HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 6.A-Attch06 09/20/2004�l. Y
1
2
' 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
}p
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
21
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35'
36
37
.38
'39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
ATTACHMENT '6
Introduced by Councilmember
ORDINANCE NO. " N.C.S.
Seconded by Councilmember
PREZONING A 22. -9. ACRES .COMPRISED OF ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. , 019-
21.0 - 017;0- 01,.9, -02'6, -027, -03'0, -031 & -037 TO .PUI) (PLANNNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT), TO ALLOW FOR' 67 RES'1DENTIAL, LOTS' AND
DEVELOPMENT OF 63 NEW' RESIDENCES ,KNO;WN AS :'t-HE RIVERVIEW
SUBDIVISION, LOCATED AT MCNEARAVENJE AND MISSION DRIVE
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE .COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PETALUMA AS
FOLLOWS'
Section L. , The City .C_.ouncl, finds that the Planning ,Comm`issi'on filed with 'the City
Council its report set. forth in its minute's of °May I 1 and June, '8, 2004, recommending the
adoption of an amendment to Zoning Ordinance Section 10724 N.C.S. as amended, by
classifying and prezoning certain lands being snore particularly_ described as Assessor's
Parcel No. 019 -2`10 0 T7;. =0f%' -02'6, -027, -030, -031 &. -037 comprising the 22.9 -acre
Riverview''project site.
Section 2.
The City Council 'further finds' that said Planning, "Commi'sson held public
hearings on said prezoning on May 11 Wand' June 8, 2004, after giving notice of said
hearing, in the manner, for the period and in the form iequired..by said Ordinance No.
1072 N.C.S, as amended.
Section 3. � The City Council' .held a °public hearing on the Ri verview ;proposal on
2002, after giving notice; of said hearing in the .manner for the period and in the form
required by said.Ordinance No. 1072 N.C.S.,.as amended and considered all written and
verbal communications. Pursuant: to the provisions? of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072
N.C.S., as amended, the City Council finds as `follows:
1. The,;;proposed Prezoning of the Riverview property to' PUD is consistent. with the
Petaluma General Plan, and ,is in general conformity with the zoning regulations
of the City of Petaluma 'as described in the project staff report'. Additionally, the
Fire Marshal,, Police Department, and, the Engineering Division have prepared
conditions of approval to address safety issues and design criteria for grading, *site
improvements and. construct ion of the residences.
ATTACHMENT 6
Page 1 of 3
r
z 2. The public necessity, convenience and general. welfare clearly permit the adoption
3. of the,,Prezoning in that •the zoning designation will result in residential-uses that
4 are appropriate and compatible with the existing surrounding uses. The proposed
5 density, would be compatible w.'th the surrounding neighborhood: The project
6 plans present. a unified and organized arrangement of residential', J`ots and public
7 streets, appropriate to adjacent and nearby properties. Proposed landscaping
s would further insure compatibility. The proposed project would also require
9 review and approval by ' the Site Plan and Architectural Review Committee.
10
The: requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) been
.have,
12 satisfied through the preparation of an Initial, Study and the drafting of d,-Mitigated
13 Negative 'Declaration to avoid or reduce- to a level of insignificance, potential
14 impacts ,generated by the proposed project. In compliance with the requirements
15 of the California En viro nm ent al Ualit ;
. Q y Act- a n , Initial S:tt d wasp prepared :for
16 prezoning of the property to PUD., Based upon the; Initial Study : a determination
17 was ;made: that no significant: environmental impacts would result<- A copy of'this
18 notice was published in the Argus Courier and provided to residents and
1 :9 occupants within 300'`feetofthe site; in compliance with CEQ A �requirements.
20
21 Section 4. - Pursuant to the provisions of Zoning Ordinance No. 1072 N. CS., arid. based'
22 upon, the evidence it, has received and in accordance with the findings made, the City
23, Council hereby adopts an ,amendment to said Zoning Ordinance No. 1:0,72 N'C. S•.., so as to
24 prezone said property herein, referred to, =i ' accordance with the recommendation• of `the,
25 Planning Commission.
26
27 Section 5. - The City Clerk iS° hereby directed, to post this Ordinance for the, period 'and. in
28 the.manner.required by the City Charter.
29
30 IF ANY SECTION; subsection, sentence, clause or phrase or .word of this: 'Ordinancc is
31 for any reason, held to b e, unconstitutional, Unlawfu or Otherwise invalid ?by a 'Of
.court"
32 competent jurisdiction such .decision. shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions
33 of this Ordinance. The City Council of the City of Petaluma hereby declares that 'it would
34 have passed,,and adopted .this Ordinance and each, and all provisions thereof irrespective of
35; the fact that any one or more of said provisions be declared unconst unlawful or
36 otherwise invalid.
37'
38 INTRODUCED and ordered' Posted/Publishedchis day of
39
40' ADOPTED: this day of , 2004, by the following: vote:
41
42 AYES::
43
44 NOES':
46
a6 ABSENT,;
ATTAGII - MENT 6
Page 2 of
1
z ABSTAIN:
3
4
5
6
7 ATTEST:
s
9
10
11 City Clerk"
12
13
14
15 .
16 SACC -City Council\ Ordinances \Riven%il wWTT zoning.doc
•
•
Mayor
APPROVED AS `TO 'FORM:
City Attomey
ATTACHMENT 6
Page 3 of:3