Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 1.B-Minutes 11/15/2004, v r 9 ' . L � a City of'Petalu�ma : Cali,�orn d i MEETING�OF THE PETAL'U'MA CITY COUNCIL/ I85 PETAWMA C �^ OMMUNITY DEVEC PMENT COMM ISSION O • DRAFT City CouncivPCDC'Minutes` Monday November' 1, 2004 - 3,'0.0' P.'M: Regular Meeting 1 Monday,, November 1 ,:2004. - AFTERNOON SESSION 2 3:00: P.M. 3 4 CALL TO ORDER 5 6 A. R611 Call 7 8 Members Harris', Healy, Moynihan, 0 Brien, Thompson,. Torliatt and Mayor Glass 9 10 B. Pledge of Allegiance- Council Member,-O'Brien ® 1'2 13 PUBLIC COMMENT 14 „ 15 Peter Tscherneff, Petaluma, spoke r.,egarding`, veterans, religions and voters 16 17 'Hazelnut Wooderbe, Petaluma, spoke of crime and punishment and crimes for which she 18 believes the punishmenf, is unjust. 19 20 Vince Landof, Petaluma excluded Torliatt, Grass: and., Bierman from his comments. He 21 mentioned the garb ge;.behind Albertsons; by the railroad track and referred to Council 22 Member O'' Brien's 'statement in the voter pamphlet that he's for anything for the ,public's 23 good. He asked why he 'As not seeing thaf that is ;,cleaned up. He said Empire Waste has 24 missed street sweeping several - .times , over, °the'last few "months and ,picking up yard waste 25 as vwell.'He said- they are holding the people of the City hostage to get what they want. 26 He mentioned Rainier, noting that people who show up at meetings are. the only X27 ones who have the guts to come down:'here and;.speak- against it. He said that all the 28 people who claim they support it never show up but they want to .complain. He said that 29 a vote four years ago was taken and it was voted down and now it's being pushed 30 again'. 31 32 Lon Wiley, Petaluma, stated he would be back in two weeks; thanked Council and 33 invited them to visit the site. 34 35 Kirk Andrade Petaluma, spoke: regarding Rainier_ and said, that with so many traffic- ' 36 impasses th City, will eventually approve "R'ainier' He asked what consideration had 6' 37 been'given.to the impact of comrnuter trains on traffic. He , se.es building in the floodplain' °r ' 38 as a gamble that will create a large debt for future residents toI repay. l 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 2.1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3' 1 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Vol. XX, Page 2 November 1, 2004 Lynn Livie Petaluma, was frustrated with the closure of Lakeville Street ,from the Boulevard to Washington Street that has lasted from April until' December. She toted because of this,-'her street; - "Wilson - has been t`urned into a major .road with 300 trucks -, going by each�day /night (Clover Stornetta) - :7 DAYS A:WEEK 'She said taking, on the neighborhood and,stretching their patience. She - requested Council please divert traffic now while the' project`is being completed. Marvin, Livie, 'Petaluma, commended the City on street repairs. 'He mentioned that Wilson Street; one of the oldest'streets in Petaluma, had been. topped off so many tunes it has the highest crown of any - street in Petaluma and needs to be totally redone. He said the driveway culverts are plugged "up and requested help with this and street reconstruction - ,., Geoff Cartwright Petaluma, commented, on Mr. Andrade's 'staterents and the City's flooding problems. 'He, noted that, one of the candidates for Council; Karen Nau; stated she is, pro- development.. He said the City has had a lot of development ' and it has resulted in flooding, He stated he would vote for Thomas, ;Toliatt, and Burton -- and that accountabilitywas needed. CITY MA'NAG'ER COMMENT City Manager Bierman commented on the Corps project Wilson Street while Lakeville is closed. He: said the Corps had been 'asked to .pave - Lakeville this week `to open Lakeville so 'Clover Stornetta could use it. He stated , "the Corps .will let `the City know today if they can accommodate this. He also stated the City is doing storm drain and gutter clean out throughout the City and Wilson Street would be added to the list. COUNCIL COMMENT Vice Mayor Moynihan stated his concern about the City being a million dollars over budget, because of additional salary increases without additional revenue to cover this expenditure. He said this would result in spending the City's, contingency reserve in the next two years and' would affect its ability' to respond tto an emergency He asked Council to set up a special meeting dealing solely with the budget to .discuss 'what service cuts,and.layoffs would be necessary. Council Member Healy responded that the City would have o_ ne important piece , of the puzzle .in place when voters decide on Measures 1 A, and M. The results would let the City know what it-will have to meet its needs dnd make long - range, decisions. He, thanked the City:Manager, for his update on the Corps project and that would be great to have Lakeville reopened. He,stafed that Clover is trying to get approval for the Adobe Lumber site as distribution facility and this would reduce a lot.o.f traffic on.Wilson. He added, in respect to street crowning, the street committee recommended. to not address this issue because of the.cos't but he felt the extreme examples should be considered. Council: Member T,orliaft commented regarding Waste Management and yard waste pickup. She understood there were some changes in the routes that may have been part of problem. She stated she would be 'happy to look; at the 'Wileys' property as she usually 'does gook at' projects that Council reviews , for decisioh- making. She :said she had. talked to WKIson Street residents and wanted to be sure that Council keeps: the pressur,,e, on the Corps to get Lakeville opened up as 'soon cis, possible. She mentioned the United . Anglers, along with the neighborhood,; had a clean up.-.She said ' that while cleaning • ' 0 , • November 1, 2004 Vol. XX, Page•3 a " 1 garbage they "found an 18" Chinook,salmon --they rescued it and took it to the hatchery, 2 process to save the fish and mentioned the Anglers' She said s e _ 3 fundraiser :November h. She spoke . about the "Truth About Rainier Crosstown ". 4 Connector" "flyer ... 5 6 Vice Mayor' Moynihan ca "led. for ;a point of order and complained about campaigning 7 from the dais. 8 9 � � 1. Council Member '�To'rliatt',.continued.:" . and "that the" group stated it was local non profit 10 - a from Santa Rosa >;She said this group did talk to l fhe candidates to find out their 11 positions on this issue., She felt this was.an example of negative campaigning with half - 12 truths. and. as such, did not have a place in, the community: She urged everyone to 13 exercise their right to vote. 14 15 AGENDA CHANGES AND DELETIONS Changes to current agenda only). = None. 16 17 APPROVAL OF MINUTES 18 19 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 20 21 A. City Council Minutes of October 4, 2004 22 23 Co,uncilmembeh Torliatt clarified on Page 2, line 44 that she had said that, 24 "a lefter would be drafted to'ask for clarification of the mission, objectives 25 an'd godls` of the Water Agency with respect to .the best management 26 practices," ® 27 28 M /S: Toriiatt /Healy 29 CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 30 31 2. APPROVAL OF' PROPOSED AGENDA 32 33 A. Approval of Proposed Agenda for Council's Regular Meeting of 34 November 15, 2004. 35 36 Vice Mayor Moynihan requested addition of quarterly litigation report to 37 Closed Session. 38 39 Council Member Harris commented he would not be here on November 40 15th. 41 42 M/S Glass /Torliatf 43 CARRIED:UNANIMOUSLY 44 45 3. CONSENT iCALEN DAR _ `.CITY COUNCIL ANIJ;,PCDC 47 { ncil ' t`mu A discussion; cusi C,ou Member Council;M °ember 0 Brien asked to remove i e 48 Heal`' asked to" scussionI Council'M'ember' 'Torliatf "asked to y remove item C for d 49 , ,remove item D for discussion. 50 51 A.. ,. PC&C Resolution 2004' =18 Determining the 'Necessity of Expendirjg Fund '' 52 for the Planning and' Administrafi:on of "Projects, and Programs which Vol. XX, Page 4 November 1, 2004 I! 1 Facilitate 'the Production, Improvement, or Preservation of Low and 2 Moderate Income 'Housing for•.2004- 2005. (Gaebler) - This item was • 3 removed for further discussion: B. Resolution 2004- 203N.C.S. Awarding a Construction Contract for 2604 Re- Roof Corporation Yard Buildings- ProjectC100205` (Skladzien /Lackie) C. Resolution 2004 =204 N.C.S. Authorizing the City of Petaluma A. pply' for Grant Funds for the '2002 Resources Bond ,Act: "Youth Soccer' and Recreation Development Program," `Under the California' Clean Water; Clean Air; Safe: Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Act of 2002. (Carr) Thnitem wos removed for further discussion. Items,Removed from Con'sent.Calendarf or. Discussion A. PCDC Resolution 2004 -18 Determining the Necessity of Expending Funds for the Planning `and ;Administration of Projects and' Programs 'whic'h Facilitate the Production,. Improvement, or Preservation of 'Low and Moderate Income Housing for'2004 -2005. (Gaebler) Council Member O'Brien' asked for clarification of this resolution as a PCDC resolution since he thought Housing was under Community Development. City Mdnager Bierman explained this Was .because it was funded by Council Member O'Brien had a second question regarding the stated cost of the. 'proposal as zero - but $364,900 would be expended for planning and administration. Housing Administrator Bonne Gaebler explained this is a proportionate amount for planning and administration and was dllocdfed in .the budget. M/S 0 Brien /Torliatt CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY C. Resolution 2004 -204 N .-C.S': Authorizing the City of Petaluma ,to Apply for .Grant Funds for the .2002 Resources Bond Act.: "Youth Soccer and - Recreation Development Program," Under the CC1.lifo,rnia Clean Water Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks,. and Coastal Protection. Act of 2002. (Carr) Council. Member Torliatf asked to be recused; as the site is within 500 feet of her home. .Council Member Healy - asked for status report from Jim Carr: Parks and Director Jim Carr, stated this was to obtain a resolution to relocate' the: athletic fields at Carter Field. He became aware of a grant `program that `would help with some funding, under Proposition •' 40 to provide for' development of athl&fic fields. he stated the. ;generic ' November `l , 2004 Vol. XX, Page 5 NA . 1 resolution; before °.Council would indicate that Councilvas aware that he 2 would be�a P plyin 9 fo'the,stoto f&fhis grant. He explained there were ,two � p ossib l e j unior and a design 4' on e deNel0 ' " kHe F led he wou bmit applications for 5 both sites" this we.ek and when more formation was available,'he would ' 6 the grant applications: o contact the � tate and withdraw one f" 7 ., 8 P,UBLIOCOMMENT 5 9 10 Tro' erson, Pet" Petaluma National Little League stated he Y antl ., alpp l.. 1 i _ su orted the g lotion. He,said this was an °opportunity to meet p p 1 and have'�a , oubl process so that' the groups'who affected have 1 3 th'e o ortunit t0. s peak eak before= ' 'the move' pp .. y p takes. place. He wanted 14 C "ouncii; to consider that he undekstood if was a "dollar for dollar match 15 Trod the State, and we won't get, ° 'an , dnswe` r until the. summer., As we go 16 down this a d to do looking at both sites, t we t w� 17 we won''t prow where end u P : unt ��i s summer. We will lose our 18 fields a it - 'stands now apparently= -'it rnoy hot be cast in stone - we will lose 19 our"field as September Z 2005 I will get =one more season in where I'm at 20 for our 250 kids but then we will be moving, as it stands now. There will be 21 a. trem'endo'us time crunch wheh we do. find out if that money comes 22 avdila6ie to get those'fields constructed and "ready for play the following 23 February..The middle of February is about as soon as rain allows us to start 24 playing; we. start playing';" He stated 'that the new facilities would be 25 sm. alter than the current site because of the land Use restrictions on the 26 west side: He said that theywould.notask for more than what the current • 27 facility provides. He said that if the dollar for dollar match wasn't 28 obtained, -there would be a 50 %shortfall in the funding needed for the 29 project., 30 31 Council Member.Healy supported the idea of submitting two applications 32 and pulling one. as `a much better solution than trying to. choose a site this' 33 week and bypassing all the ``involved organizations -and public input. 34 35 Mayor Glass asked if it was possible to add any other sites. 36 37 ML Carr replied that unfortunately the grant had to be site specific and it 38 was unknown what' was going to happen; with the !Fdirground site since 39 theirlease extends to 2026. 40 ,4'1 Vice Mayor Moynihan stated that regardless of the outcome, the City 42 would ;',be losing two adult playing ,Jieids, He suggested identifying the 43 fairgrounds as a possible location for a 90 -foot field and submitting an 44 application for that. 45 46 one sup of the Fair Board; Mr.. Carr stated this co not bd without e 47 he did not think this would g port s a viable option, considenn the timeline. 49 w Vice Mayor Moynihan ,stated he ;thou h this uf work g Ian co at and 50 p in anoth wanted to kee' `the door o en: e wanted to' °' her a on. p p: H ppli 51 x Vol. XX, Page. 6 N,oyEkm,.ber I i 2004 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10' 13 14 15 17 1_8 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 '27 28 29 30 3,1 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 .40 �41 A2 - 43 .44 45 46 47 48 49' 50 51 t Mr; Carr stafed that he did not have ajoinf use ,agreement 'and nothing fro,r the governing ,body that said this was a viable option. Councilmember Ihornpsoinsaid that even, in a year, there would be 'n cledrer resolution regarding the fairgrounds, Mayor Glass clarified that McNear as a public park and the rela tionship with the Kenilworth Junior High, because of the � transaction made. ffiese sites . available if the City got the green light to go ahead,. and if'the City chose to pursue it, Vice Mayor Moynihan asked' specifically what the.City was going to do to replace. the.,tWo, 9U fields. W C arr ; stotedAhat looking at the existing inventory, he thought this use. could be'm I et. He said th6 schools are going to have to open up facilities for additioncilbse by the .community. He referred to the Recreation,. Music and Parks Commission and its endeavor to 'have a meeting with all involved org where they Would' identify problems with existing inventory and try to have them help th City solve the problem. 'He .-8did a tentative meeting with all'the !'users had been scheduled uled . for Novemoer 1r6. M/S- H,ealy/b Brien CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING V OTE: AYES:, Mayor Glass, Harris, Healy; O'Brien, Vice Mayor'. Thompson NOES: None ABS'ENT:. None RECUSED: jorlicift D. Resolution 2004-:205 N.C.S. Rejectin All Bids for the.. M6Near Peninsul ,Phase I Improvements Ptoject C400304. (Tuft) Counc.ill, Member Torlia.ft asked,' if access to McNear Peninsula could be, allowed. Director of. Parks and Recredt . ioh Jim Carr that Scott Duivon, Associate Planner in the General Pld Department, had, been worki with the architect, trying - to reduce the price. He said this item would come back to Council and after construction, begins in January /.February, �access could be allowed. Council Member Torliciff said this area had been closed too long and she ,wanted to get people out there even without all the - improvements' envisioned- Council Member Healy had a - question for staff. regarding value engi He asked if this was to determine what could be deferred, to a later phase or reducing the expense or quality of certain aspects. a �' m November 1, 2004 'V 0 'I. XX, Page li I al dim Ilk 7� , h V 116 S Cott Du Planner, General Associate. Plann G "eneral F Ian said it: would be a y � + 1 11 m m l otion of both`He sfa�tedl that t he foundation for the project would' " Fu 3 be+ deyelo ed�,,and improved over t me as additional money became r 4 available: 5 6 M S Tor 7,. CAIRRIED'Ut-- Nl3rien MO LLS LY' g, ', u 9 4. VNEINISH - ED BUSINESS 10 r. 1 1 S cond Readin Ado tion' of Ordindnce 2195 ,N C.S. to Establish Speed A e ; 9( p ) 12 n Various of Petaluma. (Skladzien) Limits o ri'ous Stre =ets Within,tFi:e City 13 14 Council;Mernbei Harris recused himself from the Hartman. Lane portion of 15 the °,lordinarice because of its proximi y to his home, and left the dais. 16 �„ 17 M/S Torliatt /H (Hditman; Lane' po(tion) 18 CARRIED "BY'THE FOLLOWIN'G'VOTE: 19 , 20 AYES r 41 Mayor ` Glass, Healy, O Vice Mayor Moynihan, 21 Thompson, Torli60 22 NOES: None 23 ABSENT`,: . None 24 REC USED'.1 Harris 25 � .. 26 Council Member Harris returned to dais., ® 27 28 ! Brien/ Ba M /S. O en /Heal B ' y ( lance of streets) 29 CARRIED Y 30 31, 5. ; NEW'BUSINESS '" 32 33 A. Resolution' 20047206: N.C.S. Amending, the Compensation for Part-Time 34 Positionsl' That Have F IkTime Equi`valenf Classifications and Amending the 35 Compensation for Certain Other Part- Tim e`Positions. (Robbins) 3 6 37' Vice Mayor Moynihan said this showed the proposed raises, but not 38 current" pay :rates; he asked where the money was coming from if it 39 was. budgeted? 40 . 41, Interim Human Resources Manager Pambla Robbins stated that these 42 were budgeted .items and this could no,t forward unless they were. She: 43 explained; the first page cleaned'rup .the currenf' <salaries and :reflected. 44 what was currently being 'ipaid.,- She •referred - to the second page 45 indicating the adjustments made by the Parks and Recreation 46 Department and funding. 47 48 Vice. Mayor Moynihan asked 'if. this was in the approved budget and if the 4,9 incremental costs of this increase was known. 50 . 51 City Manager Bierman explained these were budgeted and were 52 reflected within the budgetedr,amoun.t. Vol. XX, Page.8 November 1, 2004 Vice Moynihan explained his concerns about knowing what'.kind of money this would amount to. . Council Member, Torliatt stated that this was reflected in th - e budget and motioned. M¢S: Torliatt %Healy CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Mayor Glass,, Harris;, Healy, O'Brien, Thompson, Torliatt NOES: Vice Mayor Moynihan ABSENT: None B °. Discussion and Possible Action of Waiver Request from ,Meyers Nave Riback. Silver ,& Wilson Regarding Legal Representation of Sonoma Morin Area Rail Transit., (Bierman) . Council Member Torliatt', asked City ;Atforne,y Rudnansky about having his firm represent SMART 'with the City of Santa Rosa "s rail d'epat ,and if this would have anything to do With allocation o.f`funds for t. heir, - project. City Attorney .Rudnansky stated that he understood this dealt with mechanics- not funding. He said he: was not handling this and,t.hat Leann Goldberg was bringing, this to Meyers Nave from her previous firm. He said he would be involved with some..discussion.with SMART on the spur line in Petaluma and this should, be brought to Council's attention. Council Member Torliatt saidl that if this.had to do with setting up' a funding structure, or working on a development agreement for this project, Council would probably be doing the, same in the City of Pe.tdlum_a around the depot station. She said -she didn't know if there `would. be an inherent conflict because of how the funding was put together. City Attorney . Rudnansky stated that SMART just wanted Leann to conclude her work with Santa Rosa. Council,Memb'er Healy stated that SMAR,T'was relying on Sonoma County Counsel, office for most legal :matters. He said hr e understood this request; was limited -to environmental issues of the Santa Rosa ,depot and with this limitation ,he .did. not have concerns. Council. Member Torliatt stated she wanted to-'raise this issue so in the future the City Attorney would U6 aware. M/S O'Brien/Healy CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY C. Resolution. 2004 =207 N.C.S. Ratifying: Memorandum of Understanding Executed by the Duly Authorized Representatives of the City and the International Association of Firefighters local 14.15_ . for Employees of Unit7 (Firoj_(Robbir s) • • • Novernber T, 2004 Vol. XX, Page 9 r i o'I ry I , 1 v I I 2 I n � ' y Vice gdyor" Mo nih.an stated that this •was an additional pay increase 3 addin another million - dollar deficit. He asked, once again, what lay- offs„ 4 - and services would have toy be reduced. He was concerned about- 5 reducin reserves in case; o,fi an emer enc He stated these eo le are g g y p p 6 , overpaid relative to what is going:' on in the community. 7 8 Mayor Glass referred to the binding arbitration contract and that the Fire 9 D epartmen,t had a bhe' -year agreement. He' said revenues are up in the 1`0 City but :ther - e are some - economic challenges. He stated he chose to 1 1 allocate resources to retain quality employees in the Fire Department. 12 13 Counc Merr6,er Healy 'stated' ",that recruitment %retention were serious 14 issues in� �this community for both Police and ll'Fire. 'He said, the City was 15 behind i'comparable jurisdictions m!pay and benefits. He said this was a 16 Ii first- step b bring Pefalumd' %closer I to si,m'ilar jurisdictions. 17� a 18 Council,, Member Torliatf agreed:.with the Mayor and Council Member 19 Healy;, She isfated it was important to have labor peace in the community. 20 She said this helped.in the interim, while cities wait to see if 1 A passes and 2.1 as the Cify works towards economic prosperity-for the community. 22 23 Council 'Member Harris said he was, glad to respect and honor the 24 firefighters. 25 • 26 27 MYS: O' Brien /Thompson CARRIED BY'THE FOLLOWING VOTE: 28 , 29 AYES Mayor Glass, Harris, Healy, "O'Brien, Thompson, Torliatt 30 NOES: Vice Mayor, Moynihan 31 ABSENT: None 32 33 D: InfeddUction, of Ordinance 2196 N.C.S. Accepting Donation of a Parcel of 34 1.04 'Acres of, ,Real Property from Marina Office Park Associates and 35 Authorizing the City Manager to Execute a Certificate of Acceptance 36 Once Certdin Conditions Are Met.'(Bierman), 38_ City Manager; Bierman referred to;, a mapo in front of Council showing the parcel. 'He explained this I parcel would make it possible to extend the trail �0 fo being all the way th "rau tea ` Legacy who has a east't o pond right" to put a path through. He s - with 120 total parking spaces with $0 dedicate d,to the City. , y id'if it were decided MI association m eetin that maining area could not be turned fort'''He 44 �� �° "&6re i er to the City PA MO„ said it was in the City's interest PA would pay 'pay 45 , to laccept property for „trail and parking in the marina.,project area. 46 47 Council . Member Torii,att wan ' f oh regarding the discussion 48 i about the parking lot;, stating s e war ted e information :before the 49 second reading to determine if there were any financial responsibilities or 50 pro.rdta share of cost associated with this. She said she would like to see • 51 an exhibit shoving lot 4 and lot 5 that were being discussed in the staff 52 report because none of the attachments reflected them. Vol. XX,. Page 10 November 1, 2004 y g Cit ,Nlana er Bierman staged this : .information could be provided by the second reading on .November 15;. Council .,Member Healy asked if, this. parcel had a sewer main 'under it going out,to the oxidation ponds. City Manager Bierman answered it.does have sewer easements. Council Member. Healy said he thought Jt had the main line to 'link to the new wastewater facility and this was an even'better'reason to have iit. Vice Mayor Moynihan asked' what was the City was,going to do with' this property and why,was it necessary to incur the liabilities. City Manager Bierman explained1hat this would allow for a continuation of hike /bike trail 'throughout the, area and;it has an easement. He said that the. City is al member of MOPA and therefore shares some of the liability already. Mr. Carr explained that the property behind Legacy has a project pending to expand the. parking tot and a'l,bike trail that would ;go. all the way to Casa Grande Road next to Rocky Dog Park. He said this `would' give the City one more hnk toward the Shollenberger Trail and on to the new sewer treatment plant. He said the vision was to work toward getting a trail from downtown, all the way to the new sewer facility and connect with the Bay Ridge Trail as well. Vice �Mayor'Moynihan asked if the rest of the trail was owned fee. simple. Mr. Carr answered that the area to the westwas not ,owned; but the area to the east would be owned as a permanent easement. He explained that this parking helps the Marina' and the :new Workout Plan "that would change the type of boats - that "would be moored at the Marina that would make additional parking necessary. He thought for the future, this was good planning. Vice Mayor Moynihan clarified that the City was not asking .for an easement but a fee simple dedication and the City was assuming liability for the owner's association assessments for the parking and common area maintenance. City Manager Bierman explained that the, - City was already a member of M'OPA and there was an .assessment that would be 'increased' by assuming the 80 parking spaces. Council Member Torliatt: stated that this is what she 'was .asking staff to clarify before the second reading because if the.Council doesn't move it now, they could lose the possibility of getting this property. She supported the trail connection and motioned to request, an exhibit that would .be brought. back to Council for the second reading,'identifying lots 4 5, and the 80' parking spaces; and additional, information on, any financial • November 1, 2004 Vol. XX, Page 11 1 responsibilities that the Council may incur by the acquisition of this 2 property..~ 3 4 Vice .Mayor Moynihan asked about the proposed use and the Phase 1 5 Environmental, Assessment, how would this be done and when. He felt the 6 process seemed backwards. 7 8 City Attorney Rudnansky explained that it was conditioned on Phase 1 9 being completed before the transfer would be done. 10 1 1 -Vice Mayor :Moynihan said he was not sure about the timing and 12 questioned �)f the City was better off with it or without or if maintaining an 13 easement was in, the best interests of the community. 14 15 PUBLIC "!COMMENT 16 17 Borue O'Brien, Marina' Office Park Associates pointed out that the 18 donation must , be done by December 31,,,,2 1 004 tax reasons. He stated 19 they,have approval to build 24,000, SF of retail /office space. He explained 20 that ahei'r information shows ,there is a , sewer line on the property without 21 benefit bf an. easement: He stated this. would cause future conflict if the 22 development occurs and he wanted to .give it to the City to solve this 23 problem. He dded that under ' the rules of the Owners Association 24 identifying the, parking spaces could not „be he said they were not g P 25 designated'arid could be any where within "the project. He said they were 26 27 originally going to have 120 spaces but it was reduced to 80, reducing the City s cost by about $2000; he ,,aid if this was still an issue, he would 28 address this on November 15th. 29 30 Cit Attorne y Rudnansk y made note of .a procedural point - that this 31 resolution had to be - introduced unanimously because of the second 32 reading on the 15th. 33 34 M /S. Torliatt /Thompson 35 CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY 36 37 ADJOURN TO: CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION - 38 39 .- PUBLIC COMMENT - None, 40 4T ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION - 4:20p ;tn. 42 , (Government §54956(x)} City • AL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION Government 44 45 of sWNovb et al So_ noma 'Count Su error Cou •� CONFER, ITH ” ANTICIPATED Exposure to Litigation. ENCE W LEGAL COUNSEL - y I I LITIGATibN Significant 6 46 (Government Code, §54956.9[6]) (one matter,). 4.7 • CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL- EXISTING LITIGATION (Government Code §54956(a)) 48 Thompson et al:!VS. Cityof Petaluma (Thompson II)' U.S. District Court, Northern California, Case # C 03 50 • �C�O � E „ 0033EDL WITH LABOR NEGO,TI'ATOR G nt Co CONFERENCE overtime Code §54957.6. Agency Negotiator: 51 " Mich ael �B,iernan� and Unrepresented Employees. 52 Vol. XX, Page 12 Noyember 1, 2004 1 2 THERE WAS NO EVENING SESSION SCHEDULED. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ATTEST: 12 13 14 15 Claire Cooper, Deputy City Clerk 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 . 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 David Glass, Mayor 0