HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Bill 4.B 11/15/2004ii I Mo
CITY;'OFETALUMA, C ALIFORNL._
1
L
PETALUMA COMMUNTTY DEVELOPME NT "POVember 15.2
4
L
C „
AG A BILL
Agenda Title Meeting Date: November 15, 2004
y Approving the, Plans and Specifications
Prepared R 6 M
ion an _
Resolution T»ae "
' Presentation ®3:00 PM
b 'Pent Design and p
Approving the Project 'Budget, Awarding the Contract f6r the eetin ❑ 7 :00 PM
Installing " S ayfinding Signs Project No , Ena� i ,
Maximum `Total Project Cost: $664 ;500 Funded b
The City' y Central
g g y'
Business District Fund (3300).
Category (che
ck one) ❑ Consent;Cale�dar ❑i',Pub11e Dearing C1 New Business
Unfinished Business ❑. Presentation_
p a i ; Ia Con � 8 -45 umber
ED & Redevelo ment Drector �
hone 1V
Paul, aran e1T 8.1
Cost of Proposal $533;000.00 ,.: Account Number-
. Amount Bud eted $664 500 I ` u a ' 340.0- 54.151 - 0200603
�
g ; . Name of Vund: PCD & CBD
Attachments to Aiienda Packet Item
1 Cons Contract
g , he.Plans,,� Specifications; Approving the Project Budget., Awarding the
:owntown; Pedestrian on Sign Location Plan Directi
2. D �
3
'S! ag6Plans
Summary Statement
t am Design, worked' with �a Crt c mmittee program to direct vehicles to the
Kist o y ><n the: ar es The to i na e
one downtown 'and to ubhc arkm g g
Pen committee 'to to esi g
represented diverse interests such
design
P p g= g � P ..
as Chamber of Commerce, Petaluma Downtown Association visitor, ,s Bureau, Arts Council, ZAC
Landscape Architects and , City maintenance staff. After mu
tion between the steering, committee
d Pentagram, two signage des ;for full�,developmen
p y ch.mtera
an � . gns were selected t. The end! result, of the committee
was to .select the design of A' signage`. way- finding system, "Which was then .presented to SPARC for
y g gn �g January 8, 2004,
approval SPARC a " roved the, si non
pp pp final wa -findln si de
Bids were solicited on May 12 2004, Only 'one bid was: received, from James Nolan Construction for
$682,1'93. This amount exceede &`the previously budgeted amount by .$282,193. The bids were rejected on
review in
June 7, .2004: The project was then're, -bid on October . 29 2004? Slit 'bids were ,received. Contracting
pp Py . _ P ag r-
S'ervlces' was the 'a anent low bidder bid ack e• is available f o
er at x$302 565.12. A co of the
the City Clerk. s' Office:.
ag is to adopt "a resolution approving the plans and specifications prepared by
The, purpose of this enda item g
agr gn,. pp g p j dg ,. ntract to 'Contracting .
P�'P. "
Pent am Desl a room the ` ect" bu et and awardm .�� the,,;, construction co
Services f6r .
Recom resolution Act on/SuEges ed Motion p i
Adopt ��
p m PCD appr "ovmg the , lans and s eclf catlonssr prepared by Rentagram. Deslgl and
Redevelopment, staff, 'approving the project budget, and awarding the construction contract to Contracting
Services for $302 565 1 "2:
unanceal) ire
, -
Re�a a .b` 'AF'' " . � .• "etor:� Re�aew < 6" e ADD4 -Cit ;1Vlana er:;
eN ate
D
Toda ' t :, = Revision # and a e evised File Coder
Octob ` 29 O04 S \CIP Downtown Imps C200603'' (9053) \Wayfinding
h # (603W)\Design\330 =i'CDC Agenda Bills \11 -03 04
p
;b.aoe
F ®R.
REGARDING A RESOLUTI
D �Y PENTAGRAM ID�SIGN 'AND ��� TAE. PLANS A1VI)
DISCUSSION AND ACTION
SPECIFICATIONS'PREPARE DEVELOPMENT STAFF,
APPROVING THE PRO ,.;,. JECT BUDGET, AWARDING THL-CONTRACT FOR THE PETAI.UMA
WAYF'INIDiNG` SIGNS PR04E, C200603
1.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
agr Design y g gn ,g p gr direct vehicles to the
Pentagram Desi worked. with a Crt. committee to deli n a si a e ro am to dire
p g g As'sociatio tree represented diverse'iriterests
taluma Downtown. historic downtown and to public arkm m the g The �
such as Chamber of Commerce Pe Visitor's Bureau; Arts Council, ZAC
p y ag g � interaction between the .steering
maul much ,
Landscape Architects and City 'd S lectedfor fu
committee and Penta am, two si design a gnag y g y tem ewh c ent. The end result of the
gr
committee was to select the of a si a wa - findin' s h was then presented to
SPARC for approval'. SPARC approved the. final way- finding sign:design on Januaiy 8, 2004.
Bids were solicited on May 12 20 ecei
`04. Only one bid., was r
y ved from' "James Nolan Construction for
$682,1.93. This amount exceeded the previously" budgeted amount by $282,193. The bids were rejected
on -June 7; 2004. The project, -was th "en re -bid on October 29, 2004. Six bids were received. Contracting
Services was the- apparent low bidder.at $302,565.12. A copy of the bid package is..avai_ Table for review
in the City Clerk's Office. '
The purpose of this agenda - item.is °to adopt a resolution approving the -plans and specifications prepared
by Pentagram `Design, aappToying the> project budget and awarding the construction contract to
Contracting Services for $302,565 1,2.
2. BACKGROUND
Over the, past ten : years , the Crt: has receved`co Taints 'from visitor
City complain" s concerning poor directional
signage. Both the Petalu rna ntown Association and'-the, Visitors Bureau have asked that new
Dow_
and implemented. After extensive committee the
and SPARCeCinvolvementgnage program lie .created
signage become,a high 'priority In FY 2003 -0 ,
p 'the design was finally
accomplished.
the
e design work,
patron secondary Seconrdaril d a destrian si r a ern primarily In the. course of th owls were als gn g program
people P d future arkin ar es.
�'Y g
d igned t le into the resent an
P g g � as ect�was toy�P ,. � g system was
o du-ect ' once
''on the street A third p identify and design signage to
locations outside" of the city 'center such as the. Community Center, and the Santa_ Rosa Junior College.
The ro' am forthe city _ gn mp ti he future.
P _
was.deli ed for i lementa 'on t
In summary, the'work'of the: committee was to provide a recommendation_ for the design of signs that
Y g' g
u o t her character ,of'Petaluma, clean " legible, able to b , maintained by _City
crews and that would 'd
he visitor to the. historic downtown district and garage parking-
was re bid on October 29 2004. This new bid resulted in bids _as cause it was too expensive, the
After receiving only one bid on May 12, 2004 and rejectin&this bid be
_
project listed below.
CITY OF PE T ALg�vjt: 9 CALIFORNIA.
PETALUMA CommuNrry DEVELOPMENT C.ommisSIUN
AGEIVI)A REPOR
S
NAME OE'DIDDER,
TOTALL, BID
Engine Estimate .;
$,430,000.0.0 ,
Contracts Services
$302,56512
James`No1an Const.
'$3 ;32,960.00
Explore.General,.Inc � `
$378,203,00,,.
North Bay Const;, Inc.
$417,11,0:00
TieldStone Const -, Co
$442,280:00
Angotti & Reilly
$49.1,314.00
Contractin S
g ervices a Class A licensed construction contractor from Vacaville was determined, as the
lowest, responsible, responsive bidder. -
ALTERNATIVES -
A. Award-,"the n Pro'ect Th
_ J ere bid resulted in a responsive, cost effective project we1T within the
project'budget;, making; award,.at this time desirable.
A:, Reject:•nll Bids: In- rejecting all bids; the project can be re -bid in the future:
RNANcuL lrVeAcrS
The.FY 2004 05' ?CDC adopted bud g et'includes fu � ndin of $664 50.0 f6t the complete way nding sign
project. The low bid at; $302,565.12, is $;147,,434-0 Je. ss than the approved construction budget.
VV 04 -05 APPIIOVED. B EGET F OR WA YFT NDINGSI -
PROJEC'T C200603
3.
n
v
}
Authorezed by PCI)C Y
General :Fund Overhead
-$22 ;500 0Q
Design
$22,500.00
Administration
$3'4;SO,O:QO
Construction •Management
'$45,000:00
Construction
$450;000 00
Contin enc .. ".
g y
$90 ,000 00
Total
:$664,500:00
For awardin and man . in this cons
g ag' g traction contract to Contracting Services, we ,request, that the
following budget be approved -for the construction :phase of this project:
•
y
PROPOSED BUD GETTOR WAY'1NDINGSIGNS
PROJECT C200603'
C
Costs
Authorized by PCIDC
,I+'Y -Ni05
General Fund Overhead
$25400:00
Design
$25
Administration
$30,000.00
Construction Management
$50
Construction
$302,565.12
"Contingency
$100
Total
:$533,000.00
5. CONCLUSION
be en developed.and approved by SPARC. Bids were received and
are within project e budget Staff recommends awarding a contract to the low bidder, Contracting
Services.
6. OUTCONES.ORPERFORMANCE E ,_ .- MNTS'THAT WII:L�IIDMTTWY:SUCCESS OR COMPLETION:
g Snag pr g . implemented _
A wayfindin si e o am'is ' lemented by June 30, 2005...
RECOMMENDATION .
It is recommended that the P
.
CDG adopt the attached resolution approving the plans and specifications
prep y Pentagram gn developmen't.. staff, approving the revised project budget, and
awarding the constructio Dcontract to Contracting.. Services for $302,565.12.
•
ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION # 2004-
PE'TAI..IJMA COMMIJNTT "
�' I) PVELOPMEN'T;COMISSI0N
r
..
SOY:IJTION OFT CII'd'Y OF PETAEi7MA CO DEVELOPM NT COMMISSION
ARE
APPROVING THE PLANS AND - SPECIFICATIONS PREPARED BY PENTAGRAM DESIGN' AND
REDEVELOPMENT STAFF, TAE PRQJECT BUDGET, AWAKING THE
CONTRACT FO R THE PETAIXMA WAYFINDING, PROJECT NO. C200603
WI EPEAS, at its meeting of July 19, 2004 the PCDC adopted the 2004 -05 PCDC Budget and appropriated
funds'forthe Wayfinding Sign project and
7fM ItEAS, the Commission finds that the transactions, authorized in this resolution are consistent with and
uate the purposes of Californian .Comminity;Redevelopmerit Law (Health and'Safety Code Section 33000
et seq.); and
WHEREAS, of the amount a o at the 2004 OS PCDC budget, `$664,500 is currently budgeted for the
ppr pri ed to
Petaluma Way- Finding Sign Project, Project No.- C200603 ( "Project ") - and
' W HE REAS,
PC- staff have worked diligently with Pentagram Desi` to design an& prepare construction bid
documents and advertise for. construction of this. Project, and
REAS, accordance with Calif
in orn% PAlic Contract Code Section 0688.2 and other applicable law,
' a�
PCDCC, staff solicited bids for the Project; and
WHEREAS, the project was original , i t
' originally b'd on May 12, 2004 and received one (1) °bid; and
W1WREAS, the City Council rejected the bid on June 7 2004 because it exceeded the budgeted project
amount; and
WHEREAS, the project was re -lied on October 29; 2004 and six (0Y'bids were received and opened'in
accordance with applicable, law; and
WHEREAS, the lowest. bid Project I1
'd for the � contracting � was the bid' of Contra, ig Services in the amount of $3.02,565.12 '
and
WHEREAS; staff has 'determined: °that g
1Contractin Services bid satisfies -the = bidding requirements for the
Project; liand
WHEREAS staff has verified that, Contracting. Services posse
sses a valid California Contractor's License,
class A number 670447 that orm the Project; and
qualifie s Contracting Services to perf
I
WHEREAS,. the Project is exempt. from the California Environmental Quality Act .( "CEQA ") pursuant, to
Article 19, Section - 15301, of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations ( "CEQA Guidelines "),, because,the
consists of repair, maintenan f nse :and minor be. and thatlex�stin at the time of he determination o� X r fa �1'ities
project .
involving negligible or no expansio o y g emP •
on;
NOW, THEREFORE,. BE nRE b y y , t h e Petaluma C o m m u n i t y Developme,rit tommission hereby:
1. Determines , the above recitals are true and; correct and `hereby declared to .be findings 'of the Petaluma
Community Development Commission. .
2'.. Approves the Plans and Specifications Prepared by Pentagram Design and Redevelopment staff
PP. dg OO:00:
3. A roves` he:Pro'ect Bu in the�ainount of $533,0 .
4. In accordance with "Califoriva Public; Contract Code Section 20688.2 and other applicable law waives
any and :all non - conformities;, m..°the bid of Contracting Services for :the; Petaluma Wayfinding Sign ,
Project and firfds the bid of Contracting Services =to be the lowest, responsive bid.
5. Awards,the. contract. for the Petaluma Wayfiidin Si Project to Contracting Services; ui the amount' of
$302 565. T2 ,the amount o g
f the lowest responsible bid, conditioned on Contracting Services° timely
executing the project' contract .and, submitting all. required. ddocuments, including, but not 1united to, ,
executed , certificates' of insurance, and, "endorsenienfs; in accordance with the project bid
documents: 1
6': Direct staff to issue a,notice of award to Contracting Services.
7. Authorizes. and directs. the PetalumaCommunity Development Commission Executive Director °to sign
the ;,project contract on behalf of the, Petaluma Community Development.. Commission "upon timely
submission by Contraactmg Services of the executed project .contract, all other required documents;:. "
g , .but not limitedao executed bonds, certificates of insurance, and endorsements; `in accordance
mcludm '
with the project bid documents.
8. Furtlier,.authorizes ;the Petaluma, Community Development Commission` Executive Director to executed
on behalf O' khe Petaluma Community Development. Commission any and. all change orders and other
amendments to the project contract that necessary to effectively com dete'the; project and/or to .
realize project and/or cost. benefits for the 'Petaluma Community Development Commission, axed the
"public, g' as °su c f the total rd &go e d c this aggregate, do iot result an increase ui
so lon
excess of 10 percent o .._ p j amoun as P ified
9. Based on the
'foregoing ; ids that (i) the expenditur e of "tax ,increment. funds" to undertake °the Projects
f � _
set forth. m this Resolution will be of benefit to the - Project Area, (ii) no .other reasonable means of t
financing° the Projects are- reasonably available, (iii) ,completion of the Projects will eliminate blighting
conditions in the. Project Area; and (iv) completion of Public Iriiprovements.:is consistent with the
Implementation Plan of the'ProjectArea.
[7
a
Adopted °this 15th day of November, 2004 by the following vote:
II
. COMMISSIONER AYE , 110'_ ABSENT
-Gl
O rris •
Healy
Moynihan
O'Brien
Thompson
Torliatt
bavid Glass, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Gayle Petersen, Recording Secretary
•
Downtown: Pedestrian Direction - Sign Location Plan.
1 F'ad. Direction Sign
ti -: _
Y t �-` •; �'.k4 ',
'�vr•
Kentucky Street
. r6- a 3 y ; t
! _ ,:
.i
t;-!� :•f v r $ett.irif >k,..
Putnam Plan
Water Sheet Promenade
t_
'i '_ �'t �°r =- a z -
a,•.u>
ar
�`°'"°�`°°
:nn,emor,a.: '�`+(
River Walk .
Boulevard Cinema
p 5r- -, � t F
0
se.grrvren
Q. r,: �.oeu =.•,.
Museum
' si'' 1,2. _ csrnmrpc„
_�ma+rrwaes:nm �,-
¢
2. Ped. Doection Sign
^ Kentucky Street
Putnam Plaza
. `.. - •T! ...� .
. _ ,.
. -r _ ._ �+t_
- Putnam Plaza j S �Y' N = c! ,• yy
W t r Street Promenade __ Ivr��
- _ River Walk �..: ��•7 � s 7 v � ,��l� a
Boulerdrd_ Cinema
> Museum • .+ - -? n t ww ? ly 3 . t+ i
^ Downtown Garage'
4. Ped. Direction. Sign
^ Water Street Promenade
River Walk
Boulevard Cinema_
^ ltentucky,Street.
Downtown Garage - r 2T Crea iadldt ; D jj 3 t s7 P
r - t aleg
c i f iv' yy fdt e a Eat . ttr r f I s
- f�`� ��d'- �.;3� .�etlrar's{11i e •^ a , k z � i�:.
S. Ped Direction Sign
• . Water Street Promenade z ,+ y
River, Walk S., ( $ i
> Boulevard Cinema - _r " t 8 k- •� ? tee-.' i
Kentucky
ar Street
Downtown Gage"
> Putnam pla_z_a
i_ "Nl .} y�G i �. � � � .r r'•" " 4 GR � ;� r r � �� � . r � �-'� �f r �
t �
�
6. Ped Directio Sign'
G
Water Street Promenade r x• "'+_ s Yet. iti'k
River Walk
Boulevard Cinema
City Hag
�rLL r
> Downlown'. Garage
,�
r
:. _4'r. • F KI
7 Ped. Direchon Sign, B. Ped. Direction Sign 9 Ped. Direclon Sign it ID Ped: Y1. Ped. Direction`Sign: 12: Ped:. Dire (ion
^ Water Stree[ Frmmenade. ° Boulevard. Cinema ^ Boulevard Cinema > Boulevard Cinema Wafer Street Pmmana_ de. ^ .Wateripr t
RNer Walk Museum' rThealer,,
Boulevard Cinema Post Office Garage Theater Garage' ge` - Hls[ork1)uy ^r Walk
> Museum, •`Wafeiffont. 'WateflmnU
Rive
"
.. _ °< Boulevard. Cinema < Historic Downtown.
., - Dow ntown St Garage > Post OHlce > Downtovm Gara "
Pentagram CIIy;Hall Water Stre Promenade - ge Theater Garage < Boulevard Cinema
__ = > Downtown Garage Kentucky Street Shops _ - -
City of Potato- Waygnding ^Downtown Garage Kentoclry Street Shops . "Mrmerim
< Museum "" .
255epteinkei 2003 Vlctarfan'Hause Walk Entertainment,
� 9. Ped. Direction Sign
> Visitor Center
^ Historic Downtown
Waterfrom.
i
16 Ped Direction Sign
- Nsltor &.Transit Center
^ HistorliDowiriowri
I: ^- Boofivii i Cinema
17. Pad.:Direcllon ?Sign
Visit &,Tr Cent
HlstodeAcwntawn
^ Boulevard Cinema
16. Ped Direction Sign
Visitor &Transit Center
Go Pagle Plaza
Hfstodc Dowrdown -
Boulevard Cinema _-
Ken6chy,5treet .
15: Ped Direction Sign
< Water Street Promenade
'< Hi stori c Dow
^ Warehouse District
^ TheatecGarage,
B ufevard,Clnema
14. Ped Direction Sign
— < Waterhont
< Riv r,Walk
_< Hlstgrirpownfown
> Warehouse District
'13. Ped Direction Sign
< Waterfront
< Rlver Walk -
< Historic Downtown
> Warehouse'. District
•
18
J
Sigtolb-A]
OTPORTAYID
Th igA dvsip iu,u,rt
Side View
11
-Pentagram
han Frwiol�vo, (A 94103
F415.896.0555
Wil
Client (.'Ay of NW.'na.
ltol—�Iop—1
, I 1gmy
Job
City W.ayfindin
De—iinion
D.w
Or t, 0,11—r'2004
D No.
• 1.0
ltn,i,ion
0 7 Uctubor '2001
Frout
Back View
1/4"=FO"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
� \� t \�)! }� \\ }\ � �a \�
C-It, Hlidl
Fa irgrou-n
- o m y
Cen-te. r
�+g\
: ,
um�\ #+&Sign
3 PeiA g am '
�i. " s
T 415.896.0491)
«,-
y .
� «
,, m
D tion �{ a
O r
Smc,.
=r
D .
No. a
_ r . _ _
.D *. a� a Pole
� ter .. �.