDir Contact Person Phone Number JmiC n Jim Carr (707) 778 -4380 Parks and.Recreation `—. Cost of Provosal $117,000' � „' Account Number C400605 Amount Budgeted $2,042;00©” Name of Fund': Park Fees Attachment& to Agenda Packet Item 1. Ressolutio n Authorizin g' t h a City to enter into an Agreement with the•proposed consultant. ol u ti an 2. W Schedule _ mple and Fee Estimate 3. List of Facilities /references.. Summary Statement With the proposed, sale of the Petaluma aquatic. consultants Center were solicited and interviewed interviewed regarding the replacement- of the existin Petaluma Swim Center Four firms were interview and the unanimous choice of the interview panel was the firm of NTDStichler' of Auburn, California. Recornmended'dty Council Ac g Leon /Sug ested' 1Vlotiow Recommend approval of the proposed resolution . _ Reviewed e b Fnance`'IDirector:.; ReViewedby CityA'torney , t A rov d . Ci - 1Vlana er.: a D a te: odav's BDate I Reis ®ono i V, t : evised: File Code: e eP %F 1 2'. CITY .OF . CA LIFORNIA DESg -'N AGREEMENT WITH NTDSTICH'LElt FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 'REGARDING THE RE PLACEMENT OF THE 6 FET'ALUMA SWIMt CENT'E'R 7 AGENDA REPORT 8 )r'OI2° 9 SEPT 13, 200 10 11 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMAR 12 With the pending sale of the Petaluma Swim Center, :a'Request for Proposal, was issued for aquatic 13 consultants to provide architeduraL services regarding- the replacement of the Petaluma Swim 14 Center. Four.firms were interviewed and the unanimous selection ofthe interview panel was 15 NTDSTICHLER of Auburn, California. 16 17 2. BACKGROUND 18 With the sale , of the,.Kenilworth;.Juni,or',High School site "the .City Council authorized 'the City 19 Manager to negotiate with the developer Regency, regarding the sale of the Petaluma Swim Center 20 and the Petaluma Skate ;Park. A.,Request for Proposal .(RFP) was issued, recruiting aquatic 21 consultants regardin the re lacement of the ° p o the g, p Petal'uma� Swim Center: 'Four firms responded t 22 1 23 The interview panel was om ri "s d of three competitive The p p p swimmers, the Twin Valleys Coach, one 24 Recreation Music 'and Parks Commissioner the Petaluma Swim Center Director, one Recreation 6 Supervisor, sand the'Parks. and Recreation Director. The panel thoroughly interviewed "the four firms from 100' pm 16. 6'30 pm. 27 The four firms interviewed. : d wer e: 28 NTDSTICHLER,.Auburn, California "$117',000 29 Glass Architects, Santa Rosa, California 88,650 30 RJM Design;Group, Inc. Sacramento, California 80;000 31 davis wahl llp,,San;Francisco, California To be negotiated 32 b 4 33 The unanimous choice ofthe interview panel was the team lead NTDSTICHLE ' y R of Auburn, 34 California. The two top. films `N . STICHLER and. Glass Architects both used the'firms of Rowley, 35 International, Inc; (specialists�in aquaticdesign-and engineering of aquatic facilities) and'The Sports 36 Management Group (Programming and Feasibility)., 37 - Deciding factors for the interview panel was the amount of experience the NTDSTICHLER team 38 had, workin over the years, the obvious chemistry as a, team that °they displayed and the 39 number of complexes they have completed (See list of facilities). 40 The tasks required of the consultants for the needs analysis, feasibility and conceptual design 41 include_: 42 1. Mobilization, ,data, and analysiss 43 2. Fea"sib'ility. Study and conceptual alternatives` 44 3. Conceptual Plan and Final' Report 45 A number of public zmeetingsare incorporated in the process, and. the team makes every effort to 46 identify all pool users, provide a working design, and develop operational and" construction costs. 4 References rate the ;team of NTDSTICHLER as very good in.how they work with a community provide valuable' information regarding pool programming options and realistic operational costs, 11 49 and in the finished' product. 1 2 3 4. 6 7 8 9 10 11 .12. 13 14 15 16 1.7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2.7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 3.5 36 37 38' 39 40' 41 42 43 4'4 45 46 47 4 8 49 50 51 . 52 An example, of a time line is included with this report. Depending on the, scope of the project (i.e. type and size ofpool), in excess of two years could be required�from start of planning to the conclusion of aquatic construction. It is important that the planning process start at this time in order to Have a pool ready when the current site; is required= by. the developer. 3.. ALTERNATIVES • a. Direct Staff to select: another consulting firm. , b: Make no selection a't, this =time " c. Select the firm recommended: NTDSTICHLEI , Auburn, California. 4: nNANCIAL wACTs The proposed fee for phase one of the project is $'1 1'7,000. In Excess of $2;000,000 is budgeted for the , current year. 5; , CONCLUSION With the.pending sale of the Petaluma _Swim Center," the planning, and design' must start immediately if anew facility is o be ready prior to, the "closure of the existing complex ". An'interview panel of aquatic personnel, volunteers ;and', staff,, h'as interviewed ".four; professional firms :experienced in designing and constructing aquatic, complexes. One firm was the unanimous" choicei of the interview panel. The firm ofNTDSTICHLER is.recommended to the City Council the. firm'to design! the. new Petaluma Aquatic Complex: 6. O UTCOME&ORTEREORMANCE MEASUREMENTS "THAT ° Wi1a; I1DENTY S 1IC"I A OR Once the City Council provides authorization, to proceed, .necessary contracts will" be prepared and executed, a time, line developed and the process started: Public meetings wilt bey scheduled tnd a timeline with identified tasks provided to the - Recreation; Music and' Parks Commi'sslon;. "Aquatic Committee and the City Council. l 7. RECOmAENDATION Appy -o ve needs anal. the Resolution on. authorizing'the City Manager�to enter into a with NTDSTICHLER A ro y , f easlbility and conceptual design of the new Petaluma Aquatic Complex. g:l_forms/2003 agenda bill, 2; RESOLUTION AWARDING THE CONTRACT FOR THE REPLACEMENT PETALUM3A, AQUATIC FACILITY CONCENTPUAL PLANNING AND 'DESIGN PROJECT TO NTDSTICHLER OF AUBURN, CAIFORNIA, AND 7 AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE REQUIRED AGREEMENT 8 9 WHEREAS, the City' of Petaluma is planning °to sell the site upon which the current Petaluma Swim Center 10, and Skate Park are located; and 11 12; WHEREAS, the City Council is committed to having a replacement Aquatic Facility available before the 13 existing facility is closed; and 14 15 WHEREAS, a Request for Proposal has been issued and 'four f rms interviewed by a panel comprised of 16... community and staff members; and 17 18 WHEREAS, the firm of NTDSTICHLER of Auburn, California is the: unanimous choice of the interview 19 'panel and is recommended to the 'City Counncil as the fir mi to design aseplacement Aquatic Facility for the 20 City of Petaluma: 21 22 NOW THE ' RE f SOL BEFORE, BE 'ft VED, that tle.Petaluma City Council does hereby award the contract to 23 design a new' aquatic.,facil for the City of Petaluma fo the, firm:igf NTDSTICHLER of Auburn, California 24 for the amount: of $.117 000 and authorizes t , $e City Manager to execute the required Professional Services ; 25 Agreement, subject to review and approvaVof all agreements and insurance the City Attorney. ,r • City of Petaluma Aquatic Facility WORK' PLAN S`CH_EDULE: The: following defines our scope of services as understood from the Request for Proposals: A recommendation for two workshops..is, included and may `be op`onal..Deliverables will include the Final Report, a comprehensive schedule for the Design and; Construction phases and a .Conceptual Plan of the recommended °facility. Scope of 'Services ,_Phase_f. Needs Analysis, Feasibility 8 Conceptual Design Mobilization, Data .& Anal'' is The NTDStichler team will attend a project team meeting with the Aquatics Advisory Committee,to review project . program data including any prior survey information. We will, visit selected sites to document Opportunities and constraints.. The tearn will then .analyze the; data, create base sheets and. develop site ,analysis for each site. Feasibility Study and 'Conceptual Alternates We will assess data and develop a draft feasibility study with budgets and _develop alternate Conceptual Plans. We will then review the draft feasibility:repo'rt, budgets, site analysis and alternate concepts . with the Aquatics Advisory Committee Public Input Two workshops, one for user groups and one for the public are recommended. This will allow the -team to gain, information directly from the public for the process. These workshops can be a strong consensus building too. l Conceptual Plan and Final Report The final report to-be delivered to the Citywill incorporate: A completed market analysis; feasibility study ; needs analysis; programming recommendations; Workshop 1: User Groups '(Establish type of facility preferred by the. community.) Establish dialog with the user groups and gather information associated with their needs. Work Plan & Schedule Workshop 21:, Public (Establish type of facility preferred by the community.) Establish dialog with the public and gather information associated with their needs. The - team will assess and the data for.the feasibility report, budgets and conceptual alternates for review with the Aquatics Advisory Committee. The draft report preferred concepts, revised cost estimate, development'schedule and public comments will. be presented, to the Aquatic Advisory Committee, Recreation, Music: and Parks, Commission and the community At Commission meeting The team will take comments for. the final' report. 9 4 presentation conceptual plan ,of the preferred facility and opinions of cost for construction, operating and `maintenance, budgets as well as recommended programs for revenue. Present to Aquatics Advisory Committee - for °final review. At a'regular City Council meeting, deliver Final Report and present concept plans and financial /market analysis with forwarding information and, comments ,from the Aquatics Advisory Committee, Music: and Parks Commission.. Phase II': Design &. Construction The following six phases are typical for the design and construction.. process. They .incorporate development of the final design, construction documents ,(plans and specifications), permitting process and administration through the construction of the facility. This. phase is to be negotiated at the conclusion of Phase! I,, A. Schematic Design B. 'Design Development C. 'Construction Documents D. Agency Review E. Bidding E Construction Administration City'of Petaluma Aquatic "Facility Project Schedule NTD considers the - li schedul&`to be an intgral part of the project management process. Over the years; we, have strived for design excellence while at the same. tune 'successfully meeting schedule requirements.. We are prepared to begin work ,on your project immediately upon award. The following identifies the Scope ofServices , and defines calendar scheduling associated with each task and overall timeline. The depth of resources, experience; and working history of our team has allowed ;us to reefforts to meet your fine our eff schedule 1. p 0 1 � Work Plan, & Schedule , CTyofv A FEASIBILI CONCEPTUAL OESI SCHEDULE - sk Name', Start Finish- iASE I NEEDS,ANALYSIS FEASIBILITY_ STUDY 8, CONCEPTUAL. DESIGN _ Wed 9!1104 Mon 3/21105 Wed VIM Mtn A 2. Anal zt e data endcreate sheets ) •- Wed 9/1!04 Mon 1014104 1 Kick off meetin Misit Sites (meeting #1 Wed 9/7/04 W d 9/1/04 Yi •_ - - - ".. ...: _ -- - 3. Develo sde,anal 515' - -- Wed9/1f04 Mon 1014/04 P y _ _ B. Feasibility Study and Conceptual Alternates - T e 10/5/04 Mon 3/21/05 1. Develop dratt'feasibdrty study and budgets - Tue 10/5/04 Thu 11/11/04 1 De elop alternate conceptual plaits. _ Tue 10/S 104 Thu 1 {%11/04 2 Review wl Advisory Committee (_rneeting #2) - -. Thu 11111!04 Th 71/11104'. - 3: First Workshop (usec`groups) meeting #T _ -.- _ _ Wed :1211 /0a ;Wed 1211/04- 4 Second Workshop (public) meeting #4 Wed 12 /8104 Wed 12/8/04 5_Update data„ teasibihty. budgets & conceptual alternates Thu 11111 /04 Mon 3121/05. 6! Review w! Advisory Committee (. meehng #5) Mon 3114!05 Mon 3!14!05 C,Conceptual;Plan - and. F inal Report pre3entat on to City Council - - M n L21l05 Mon 3121105 iASE IIDESIGWAND, CONSTRUCTION Tue 3722105 Mon`B111 /07 A Schematic Design ". - - - Tue L22/OS Rif 7111 ,B_Design.Develdgment - - - " -� Mon 714/05 "Mon 10!3/05` - C ConstrucUon',Documents ` a. . -._ _ T 81014/05 Fri 4/14/06 O Agency Review - - -" •- Mon 4117/06 Fn 619!06 E Bidding - Mon 6/1 L06 Thu 8!10/06 ;D.Construction - "" Fri 8!11106 Mon 6111/07 = - - - - 2005 Jul Aug Sep Oct NOV. Dec Jan 9/1 Feb Mar Apr May 3/21 Jun Jul Aug Sep 2006 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr. May Jun Jul - Aug Sep Oct 21111 Nov ec Jan D - - Feb Mar Apr . May Jun _ 9/110/4 9/1 ®911 " ., 101 9/1 1 014 - - - - i - - -- - —__ 1015 ", 1015° •�• 11/11 10/5.. 11111 X7121 I - — - 11111 11/71 - - 1211 ;012/1 1218 01218 ,, 11111 " 3/21 - I � - - _ _ � 3/141V&3/14 - 3121 ®3121 _ - -_ _ 3122 z - .3122 717 = — - - - — - -- - - -- — i - /d 1013 _ -= ±4/14 - - - 10/4 8 /10 -_ - _ yd117 6112 „•.,._ - - - - - - 8/11 ° - - -- p.ye.i 1 1 A e City of Petaluma Aquatic Facility \TDSticliler Architectural Service Fee Petaluma - Aquatic Facility City of Petaluma, Ca. July 23,3004; p pr sen concepf;p ans and financial /market analysis whh forwarding information' and comments from ' 4 the Aquatics Advisory Committee, Music:and'Parks Commission. #8 x Consultant Subtotals, Phase l..fee Subtotal S I08,3Qt1 Consultant Reimbursable S5 , ,000 Rcin-ibursable'Expensc•Total 58,700 X $47;600 ' S441700'. 52,500 Phase :11: Design "& , Construction The following six phases are typical for the.design,and' construction process. They incorporate developtnentof the final design, constructIion documents (plans and' specifications);,,penrnitting.• process and' administrationathrough• the construction of the facility. Fees for this phase are to be negotiated at the conclusion of Phase 1s A. ,Schematic, Design x x x M Design Development x x C. Construction, Documents x x D. AgencyRevie1v x X• E. Bidding x x F. Construction Administration x x' S 16 0,90 S 1 200 Fee Est•m'at'e ...,�...S ,,.iuou�umo ��oir�V KVVV':•L Phase I: Needs'Analysis Feasibility & Conceptual Design A. Mobilization, Data &,Analysis I Attend project- team °meeting w / review project &- :program., #1 x x X; ' 2 Obtain/ review pertinent data (including any prior survey information) x x x 3. V.isit'sites to documnt-.opportunities /constraints x x x 4 Analyze data and create base sheets x- x x 5 Develop alternate;opport unities /constraints,plans (Site Analysis) x K Feasi,bilitystridy and conceptual'alternates. 1 Assess, data and develop, draft. feas ibili ty study and budgets. 2 Develop alternate:Conceptual Plans. Review draft feasibility report, budgets, site analysis concepts with 3 the Aquatics. Advisory Committee #2 x x x, 'Work shop 1< User :groi psf(Establish.type of facility • preferred by'the community;) Establish, dialog' with the user groups and gather information_ 4 associatedwtth their;nee&. #3 x x x. Work shop !:,Public (Establish °type -of facility preferred by the community.) Establish dialog with,the puF,lic and' gather information associated with their 5 needs. #4 -x x. Assess and.update data, update: feasibility report, budgets:•and conceptual 6 alternates for review'with the. Aquatics Advisory Committee. x x PresentDraft with preferre&cc nceots, revised costestimate; development schedule x and public coinmentss Receive comments from the A4uat c Advisory Committee, Recreation; Music and Parks;Commission and the community at Commission T meeting. #5 x 'x x C. Conceptual ;Plan ,, and'Final,Report I Finalize preferred conceptual plan, x x x 2 Develop.;finaVreport, budgets and schedules. x x x 3 Present'to.AquaticsAdvisory Committee;for final; review. #7 x- x At regular Citv�Council�meeting deliver Final Re ort and a -_ t "I p pr sen concepf;p ans and financial /market analysis whh forwarding information' and comments from ' 4 the Aquatics Advisory Committee, Music:and'Parks Commission. #8 x Consultant Subtotals, Phase l..fee Subtotal S I08,3Qt1 Consultant Reimbursable S5 , ,000 Rcin-ibursable'Expensc•Total 58,700 X $47;600 ' S441700'. 52,500 Phase :11: Design "& , Construction The following six phases are typical for the.design,and' construction process. They incorporate developtnentof the final design, constructIion documents (plans and' specifications);,,penrnitting.• process and' administrationathrough• the construction of the facility. Fees for this phase are to be negotiated at the conclusion of Phase 1s A. ,Schematic, Design x x x M Design Development x x C. Construction, Documents x x D. AgencyRevie1v x X• E. Bidding x x F. Construction Administration x x' S 16 0,90 S 1 200 Fee Est•m'at'e • • City of Petaluma Aquatic Facility Additional W S'tichler Experience A verno High School Sierra Madre, California Gymnasium Anaheim Union High School District Anaheirra; .California " 5 Swimming Pools Auburn Recreation District Auburn California Railhead Park Recreation °Park Gym Expansion Regional Park Tennis' Courts Improv ,Regional Park Gymnasium Regional Park .Aquatics-Master pl'an Regional Park Comm. Center Plaza 'Boy's and'Girl's Club & Teen`Center Auburn Ski Club Soda: Springs, California Nordic: & Alpine Training Facility Beverly, Hills School District, Beverly Hills California Beverly Hills High Pool Mods. Biola University La Mirada, California Student Union Expansion Capistrano Unified School District San Clemente, California Niguel Hills, Jr High. School Gym Shorecliffs Junior High School Gym Phillip J. Reilly School Gym Boys & Girls Club of America Auburn, 'California Masterplan Chaffey College Alta Loma,, California Gymnasium California State University,., Northridge Northridge, California Recreation Center Chaffey Union High School District Fontana - Upland California Fontana High. School Gymnasium Upland High School Gymnasium California State University, ,Fullerton i Fullerton California University Center Expansion Renovation City of ChicolChico.Area Park & Recreation District Chico, California New Aquatics & In'd'oor Recreation Community Center China Lakes Recreation Park & Community Center Ridgecrest, California Recreation Park & Community Center .City of Corona Corona, California Recreation Complex Chino 'Unified School District Chino, California Chino High School Gymnasium Team Experience Citrus Union High School District Glendora, California Glendora High School Gymnasium Citrus College Azusa, California Student Center City of Brentwood Brentwood, California Aquatics Facilities City of Petaluma Aquatic Facility City of Duarte Duarte, California Recreation Complex . Three Swimming Pools City of Folsom Folsom„ California Lembi Park Expansion Aquatics, Recreation :& Community'Center Maste"rplan City of:G'alt Galt, California New Bathhouse +& Aquatics Facility City of "Los Alamitos Los Alamitos, California Recreation Complex City of Williams Williams, California Tennis Court Improvements County of Los::A'ngeles Los Angeles, California Mettle Webber Pool'.'& Bathhouse Escondido- Union. School_ District Escondido; California Community Therapy Pool Harvey Mudd College Claremont,, California Recreation Center Huntington Beach U.H.S. District Huntington Beach; Fountain Valley 6 Westminster, California Edison High School Gymnasium Fountain Valley Heigh Gymnasium Westminster High School Gymnasium Marina High School Gyrnnasiarn Indian Valley College Marie County, California; 50 Meter'Sw' mining Pool Student: Center LosAngeles Pierce College Woodland Hills;, California Swimming Pool Mammoth Unified School District Mammotlr.Lakes, California Mammoth High G.yni Modernizat on- Mammoth Middle .N'ew,Gym,l M.P;; Mammoth Elein. Gym / M.P. Rehab Mira Loma, Boys Camps Lancaster, California Two All Purpose G,yrrinasiums Occidental College Los Angeles, California Alumni Gy n rasium Patterson Field &novation' Training Quarters Orange 'Unified School; District Orange; Cali ornia• Swimming;P.00l Palmdale School District ,Palmdale, .California Mesa Intermediate School Gym Ball Tiel'ds Multi - Purpose Facility Pasadena City °School. District Pasadena, California Blair High School Gymnasium Swimming & Dying Pools Pauma, School'Dstrict Pauma Valley, California Recreational Fields Multi- Purpose Building Pepperdine University Malibu,, California Gym Expansion,Study Polytechnic,School Pasadena, California Gym tiasi um Loma, Linda,' University Lorna Linda, California Swimming' Pool Team Experience 1 c d�ryry' Pomona College Claremont, California. Athletic Facility Pomona. Unified School District Pomona .California High School Gymnasium, Rancho Murieta Rancho Mi'ti zeta California Communi Teen Center Rancho Simi Recreational_ Complex Simi Valley, ,California 50 Meter.Swimmin - Pool Recreation Center R verside,City College'. .Riverside, California Student Union City of Petaluma Aquatic Facility U.S. Navy Iwentynine.Palms, California EM & NCO Clubs University of California San Diego, California Visual.Arts Facility Walnut Valley Unified School District Walnut, California - ChaparrelIn termed late Gym South Pointe Middle School Gym Multi- Purpose Facility Diamond Bar High School Gym & Multi- Purpose Facility Walnut High School Gym Addition JNalsh Medical Arts Facility Murrieta, California .Physical Therapy Facility with Therapy Pool , Riverside Unified School, District R iverside, California Arnelia Earhart Middle School Gy n Saddleback Valley Unified High School District Mission Viejo California EI Toro High School 'Pool, Gym & Multi- Purpose Building San Diego Unified School District San Diego, California Junpero Serra High Gymnasium Mira. Mesa High School Gymnasium Marston & Lewis Tools South Pasadena Unified School District South Pasadena, California Swimming, Pools U. S. Navy Bremerton, Washington Trident Recreation Center & Pool Facilities Westmont College Santa Barbara, 'California Physical Education Complex 50 Meter Swimming Pool Wm. -S. Hart Union High School District Newhall, . California Hart High No. 4 Gymnasium & Multi- Purpose Facility Hart Jr. High No. 4 Gymnasium & Ivlalt'i- Purpose Facility Yucaipa' - Calimesa Joint Unified District Yucaipa, California Yucaipa:Hgh School <Pool YMCA .San Diego, California Penasquitos Family YMCA Recreational Center & Pool Team Experience The Sports Management Group The'Sports IV1'anagement,Group, has provided similar services to over 225° cornmunit`'ie throughout the Utiited States, including =the California ,ci ies of Morgan. Hill', Santa Barbara, Tracy, San Jose, Brea,, Monterey, Anaheim, ,Newark Mill Valley, Livermore, Redwood City, Roseville Elk Grove, Citrus Heights, Woodlands, Santa Rosa Walnut Creek, Calistoga, Santa Cruz; Notli Tahoe, Cupertino, and Union Crty'These projects have included. needs; assessments, master planning,: programming and scheduling, ,revenue and cost analysis; detailed architectural 'programming and conceptual design for recreation and aquatics facilities. Each of'these projects is unique and our work with each has. been individually tailored to address the specific needs of that client. With each,project, they work closely with staff to understand specific priorities and develop, an appropriate approach ;that recognizes the political, - social and cultural, realities of the community. Recent Project 'Experience Folsom Aquatic Center Folsom, California Needs'Assessment Prograinmi'ng Architectural Program Design Consulting Recreation /Activity Pool 8' Lane Lap Pool Snack Bar City of Petaluma Aquatic Facility TracyAquatic Center Tracy, California Needs Assessment; Economic.Analysis Programming 25 Meter z 25 Yard Pool - Leisure. Pool w13, Lap Lanes Waterslido Sprays, Play'F.eatures Sprayground Concessions Laguna Aquatic Center Elk Grove, California, Needs Assessment Programming Architectural Program Design Corisu!ltin,g Recreation /Activity Pool 8 Lane Lap Pool Snack 'Bar Calistoga 'Comblunity pool Calistoga, California Feasibility Study 6 Lane Lap /Recreation Pool Water Slide Spa Sprayground Barbeq,ue /Picnic Area Bocce Ball Court Sand Volley Ball Richmond Municipal Natatorium Richmond,' California Needs Assessment. Market,Analys k Public.Survey Programming Economic Analysis Locker Rooms Party Room Fitness Celiter Sauna'and Spa • • Team,fxperience Team Experience City of Petaluma Aquatic Facility Morgan iil Aquafics',Cehfer Recreation Pool g Hill, California Waterslide -Economic Analysis Play Features, Programming Design Consulting .,, Mill Valley Community Center Implementation ;Pl'an Mill [galley, California 50 Meter x "25 Yard Pool 5300 sf Leisure Pool Econo Analys y i,s 800 sf Sprayground Operational Planning Picnic Areas Indoor Pool with Retractable Roof 4 BaCl_ House Water Slide, Support Facilities '', Sp vents rn Santa: Barbara vatic Co q p Community en Center Santa Barbara, California Needs Assessment Segrid & Harry Spath Aquatics ' Market Analysis Center Programming. Mendocino, California I 'o 50 Meter 125 Meter Pool ee 'N ds Assessment Leisure Pool Markei.Analysis. 18'0'' Waterslide /Sprays Economic Analysi Sprayground Programming "S`uppo'rt Facilities Information Campaign Design Consulting . Sillim - an Family Aquatic 'Center 6'' °Lane x 25 Yard Indoor Pool Newark, California Leisure. Pool &. Spa Needs. Assessment Spray,.'Play Features Programming Recreation Center � EconomicAnalysis , Design Consulting Los Osos Community ,Poo/ Indoor,.Lei'sure Pool Los Osos California .u; 2. Water Slides & Splashd'own Needs Assessment Poo M'arket,Analysis Lazy River Programming 4 Lane x, 25 Yard Lap Pool Cost Analysis Play °F Sprays, eatures Public' Process Concessions FundingOptio "ns Design Criteria. Robert Livermo "re. Community Center 6'' Lane Lap Pool" Livermore, California Recreation /Activity -Pool. Needs Assessment Economic Analysis Finley Park Swirir Center Programming Santa Rosa, California Community Use Plan 25 Yd x 25 M Pool Design Consulting 1 Recreation Poo . Iinplem ntation Planning. Pool House 25 Yard 8 -Lane Competitive Pool, Concessions Building Shade Structure Team Experience C ity of :'Petaluma A quatic rFacilitV Tahoe Regional Center Nonb Lake Tahoe, -Cdli oril , f za Need's Assessirient Market Analysis, Tourism-Study Programming Economie.Analysis Public Process Desi 25 Yard Competitive Podf Indoor Leisure- Pool Watersh Sprays, Play Features Locket Room Recreation- Center Juniper Swin1 Center Bend, Oregon Needs Ass Tacility—Assessment Economic Assessment ,Prograrnmjrfg Design Consulting, ,50 Meter x . 0 2 Meter Pool . - :-'T6a-m Locker- Concessions Changing Rooms North Jeffco-Apex Center N orth Jefferson tounty,• Colorado MarketAn.alysis' Eeonomlc Analysis Progra-mm I i - ng Activity. Pool ,w 2-150' Slides Zero Depth Pool w/Play S.iructure Vortex: Current Channel 4 Lane Lap Pool Adult Spa, Family Spa Recreation Center DurangaRecroatiori Center Durango, Colorado Needs Assessment Market Analysis EconomicAnalysis Programming : 2 5 Meter x. Yard"Compefi'1�1ve. Pool Indoor Leisure Pool Recreation C GerloVera," Chavez Community Center Santa Fe, Nhu Mexico Operati Costs Policies and Procedure's .Design Consulting Leisure Pool Triple Loop, Wdterslide Play Feat 50 Meter Competitive Poo Therapy Pool West Vaikey Family Fitness & Wellness Center West Valley 6�r, U tah Needs Assessment Market Analy -YsIs, Program,min ' g Econoffiic�Analysi& Design C-6hstAting 8-La- ne Competitive Pool Leisure Po Sprays, Play Features, Watef§li Dearborn 6 Perforniihg Arts Center' Dearborn, Michigan Needs Assessme'rit, Market Analysis Econorhi Analysis 'Programn 6 -Lane Lap Pool Recreational Pool Performing Arts,'Theatre- Recredtiqn,Cent • 'Team, Experience' City of Petaluma Aquatic Facility Rowley International. 'Rowley International has extensive experience i`ii the design of;indoor and ;outdoor aquatic competition and recreati "onal` facilities A few projects are highlighted here: Allen 'Witt Aqua tic Park'Expansio'n Fairf eld, California 2,200 sf Shallow Recreation,Pool with. Wading Alcove Arroyo.Park Community Pool City of Davis California ' 4,000.sf Recreation Pool;wi'th Waterslide and Water Play Features; '25'- .yard x 8 lane Comperitiorr Pool Balfour Road Aquatic C e enter .City of Brentwood, 'California:. . 4 0ne'5;0.0.0 -sf Recreation Pool with 3 Lap Lanes and Water Play Features one 1„500 sf.; three Lap Lane Slide Pool with two large Waterslides one 25- yar4,x 25- meterall.deep water Cornpeution Pool Brisba Community City of Brisbane, California .25' -yard x 6- aane Competition Pool with Recreafio.n L- shaped; Zero depth entry and adjacent Children's Wad irtg Pool Costa .Mesa ;Downtown. Pool City of Costa Mesa,' California. 25 -yard Recreational Lap Pool. Crown Valley Community Park Laguna Nikuel, -California I PO -ft Competition Pool and Wading Pool Renovation (Diving Tower & Therapeutic Spa added in Phase 2) Downey Community Swim Facility Downey, California . 50-meter x 25 -yard Competition Pool El'Sereno Park Pool Los Angeles, California 25 -yard x.25- meter Indoor Pool Finley Community Park Santa Rosa, California 2'5 -yard Competition Pool, Freeform,-Recreational -Pool and Wading Pool GaltAquatic Center City of Galt, California 25-yard Training Pool and Recreational Pool with 2 Slides Gomez "Park Pool Placentia, California 39 -ft x 60 -ft Recreational Pool Renovation Independence Park Pool Fullerton, California 50 -meter Competition /. Recreation Pool Rehabilitation Irwindale. Community Pool Irwindale California 25 -meter x 25 -yard Competition ,Pool sand Wading Pool /slander Park Pool Riverside, California 2!5. -yard Recreational Pool. and Wading,Pool Renovation Los Banos del Mar Santa Barbara, California Renovation of Historic 50 -meter Competition Pool Matt Dshman Aquatic Facility Portland, Oregon 25 -yard L- Shaped Recreational Pool and ,Spa Rehabilitation Team Experience City of Petaluma Aquatic Facility Mesa IndoorAquatic Center Mesa Arizona Complete. construction documentation' bidding for an all`AquaticSport FI,NA- compliant Indoor Competition Venue with 2,500.per_rrianent, expandahle to 6;0,00' person seating capacity with fourp,00ls including;° 54 -Meter x 25- Nleter all deep water 10-lare Competition, Pool for swimming,'waterpolo and synchronized swimming: with two 2 -meter bulkheads. 52 =Meter x;25 -Meter vanable depth .,synchronized swimming, , waterpolo; , swimming,and diving pool with one 2 -meter bulkhead with recreation- lap swim and learn- to.sw.im area. Diving Tower. with 1,0.- meter; 7.5- meter, 5- meter, 3- meter,1-meter platforms, three 3,-meter springboards three 1 -meter springboards. Platfor In s and boards designed for synchronized. diving, competition. Separately enclosed'Therapy Pool. 50 -feet x' 30'feet with. zero depth entry.. - 200 - Square. Foot Hydrotherapy Spa pool. Montebello Plunge Montebello;, California 5.0- meter'O;utd'oor Pool with .attached Children's Pool: Down Pool; 10,04 Spa and an assortment of exciting interactive water features PauhNelson Pool Santa Maria, California 50 -meter Competition Pool, 25- yard x 4- lane,Recreation •Pool with Zero Depth E'ntry'and Cl- lIdren's' Play Features Prewett Family ParkAquatic Complex Antioch, California 50- meter,x 25 -yard Competiaion Pool,, Diving Tank, 25-yard Recreational - Instructional. Pool, three Freeform: Recreational Pools and'Wading, Pool Rancho California Sports Park Temecula, California 4,700sf Recreation /Train "ing Pool'with six ''25 yard Swimming,. • Lanes;, Shallow Water',Aleove with Teachi'ing Steps and Waterslide Splashdown Alcove and 2.4 -ft Diameter Wading Pool Rose Aquatic Center Pool Renovation: .Pasadena, Califon -riia Two 50 -meter Pool 'Renovation's, Rosewood,Park°Requatoridm Commerce California: 35 2 1 meter International Water Polo Pool and 25- yard Water_ Indoor Therapy Pool Rosita Park Santa Ana, California 25 =yard Recreational Pool New' Community Center & Indoor Swim Facility Santa Clara. International - Newark, California Swim` Center 5,0004 Freeform Recreation Santa Clara ,California Pool, 2,250 - -sf 4 lane Lap Feasibility and master, planning Pool; 600 -sf Watersli'de Splash study for the complete redesign of the site to include two new Team Experience • competition poolswith bull=heads to meet FINA competition standards in, swimming, waterpolo, and synchronized swirnming,, an instructional pool and a 'recreation pool with interactive water play features. Santa Clara Senior;Center Santa Clara, California I'ndoor'therapeutic lap, pool and 1.7 person therapeutic spa Santa Clara Community Pools Santa Clara, California Feasibility reports and construction estimates for the reha6i litation of three community aquatic, centers consisting of two .or more instructional and 'recreation, ,pools... Santa,,, Monica Municipal Pool Santa Monica, California 50 -Meter Competition ;Pool. and 25-Yard x 25 -Meter Instructional Recreation Pool •Sillman° Community Aquatic , Center Newariz, California 3,000 square foot Indoor Recreation 'Pool with interactive water play features, .2,600, square foot 4-Lane Lap Pool, 2,400 square foot Indoor Lazy River and Waterslide, 100 square foot Hydrotherapy Spa. United States. Military City of Petaluma Aquatic Facility Victoria Community Pool Riverside, California 50 -meter Competition Pool Renovation West Jordan Rec. Center West Jot clan, Utah 25 -Yard Indoor Lap Pool Freeform Recreation Pool with Waterslide Alcove, Interactive Water Features, Current Channel and Bubble Bench. Academy West Point, New York West Point Arvin Gymnasium Pools Complete Renovation of Indoor Aquatic Facility: 50 -Meter Competition Pool, 100 -Foot by Intramural. Pool and 75 -Foot x 30 -Foot Instructional Pool Team Experience